Interaction between stimulants of exocrine pancreatic secretion in dogs

Pancreatic bicarbonate response to intraduodenal tryptophan in dogs: role of muscarinic M1-receptors and cholecystokinin

CONCLUSIONS

In dogs, 1. Activation of cholecystokinin-receptors is needed for an adequate pancreatic bicarbonate response to secretin; 2. Cholinergic nerve fibers ending on M1-receptors are probably of little or no importance for the bicarbonate response to secretin in the given dose; 3. The bicarbonate response to tryptophan, given with a secretin background, is controlled by cholinergic M1-fibers and by cholecystokinin; 4. M1-fibers mainly mediate the bicarbonate response to low loads of tryptophan, whereas cholecystokinin controls the response to low and high loads of tryptophan; and 5. Both mediators interact in a synergistic manner.

METHODS

In six conscious dogs with chronic gastric and duodenal fistulas, we compared the action of the M1-receptor antagonist telenzepine (20.25-81.0 nmol/kg/h), the cholecystokinin-receptor antagonist L-364,718 (0.025-0.1 mg/kg/h), and combinations of both on the pancreatic bicarbonate response to graded loads of intraduodenal tryptophan (0.37-10.0 mmol/h), given against a background of secretin (20.5 pmol/kg/h).

RESULTS

Secretin significantly (p < 0.05) stimulated the pancreatic bicarbonate output above basal levels. All doses of L-374,718, but not telenzepine, significantly decreased the bicarbonate response to secretin by up to 64%. Additional administration of telenzepine together with L-364,718 had no further inhibitory effect on the secretin-stimulated bicarbonate output as compared to L-364,718 given alone. All loads of tryptophan significantly increased the bicarbonate output over that seen with secretin alone (= incremental bicarbonate response to tryptophan). Telenzepine significantly decreased the incremental bicarbonate response to the two lower loads (0.37-1.1 mmol/h) of tryptophan (by 82-124%); L-364,718 decreased the incremental bicarbonate response to all loads of tryptophan (by 50-118%). The incremental bicarbonate output, as well as the 180-min integrated bicarbonate response to all loads of tryptophan, were abolished by all combinations of both antagonists.

Effects of CCK-8 in combination with natural or synthetic secretin on amylase, lipase, trypsin, and chymotrypsin secretion in rats

In the present study, we examined the interaction between CCK-8 and natural or synthetic secretin on pancreatic enzyme secretion. On anaesthetized rats, a proximal duodenal segment was continuously perfused with saline and amylase, lipase, trypsin, and chymotrypsin were determined in the perfusate. Neither during iv saline nor during iv secretin (natural or synthetic) at doses of 0.01, 0.05, or 0.1 CU/kg/h, any of the four enzymes changed significantly from basal values over a period of 100 min. Iv CCK-8 at stepwise increasing doses of 5, 10, and 20 pmol/kg/h elicited a significant increase of all four enzymes at the medium dose, with a further increase of amylase and trypsin, but not lipase and chymotrypsin at 20 pmol/kg/h. The addition of secretin at all 3 doses potentiated CCK-induced trypsin output. The effects of natural secretin were more pronounced than those of the synthetic peptide. Secretin significantly increased amylase secretion over basal at the lowest dose of CCK-8 (5 pmol/kg/h) that by itself had no effect on amylase release. Only the higher doses of natural but not synthetic secretin augmented lipase secretion during the lowest dose of CCK-8. Both forms of secretin had no further stimulatory effect on CCK-induced chymotrypsin secretion. The present data demonstrate that, first, in rats a potentiation of CCK-8-induced enzyme secretion by low doses of secretin is different for the four enzymes, which suggests a differential regulatory action of these two intestinal hormones on pancreatic enzyme release. Second, the different effects of natural secretin may represent those of contaminants suggesting that only synthetic secretin should be employed in future studies of this peptide on pancreatic enzyme secretion.

Pancreatic enzyme response to a liquid meal and to hormonal stimulation. Correlation with plasma secretin and cholecystokinin levels

Pancreatic trypsin output and plasma secretin and cholecystokinin (CCK) levels were measured in five healthy volunteers to investigate the mechanisms involved in regulating postprandial pancreatic secretion. The pancreas was stimulated by a liquid test meal or by either intravenous secretin (1-82 pmol/kg-1 per h-1) or caerulein, a CCK analogue (2.3-37 pmol/kg-1 per h-1), or by a combination of secretin and caerulein. Pancreatic secretion was assessed by a marker perfusion technique (polyethylene glycol [PEG 4000]), plasma secretin, and CCK by specific radioimmunoassays. Increasing doses of secretin produced increasing bicarbonate output (P less than 0.01), whereas trypsin was not stimulated over basal. Graded caerulein produced a stepwise increase in trypsin and bicarbonate output (P less than 0.01). Potentiation occurred for bicarbonate secretion between secretin and caerulein, but not for trypsin output. Postprandial trypsin secretion averaged 29.1 IU/min-1 over 150 min (equal to 55% of maximal response to caerulein). The peak trypsin response amounted to 90% of maximal caerulein. Significant increases of plasma secretion (P less than 0.05) and CCK (P less than 0.01) were observed after the meal. Comparison of enzyme and CCK responses to the testmeal or to exogenous caerulein suggested that the amount of CCK released after the meal could account for the postprandial trypsin secretion. We conclude that (a) the postprandial enzyme response in man is submaximal in comparison to maximal exogenous hormone stimulation; (b) CCK is a major stimulatory mechanism of postprandial trypsin secretion, whereas secretin is not involved; and (c) Potentiation of enzyme secretion is not a regulatory mechanism of the postprandial secretory response.