Reply to "Letter to the Editor: Pulmonary toxicity of electronic cigarettes: more doubts than certainties"

User-Perceived Negative Respiratory Symptoms Associated with Electronic Cigarette Use

INTRODUCTION

Electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) expose users to an aerosol containing chemicals, which could affect the respiratory system negatively. This study examined negative respiratory symptoms associated with ECIG use.

METHODS

In 2019, adult current ECIG users from 24 US states who reported experiencing negative respiratory symptoms from ECIG use (n = 49; 44.9% women; mean age = 35.2, SD = 11.5) completed an online survey and brainstormed statements that completed the prompt: "A specific negative effect or symptom related to my breathing, nose, mouth, throat, or lungs that I have experienced from vaping/using my e-cigarette is..." Participants sorted the final list of 56 statements into groups of similar content and rated statements on how true they were for them. Multidimensional scaling analysis identified thematic clusters.

RESULTS

Eight ECIG use respiratory symptom clusters identified in analysis included Mucus and Congestion, Fatigue, Throat Symptoms, Breathing Problems, Mouth Symptoms, Chest Symptoms, Illness Symptoms, and Nose and Sinus Symptoms. Highly rated (ie, most common) symptoms included dry throat or mouth, fatigue during physical activity, coughing, shortness of breath, excessive phlegm, and bad taste in mouth. Mean cluster ratings did not differ based on lifetime cigarette smoking status (100 lifetime cigarettes smoked), but current cigarette smokers (ie, dual users) rated the Fatigue, Breathing Problems, Mucus and Congestion, and Nose and Sinus Symptoms clusters higher than noncurrent cigarette smokers.

CONCLUSIONS

Participant-identified respiratory symptoms perceived to be ECIG related, many similar to cigarette smoking symptoms. Future research should assess if these symptoms are associated with other negative health outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS

ECIG use exposes users to chemicals that may have negative health impacts on the respiratory system. Limited research has examined the broad range of negative respiratory symptoms associated with e-cigarette use. This study identified that ECIG-cigarette users perceive their ECIG use to be associated with negative respiratory symptoms. Many e-cigarette user-reported negative respiratory symptoms are similar to those associated with cigarette smoking, though some appear unique to e-cigarette use. Future research should continue to monitor respiratory symptoms reported by ECIG users and whether these are associated with health outcomes over time.

Electronic cigarettes in physician practice: a complex debate

E-cigarettes, or electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), have been suggested as a potential aid for smoking cessation, but many questions about their efficacy and safety remain unanswered. Until very recently, the evidence for ENDS in smoking cessation was largely based on observational studies or randomised controlled trials with methodological flaws and did not provide adequate evidence to support strongly ENDS for smoking cessation. Concerns about the uptake of ENDS by nonsmoking populations (such as adolescents) remain. More recent evidence may indicate the effect of ENDS in smoking cessation, but many questions remain unanswered. In this article, we address recent claims that failure to recommend ENDS for smoking cessation represents unethical practice. We strongly dispute this claim, analysing the many complex issues that clinicians working in smoking cessation should consider.

Accepting the challenge: maintaining AJP-Lung as the best place to publish basic and translational studies in lung biology and pathophysiology

Rory E. Morty takes over from Sadis Matalon as Editor in Chief of the American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology in January 2018. Here, key achievements and new and noteworthy additions to the editorial portfolio of the journal will be reviewed. Additionally, selected recent reports will be highlighted and used to illustrate how the broad spectrum of the journal's editorial content promotes methodological innovation and scientific advances in lung biology and pathophysiology.