Acute exercise does not impair renal function in nondialysis chronic kidney disease patients regardless of disease stage

Physiology and Pathophysiology of Marathon Running: A narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Marathon training and running have many beneficial effects on human health and physical fitness; however, they also pose risks. To date, no comprehensive review regarding both the benefits and risks of marathon running on different organ systems has been published.

MAIN BODY

The aim of this review was to provide a comprehensive review of the benefits and risks of marathon training and racing on different organ systems. A predefined search strategy including keywords (e.g., marathon, cardiovascular system, etc.) and free text search was used. Articles covering running regardless of sex, age, performance level, and event type (e.g., road races, mountain marathons) were considered, whereas articles examining only cycling, triathlon, stress-tests or other sports were excluded. In total, we found 1021 articles in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, of which 329 studies were included in this review. Overall, marathon training offers several benefits for different organ systems and reduces all-cause mortality. As such, it improves cardiovascular risk factors, leads to favorable cardiac adaptations, enhances lung function, and improves quality of life in chronic kidney disease patients. It also enhances gastrointestinal mobility and reduces the risk of specific tumors such as colorectal cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. Marathon training enhances bone health and skeletal muscle metabolism. It further positively affects hematopoiesis and cytotoxic abilities of natural killer cells, and may act neuroprotective on a long-term basis. After a marathon, changes in biomarkers suggesting pathological events in certain organ systems such as cardiovascular, renal, gastrointestinal, liver, hematological, immune, musculoskeletal, central nervous, and endocrine systems can often be observed. Mostly, these changes are limited to 1-3 days post-race and usually normalize within a week. Moreover, marathon running poses the risk of serious adverse events such as sudden cardiac death or acute liver failure. Concerning lung function, a decrease after a marathon race was observed. Acute kidney injury, as well as electrolyte imbalances, are relatively common amongst marathon finishers. Many runners complain of gastrointestinal symptoms during or after long-distance running. Many runners suffer from running-related musculoskeletal injuries often impairing performance. A marathon is often accompanied by an acute inflammatory response with transient immunosuppression, making runners susceptible to infections. Also, hormonal alterations such as increased cortisol levels or decreased testosterone levels immediately after a race are observed. Disturbances in sleep patterns are commonly found in marathon runners leading up to or directly after the race.

CONCLUSION

All in all, marathon training is generally safe for human health and individual organ systems. Considering the high popularity of marathon running, these findings supply athletes, coaches, sports scientists, and sports medicine practitioners with practical applications. Further large-scale studies examining long-term effects on the cardiovascular, renal, and other system are needed.

Effects of high-intensity intermittent exercise versus moderate-intensity continuous exercise on renal hemodynamics assessed by ultrasound echo

High-intensity intermittent exercise (HIIE) has become attractive for presenting a variety of exercise conditions. However, the effects of HIIE on renal function and hemodynamics remain unclear. This study aimed to compare the effects of HIIE and moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE) on renal hemodynamics, renal function, and kidney injury biomarkers. Ten adult males participated in this study. We allowed the participants to perform HIIE or MICE to consider the impact of exercise on renal hemodynamics under both conditions. Renal hemodynamic assessment and blood sampling were conducted before the exercise (pre) and immediately (post 0), 30 min (post 30), and 60 min (post 60) after the exercise. Urine sampling was conducted in the pre, post 0, and post 60 phases. There was no condition-by-time interaction (p = 0.614), condition (p = 0.422), or time effect (p = 0.114) regarding renal blood flow. Creatinine-corrected urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin concentrations increased at post 60 (p = 0.017), but none exceeded the cut-off values for defining kidney injury. Moreover, there were no significant changes in other kidney injury biomarkers at any point. These findings suggest that high-intensity exercise can be performed without decreased RBF or increased kidney injury risk when conducted intermittently for short periods.

The moderate-intensity continuous exercise maintains renal blood flow and does not impair the renal function

Exercise is restricted for individuals with reduced renal function because exercising reduces blood flow to the kidneys. Safe and effective exercise programs for individuals with reduced renal function have not yet been developed. We previously examined the relationship between exercise intensity and renal blood flow (RBF), revealing that moderate-intensity exercise did not reduce RBF. Determining the effects of exercise duration on RBF may have valuable clinical applications. The current study examined the effects of a single bout of continuous exercise at lactate threshold (LT) intensity on renal hemodynamics. Eight adult males participated in this study. Participants underwent 30 min of aerobic exercise at LT intensity using a cycle ergometer. Evaluation of renal hemodynamics was performed before and after exercise, in the recovery phase using ultrasound echo. Furthermore, blood and urine samplings were conducted before and after exercise, in the recovery phase. Compared with resting, RBF was not significantly changed immediately after continuous exercise (319 ± 102 vs. 308 ± 79 ml/min; p = 0.976) and exhibited no significant changes in the recovery phase. Moreover, urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (uKIM-1) level exhibited no significant change immediately after continuous exercise (0.52 ± 0.20 vs. 0.46 ± 0.27 μg/g creatinine; p = 0.447). In addition, the results revealed no significant change in urinary uKIM-1 in 60-min after exercise. Other renal injury biomarkers exhibited a similar pattern. These findings indicate that a single bout of moderate-intensity continuous exercise maintains RBF and does not induce renal injury.

The effects of exercise on kidney injury: the role of SIRT1

In patients with kidney injury, muscle mass and strength decrease with altered muscle protein synthesis and degradation along with complications such as inflammation and low physical activity. A treatment strategy to maintain muscle metabolism in kidney injury is important. One of the proposed strategies in this regard is exercise, which in addition to inducing muscle hypertrophy, reducing plasma creatinine and urea and decreasing the severity of tubal injuries, can boost immune function and has anti-inflammatory effects. One of the molecules that have been considered as a target in the treatment of many diseases is silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1). Exercise increases the expression of SIRT1 and improves its activity. Therefore, studies that examined the effect of exercise on kidney injury considering the role of SIRT1 in this effect were reviewed to determine the direction of kidney injury research in future regarding to its prevalence, especially following diabetes, and lack of definitive treatment. In this review, we found that SIRT1 can be one of renoprotective target pathways of exercise. However, further studies are needed to determine the role of SIRT1 in different kidney injuries following exercise according to the type and severity of exercise, and the type of kidney injury.

Renal Function Recovery Strategies Following Marathon in Amateur Runners

Long distance races have a physiological impact on runners. Up to now, studies analyzing these physiological repercussions have been mainly focused on muscle and cardiac damage, as well as on its recovery. Therefore, a limited number of studies have been done to explore acute kidney failure and recovery after performing extreme exercises. Here, we monitored renal function in 76 marathon finishers (14 females) from the day before participating in a marathon until 192 h after crossing the finish line (FL). Renal function was evaluated by measuring serum creatinine (sCr) and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We randomly grouped our cohort into three intervention groups to compare three different strategies for marathon recovery: total rest (REST), continuous running at their ventilatory threshold 1 (VT1) intensity (RUN), and elliptical workout at their VT1 intensity (ELLIPTICAL). Interventions in the RUN and ELLIPTICAL groups were performed at 48, 96, and 144 h after marathon running. Seven blood samples (at the day before the marathon, at the FL, and at 24, 48, 96, 144, and 192 h post-marathon) and three urine samples (at the day before the marathon, at the finish line, and at 48 h post-marathon) were collected per participant. Both heart rate monitors and triaxial accelerometers were used to control the intensity effort during both the marathon race and the recovery period. Contrary to our expectations, the use of elliptical machines for marathon recovery delays renal function recovery. Specifically, the ELLIPTICAL group showed a significantly lower ∆GFR compared to both the RUN group (p = 4.5 × 10−4) and the REST group (p = 0.003). Hence, we encourage runners to carry out an active recovery based on light-intensity continuous running from 48 h after finishing the marathon. In addition, full resting seems to be a better strategy than performing elliptical workouts.

The Association Between GFR Evaluated by Serum Cystatin C and Proteinuria During Pregnancy

Introduction

Physiological changes in pregnancy result in increased cardiac output and renal blood flow, with a consequential increase in proteinuria. Data from studies of the relationship between proteinuria caused by isolated proteinuria and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are still limited. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of isolated proteinuria on the cystatin C–based GFR in the third trimester of pregnancy.

Methods

Data were collected from pregnant women in their third trimester whose serum creatinine levels were normal. The GFR of each participant was measured using serum cystatin C levels, and proteinuria was measured using urine protein–creatinine ratios. The participants were divided into 3 groups according to their level of proteinuria: normal (<150 mg/d), physiological (150–300 mg/d), and gestational (>300 mg/d). Changes in GFR were recorded for each group.

Results

The study included 89 participants, of whom 66.3% had levels of proteinuria that did not differ from that of the normal population (<150 mg/d). The incidence of physiological and gestational proteinuria was 21.4% and 12.4%, respectively. The results demonstrate that proteinuria >101.50 mg/d was significantly associated with declined estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (r = –0.34, P = 0.01). The analysis found that proteinuria >491.27 mg/d led to a risk of GFR <90 ml/min with an odds ratio of 12.69, P = 0.02 when adjusted for systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and body mass index.

Conclusion

This study suggests that the term “physiological proteinuria” is a misnomer. When used in the traditional manner, creatinine level has inadequate sensitivity to estimate GFR in pregnant women. We found that there is a significant decline in GFR when urine protein > 101.5 mg/d, which could be an early biomarker for renal pathology rather than pregnancy physiology, suggesting that further workup and precaution is required.

Impact of acute versus repetitive moderate intensity endurance exercise on kidney injury markers

Exercise may lead to kidney injury through several mechanisms. Urinary Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (uKIM1) and Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (uNGAL) are known biomarkers for acute kidney injury, but their response to repetitive exercise remains unknown. We examined the effects of a single versus repetitive bouts of exercise on markers for kidney injury in a middle-aged population. Sixty subjects (aged 29-78 years, 50% male) were included and walked 30, 40 or 50 km for three consecutive days. At baseline and after exercise day 1 and 3, a urine sample was collected to determine uNGAL and uKIM1. Furthermore, urinary cystatin C, creatinine, and osmolality were used to correct for dehydration-related changes in urinary concentration. Baseline uNGAL was 9.2 (5.2-14.7) ng/mL and increased to 20.7 (11.0-37.2) ng/mL and 14.2(8.0-26.3) ng/mL after day 1 and day 3, respectively, (P ≤ 0.001). Baseline uKIM1 concentration was 2.6 (1.4-6.0) ng/mL and increased to 5.2 (2.4-9.1) ng/mL (P = 0.002) after day 1, whereas uKIM1 was not different from baseline at day 3 (2.9 [1.4-6.4] ng/mL (P = 0.52)). Furthermore, both uNGAL and uKIM1 levels were higher after day 1 compared to day 3 (P < 0.01). When corrected for urinary cystatin C, creatinine, and osmolality, uNGAL demonstrated a similar response compared to the uncorrected data, whereas differences in uKIM1 between baseline, day 1 and day 3 (Ptime = 0.63) were no longer observed for cystatin C and creatinine corrected data. A single bout of prolonged exercise significantly increased uNGAL concentration, whereas no changes in uKIM1 were found. Repetitive bouts of exercise show that there is no cumulative effect of kidney injury markers.