Patient personalized translational tools in cystic fibrosis to transform data from bench to bed-side and back

Validating organoid-derived human intestinal monolayers for personalized therapy in cystic fibrosis

Highly effective drugs modulating the defective protein encoded by the CFTR gene have revolutionized cystic fibrosis (CF) therapy. Preclinical drug-testing on human nasal epithelial (HNE) cell cultures and 3-dimensional human intestinal organoids (3D HIO) are used to address patient-specific variation in drug response and to optimize individual treatment for people with CF. This study is the first to report comparable CFTR functional responses to CFTR modulator treatment among patients with different classes of CFTR gene variants using the three methods of 2D HIO, 3D HIO, and HNE. Furthermore, 2D HIO showed good correlation to clinical outcome markers. A larger measurable CFTR functional range and access to the apical membrane were identified as advantages of 2D HIO over HNE and 3D HIO, respectively. Our study thus expands the utility of 2D intestinal monolayers as a preclinical drug testing tool for CF.

Rescue of Rare CFTR Trafficking Mutants Highlights a Structural Location-Dependent Pattern for Correction

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease caused by mutations in the gene encoding the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) channel. Currently, more than 2100 variants have been identified in the gene, with a large number being very rare. The approval of modulators that act on mutant CFTR protein, correcting its molecular defect and thus alleviating the burden of the disease, revolutionized the field of CF. However, these drugs do not apply to all patients with CF, especially those with rare mutations-for which there is a lack of knowledge on the molecular mechanisms of the disease and the response to modulators. In this work, we evaluated the impact of several rare putative class II mutations on the expression, processing, and response of CFTR to modulators. Novel cell models consisting of bronchial epithelial cell lines expressing CFTR with 14 rare variants were created. The variants studied are localized at Transmembrane Domain 1 (TMD1) or very close to the signature motif of Nucleotide Binding Domain 1 (NBD1). Our data show that all mutations analyzed significantly decrease CFTR processing and while TMD1 mutations respond to modulators, those localized in NBD1 do not. Molecular modeling calculations confirm that the mutations in NBD1 induce greater destabilization of CFTR structure than those in TMD1. Furthermore, the structural proximity of TMD1 mutants to the reported binding site of CFTR modulators such as VX-809 and VX-661, make them more efficient in stabilizing the CFTR mutants analyzed. Overall, our data suggest a pattern for mutation location and impact in response to modulators that correlates with the global effect of the mutations on CFTR structure.

Assays of CFTR Function In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo

Cystic fibrosis, a multi-organ genetic disease, is characterized by abnormal function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, a chloride channel at the apical membrane of several epithelia. In recent years, therapeutic strategies have been developed to correct the CFTR defect. To evaluate CFTR function at baseline for diagnosis, or the efficacy of CFTR-restoring therapy, reliable tests are needed to measure CFTR function, in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. In vitro techniques either directly or indirectly measure ion fluxes; direct measurement of ion fluxes and quenching of fluorescence in cell-based assays, change in transmembrane voltage or current in patch clamp or Ussing chamber, swelling of CFTR-containing organoids by secondary water influx upon CFTR activation. Several cell or tissue types can be used. Ex vivo and in vivo assays similarly evaluate current (intestinal current measurement) and membrane potential differences (nasal potential difference), on tissues from individual patients. In the sweat test, the most frequently used in vivo evaluation of CFTR function, chloride concentration or stimulated sweat rate can be directly measured. Here, we will describe the currently available bio-assays for quantitative evaluation of CFTR function, their indications, advantages and disadvantages, and correlation with clinical outcome measures.