Impact of Altered Vena Cava Flow Rates on Right Atrium Flow Characteristics

The impact of small movements with dual lumen cannulae during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A computational fluid dynamics analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO) provides respiratory support to patients with severe lung disease failing conventional medical therapy. An essential component of the ECMO circuit are the cannulas, which drain and return blood into the body. Despite being anchored to the patient to prevent accidental removal, minor cannula movements are common during ECMO. The clinical and haemodynamic consequences of these small movements are currently unclear. This study investigated the risk of thrombosis and recirculation caused by small movements of a dual lumen cannula (DLC) in an adult using computational fluid dynamics.

METHODS

The 3D model of an AVALON Elite DLC (27 Fr) and a patient-specific vena cava and right atrium were generated for an adult patient on ECMO. The baseline cannula position was generated where the return jet enters the tricuspid valve. Alternative cannula positions were obtained by shifting the cannula 5 and 15 mm towards inferior (IVC) and superior (SVC) vena cava, respectively. ECMO settings of 4 L/min blood flow and pulsatile flow at SVC and IVC were applied. Recirculation was defined as a scalar value indicating the infused oxygenated blood inside the drainage lumen, while thrombosis risk was evaluated by shear stress, stagnation volume, washout, and turbulent kinetic energy.

RESULTS

Recirculation for all models was less than 3.1 %. DLC movements between -5 to 15 mm increased shear stress and turbulence kinetic energy up to 24.7 % and 11.8 %, respectively, compared to the baseline cannula position leading to a higher predicted thrombosis risk. All models obtained a complete washout after nine seconds except for when the cannula migrated 15 mm into the SVC, indicating persisting stasis and circulating zones.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, small DLC movements were not associated with an increased risk of recirculation. However, they may increase the risk of thrombosis due to increased shear rate, turbulence, and slower washout of blood. Developing effective cannula securement devices may reduce this risk.

In silico parametric analysis of femoro-jugular venovenous ECMO and return cannula dynamics: In silico analysis of femoro-jugular VV ECMO

BACKGROUND

Increasingly, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is helping explore the impact of variables like: cannula design/size/position/flow rate and patient physiology on venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Here we use a CFD model to determine what role cardiac output (CO) plays and to analyse return cannula dynamics.

METHODS

Using a patient-averaged model of the right atrium and venae cava, we virtually inserted a 19Fr return cannula and a 25Fr drainage cannula. Running large eddy simulations, we assessed cardiac output at: 3.5-6.5 L/min and ECMO flow rate at: 2-6 L/min. We analysed recirculation fraction (Rf), time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS), pressure, velocity, and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) and extracorporeal flow fraction (EFF = ECMO flow rate/CO).

RESULTS

Increased ECMO flow rate and decreased CO (high EFF) led to increased Rf (R = 0.98, log fit). Negative pressures developed in the venae cavae at low CO and high ECMO flow (high CR). Mean return cannula TAWSS was >10 Pa for all ECMO flow rates, with majority of the flow exiting the tip (94.0-95.8 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results underpin the strong impact of CO on VV ECMO. A simple metric like EFF, once supported by clinical data, might help predict Rf for a patient at a given ECMO flow rate. The return cannula imparts high shear stresses on the blood, largely a result of the internal diameter.

Hemodynamic and recirculation performance of dual lumen cannulas for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be performed with two single lumen cannulas (SLCs) or one dual-lumen cannula (DLC) where low recirculation fraction ([Formula: see text]) is a key performance criterion. DLCs are widely believed to have lower [Formula: see text], though these have not been directly compared. Similarly, correct positioning is considered critical although its impact is unclear. We aimed to compare two common bi-caval DLC designs and quantify [Formula: see text] in several positions. Two different commercially available DLCs were sectioned, measured, reconstructed, scaled to 27Fr and simulated in our previously published patient-averaged computational model of the right atrium (RA) and venae cavae at 2-6 L/min. One DLC was then used to simulate ± 30° and ± 60° rotation and ± 4 cm insertion depth. Both designs had low [Formula: see text] (< 7%) and similar SVC/IVC drainage fractions and pressure drops. Both cannula reinfusion ports created a high-velocity jet and high shear stresses in the cannula (> 413 Pa) and RA (> 52 Pa) even at low flow rates. Caval pressures were abnormally high (16.2-23.9 mmHg) at low flow rates. Rotation did not significantly impact [Formula: see text]. Short insertion depth increased [Formula: see text] (> 31%) for all flow rates whilst long insertion only increased [Formula: see text] at 6 L/min (24%). Our results show that DLCs have lower [Formula: see text] compared to SLCs at moderate-high flow rates (> 4 L/min), but high shear stresses. Obstruction from DLCs increases caval pressures at low flow rates, a potential reason for increased intracranial hemorrhages. Cannula rotation does not impact [Formula: see text] though correct insertion depth is critical.

Cannulation configuration and recirculation in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Femoro-atrial cannulation means blood is drained from the inferior vena cava and returned to the superior vena cava; the opposite is termed atrio-femoral. Clinical data comparing these two methods is scarce and conflicting. Using computational fluid dynamics, we aim to compare atrio-femoral and femoro-atrial cannulation to assess the impact on recirculation fraction, under ideal conditions and several clinical scenarios. Using a patient-averaged model of the venae cavae and right atrium, commercially-available cannulae were positioned in each configuration. Additionally, occlusion of the femoro-atrial drainage cannula side-holes with/without reduced inferior vena cava inflow (0–75%) and retraction of the atrio-femoral drainage cannula were modelled. Large-eddy simulations were run for 2-6L/min circuit flow, obtaining time-averaged flow data. The model showed good agreement with clinical atrio-femoral recirculation data. Under ideal conditions, atrio-femoral yielded 13.5% higher recirculation than femoro-atrial across all circuit flow rates. Atrio-femoral right atrium flow patterns resembled normal physiology with a single large vortex. Femoro-atrial cannulation resulted in multiple vortices and increased turbulent kinetic energy at > 3L/min circuit flow. Occluding femoro-atrial drainage cannula side-holes and reducing inferior vena cava inflow increased mean recirculation by 11% and 32%, respectively. Retracting the atrio-femoral drainage cannula did not affect recirculation. These results suggest that, depending on drainage issues, either atrio-femoral or femoro-atrial cannulation may be preferrable. Rather than cannula tip proximity, the supply of available venous blood at the drainage site appears to be the strongest factor affecting recirculation.