Adherence to guidelines for surveillance colonoscopy in patients with ulcerative colitis at a Canadian quaternary care hospital

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on colorectal surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remain at increased risk for colorectal cancer and death from colorectal cancer compared with the general population despite improvements in inflammation control with advanced therapies, colonoscopic surveillance and reductions in environmental risk factors. This guideline update from 2010 for colorectal surveillance of patients over 16 years with colonic inflammatory bowel disease was developed by stakeholders representing UK physicians, endoscopists, surgeons, specialist nurses and patients with GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodological support.An a priori protocol was published describing the approach to three levels of statement: GRADE recommendations, good practice statements or expert opinion statements. A systematic review of 7599 publications, with appraisal and GRADE analysis of trials and network meta-analysis, where appropriate, was performed. Risk thresholding guided GRADE judgements.We made 73 statements for the delivery of an IBD colorectal surveillance service, including outcome standards for service and endoscopist audit, and the importance of shared decision-making with patients.Core areas include: risk of colorectal cancer, IBD-related post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer; service organisation and supporting patient concordance; starting and stopping surveillance, who should or should not receive surveillance; risk stratification, including web-based multivariate risk calculation of surveillance intervals; colonoscopic modalities, bowel preparation, biomarkers and artificial intelligence aided detection; chemoprevention; the role of non-conventional dysplasia, serrated lesions and non-targeted biopsies; management of dysplasia, both endoscopic and surgical, and the structure and role of the multidisciplinary team in IBD dysplasia management; training in IBD colonoscopic surveillance, sustainability (green endoscopy), cost-effectiveness and patient experience. Sixteen research priorities are suggested.

Patient Perspectives on Personalized Risk Communication Using Polygenic Risk Scores to Inform Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is increasingly diagnosed in people aged <50 years. New U.S. guidelines recommend screening initiation at age 45 years. Providing personalized risk for colorectal cancer using polygenic risk scores may be an opportunity to engage this younger population in colorectal cancer screening. There is limited research on patient understanding of polygenic risk scores results and use of polygenic risk scores to inform colorectal cancer screening decisions.

Methods

From May 2022 to June 2023, 20 Kaiser Permanente Colorado members aged 46-51 years who had been offered colorectal cancer screening but had never completed it signed consent to provide a saliva sample for colorectal cancer polygenic risk score analysis. After receiving personalized polygenic risk scores for colorectal cancer, participants completed a semistructured interview regarding the understanding of their polygenic risk scores, perceived colorectal cancer risk, and intention to screen. Thematic analysis was conducted using Atlas.ti, Version 8.

Results

Of the 19 participants who successfully completed polygenic risk score-related testing and a semistructured interview, 13 were female, 14 never smoked cigarettes, 6 were Hispanic, and 13 were non-Hispanic White. One participant had high risk for colorectal cancer on the basis of polygenic risk score results. Qualitative interviews showed participants' understanding of their results, trust in polygenic risk scores, perception of risk for colorectal cancer, plans to complete colorectal cancer screening, intent to share polygenic risk scores with healthcare providers, and concerns about genetic results impacting health care.

Conclusions

Qualitative analyses suggest that participants were interested in and understood their polygenic risk score results. Further study is needed to develop guidelines, effective calls to action, provider engagement, and health education materials on use of polygenic risk scores for health decision making.

Colorectal Dysplasia and Cancer Surveillance in Ulcerative Colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a risk factor for the development of inflammation-associated dysplasia or colitis-associated neoplasia (CAN). This transformation results from chronic inflammation, which induces changes in epithelial proliferation, survival, and migration via the induction of chemokines and cytokines. There are notable differences in genetic mutation profiles between CAN in UC patients and sporadic colorectal cancer in the general population. Colonoscopy is the cornerstone for surveillance and management of dysplasia in these patients. There are several modalities to augment the quality of endoscopy for the better detection of dysplastic or neoplastic lesions, including the use of high-definition white-light exam and image-enhanced colonoscopy, which are described in this review. Clinical practice guidelines regarding surveillance strategies in UC have been put forth by various GI societies, and overall, there is agreement between them except for some differences, which we highlight in this article. These guidelines recommend that endoscopically detected dysplasia, if feasible, should be resected endoscopically. Advanced newer techniques, such as endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection, have been utilized in the treatment of CAN. Surgery has traditionally been the mainstay of treating such advanced lesions, and in cases where endoscopic resection is not feasible, a proctocolectomy, followed by ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, is generally recommended. In this review we summarize the approach to surveillance for cancer and dysplasia in UC. We also highlight management strategies if dysplasia is detected.

Risk factors for locally advanced cancer associated with ulcerative colitis: Results of a retrospective multicentric study in the era of biologics

BACKGROUND

Patients affected by ulcerative colitis (UC) are more likely to develop colorectal cancer, and are often diagnosed with lymph node involvement (N+) at surgery.

AIM

To identify the risk factors for N+ cancer in UC patients.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery from 2001 to 2018 in six European tertiary centres were included. N+ patients were compared to the control group (N-) for clinical variables. The evaluation of risk factors for N+ was assessed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients were included. Median duration of disease was 21 years (1-52). Forty patients (30.8%) were N+ at surgery. Eighteen (13.8%) developed cancer within 10 years from the onset of UC. Younger age at surgery (Odds ratio -OR- 0.96, p = 0.042), left colon location (OR 2.44, p = 0.045) and the presence of stricture (OR 5.07, p = 0.002) were associated with N+.

CONCLUSION

Location in the left colon, presence of strictures and younger age strongly correlated with a higher risk of N+ cancer, which could develop before the starting point of surveillance. Duration, extension and severity of disease were not associated with N+. These results should be considered in the evaluation of risk of advanced cancer in UC patients.

High Adherence to Surveillance Guidelines in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Results in Low Colorectal Cancer and Dysplasia Rates, While Rates of Dysplasia are Low Before the Suggested Onset of Surveillance

BACKGROUND

Patients with Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC] are at increased risk for colorectal dysplasia [CRD] and colorectal cancer [CRC]. Adherence to CRC surveillance guidelines is reportedly low internationally.

AIM

To evaluate surveillance practices at the tertiary IBD Center of the McGill University Health Center [MUHC] and to determine CRD/CRC incidence.

METHODS

A representative inflammatory bowel disease cohort with at least 8 years of disease duration [or with primary sclerosing cholangitis] who visited the MUHC between July 1 and December 31, 2016 were included. Adherence to surveillance guidelines was compared to modified 2010 British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines. Incidence rates of CRC, high-grade dysplasia [HGD], low-grade dysplasia [LGD] and colorectal adenomas [CRA] were calculated based on pathology.

RESULTS

In total, 1356 CD and UC patients (disease duration: 12 [interquartile range: 6-22) and 10 [interquartile range: 5-19] years) were identified. The surveillance cohort consisted of 680 patients [296 UC and 384 CD]. Adherence to surveillance guidelines was 76/82% in UC/colonic CD. An adequate number of biopsies were taken in 54/54% of UC/colonic CD patients. The incidence of CRC/HGD in UC and CD with colonic involvement was 19.5/58.5 and 25.1/37.6 per 100,000 patient-years, respectively. The incidence of dysplasia before 8 years of disease duration was low in both UC/CD [19.5 and 12.5/100,000 patient-years] with no CRC detected. The CRA rate was 30/38% in UC/colonic CD.

CONCLUSION

High adherence to surveillance guidelines and low CRC and dysplasia, but not CRA rates were found, suggesting that adhering to updated, stratified, surveillance recommendations may result in low advanced neoplasia rates. The incidence of dysplasia before the start of surveillance was low.

Patterns and predictors of adherence to colorectal cancer screening recommendations in Alberta's Tomorrow Project participants stratified by risk

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is an important modifiable behaviour for cancer control. Regular screening, following recommendations for the type, timing and frequency based on personal CRC risk, contributes to earlier detection and increases likelihood of successful treatment.

Methods

To determine adherence to screening recommendations in a large provincial cohort of adults, participants in Alberta’s Tomorrow Project (n = 9641) were stratified based on increasing level of CRC risk: age (Age-only), family history of CRC (FamilyHx), personal history of bowel conditions (PersonalHx), or both (Family/PersonalHx) using self-reported information from questionnaires. Provincial and national guidelines for timing and frequency of screening tests were used to determine if participants were up-to-date based on their CRC risk. Screening status was compared between enrollment (2000–2006) and follow-up (2008) to determine screening pattern over time.

Results

The majority of participants (77%) fell into the average risk Age-only strata. Only a third of this strata were up-to-date for screening at baseline, but the proportion increased across the higher risk strata, with > 90% of the highest risk Family/PersonalHx strata up-to-date at baseline. There was also a lower proportion (< 25%) of the Age-only group who were regular screeners over time compared to the higher risk strata, though age, higher income and uptake of other screening tests (e.g. mammography) were associated with a greater likelihood of regular screening in multinomial logistic regression.

Conclusions

The low (< 50%) adherence to regular CRC screening in average and moderate risk strata highlights the need to further explore barriers to uptake of screening across different risk profiles.

Frequency of Surveillance and Impact of Surveillance Colonoscopies in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Who Developed Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis (UC) is increased. The aim of this study was to evaluate if patients who developed CRC in the setting of UC were undergoing guideline-recommended surveillance colonoscopies and to determine the impact of surveillance on the staging of CRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data was obtained from the Veterans Affairs healthcare system to identify patients with UC and CRC. Stage 0 and I were considered early-stage CRC, whereas stage ≥ II were considered advanced-stage CRC. Patients were considered to have adequate surveillance if they had a colonoscopy within 2 years before developing CRC. We conducted a case-case analysis using multivariable logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio for presenting with advanced-stage CRC associated with lack of adequate surveillance.

RESULTS

Of the 48 patients, the majority were white (70.8%) and male (100%). Sixty-nine percent of patients had inadequate surveillance. In multivariable analysis, prior adherence to CRC surveillance was associated with a decreased risk of presenting with advanced-stage CRC (vs. early-stage CRC) (adjusted odds ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.85; P = .029).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients who developed CRC in the setting of UC underwent inadequate surveillance, and they were more likely to present with advanced-stage CRC.

Clinicians' adherence to international guidelines in the clinical care of adults with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Although evidence-based guidelines have been developed for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the extent to which they are followed is unclear. The objective of this study was to review clinicians' adherence to international IBD guidelines.

METHODS

Retrospective data collection of patients attending a tertiary Australian hospital IBD clinic over a 12-month period. Management practices were audited and compared to ECCO (European Crohn's and Colitis Organization) guidelines.

RESULTS

Data from 288 patients were collected: 47% (136/288) male; mean age 43; 140/288 (49%) patients had ulcerative colitis (UC); 145/288 (50%) patients had Crohn's disease (CD); 3/288 (1%) patients had IBD-unclassified (IBD-U). Patient care was undertaken by gastroenterologists, trainees and general practitioners.

DISEASE MANAGEMENT

Overall adherence to disease management guidelines occurred in 204/288 (71%) of patient encounters. Discrepancies between guidelines and management were found in: 25/80 (31%) of patients with UC in remission receiving oral 5-aminosalicyclates (5-ASAs) as maintenance therapy, and; 46/110 (42%) of patients with small bowel and/or ileo-cecal CD receiving 5-ASA. Preventive Care: Adherence to ≥1 additional component of preventive care was observed in 73/288 (25%) of patient encounters: 12/133 (9%) on thiopurines underwent annual skin checks; 61/288 (21%) of patients with IBD underwent a bone scan; 46/288 (16%) patients were reminded to have their influenza vaccine. Psychological care: Assessment of psychological wellbeing was undertaken in only 16/288 (6%) of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There remains a gap between adherence to international guidelines and clinical practice. Standardizing practice using evidence-based clinical pathways may be a strategy towards improving the quality of IBD outpatient management.

Organization of surveillance in GI practice

BACKGROUND

Several reports documented an inefficient utilisation of available resources, as well as a suboptimal compliance with surveillance recommendations. Although, evidence suggests that organisational issues can influence the quality of care delivered, surveillance protocols are usually based on non-organized approaches.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search (publication date: 01/2000-06/2016) on PubMed and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for guidelines, or consensus statements, for surveys of practice, reporting information about patients, or providers attitudes and behaviours, for intervention studies to enhance compliance with guidelines. Related articles were also scrutinised. Based on the clinical relevance and burden on endoscopy services this review was focused on surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus, IBD and post-polypectomy surveillance of colonic adenomas.

RESULTS

Existing guidelines are generally recognising structure and process requirements influencing delivery of surveillance interventions, while less attention had been devoted to transitions and interfaces in the care process. Available evidence from practice surveys is suggesting the need to design organizational strategies aimed to enable patients to attend and providers to deliver timely and appropriate care. Well designed studies assessing the effectiveness of specific interventions in this setting are however lacking. Indirect evidence from screening settings would suggest that the implementation of automated standardized recall systems, utilisation of clinical registries, removing financial barriers, could improve appropriateness of use and compliance with recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of sound evidence regarding utility and methodology of surveillance can contribute to explain the observed variability in providers and patients attitudes and in compliance with the recommended surveillance.

Implementing quality measures for inflammatory bowel disease

Variation in care for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is present across multiple aspects of IBD management, suggesting overall poor quality of care. Quality indicators are intended to provide clear, measurable processes and outcomes of quality care. Initial sets of process and outcome measures have been developed to address areas of inconsistent care and to allow for standardized measurement of outcomes. Measures developed by the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA) are intended to provide measurable standards for improvement in care. These measure sets will warrant updates overtime to best represent gaps in IBD management. Practically, implementation of quality measures may depend on the care setting and whether quality measurement and improvement can be incorporated into workflows and electronic medical records. Collaborative networks, utilization of care pathways, and standardized treatment algorithms may represent avenues for wide-scale implementation of quality improvement. Implementation efforts should assess the impact on outcomes in order to identify successful models for improvement in IBD care.

Colonoscopy is associated with a reduced risk for colon cancer and mortality in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Surveillance colonoscopy is recommended at 2- to 3-year intervals beginning 8 years after diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, there have been no reports of whether colonoscopy examination reduces the risk for CRC in patients with IBD.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, we analyzed data from 6823 patients with IBD (2764 with a recent colonoscopy, 4059 without a recent colonoscopy) seen and followed up for at least 3 years at 2 tertiary referral hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts. The primary outcome was diagnosis of CRC. We examined the proportion of patients undergoing a colonoscopy within 36 months before a diagnosis of CRC or at the end of the follow-up period, excluding colonoscopies performed within 6 months before a diagnosis of CRC, to avoid inclusion of prevalent cancers. Multivariate logistic regression was performed, adjusting for plausible confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients developed CRC. The incidence of CRC among patients without a recent colonoscopy (2.7%) was significantly higher than among patients with a recent colonoscopy (1.6%) (odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.80). This difference persisted in multivariate analysis (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45-0.93) and was robust when adjusted for a range of assumptions in sensitivity analyses. Among patients with CRC, a colonoscopy within 6 to 36 months before diagnosis was associated with a reduced mortality rate (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Recent colonoscopy (within 36 months) is associated with a reduced incidence of CRC in patients with IBD, and lower mortality rates in those diagnosed with CRC.

Colorectal cancer surveillance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and primary sclerosing cholangitis: an economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

The cost-effectiveness of annual colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is uncertain. The aim of this study was to determine whether annual colonoscopy among patients with IBD-PSC is cost-effective compared with less frequent intervals from the perspective of a publicly funded health care system.

METHODS

A cost-utility analysis using a Markov model was used to simulate a 35-year-old patient with a 10-year history of well-controlled IBD and a recent diagnosis of concomitant PSC. The following strategies were compared: no surveillance, colonoscopy every 5 years, biennial colonoscopy, and annual colonoscopy. Outcome measures included: costs, number of cases of dysplasia found, number of cancers found and missed, deaths, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained, and the incremental cost per QALY gained.

RESULTS

In the base-case analysis, no surveillance was the least expensive and least effective strategy. Compared with no surveillance, the cost per QALY of surveillance every 5 years was CAD $15,021. The cost per QALY of biennial surveillance compared with surveillance every 5 years was CAD $37,522. Annual surveillance was more effective than biennial surveillance, but at an incremental cost of CAD $174,650 per QALY gained compared with biennial surveillance.

CONCLUSIONS

More frequent colonoscopy screening intervals improve effectiveness (i.e., detects more cancers and prevents additional deaths), but at higher cost. Health systems must consider the opportunity costs associated with different surveillance colonoscopy intervals when deciding which strategy to implement among patients with IBD-PSC.

Inflammatory bowel disease cancer surveillance in a tertiary referral hospital: attitudes and practice

BACKGROUND

Physician adherence to guidelines for colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is often poor. This may lead to adverse patient outcomes and excess endoscopic workload.

AIMS

To assess the attitudes and practice of IBD specialists in a tertiary centre towards colonoscopic surveillance.

METHODS

First, a questionnaire evaluating attitudes and approach to CRC surveillance was issued to 36 clinicians at one tertiary referral hospital. Second, a retrospective audit of IBD surveillance colonoscopy practice over a 2-year period was performed.

RESULTS

Questionnaire response rate was 97%. Sixty-nine per cent of respondents were aware of, and used, Australian guidelines. Surveillance was undertaken by all clinicians in patients with extensive colitis, 83% in patients with left-sided colitis and 51% in patients with proctitis. Seventy-six per cent used chromoendoscopy, and 47% took 10 to 20 random biopsies. Colectomy was considered appropriate in 0% for unifocal low-grade dysplasia, 35% for multifocal low-grade dysplasia and 83% for high-grade dysplasia. Sixty-six per cent would remove elevated dysplastic lesions endoscopically. The audit identified 103 surveillance colonoscopies in 81 patients. Chromoendoscopy was used in 21% of cases, and the median number of random biopsies was 13. Sixty-two per cent of colonoscopies were performed outside the guidelines in relation to colonoscopic frequency. Following colonoscopy, an appropriate recommendation for subsequent surveillance was documented in 40% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge and practice of CRC surveillance in IBD vary among specialist clinicians and often deviate from guidelines. Many clinicians perform surveillance earlier and more frequently than recommended. These findings have implications for patient outcomes and workload.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of chromoendoscopy for colorectal cancer surveillance in patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Recent studies report that the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) among patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) may be lower than previously estimated. Although white-light endoscopy (WLE) with random biopsies is recommended for dysplasia detection in patients with UC, several studies reported increased detection of dysplasia by chromoendoscopy.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the cost effectiveness of chromoendoscopy relative to WLE or no endoscopy for CRC surveillance in patients with UC.

DESIGN

Decision-analytic state-transition (Markov) model with Monte Carlo simulation.

SETTING

To simulate the clinical course of chronic UC, we estimated dysplasia and CRC incidence and progression, endoscopic test characteristics, stage-specific mortality rates, and costs from published literature and Medicare reimbursement data.

PATIENTS

Patients from a population-based age distribution with ulcerative colitis for ≥8 years.

INTERVENTION

We compared 3 different strategies at various surveillance intervals: chromoendoscopy with targeted biopsies, WLE with random biopsies, and no surveillance. The robustness of the model was assessed by using probabilistic sensitivity analysis. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate individual variables, and 3-dimensional analysis was used to examine the effects of varying screening intervals.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

Chromoendoscopy was found to be more effective and less costly than WLE at all surveillance intervals. However, compared with no surveillance, chromoendoscopy was cost effective only at surveillance intervals of at least 7 years, with an ICER of $77,176. Chromoendoscopy was the most cost effective strategy at sensitivity levels >0.23 for dysplasia detection and cost <$2200, regardless of the level of sensitivity of WLE for dysplasia detection. The estimated population lifetime risk of developing CRC ranged from 2.5% (annual chromoendoscopy) to 5.9% (chromoendoscopy every 10 years).

LIMITATIONS

Estimates used for the model are based on best available data in the literature.

CONCLUSION

Chromoendoscopy is both more effective and less costly than WLE and becomes cost effective relative to no surveillance when performed at intervals of ≥7 years.

Automated identification of surveillance colonoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease using natural language processing

BACKGROUND

Differentiating surveillance from non-surveillance colonoscopy for colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) using electronic medical records (EMR) is important for practice improvement and research purposes, but diagnosis code algorithms are lacking. The automated retrieval console (ARC) is natural language processing (NLP)-based software that allows text-based document-level classification.

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility and accuracy of ARC in identifying surveillance and non-surveillance colonoscopy in IBD using EMR.

METHODS

We performed a split validation study of electronic reports of colonoscopy pathology for patients with IBD from the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center. A gastroenterologist manually classified pathology reports as either derived from surveillance or non-surveillance colonoscopy. Pathology reports were randomly split into two sets: 70 % for algorithm derivation and 30 % for validation. An ARC generated classification model was applied to the validation set of pathology reports. The performance of the model was compared with manual classification for surveillance and non-surveillance colonoscopy.

RESULTS

A total of 575 colonoscopy pathology reports were available on 195 IBD patients, of which 400 reports were designated as training and 175 as testing sets. Within the testing set, a total of 69 pathology reports were classified as surveillance by manual review, whereas the ARC model classified 66 reports as surveillance for a recall of 0.77, precision of 0.80, and specificity of 0.88.

CONCLUSIONS

ARC was able to identify surveillance colonoscopy for IBD without customized software programming. NLP-based document-level classification may be used to differentiate surveillance from non-surveillance colonoscopy in IBD.

Factors that affect adherence to surveillance colonoscopy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with extensive ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease of the colon have an increased risk of colon cancer and require colonoscopic surveillance. This study explores factors that affect adherence to surveillance colonoscopy.

METHODS

Three hundred and seventy-eight patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease of the colon for at least 7 years and at least one-third of the colon involved participated in this cross-sectional questionnaire study performed at 3 tertiary referral inflammatory bowel disease clinics.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eight patients were female and 189 had ulcerative colitis. The mean age was 49.9 years and mean disease duration 22.9 years. The total number of surveillance colonoscopies performed was 1529, and the mean number per patient was 4.01. The mean interval between surveillance colonoscopies was 2.71 years; 282 patients had a mean interval of <3 years. Self-reported adherence was consistently higher than chart-documented adherence. Significant categories of reasons for nonadherence were logistics (P = 0.012), health perceptions (P = 0.0001); stress regarding procedure, job, or personal life (P = 0.0002); and procedure problems (P = 0.001). The most frequently cited most important reason was difficulty with the bowel preparation (18 patients; 4.8%). Of the 26 patients with inflammatory bowel disease-related dysplasia, 3 had cancer, 4 high-grade dysplasia, 15 low-grade dysplasia, and 4 indefinite dysplasia. Detection of dysplasia was not related to adherence or to lack of adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, 25.5% of our patients underwent surveillance colonoscopies at >3-year intervals on average. Significant categories of reasons for nonadherence included logistics, health perceptions, stress, and procedure problems.

Quality improvement in gastroenterology clinical practice

An emphasis on quality improvement (QI) is vital to the cost-effective provision of evidence-based health care. QI projects in gastroenterology have typically focused on endoscopy to minimize or eliminate procedure-related complications or errors. However, a significant component of gastroenterology care is based on the management of chronic disease. Patients with chronic diseases are seen in many different outpatient practices in the community and academia. In an attempt to ensure that every patient receives high-quality care, major gastrointestinal societies have published guidelines on the management of common gastrointestinal complaints. However, adherence to these guidelines varies. We discuss common outpatient gastrointestinal illnesses with established guidelines for management that could benefit from active QI projects; these would ensure a consistently high standard of care for every patient.

Myelosuppression monitoring after immunomodulator initiation in veterans with inflammatory bowel disease: a national practice audit

BACKGROUND

Immunomodulator medications (IMM) play a vital role in the care of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBD practice guidelines recommend myelosuppression monitoring after initiation of IMM.

AIM

To identify adherence rates and predictors of myelosuppression monitoring after IMM initiation in a large practice setting.

METHODS

We identified a national cohort of VA users with IBD for the fiscal years 2003-2009 using the Veterans Affairs administrative datasets. Subjects with filled prescriptions for IMM were included. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects who had a white blood cell (WBC) test completed within 90 days of the IMM index date. Determinants of myelosuppression monitoring were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 6045 unique IBD patients were identified with filled IMM prescriptions. Overall, only 57% of subjects completed a WBC test within 90 days of IMM index date. Monitoring rates increased over time, from 48% in 2003 to 75% in 2009. There was variability of monitoring rates by facility, ranging from 0 to 83%. In multivariate analyses, older age at IMM index date was associated with a lower rate of monitoring. Frequency of VA encounters and IMM index date were associated with increased rates of myelosuppression monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring for myelosuppression among veterans with inflammatory bowel disease after immunomodulator medications initiation is low with wide variability based on facility. This may reflect a low quality of care among veterans with IBD. Provider- and system-wide interventions are needed to improve adherence and reduce variability of immunomodulator medications monitoring across facilities.

Diagnostic workup of paediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease in Europe: results of a 5-year audit of the EUROKIDS registry

OBJECTIVE

In 2005, the Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Working Group of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition published consensus guidelines on the diagnostic workup of paediatric IBD, the Porto criteria. According to these guidelines, children suspected of having IBD should undergo an oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD), ileocolonoscopy, and (except in cases of definitive ulcerative colitis) adequate imaging of the small bowel. To audit and evaluate the diagnostic workup of paediatric patients with IBD in Europe, the Working Group created EUROKIDS, a prospective, Web-based registry of newly diagnosed paediatric patients with IBD.

METHODS

Patients with IBD (ages 0-18 years) were registered in 44 centres in 18 countries. Data on diagnostic workup were analysed according to the year of diagnosis, type of IBD, and centre size. Diagnostic yield of OGD and ileal intubation were evaluated.

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2009, 2087 newly diagnosed patients were correctly registered. Both OGD and ileocolonoscopy had been performed in 64% of all of the patients and increased significantly from year 1 (52 %) to 5 (71%, P  <  0.001). Small-bowel follow-through use decreased during the years (year 1 n = 213, year 5 n = 108; P < 0.001), whereas magnetic resonance imaging use increased (year 1 n  = 25, year 5 n  = 171; P < 0.001). Patients diagnosed as having Crohn disease (CD, 59%) and ulcerative colitis (58%) were more likely to have had a complete diagnostic workup than patients diagnosed as having IBD unclassified (45%). In CD, the diagnostic yield of OGD was 7.5% and the yield of ileal intubation was 13%.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of diagnostic workup in paediatric patients with IBD increased steadily between 2004 and 2009. Small-bowel imaging by magnetic resonance imaging superseded the use of small-bowel follow-through. OGD and ileal intubation contributed to a definitive diagnosis of CD.

Low prevalence of colonoscopic surveillance of inflammatory bowel disease patients with longstanding extensive colitis: a clinical practice survey nested in the CESAME cohort

BACKGROUND

Surveillance colonoscopy is recommended for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with longstanding extensive colitis (LEC).

AIMS

To assess modalities and results of colonoscopic surveillance in a subset of CESAME cohort patients at high risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and followed in university French hospitals.

METHODS

Among 910 eligible patients with more than a 7-year history of extensive colitis at CESAME enrolment, 685 patients completed a questionnaire on surveillance colonoscopy and 102 were excluded because of prior proctocolectomy. Finally, 583 patients provided information spanning a median period of 41months (IQR 38-43) between cohort enrolment and the end of follow-up. Details of the colonoscopic procedures and histological findings were obtained for 440 colonoscopies in 270 patients.

RESULTS

Only 54% (n=312) of the patients with LEC had at least one surveillance colonoscopy during the study period, with marked variations across the nine participating centres (27% to 70%, P≤0.0001). Surveillance rate was significantly lower in Crohn's colitis than in ulcerative colitis (UC) (48% vs. 69%, P≤0.0001). Independent predictors of colonoscopic surveillance were male gender, UC IBD subtype, longer disease duration, previous history of CRC and disease management in a centre with large IBD population. Random biopsies, targeted biopsies and chromoendoscopy were performed during respectively 71%, 27 and 30% of surveillance colonoscopies. Two cases of high-grade dysplasia were detected in patients undergoing colonoscopic surveillance. Two advanced-stage CRC were diagnosed in patients who did not have colonosocopic surveillance.

CONCLUSIONS

Colonoscopic surveillance rate is low in IBD patients with longstanding extensive colitis.

Development of quality measures for monitoring and improving care in gastroenterology

Over the past decade, most quality assurance (QA) efforts in gastroenterology have been aimed at endoscopy. Endoscopic quality improvement was the rational area to begin QA work in gastroenterology due to the relatively acute nature of complications and the high volume of procedures performed. While endoscopy is currently the focus of most quality assurance (QA) measures in gastroenterology, more recent efforts have begun to address clinical gastroenterology practices both in the outpatient and inpatient settings. Clinical outpatient and inpatient gastroenterology is laden with areas where standardization could benefit patient care. While data and experience in clinical gastroenterology QA is relatively limited, it is clear that inconsistent use of guidelines and practice variations in gastroenterology can lead to lower quality care. In this review, we review a variety of areas in clinical gastroenterology where existing guidelines and published data suggest both the need and practicality of active QA measures.

Dysplasia and cancer in inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic gastrointestinal disease associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Although CRC occurs in a minority of IBD patients (1%), it carries a high mortality and accounts for 20% of IBD-related mortality. Established risk factors for the development of CRC in IBD include disease duration of 8 years or more, family history of CRC, extensive colitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Meticulous colonoscopy and anti-inflammatory medications can reduce the risk of developing CRC. The future of IBD surveillance involves the use of novel endoscopic techniques (chromoendoscopy, narrow-band imaging, confocal laser endomicroscopy and autofluorescence) to enhance colonoscopic accuracy, in concert with chemopreventative medications to help reduce the risk of CRC in IBD.