Comparison of CT Lung Density Measurements between Standard Full-Dose and Reduced-Dose Protocols

A systematic assessment and optimization of photon-counting CT for lung density quantifications

BACKGROUND

Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) has recently emerged into clinical use; however, its optimum imaging protocols and added benefits remains unknown in terms of providing more accurate lung density quantification compared to energy-integrating computed tomography (EICT) scanners.

PURPOSE

To systematically assess the performance of a clinical PCCT scanner for lung density quantifications and compare it against EICT.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study involved a retrospective analysis of subjects scanned (August-December 2021) using a clinical PCCT system. The influence of altering reconstruction parameters was studied (reconstruction kernel, pixel size, slice thickness). A virtual CT dataset of anthropomorphic virtual subjects was acquired to demonstrate the correspondence of findings to clinical dataset, and to perform systematic imaging experiments, not possible using human subjects. The virtual subjects were imaged using a validated, scanner-specific CT simulator of a PCCT and two EICT (defined as EICT A and B) scanners. The images were evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) of lung and emphysema density against their corresponding ground truth.

RESULTS

Clinical and virtual PCCT datasets showed similar trends, with sharper kernels and smaller voxel sizes increasing percentage of low-attenuation areas below -950 HU (LAA-950) by up to 15.7 ± 6.9% and 11.8 ± 5.5%, respectively. Under the conditions studied, higher doses, thinner slices, smaller pixel sizes, iterative reconstructions, and quantitative kernels with medium sharpness resulted in lower lung MAE values. While using these settings for PCCT, changes in the dose level (13 to 1.3 mGy), slice thickness (0.4 to 1.5 mm), pixel size (0.49 to 0.98 mm), reconstruction technique (70 keV-VMI to wFBP), and kernel (Qr48 to Qr60) increased lung MAE by 15.3 ± 2.0, 1.4 ± 0.6, 2.2 ± 0.3, 4.2 ± 0.8, and 9.1 ± 1.6 HU, respectively. At the optimum settings identified per scanner, PCCT images exhibited lower lung and emphysema MAE than those of EICT scanners (by 2.6 ± 1.0 and 9.6 ± 3.4 HU, compared to EICT A, and by 4.8 ± 0.8 and 7.4 ± 2.3 HU, compared to EICT B). The accuracy of lung density measurements was correlated with subjects' mean lung density (p < 0.05), measured by PCCT at optimum setting under the conditions studied.

CONCLUSION

Photon-counting CT demonstrated superior performance in density quantifications, with its influences of imaging parameters in line with energy-integrating CT scanners. The technology offers improvement in lung quantifications, thus demonstrating potential toward more objective assessment of respiratory conditions.

Quantification of Emphysema Progression at CT Using Simultaneous Volume, Noise, and Bias Lung Density Correction

Background CT attenuation is affected by lung volume, dosage, and scanner bias, leading to inaccurate emphysema progression measurements in multicenter studies. Purpose To develop and validate a method that simultaneously corrects volume, noise, and interscanner bias for lung density change estimation in emphysema progression at CT in a longitudinal multicenter study. Materials and Methods In this secondary analysis of the prospective Genetic Epidemiology of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPDGene) study, lung function data were obtained from participants who completed baseline and 5-year follow-up visits from January 2008 to August 2017. CT emphysema progression was measured with volume-adjusted lung density (VALD) and compared with the joint volume-noise-bias-adjusted lung density (VNB-ALD). Reproducibility was studied under change of dosage protocol and scanner model with repeated acquisitions. Emphysema progression was visually scored in 102 randomly selected participants. A stratified analysis of clinical characteristics was performed that considered groups based on their combined lung density change measured by VALD and VNB-ALD. Results A total of 4954 COPDGene participants (mean age, 60 years ± 9 [SD]; 2511 male, 2443 female) were analyzed (1329 with repeated reduced-dose acquisition in the follow-up visit). Mean repeatability coefficients were 30 g/L ± 0.46 for VALD and 14 g/L ± 0.34 for VNB-ALD. VALD measurements showed no evidence of differences between nonprogressors and progressors (mean, -5.5 g/L ± 9.5 vs -8.6 g/L ± 9.6; P = .11), while VNB-ALD agreed with visual readings and showed a difference (mean, -0.67 g/L ± 4.8 vs -4.2 g/L ± 5.5; P < .001). Analysis of progression showed that VNB-ALD progressors had a greater decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (-42 mL per year vs -32 mL per year; Tukey-adjusted P = .002). Conclusion Simultaneously correcting volume, noise, and interscanner bias for lung density change estimation in emphysema progression at CT improved repeatability analyses and agreed with visual readings. It distinguished between progressors and nonprogressors and was associated with a greater decline in lung function metrics. Clinical trial registration no. NCT00608764 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Goo in this issue.

Baseline characteristics from a 3-year longitudinal study to phenotype subjects with COPD: the FOOTPRINTS study

BACKGROUND

FOOTPRINTS® is a prospective, longitudinal, 3-year study assessing the association between biomarkers of inflammation/lung tissue destruction and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) severity and progression in ex-smokers with mild-to-severe COPD. Here, we present baseline characteristics and select biomarkers of study subjects.

METHODS

The methodology of FOOTPRINTS® has been published previously. The study population included ex-smokers with a range of COPD severities (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] stages 1-3), ex-smokers with COPD and alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency (A1ATD) and a control group of ex-smokers without airflow limitation (EwAL). At study entry, data were collected for: demographics, disease characteristics, history of comorbidities and COPD exacerbations, symptoms, lung function and volume, exercise capacity, soluble biomarkers, and quantitative and qualitative computed tomography. Baseline data are presented with descriptive statistical comparisons for soluble biomarkers in the individual GOLD and A1ATD groups versus EwAL.

RESULTS

In total, 463 subjects were enrolled. The per-protocol set comprised 456 subjects, mostly male (64.5%). The mean (standard deviation) age was 60.7 (6.9) years. At baseline, increasing pulmonary symptoms, worse lung function, increased residual volume, reduced diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) and greater prevalence of centrilobular emphysema were observed with increasing disease severity amongst GOLD 1-3 subjects. Subjects with A1ATD (n = 19) had similar lung function parameters to GOLD 2-3 subjects, a high residual volume comparable to GOLD 3 subjects, and similar air trapping to GOLD 2 subjects. Compared with EwAL (n = 61), subjects with A1ATD had worse lung function, increased residual volume, reduced DLco, and a greater prevalence of confluent or advanced destructive emphysema. The soluble inflammatory biomarkers white blood cell count, fibrinogen, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and plasma surfactant protein were higher in GOLD 1-3 groups than in the EwAL group. Interleukin-6 was expressed less often in EwAL subjects compared with subjects in the GOLD and A1ATD groups. Soluble receptor for advanced glycation end product was lowest in GOLD 3 subjects, indicative of more severe emphysema.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide context for upcoming results from FOOTPRINTS®, which aims to establish correlations between biomarkers and disease progression in a representative COPD population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02719184, study start date 13/04/2016.

Heterogeneity and Progression of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Emphysema-Predominant and Non-Emphysema-Predominant Disease

While variation in emphysema severity between patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is well-recognized, clinically applicable definitions of the emphysema-predominant disease (EPD) and non-emphysema-predominant disease (NEPD) subtypes have not been established. To study the clinical relevance of the EPD and NEPD subtypes, we tested the association of these subtypes with prospective decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and mortality among 3,427 subjects with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) spirometric grade 2-4 COPD at baseline in the Genetic Epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) Study, an ongoing national multicenter study that started in 2007. NEPD was defined as airflow obstruction with less than 5% computed tomography (CT) quantitative densitometric emphysema at -950 Hounsfield units, and EPD was defined as airflow obstruction with 10% or greater CT emphysema. Mixed-effects models for FEV1 demonstrated larger average annual FEV1 loss in EPD subjects than in NEPD subjects (-10.2 mL/year; P < 0.001), and subtype-specific associations with FEV1 decline were identified. Cox proportional hazards models showed higher risk of mortality among EPD patients versus NEPD patients (hazard ratio = 1.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.34, 1.60; P < 0.001). To determine whether the NEPD/EPD dichotomy is captured by previously described COPDGene subtypes, we used logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to predict NEPD/EPD membership using these previous subtype definitions. The analysis generally showed excellent discrimination, with areas under the ROC curve greater than 0.9. The NEPD and EPD COPD subtypes capture important aspects of COPD heterogeneity and are associated with different rates of disease progression and mortality.

Findings on High Resolution Computed Tomography in Symptomatic Veterans with Deployment-Related Lung Disease

PURPOSE

Military deployment to dusty, austere environments in Southwest Asia and Afghanistan is associated with symptomatic airways diseases including asthma and bronchiolitis. The utility of chest high-resolution computed tomographic (HRCT) imaging in lung disease diagnosis in this population is poorly understood. We investigated visual assessment of HRCT for identifying deployment-related lung disease compared with healthy controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chest HRCT images from 46 healthy controls and 45 symptomatic deployed military personnel with clinically confirmed asthma and/or biopsy-confirmed distal lung disease were scored by 3 independent thoracic radiologists. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics and frequency of imaging findings between deployers and controls, and between deployers with asthma and those with biopsy-confirmed distal lung disease, using χ2, Fisher exact or t tests, and logistic regression where appropriate. We also analyzed inter-rater agreement for imaging findings.

RESULTS

Expiratory air trapping was the only chest CT imaging finding that was significantly more frequent in deployers compared with controls. None of the 24 deployers with biopsy-confirmed bronchiolitis and/or granulomatous pneumonitis had HRCT findings of inspiratory mosaic attenuation or centrilobular nodularity. Only 2 of 21 with biopsy-proven emphysema had emphysema on HRCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with surgical lung biopsy, visual assessment of HRCT showed few abnormalities in this small cohort of previously deployed symptomatic veterans with normal or near-normal spirometry.

Radiomics for Improved Detection of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Low-Dose and Standard-Dose Chest CT Scans

Background Approximately half of adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remain undiagnosed. Chest CT scans are frequently acquired in clinical practice and present an opportunity to detect COPD. Purpose To assess the performance of radiomics features in COPD diagnosis using standard-dose and low-dose CT models. Materials and Methods This secondary analysis included participants enrolled in the Genetic Epidemiology of COPD, or COPDGene, study at baseline (visit 1) and 10 years after baseline (visit 3). COPD was defined by a forced expiratory volume in the 1st second of expiration to forced vital capacity ratio less than 0.70 at spirometry. The performance of demographics, CT emphysema percentage, radiomics features, and a combined feature set derived from inspiratory CT alone was evaluated. CatBoost (Yandex), a gradient boosting algorithm, was used to perform two classification experiments to detect COPD; the two models were trained and tested on standard-dose CT data from visit 1 (model I) and low-dose CT data from visit 3 (model II). Classification performance of the models was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and precision-recall curve analysis. Results A total of 8878 participants (mean age, 57 years ± 9 [SD]; 4180 female, 4698 male) were evaluated. Radiomics features in model I achieved an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.91) in the standard-dose CT test cohort versus demographics (AUC, 0.73; 95% CI: 0.71, 0.76; P < .001), emphysema percentage (AUC, 0.82; 95% CI 0.80, 0.84; P < .001), and combined features (AUC, 0.90; 95% CI: 0.89, 0.92; P = .16). Model II, trained on low-dose CT scans, achieved an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83, 0.91) on the 20% held-out test set for radiomics features compared with demographics (AUC, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.75; P = .001), emphysema percentage (AUC, 0.74; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.79; P = .002), and combined features (AUC, 0.88; 95% CI: 0.85, 0.92; P = .32). Density and texture features were the majority of the top 10 features in the standard-dose model, whereas shape features of lungs and airways were significant contributors in the low-dose CT model. Conclusion A combination of features representing parenchymal texture and lung and airway shape on inspiratory CT scans can be used to accurately detect COPD. ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT00608764 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Vliegenthart in this issue.

Quantitative CT Evaluation of Emphysema Progression over 10 Years in the COPDGene Study

Background Long-term studies of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can evaluate emphysema progression. Adjustment for differences in equipment and scanning protocols of individual CT examinations have not been studied extensively. Purpose To evaluate emphysema progression in current and former smokers in the COPDGene cohort over three imaging points obtained at 5-year intervals accounting for individual CT parameters. Materials and Methods Current and former cigarette smokers enrolled between 2008 and 2011 from the COPDGene study were prospectively followed for 10 years between 2008 and 2020. Extent of emphysema as adjusted lung density (ALD) from quantitative CT was measured at baseline and at 5- and 10-year follow-up. Linear mixed models adjusted for CT technical characteristics were constructed to evaluate emphysema progression. Mean annual changes in ALD over consecutive 5-year study periods were estimated by smoking status and baseline emphysema. Results Of 8431 participants at baseline (mean age, 60 years ± 9 [SD]; 3905 female participants), 4913 were at 5-year follow-up and 1544 participants were at 10-year follow-up. There were 4134 (49%) participants who were current smokers, and 4449 (53%) participants had more than trace emphysema at baseline. Current smokers with more than trace emphysema showed the largest decline in ALD, with mean annual decreases of 1.4 g/L (95% CI: 1.2, 1.5) in the first 5 years and 0.9 g/L (95% CI: 0.7, 1.2) in the second 5 years. Accounting for CT noise, field of view, and scanner model improved model fit for estimation of emphysema progression (P < .001 by likelihood ratio test). Conclusion Evaluation at CT of emphysema progression in the COPDGene study showed that, during the span of 10 years, participants with pre-existing emphysema who continued smoking had the largest decline in ALD. Adjusting for CT equipment and protocol factors improved these longitudinal estimates. Clinical trial registration no. NCT00608764 © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See the editorial by Parraga and Kirby in this issue.

Quantitative imaging analysis detects subtle airway abnormalities in symptomatic military deployers

Background

Exposure to inhalational hazards during post-9/11 deployment to Southwest Asia and Afghanistan puts military personnel at risk for respiratory symptoms and disease. Pulmonary function and qualitative chest high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) are often normal in “deployers” with persistent respiratory symptoms. We explored the utility of quantitative HRCT imaging markers of large and small airways abnormalities, including airway wall thickness, emphysema, and air trapping, in symptomatic deployers with clinically-confirmed lung disease compared to controls.

Methods

Chest HRCT images from 45 healthy controls and 82 symptomatic deployers with asthma, distal lung disease or both were analyzed using Thirona Lung quantification software to calculate airway wall thickness (by Pi10), emphysema (by percentage of lung volume with attenuation < -950 Hounsfield units [LAA%-950]), and three parameters of air trapping (expiratory/inspiratory total lung volume and mean lung density ratios, and LAA%-856). SAS v.9.4 was used to compare demographic and clinical characteristics between deployers and controls using Chi-Square, Fisher Exact or t-tests. Linear regression was used to assess relationships between pulmonary function and quantitative imaging findings.

Results

Gender and smoking status were not statistically significantly different between groups, but deployers were significantly younger than controls (42 vs 58 years, p < 0.0001), had higher body mass index (31 vs 28 kg/m², p = 0.01), and had fewer total smoking pack-years (8 vs. 26, p = 0.007). Spirometric measures were not statistically significantly different between groups. Pi10 and LAA%-950 were significantly elevated in deployers compared to controls in unadjusted analyses, with the emphysema measure remaining significantly higher in deployers after adjustment for age, sex, smoking, BMI, and expiratory total lung volume. Air trapping parameters were more common in control images, likely due to differences in age and smoking between groups. Among deployers, LAA%-950 and Pi10 were significantly correlated with spirometric markers of obstruction based on ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) and/or percent predicted FEV1.

Conclusions

Quantitative chest HRCT imaging analysis identifies emphysema in deployers with asthma and distal lung disease, and may be useful in detecting and monitoring deployment-related lung disease in a population where spirometry is typically normal.