4
|
Priya S, Dhruba DD, Perry SS, Aher PY, Gupta A, Nagpal P, Jacob M. Optimizing Deep Learning for Cardiac MRI Segmentation: The Impact of Automated Slice Range Classification. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:503-513. [PMID: 37541826 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is crucial for diagnosing cardiovascular diseases, but lengthy postprocessing and manual segmentation can lead to observer bias. Deep learning (DL) has been proposed for automated cardiac segmentation; however, its effectiveness is limited by the slice range selection from base to apex. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this study, we integrated an automated slice range classification step to identify basal to apical short-axis slices before DL-based segmentation. We employed publicly available Multi-Disease, Multi-View & Multi-Center Right Ventricular Segmentation in Cardiac MRI data set with short-axis cine data from 160 training, 40 validation, and 160 testing cases. Three classification and seven segmentation DL models were studied. The top-performing segmentation model was assessed with and without the classification model. Model validation to compare automated and manual segmentation was performed using Dice score and Hausdorff distance and clinical indices (correlation score and Bland-Altman plots). RESULTS The combined classification (CBAM-integrated 2D-CNN) and segmentation model (2D-UNet with dilated convolution block) demonstrated superior performance, achieving Dice scores of 0.952 for left ventricle (LV), 0.933 for right ventricle (RV), and 0.875 for myocardium, compared to the stand-alone segmentation model (0.949 for LV, 0.925 for RV, and 0.867 for myocardium). Combined classification and segmentation model showed high correlation (0.92-0.99) with manual segmentation for biventricular volumes, ejection fraction, and myocardial mass. The mean absolute difference (2.8-8.3 mL) for clinical parameters between automated and manual segmentation was within the interobserver variability range, indicating comparable performance to manual annotation. CONCLUSION Integrating an initial automated slice range classification step into the segmentation process improves the performance of DL-based cardiac chamber segmentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarv Priya
- Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa (S.P.).
| | - Durjoy D Dhruba
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa (D.D.D., M.J.)
| | - Sarah S Perry
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa (S.S.P.)
| | - Pritish Y Aher
- Department of Radiology, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida (P.Y.A.)
| | - Amit Gupta
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (A.G.)
| | - Prashant Nagpal
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin (P.N.)
| | - Mathews Jacob
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa (D.D.D., M.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chae A, Yao MS, Sagreiya H, Goldberg AD, Chatterjee N, MacLean MT, Duda J, Elahi A, Borthakur A, Ritchie MD, Rader D, Kahn CE, Witschey WR, Gee JC. Strategies for Implementing Machine Learning Algorithms in the Clinical Practice of Radiology. Radiology 2024; 310:e223170. [PMID: 38259208 PMCID: PMC10831483 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.223170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Despite recent advancements in machine learning (ML) applications in health care, there have been few benefits and improvements to clinical medicine in the hospital setting. To facilitate clinical adaptation of methods in ML, this review proposes a standardized framework for the step-by-step implementation of artificial intelligence into the clinical practice of radiology that focuses on three key components: problem identification, stakeholder alignment, and pipeline integration. A review of the recent literature and empirical evidence in radiologic imaging applications justifies this approach and offers a discussion on structuring implementation efforts to help other hospital practices leverage ML to improve patient care. Clinical trial registration no. 04242667 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hersh Sagreiya
- From the Departments of Bioengineering (M.S.Y.), Radiology (H.S.,
N.C., M.T.M., J.D., A.B., C.E.K., W.R.W., J.C.G.), Genetics (M.D.R.), and
Medicine (D.R.), Perelman School of Medicine (A.C., M.S.Y., H.S., A.B., C.E.K.,
W.R.W., J.C.G.), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd,
Philadelphia, PA 19104; Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical
Center, Maywood, Ill (A.D.G.); Department of Information Services, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.E.); and Leonard Davis Institute of Health
Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.B.)
| | - Ari D. Goldberg
- From the Departments of Bioengineering (M.S.Y.), Radiology (H.S.,
N.C., M.T.M., J.D., A.B., C.E.K., W.R.W., J.C.G.), Genetics (M.D.R.), and
Medicine (D.R.), Perelman School of Medicine (A.C., M.S.Y., H.S., A.B., C.E.K.,
W.R.W., J.C.G.), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd,
Philadelphia, PA 19104; Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical
Center, Maywood, Ill (A.D.G.); Department of Information Services, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.E.); and Leonard Davis Institute of Health
Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.B.)
| | - Neil Chatterjee
- From the Departments of Bioengineering (M.S.Y.), Radiology (H.S.,
N.C., M.T.M., J.D., A.B., C.E.K., W.R.W., J.C.G.), Genetics (M.D.R.), and
Medicine (D.R.), Perelman School of Medicine (A.C., M.S.Y., H.S., A.B., C.E.K.,
W.R.W., J.C.G.), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd,
Philadelphia, PA 19104; Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical
Center, Maywood, Ill (A.D.G.); Department of Information Services, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.E.); and Leonard Davis Institute of Health
Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.B.)
| | - Matthew T. MacLean
- From the Departments of Bioengineering (M.S.Y.), Radiology (H.S.,
N.C., M.T.M., J.D., A.B., C.E.K., W.R.W., J.C.G.), Genetics (M.D.R.), and
Medicine (D.R.), Perelman School of Medicine (A.C., M.S.Y., H.S., A.B., C.E.K.,
W.R.W., J.C.G.), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd,
Philadelphia, PA 19104; Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical
Center, Maywood, Ill (A.D.G.); Department of Information Services, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.E.); and Leonard Davis Institute of Health
Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.B.)
| | - Jeffrey Duda
- From the Departments of Bioengineering (M.S.Y.), Radiology (H.S.,
N.C., M.T.M., J.D., A.B., C.E.K., W.R.W., J.C.G.), Genetics (M.D.R.), and
Medicine (D.R.), Perelman School of Medicine (A.C., M.S.Y., H.S., A.B., C.E.K.,
W.R.W., J.C.G.), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd,
Philadelphia, PA 19104; Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical
Center, Maywood, Ill (A.D.G.); Department of Information Services, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.E.); and Leonard Davis Institute of Health
Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.B.)
| | - Ameena Elahi
- From the Departments of Bioengineering (M.S.Y.), Radiology (H.S.,
N.C., M.T.M., J.D., A.B., C.E.K., W.R.W., J.C.G.), Genetics (M.D.R.), and
Medicine (D.R.), Perelman School of Medicine (A.C., M.S.Y., H.S., A.B., C.E.K.,
W.R.W., J.C.G.), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd,
Philadelphia, PA 19104; Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical
Center, Maywood, Ill (A.D.G.); Department of Information Services, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.E.); and Leonard Davis Institute of Health
Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.B.)
| | - Arijitt Borthakur
- From the Departments of Bioengineering (M.S.Y.), Radiology (H.S.,
N.C., M.T.M., J.D., A.B., C.E.K., W.R.W., J.C.G.), Genetics (M.D.R.), and
Medicine (D.R.), Perelman School of Medicine (A.C., M.S.Y., H.S., A.B., C.E.K.,
W.R.W., J.C.G.), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd,
Philadelphia, PA 19104; Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical
Center, Maywood, Ill (A.D.G.); Department of Information Services, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.E.); and Leonard Davis Institute of Health
Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.B.)
| | - Marylyn D. Ritchie
- From the Departments of Bioengineering (M.S.Y.), Radiology (H.S.,
N.C., M.T.M., J.D., A.B., C.E.K., W.R.W., J.C.G.), Genetics (M.D.R.), and
Medicine (D.R.), Perelman School of Medicine (A.C., M.S.Y., H.S., A.B., C.E.K.,
W.R.W., J.C.G.), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd,
Philadelphia, PA 19104; Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical
Center, Maywood, Ill (A.D.G.); Department of Information Services, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.E.); and Leonard Davis Institute of Health
Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.B.)
| | - Daniel Rader
- From the Departments of Bioengineering (M.S.Y.), Radiology (H.S.,
N.C., M.T.M., J.D., A.B., C.E.K., W.R.W., J.C.G.), Genetics (M.D.R.), and
Medicine (D.R.), Perelman School of Medicine (A.C., M.S.Y., H.S., A.B., C.E.K.,
W.R.W., J.C.G.), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd,
Philadelphia, PA 19104; Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical
Center, Maywood, Ill (A.D.G.); Department of Information Services, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.E.); and Leonard Davis Institute of Health
Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.B.)
| | - Charles E. Kahn
- From the Departments of Bioengineering (M.S.Y.), Radiology (H.S.,
N.C., M.T.M., J.D., A.B., C.E.K., W.R.W., J.C.G.), Genetics (M.D.R.), and
Medicine (D.R.), Perelman School of Medicine (A.C., M.S.Y., H.S., A.B., C.E.K.,
W.R.W., J.C.G.), University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd,
Philadelphia, PA 19104; Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical
Center, Maywood, Ill (A.D.G.); Department of Information Services, University of
Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.E.); and Leonard Davis Institute of Health
Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa (A.B.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jain R, Yoo TK, Ryu IH, Song J, Kolte N, Nariani A. Deep Transfer Learning for Ethnically Distinct Populations: Prediction of Refractive Error Using Optical Coherence Tomography. Ophthalmol Ther 2024; 13:305-319. [PMID: 37955835 PMCID: PMC10776546 DOI: 10.1007/s40123-023-00842-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The mismatch between training and testing data distribution causes significant degradation in the deep learning model performance in multi-ethnic scenarios. To reduce the performance differences between ethnic groups and image domains, we built a deep transfer learning model with adaptation training to predict uncorrected refractive errors using posterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of the macula and optic nerve. METHODS Observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study design. We pre-trained a deep learning model on OCT images from the B&VIIT Eye Center (Seoul, South Korea) (N = 2602 eyes of 1301 patients). OCT images from Poona Eye Care (Pune, India) were chronologically sorted into adaptation training data (N = 60 eyes of 30 patients) for transfer learning and test data (N = 142 eyes of 71 patients) for validation. Deep learning models were trained to predict spherical equivalent (SE) and mean keratometry (K) values via transfer learning for domain adaptation. RESULTS Both adaptation models for SE and K were significantly better than those without adaptation (P < 0.001). In myopia/hyperopia classification, the model trained on circular optic disc OCT images yielded the best performance (accuracy = 74.7%). It also performed best in estimating SE with the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.58 D. For classifying the degree of corneal curvature, the optic nerve vertical algorithm performed best (accuracy = 65.7%). The optic nerve horizontal model achieved the lowest MAE (1.85 D) when predicting the K value. Saliency maps frequently highlighted the retinal nerve fiber layers. CONCLUSIONS Adaptation training via transfer learning is an effective technique for estimating refractive errors and K values using macular and optic nerve OCT images from ethnically heterogeneous populations. Further studies with larger sample sizes and various data sources are needed to confirm the feasibility of the proposed algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishabh Jain
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Tae Keun Yoo
- Department of Refractive Surgery, B&VIIT Eye Center, B2 GT Tower, 1317-23 Seocho-Dong, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Research and Development Department, VISUWORKS, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Ik Hee Ryu
- Department of Refractive Surgery, B&VIIT Eye Center, B2 GT Tower, 1317-23 Seocho-Dong, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Research and Development Department, VISUWORKS, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Joanna Song
- Research and Development Department, VISUWORKS, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Ashiyana Nariani
- Department of Ophthalmology, King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Selles M, Slotman DJ, van Osch JAC, Nijholt IM, Wellenberg RHH, Maas M, Boomsma MF. Is AI the way forward for reducing metal artifacts in CT? development of a generic deep learning-based method and initial evaluation in patients with sacroiliac joint implants. Eur J Radiol 2023; 163:110844. [PMID: 37119708 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a deep learning-based metal artifact reduction technique (dl-MAR) and quantitatively compare metal artifacts on dl-MAR-corrected CT-images, orthopedic metal artifact reduction (O-MAR)-corrected CT-images and uncorrected CT-images after sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion. METHODS dl-MAR was trained on CT-images with simulated metal artifacts. Pre-surgery CT-images and uncorrected, O-MAR-corrected and dl-MAR-corrected post-surgery CT-images of twenty-five patients undergoing SI joint fusion were retrospectively obtained. Image registration was applied to align pre-surgery with post-surgery CT-images within each patient, allowing placement of regions of interest (ROIs) on the same anatomical locations. Six ROIs were placed on the metal implant and the contralateral side in bone lateral of the SI joint, the gluteus medius muscle and the iliacus muscle. Metal artifacts were quantified as the difference in Hounsfield units (HU) between pre- and post-surgery CT-values within the ROIs on the uncorrected, O-MAR-corrected and dl-MAR-corrected images. Noise was quantified as standard deviation in HU within the ROIs. Metal artifacts and noise in the post-surgery CT-images were compared using linear multilevel regression models. RESULTS Metal artifacts were significantly reduced by O-MAR and dl-MAR in bone (p < 0.001), contralateral bone (O-MAR: p = 0.009; dl-MAR: p < 0.001), gluteus medius (p < 0.001), contralateral gluteus medius (p < 0.001), iliacus (p < 0.001) and contralateral iliacus (O-MAR: p = 0.024; dl-MAR: p < 0.001) compared to uncorrected images. Images corrected with dl-MAR resulted in stronger artifact reduction than images corrected with O-MAR in contralateral bone (p < 0.001), gluteus medius (p = 0.006), contralateral gluteus medius (p < 0.001), iliacus (p = 0.017), and contralateral iliacus (p < 0.001). Noise was reduced by O-MAR in bone (p = 0.009) and gluteus medius (p < 0.001) while noise was reduced by dl-MAR in all ROIs (p < 0.001) in comparison to uncorrected images. CONCLUSION dl-MAR showed superior metal artifact reduction compared to O-MAR in CT-images with SI joint fusion implants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Selles
- Department of Radiology, Isala, 8025 AB Zwolle, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Derk J Slotman
- Department of Radiology, Isala, 8025 AB Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Ruud H H Wellenberg
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mario Maas
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
De Santi LA, Meloni A, Santarelli MF, Pistoia L, Spasiano A, Casini T, Putti MC, Cuccia L, Cademartiri F, Positano V. Left Ventricle Detection from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Relaxometry Images Using Visual Transformer. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:3321. [PMID: 36992032 PMCID: PMC10052975 DOI: 10.3390/s23063321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Left Ventricle (LV) detection from Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) imaging is a fundamental step, preliminary to myocardium segmentation and characterization. This paper focuses on the application of a Visual Transformer (ViT), a novel neural network architecture, to automatically detect LV from CMR relaxometry sequences. We implemented an object detector based on the ViT model to identify LV from CMR multi-echo T2* sequences. We evaluated performances differentiated by slice location according to the American Heart Association model using 5-fold cross-validation and on an independent dataset of CMR T2*, T2, and T1 acquisitions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to localize LV from relaxometry sequences and the first application of ViT for LV detection. We collected an Intersection over Union (IoU) index of 0.68 and a Correct Identification Rate (CIR) of blood pool centroid of 0.99, comparable with other state-of-the-art methods. IoU and CIR values were significantly lower in apical slices. No significant differences in performances were assessed on independent T2* dataset (IoU = 0.68, p = 0.405; CIR = 0.94, p = 0.066). Performances were significantly worse on the T2 and T1 independent datasets (T2: IoU = 0.62, CIR = 0.95; T1: IoU = 0.67, CIR = 0.98), but still encouraging considering the different types of acquisition. This study confirms the feasibility of the application of ViT architectures in LV detection and defines a benchmark for relaxometry imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Anita De Santi
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, 56122 Pisa, Italy;
- U.O.C. Bioingegneria, Fondazione G. Monasterio CNR-Regione Toscana, 56124 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Antonella Meloni
- U.O.C. Bioingegneria, Fondazione G. Monasterio CNR-Regione Toscana, 56124 Pisa, Italy;
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione G. Monasterio CNR-Regione Toscana, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (L.P.)
| | | | - Laura Pistoia
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione G. Monasterio CNR-Regione Toscana, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (L.P.)
| | - Anna Spasiano
- Unità Operativa Semplice Dipartimentale Malattie Rare del Globulo Rosso, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale “A. Cardarelli”, 80131 Napoli, Italy
| | - Tommaso Casini
- Centro Talassemie ed Emoglobinopatie, Ospedale “Meyer”, 50139 Firenze, Italy
| | - Maria Caterina Putti
- Clinica di Emato-Oncologia Pediatrica, Dipartimento di Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Azienda Ospedale Università, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Liana Cuccia
- Unità Operativa Complessa Ematologia con Talassemia, ARNAS Civico “Benfratelli-Di Cristina”, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Filippo Cademartiri
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione G. Monasterio CNR-Regione Toscana, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (L.P.)
| | - Vincenzo Positano
- U.O.C. Bioingegneria, Fondazione G. Monasterio CNR-Regione Toscana, 56124 Pisa, Italy;
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione G. Monasterio CNR-Regione Toscana, 56124 Pisa, Italy; (L.P.)
| |
Collapse
|