New insights into receptor regulation

Deciphering the mechanism behind Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) induced biphasic signal-response profiles

BACKGROUND

The Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) pathway is driving various aspects of cellular responses in both normal and malignant cells. One interesting characteristic of this pathway is the biphasic nature of the cellular response to some FGF ligands like FGF2. Specifically, it has been shown that phenotypic behaviors controlled by FGF signaling, like migration and growth, reach maximal levels in response to intermediate concentrations, while high levels of FGF2 elicit weak responses. The mechanisms leading to the observed biphasic response remains unexplained.

RESULTS

A combination of experiments and computational modeling was used to understand the mechanism behind the observed biphasic signaling responses. FGF signaling involves a tertiary surface interaction that we captured with a computational model based on Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs). It accounts for FGF2 binding to FGF receptors (FGFRs) and heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans (HSGAGs), followed by receptor-phosphorylation, activation of the FRS2 adapter protein and the Ras-Raf signaling cascade. Quantitative protein assays were used to measure the dynamics of phosphorylated ERK (pERK) in response to a wide range of FGF2 ligand concentrations on a fine-grained time scale for the squamous cell lung cancer cell line H1703. We developed a novel approach combining Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and feature-based constraints in the objective function to calibrate the computational model to the experimental data. The model is validated using a series of extracellular and intracellular perturbation experiments. We demonstrate that in silico model predictions are in accordance with the observed in vitro results.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a combined approach of computational modeling and experiments we found that competition between binding of the ligand FGF2 to HSGAG and FGF receptor leads to the biphasic response. At low to intermediate concentrations of FGF2 there are sufficient free FGF receptors available for the FGF2-HSGAG complex to enable the formation of the trimeric signaling unit. At high ligand concentrations the ligand binding sites of the receptor become saturated and the trimeric signaling unit cannot be formed. This insight into the pathway is an important consideration for the pharmacological inhibition of this pathway.

The MARCKS family of phospholipid binding proteins: regulation of phospholipase D and other cellular components

Myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate (MARCKS) and MARCKS-related protein (MRP) are essential proteins that are implicated in coordination of membrane-cytoskeletal signalling events, such as cell adhesion, migration, secretion, and phagocytosis in a variety of cell types. The most prominent structural feature of MARCKS and MRP is a central basic effector domain (ED) that binds F-actin, Ca2+-calmodulin, and acidic phospholipids; phosphorylation of key serine residues within the ED by protein kinase C (PKC) prevents the above interactions. While the precise roles of MARCKS and MRP have not been established, recent attention has focussed on the high affinity of the MARCKS ED for phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), and a model has emerged in which calmodulin- or PKC-mediated regulation of these proteins at specific membrane sites could in turn control spatial availability of PIP2. The present review summarizes recent progress in this area and discusses how the above model might explain a role for MARCKS and MRP in activation of phospholipase D and other PIP2-dependent cellular processes.

Regulation by chronic drug administration of neuronal and cardiac calcium channel, beta-adrenoceptor and muscarinic receptor levels

Chronic administration of atropine (40-100 mg/kg, 23 days) produced a 29-33% increase in muscarinic receptors, measured by [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate binding, in rat brain. Diisopropyl phosphorofluoridate (0.9 mg/kg, 14 days) produced a 35% decrease in muscarinic receptors. Propranolol administration (800 micrograms/kg/hr, 10 days) increased beta-adrenoceptors, measured by [3H]dihydroalprenolol binding, by 69 and 50% in brain and heart respectively. Isoproterenol administration (800 micrograms/kg/hr, 10 days) produced a 50% reduction in cardiac beta-adrenoceptors but did not alter brain receptors. These drug treatments were without effect on binding of the Ca2+ channel ligands, [3H]nimodipine and [3H]nitrendipine, to brain or heart respectively. However, chronic administration of nifedipine for 20 days (36 and 360 micrograms/kg/hr) did produce down-regulation of both cardiac and neuronal Ca2+ channels and a similar down-regulation of beta-adrenoceptors. Co-regulation of Ca2+ channels and neurotransmitter receptors may occur but may not be an automatic consequence of either receptor or channel regulation.