Clinical relevance of transjugular liver biopsy in comparison with percutaneous and laparoscopic liver biopsy

Alveolar Bile and Light Chain Immunoglobulin Depositions as an Unusual Complication of Transjugular Liver Biopsy Resulting in Bilhemia in a Patient with Multiple Myeloma

Background: A 69-year-old man with multiple myeloma and left-sided heart failure presented to the hospital with a two-month fever. Method: A transjugular liver biopsy was performed due to the rapid progression of liver failure. The procedure was complicated by an intraperitoneal hemorrhage. The bleeding was managed expectantly. Result: Significantly elevated serum bilirubin levels occurred on the 13th day after liver biopsy. Increasing serum bilirubin levels were observed until the patient's death due to a biliovenous fistula at the liver biopsy site. Simultaneously, his slightly elevated liver enzymes returned to normal. The patient died 23 days after liver biopsy due to acute respiratory distress syndrome. Fistulous communication between the biliary tree and the hepatic venous system with subsequent bile leakage into the venous system (bilhemia) can lead to bile deposition in the lungs. Bile deposition in the lungs may potentiate and accelerate the development of diffuse alveolar damage with hyaline membranes. Conclusions: Lambda and kappa light chain deposition in the pulmonary alveoli in patients with multiple myeloma can mimic typical hyaline membranes.

Miliary tuberculosis diagnosed by diffuse hepatic uptake on PET/CT and transjugular liver biopsy

The patient was an 81-year-old man. In his 20s, he had been treated with pharmacotherapy for pulmonary tuberculosis for 1 year. He presented to the Department of Respiratory Medicine with a chief complaint of dyspnea. The possibility of respiratory disease appeared to be low, but hepatic impairment was detected. The patient was thus referred to our department. Though the cause of hepatic impairment was unknown, the soluble interleukin-2 receptor level was elevated, suggesting malignant lymphoma. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) revealed diffuse, homogenous, intense FDG uptake in the entire liver, and transjugular liver biopsy confirmed the diagnosis. Histopathological examination revealed an epithelioid granuloma, and auramine staining was positive for bacilli suggestive of tuberculosis. CT revealed diffuse micronodular shadows in the lung, yielding a diagnosis of miliary tuberculosis. Therefore, the patient was prescribed antituberculosis medication by the Department of Respiratory Medicine. His subsequent clinical course was good. The miliary (hepatic) tuberculosis was typical based on the diffuse, homogenous, intense FDG uptake throughout the liver observed on PET-CT.

Comparison of the Safety of Transjugular and Percutaneous Liver Biopsies

PURPOSE

To compare adverse events (AEs) between the transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) and percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1,300 patients who underwent liver biopsy between July 1, 2014 and January 31, 2018, were examined, and bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine predictors of the biopsy method used and AEs. To reduce bias in the comparison of the AE rates between patients who had TJLB or PLB, propensity score matching was used to control for baseline disease severity.

RESULTS

PLB and TJLB were performed in 601 and 699 patients, respectively. The mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 3 (±2), and antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy at the time of biopsy was used in <10% of patients. Patients with suspected cirrhosis or portal hypertension (odds ratio [OR], 9.9), an international normalized ratio of >1.5 (OR, 5.9), or a platelet count of <100 × 103/mL (OR, 3.9) were more likely to undergo TJLB. After propensity matching, which identified a population of patients with a mean international normalized ratio of <1.5 and platelet count of >150 × 103/mL, the only difference in the AE rate was for pain, which was present in 8% and 10% of patients after TJLB and PLB, respectively (P < .001). Bleeding requiring transfusion occurred in 2 patients who underwent TJLB and 1 patient who underwent PLB. There was 1 case of death occurring after TJLB.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe/life-threatening AEs occurring after liver biopsy were uncommon, and the 2 liver biopsy approaches appeared to have similar safety profiles for low-risk patients. After matching for underlying disease severity, pain was the AE that was more likely to occur in patients who underwent PLB.

Acute Liver Failure Guidelines

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a rare, acute, potentially reversible condition resulting in severe liver impairment and rapid clinical deterioration in patients without preexisting liver disease. Due to the rarity of this condition, published studies are limited by the use of retrospective or prospective cohorts and lack of randomized controlled trials. Current guidelines represent the suggested approach to the identification, treatment, and management of ALF and represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. The scientific evidence was reviewed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation process to develop recommendations. When no robust evidence was available, expert opinions were summarized using Key Concepts. Considering the variety of clinical presentations of ALF, individualization of care should be applied in specific clinical scenarios.

Transjugular Liver Biopsy

Transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) was first performed in 1970 and has since become a standard procedure in interventional radiology practices. TJLB can be used when a percutaneous liver biopsy is contraindicated, such as patients with ascites, coagulopathy, congenital clotting disorders or for patients undergoing concurrent evaluation for portal hypertension. While TJLB specimens tend to be smaller with less complete portal triads numerous studies have shown the samples to be adequate for diagnosis and staging. This article will review what the interventional radiologist needs to know about TJLB including indications/work-up, technical details, tips and tricks, and complications.

Evolution of the liver biopsy and its future

Liver biopsies are commonly used to evaluate a wide variety of medical disorders, including neoplasms and post-transplant complications. However, its use is being impacted by improved clinical diagnosis of disorders, and non-invasive methods for evaluating liver tissue and as a result the indications of a liver biopsy have undergone major changes in the last decade. The evolution of highly effective treatments for some of the common indications for liver biopsy in the last decade (e.g., viral hepatitis B and C) has led to a decline in the number of liver biopsies in recent years. At the same time, the emergence of better technologies for histologic evaluation, tissue content analysis and genomics are among the many new and exciting developments in the field that hold great promise for the future and are going to shape the indications for a liver biopsy in the future. Recent advances in slide scanners now allow creation of "digital/virtual" slides that have image of the entire tissue section present in a slide [whole slide imaging (WSI)]. WSI can now be done very rapidly and at very high resolution, allowing its use in routine clinical practice. In addition, a variety of technologies have been developed in recent years that use different light sources and/or microscopes allowing visualization of tissues in a completely different way. One such technique that is applicable to liver specimens combines multiphoton microscopy (MPM) with advanced clearing and fluorescent stains known as Clearing Histology with MultiPhoton Microscopy (CHiMP). Although it has not yet been extensively validated, the technique has the potential to decrease inefficiency, reduce artifacts, and increase data while being readily integrable into clinical workflows. Another technology that can provide rapid and in-depth characterization of thousands of molecules in a tissue sample, including liver tissues, is matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry. MALDI has already been applied in a clinical research setting with promising diagnostic and prognostic capabilities, as well as being able to elucidate mechanisms of liver diseases that may be targeted for the development of new therapies. The logical next step in huge data sets obtained from such advanced analysis of liver tissues is the application of machine learning (ML) algorithms and application of artificial intelligence (AI), for automated generation of diagnoses and prognoses. This review discusses the evolving role of liver biopsies in clinical practice over the decades, and describes newer technologies that are likely to have a significant impact on how they will be used in the future.

Safety of percutaneous versus transjugular liver biopsy: A propensity score matched analysis

PURPOSE

This study sought to identify the complication, mortality, and readmission rates of patients undergoing either percutaneous (PCLB) or transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) when propensity matched for demographics and hepatic comorbidities.

METHODS

A retrospective review of New York's Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System ICD9 coded database from the years 2009-2013 was conducted. Patients over the age of 18 undergoing either PCLB or TJLB were included. Patients with hepatic neoplasm or metastasis were excluded. 2:1 PCLB:TJLB propensity match for age, race, payment, coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia/purpura, hypercoagulability, ascites, acute liver failure, chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and bone marrow disease was conducted. Univariate analysis compared demographics, complications, readmissions, and mortality.

RESULTS

1467 patients met inclusion criteria (PCLB = 978, TJLB = 489). Propensity match was successful in that there were no significant differences in demographics or hepatic comorbidities. TJLB had significantly lower rates of hematoma (0.20 % vs 1.20 %, p = 0.049) and higher rates of cardiac complications (0.40 % vs 0.00 %, p = 0.045). Other complication, readmission, and mortality rates did not differ significantly. Logistic regression found no significant predictors of readmission within 7 days or any complication within 5 days.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective, multi-center database review of adult patients undergoing PCLB or TJLB propensity matched for demographics and hepatic comorbidities found that TJLB patients had a significantly higher rate of cardiac complications while PCLB patients had a significantly higher rate of hematoma. These findings support prior literature suggesting a trend towards safety of TJLB compared to PCLB in patients with hemostatic disorders and/or advanced liver disease.

Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver Consensus Statement on Acute Liver Failure (Part 1): Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Presentation and Prognosis

Acute liver failure (ALF) is an infrequent, unpredictable, potentially fatal complication of acute liver injury (ALI) consequent to varied etiologies. Etiologies of ALF as reported in the literature have regional differences, which affects the clinical presentation and natural course. In this part of the consensus article designed to reflect the clinical practices in India, disease burden, epidemiology, clinical presentation, monitoring, and prognostication have been discussed. In India, viral hepatitis is the most frequent cause of ALF, with drug-induced hepatitis due to antituberculosis drugs being the second most frequent cause. The clinical presentation of ALF is characterized by jaundice, coagulopathy, and encephalopathy. It is important to differentiate ALF from other causes of liver failure, including acute on chronic liver failure, subacute liver failure, as well as certain tropical infections which can mimic this presentation. The disease often has a fulminant clinical course with high short-term mortality. Death is usually attributable to cerebral complications, infections, and resultant multiorgan failure. Timely liver transplantation (LT) can change the outcome, and hence, it is vital to provide intensive care to patients until LT can be arranged. It is equally important to assess prognosis to select patients who are suitable for LT. Several prognostic scores have been proposed, and their comparisons show that indigenously developed dynamic scores have an edge over scores described from the Western world. Management of ALF will be described in part 2 of this document.

Transjugular Versus Percutaneous Liver Biopsy in Children: Indication, Success, Yield, and Complications

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous biopsy (PB) and transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) are 2 main ways of obtaining liver tissue. We evaluated the indications, success rate, tissue yield, and complications of TJLB in comparison to PB in children.

METHODS

Electronic records of children undergoing liver biopsy (LB) were reviewed. Clinico laboratory data including indication, type of biopsy, complications, and tissue yield (length and number of complete portal tracts [CPT]) were noted.

RESULTS

Five hundred forty LB (indication: neonatal cholestasis [42.9%], chronic liver disease [43.7%], liver failure [3.7%], focal lesions [3.3%] and others [6.3%]) were done. Four hundred seventy-three were PB (317 boys, 14 [1--216] months) done by percussion (322 [68%]), real-time ultrasound guidance (125 [26.4%]), or plugged method [26 (5.5%)]. Sixty-seven (12.4%) were TJLB [38 boys, 140 (24--216) months], done in patients with contraindications for PB. Technical success (67/68 vs 473/473; P = 0.7) and complications (4 [6%]; vs 15 [3.3%]; P = 0.2) of TJLB and PB were similar. Major complications (0.5%) included supraventricular tachycardia (n = 1) in TJLB and hemoperitoneum (n = 2) in PB. Tissue yield of TJLB was poorer in terms of length (1.0 [0.2--2.0] vs 1.1 [0.4--2.1] cm; P < 0.001), CPT (4 [0--9] vs 5 [2--17]; P < 0.001) and adequacy for reporting (56/67 vs 459/473; P < 0.001). Biopsy yield of <6 CPT was predicted by cirrhosis at histology and TJLB. No factor identified risk of complications with LB.

CONCLUSIONS

LB is a safe procedure and only 12% children require TJLB because of contraindications of PB. Technical success and complications are similar but tissue yield is poorer in TJLB than PB. Presence of cirrhosis and TJLB adversely affected tissue yield.

Autoimmune Hepatitis with Concomitant Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Diagnosed by Transjugular Liver Biopsy

Patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) may sometimes have concomitant idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Severe thrombocytopenia in ITP interferes with percutaneous liver biopsy for pathological diagnosis of AIH. Here, we report a case of AIH with ITP in a 63-year-old woman. The patient presented to our hospital with liver dysfunction and thrombocytopenia. For histological examination, transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) was performed, leading to a diagnosis of AIH. Corticosteroids treatment led to an improvement in her liver enzyme levels and platelet count. In conclusion, patients with AIH may sometimes have concomitant ITP. TJLB was effective for making the diagnosis of AIH with severe thrombocytopenia due to ITP.

Transjugular diagnostics in acute liver failure including measurements of hepatocentral venous biomarker gradients

AIM

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a syndrome of severe liver injury that may need urgent liver transplantation and is associated with significant risk of death. Early outcome prediction and further possibilities to increase accuracy of prognosis scores are important.

METHODS

We examined 30 patients with ALF, according to the novel criteria of the Intractable Hepato-Biliary Diseases Study Group, who underwent transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) and investigated the relevance of histology for correct diagnosis and etiology. We assessed the suitability of necrosis (%), hepatic venous pressure gradients (HVPG), and hepatocentral venous gradients of serum biomarkers for outcome prediction. For this purpose, we calculated the difference of biomarker levels between hepatic vein (HV) and superior vena cava (SVC) blood samples.

RESULTS

Histology of TJLB specimens contributed to finding the etiology in 83%. Necrosis (%) and HVPGs were not significantly different between outcome groups. In gradient measurements, caspase 3/7 activity and total cytokeratin 18 (CK-18) (M65) had significant and relevant levels different from zero. Although they were not accurate for outcome prediction, differences between outcome groups were detected in caspase activation: levels of caspase 3/7 activity in the HV and caspase-cleaved CK-18 (M30) in the SVC were significantly higher in spontaneously recovered patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results underline the role of caspase activation in spontaneous recovery from ALF. Furthermore, the calculation of hepatocentral venous biomarker gradients could represent a new diagnostic tool whose clinical potential needs to be further investigated.

Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) consensus guidelines on invasive and non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: a 2016 update

Hepatic fibrosis is a common pathway leading to liver cirrhosis, which is the end result of any injury to the liver. Accurate assessment of the degree of fibrosis is important clinically, especially when treatments aimed at reversing fibrosis are being evolved. Despite the fact that liver biopsy (LB) has been considered the "gold standard" of assessment of hepatic fibrosis, LB is not favored by patients or physicians owing to its invasiveness, limitations, sampling errors, etc. Therefore, many alternative approaches to assess liver fibrosis are gaining more popularity and have assumed great importance, and many data on such approaches are being generated. The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) set up a working party on liver fibrosis in 2007, with a mandate to develop consensus guidelines on various aspects of liver fibrosis relevant to disease patterns and clinical practice in the Asia-Pacific region. The first consensus guidelines of the APASL recommendations on hepatic fibrosis were published in 2009. Due to advances in the field, we present herein the APASL 2016 updated version on invasive and non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis. The process for the development of these consensus guidelines involved review of all available published literature by a core group of experts who subsequently proposed consensus statements followed by discussion of the contentious issues and unanimous approval of the consensus statements. The Oxford System of the evidence-based approach was adopted for developing the consensus statements using the level of evidence from one (highest) to five (lowest) and grade of recommendation from A (strongest) to D (weakest). The topics covered in the guidelines include invasive methods (LB and hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements), blood tests, conventional radiological methods, elastography techniques and cost-effectiveness of hepatic fibrosis assessment methods, in addition to fibrosis assessment in special and rare situations.

Evaluation of the Success Rate of Ultrasound-guided Transjugular Liver Biopsy (TJLB) and the Associated Complications

Introduction

Transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) is a diagnostic radiological intervention, applied to patients with contraindications to percutaneous or laparoscopic liver biopsy. The aim of this study was to determine the safety, effectiveness, complications, and pathological impact of TJLB.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted on 24 consecutive patients, undergoing TJLB at Imam Reza Hospital, affiliated to Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, from April 2010 to March 2011. The inclusion criteria were coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia, and ascites. TJLB was performed by a radiologist, and a guide wire was inserted in the right jugular vein. Right atrium and middle hepatic vein were catheterized, and then, Cook Quick-Core Biopsy Needle was used by ultrasound guidance. Data analysis was performed by SPSS version 16.

Results

The sample size included 24 subjects (54% males and 46% females). Success rate of TJLB was reported as 87.5% and the intervention duration was 23.89±9.34 min. No complications were reported in 37.5% of the patients; however, pain in the right upper quadrant (33.3%), leakage of contrast substance into the liver capsule (4.2%), and diffuse abdominal pain (4.2%). In 83% of biopsies, suitable samples were obtained for histopathological diagnosis, and 13% of patients were excluded from the study. According to the results, the mean central port track (CPT) was 6.75 ± 2.95.

Conclusion

TJLB is a relatively effective and safe procedure for patients with contraindications to percutaneous liver biopsy.

Major complications due to transjugular liver biopsy: Incidence, management and outcome

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the incidence of intraperitoneal bleeding and other major complications of transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) and analyze their outcome and management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical files of 341 consecutive patients who had TJLB were retrospectively analyzed. There were 237 men and 104 women (mean age: 51.38±12.8 years; range: 17-89 years). All patients had TJLB because standard percutaneous transhepatic biopsy was contraindicated. Patients' files were reviewed to search for major and minor procedure-related complications during or immediately after TJLB.

RESULTS

TJLBs were technically successful in 331/341 patients (97.07%; 95%CI: 94.67-98.58%). Major complications consisted exclusively of intraperitoneal bleeding due to liver capsule perforation and were observed in 2/341 patients (0.59%; 95%CI: 0.07-2.10%). They were treated using transcatheter arterial or venous embolization with a favorable outcome. The most frequent minor complications were abdominal pain (35/341; 10.26%; 95%CI: 7.25-13.99%) and supraventricular arrhythmia (15/341; 4.40%; 95%CI: 2.48-7.15%). No cases of inadvertent injury of the carotid artery were observed.

CONCLUSION

Major complications during TJLB are extremely rare and can be managed using arterial or venous embolization with a favorable outcome. Our results reinforce the general assumption that TJLB is a safe and well-tolerated technique.

Gray scale and contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of malignant liver tumors of vascular origin

OBJECTIVES

Malignant vascular tumors of the liver are rare. The aim of this study was to investigate the applicability of gray scale and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in patients with epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) of the liver and hepatic angiosarcoma (HA) and to describe the clinical presentation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all patients with epithelioid hemangioendothelioma or hemangiosarcoma of the liver from 1998 to 2011, who underwent ultrasound investigation. We describe the findings in gray scale and contrast-enhanced ultrasound and the clinical course of the disease of seven patients with EHE and five patients with HA.

RESULTS

Ultrasound investigation in EHE showed mostly multiple hypoechoic irregular lesions close to the liver capsule and with a halo in some cases. Contrast enhancement revealed inhomogeneously and through all contrast phases vascularized tumors with a rim enhancement in 50%, with or without early wash out. All tumors had avascular parts. HA presented as multiple and irregular hypo-, iso- or hyperechoic lesions. After contrast enhancement, hypervascularization with individual patterns was evident in all patients. Of five, three had liquid parts. Patients with HA were significantly older (58 vs. 37 years, p = 0.014) and presented with lower thrombocyte counts (84 vs. 264, p = 0.0025) and with higher CEA levels (4.6 vs. 1.5, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

EHE and HA are inhomogeneous tumors, explaining the high inter-individual variability and heterogeneity in ultrasound examination. The presence of multifocal lesions, heterogeneity and undefined margins may differentiate EHE or HA from hemangioma. A biopsy is essential in the diagnosis of vascular tumors.

Transjugular liver biopsy

Liver biopsy is still the gold standard for evaluation of acute and chronic liver diseases, despite achievements regarding noninvasive diagnosis and staging in liver diseases. Transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) has proved a good option when ascites and/or significant coagulopathy precludes a percutaneous approach. Because diagnostic hemodynamic procedures can be performed during the same session, it is useful in many clinical settings, regardless of the absence of percuteaneous contraindications. TJLB is a safe technique able to provide good-quality specimens with a low rate of complications. This article presents an overview of TJLB that discusses the technique, applicability, indications, contraindications, complications, and diagnostic accuracy.

Transfemoral liver biopsy using a Quick-Core biopsy needle system in living donor liver transplantation recipients

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transfemoral liver biopsy with a Quick-Core biopsy needle in select living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. Eight LDLT recipients underwent 9 transfemoral liver biopsy sessions. Six patients had undergone modified right lobe (mRL) LDLT, and 2 patients had undergone dual-left lobe LDLT. The indications for transfemoral liver biopsy were a hepatic vein (HV) at an acute angle to the inferior vena cava (IVC) on the coronal plane and a thin (<10-mm) liver parenchyma surrounding the HV to be biopsied on enhanced computed tomography. Under fluoroscopic guidance, the right inferior HV in the mRL or the left HV in the right-sided left lobe with a cranial orientation was negotiated with a 5-Fr catheter via the common femoral vein. Then, a stiffening cannula was introduced into the HV over a stiff guide wire. Needle passage was then performed with an 18- or 19-gauge Quick-Core biopsy needle. Technical success was achieved in all sessions without major complications. The median number of needle passages was 4 (range = 2-6). The median total length of obtained liver specimens in each session was 44 mm (range = 24-75 mm). The median number of portal tracts was 18 (range = 10-29), and the obtained liver specimens were adequate for histological diagnosis in all sessions. In conclusion, transfemoral liver biopsy with a Quick-Core biopsy needle is an effective and safe alternative for obtaining a liver specimen when standard transjugular liver biopsy is not feasible because of an unfavorable HV angle with respect to the IVC and/or a thin liver parenchyma surrounding the HV.

Consensus on the histopathological evaluation of liver biopsies from patients following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

After allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) liver biopsy is performed for enigmatic liver disorders when noninvasive diagnostic steps have failed in establishing a definitive diagnosis. This document provides an updated consensus on the prerequisites for proper evaluation of liver biopsies in alloHCT patients and the histological diagnostic criteria for liver graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). The Working Group's recommendations for the histological diagnosis of liver GvHD were derived from the peer-reviewed literature and from the consensus diagnosis of a total of 30 coded liver biopsies. Acceptance of the recommendations was tested by a survey distributed to all HCT centers in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Consensus was achieved for biopsy indications, methods of sample acquisition and processing, reporting and interpretation of biopsy findings. As GvHD is variably treated and the treatment modalities have changed over time, the panel endorses the use of more frequent biopsies in clinical studies in order to improve the present challenging clinical and diagnostic situation.

Transjugular liver biopsy

Biopsy of the liver is considered the 'gold standard' and is often necessary for histopathological characterization of hepatic disease processes. The techniques to obtain liver specimen are percutaneous liver biopsy, transjugular liver biopsy and mini-laparoscopic liver biopsy. Percutaneous route is the preferred method for its simplicity, ease and safety. Transjugular biopsy of the liver has become an accepted alternative method of obtaining hepatic tissue in patients with an established contraindication to percutaneous liver biopsy viz. coagulopathy, ascites, extreme obesity, small shrunken liver etc. A total of 67 transjugular liver biopsies were performed between January 2004 and February 2012 in a tertiary care hospital. The procedure was performed on in patient basis after thorough pre procedure work up with jugular puncture under ultrasonography guidance and fluoroscopy guided liver biopsy using LABS 100 liver access and biopsy set. The commonest indication for liver biopsy was work up for indeterminate chronic liver disease and the most common contraindications for percutaneous biopsy that led to biopsy by transjugular route were coagulopathy and ascites. Technical success of the procedure was achieved in 96% cases and no major complications were encountered in this group. Transjugular liver biopsy is a valuable tool for clinical decision making in a specific sub set of patients in whom percutaneous biopsy is contraindicated. Transjugular approach with jugular access under real time USG guidance and liver biopsy using automated core biopsy needle is safe, well tolerated, effective and provides adequate tissue for histological assessment.

Transjugular liver biopsy

Liver biopsy is considered the gold standard for the evaluation of acute and chronic liver disorders. Transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) was described by Dotter in 1964 and clinically performed for the first time by Hanafee in 1967. TJLB consists of obtaining liver tissue through a rigid cannula introduced into one of the hepatic veins, typically using jugular venous access. The quality of the TJLB specimens has improved so much that the samples obtained by this method are comparable with those obtained with the percutaneous technique. TJLB is indicated for patients with coagulopathy, ascites, peliosis hepatis, morbid obesity, liver transplant, or in patients undergoing a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure. The technical success rate for a TJLB procedure ranges from 87 to 97%. Sample fragmentation has been reported in 14 to 25% of the TJLB samples. The complication rates are low and range between 1.3% and 6.5%. The purpose of this article is to provide a review of the fundamental aspects of the TJLB procedure, including technique, indications, contraindications, results, and complications.

Tolerance of liver biopsy in a tertiary care center: comparison of the percutaneous and the transvenous route in 143 prospectively followed patients

BACKGROUND

Transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) is usually performed when a percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) is contraindicated. TJLB is an invasive procedure and the patient's tolerance may be variable.

AIM

To compare patient tolerance and quality of the biopsy sample between PLB and TJLB.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 143 patients underwent a liver biopsy; of these, 75 underwent TJLB and 68 underwent PLB. To evaluate patient tolerance, we used a visual analog scale that scored the intensity of the symptoms. The length of the biopsy sample and the total number of portal tracts per biopsy were also determined for assessment of biopsy quality.

RESULTS

The biopsy sample length was similar in both groups (18.88 ± 8.83 mm on PLB vs. 18.26 ± 10.30 mm on TJLB). No differences were found in the number of portal tracts between the two groups (10.43 ± 8.25 on TJLB vs. 12 ± 10.09 on PLB). Fewer complications were observed in the TJLB group compared with the PLB group (P=0.002).Further, higher degree of pain was reported by patients who underwent PLB compared with patients who underwent TJLB (3.18 ± 3.17 vs. 1.19 ± 2.07); as such, there was a greater need for analgesics on PLB.

CONCLUSION

TJLB and PLB techniques provide similar quality of tissue samples; however, TJLB is less painful and therefore better tolerated by patients.

Prediction of outcome and selection of the liver transplantat candidate in acute liver failure

Acute liver failure (ALF) is characterized by a sudden and severe deterioration of liver function, typically mirrored by a marked increase of the international normalized ratio (INR) and hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Due to various possible causes hepatocytes get damaged via either apoptotic or necrotic pathways. Anticipating the natural prognosis of a patient with ALF is one of the most challenging tasks in hepatology critical care. Important factors that influence the chance of spontaneous recovery are the underlying etiology of acute liver failure, the acuity of disease, and the severity of HE. Once an estimation of the prognosis in the individual patient has been made, this quickly has to be integrated in the discussion whether high-urgency liver transplantation is necessary and justifiable. This decision has to cover several medical, social, and organizational issues. Well organized liver transplantation programs around the world have achieved an impressive improvement of the 1 year survival rate in ALF from around 40% without transplantation up to nearly 80% with transplantation. The recent debate on whether severe acute alcoholic hepatitis could represent a new candidate eligible for high-urgency liver transplantation shows that the topic is still open for discussion.

High intrahepatic HHV-6 virus loads but neither CMV nor EBV are associated with decreased graft survival after diagnosis of graft hepatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In liver transplant recipients with graft hepatitis, the relevance of herpesviruses is not well defined.

METHODS

Viral loads of CMV, EBV, and HHV-6 were determined in blood and liver biopsies of 170 liver transplant recipients with graft hepatitis by quantitative PCR.

RESULTS

HHV-6-, CMV-, and EBV-DNA were detected in 58%, 14%, and 44% of the biopsies, respectively, with coinfections in 34%. High intrahepatic HHV-6 DNA levels (>75th percentile, 11.27 copies/1000 cells) and detection of HHV-6 DNAemia were significantly associated with decreased graft survival after diagnosis of graft hepatitis (p=0.014 and p=0.003, respectively, median follow-up was 23.8 months). Multivariate analysis confirmed high intrahepatic HHV-6 loads as an independent factor associated with reduced graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 2.61, 95%confidence interval 1.16-5.87). Low concentrations of HHV6 DNA in the liver, indicating latent infection, did not influence graft survival. Neither CMV nor EBV (qualitative detection and high virus loads) nor acute rejection (according to the BANFF score) affected graft survival. However, patients had been treated for CMV reactivations and acute rejections in this retrospective study. High age and high bilirubin levels were the other independent factors associated with reduced graft survival (adjusted hazard ratio 3.56CI 1.52-8.34 and 3.23CI 1.50-6.96, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

High intrahepatic HHV-6-DNA levels are associated with decreased graft survival in liver transplant recipients with graft hepatitis. The significance of HHV-6 as potential etiology of graft hepatitis needs further evaluation.

Clinical feasibility of liver elastography by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI)

BACKGROUND

Transient elastography is increasingly used for assessment of liver fibrosis. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) is a new technology to perform liver elastography.

AIMS

We evaluated the clinical feasibility, validity and accuracy of the ARFI method and compared it to Fibroscan(®) and liver histology.

METHODS

Ultrasonographic elastography of the liver using ARFI was performed in 29 patients with liver cirrhosis, 70 patients with liver disease and 23 healthy controls.

RESULTS

ARFI was feasible in all patients providing a mean propagation velocity of 1.65±0.93 m/s. ARFI results of the right and left liver lobes were comparable (p<0.001). In cirrhotic patients, ARFI gave significantly higher values than in the other patients (p<0.001). Rate of invalid measurements was lower in ARFI than in Fibroscan(®) (p<0.04). Both elastography methods were highly correlated to each other (p<0.001). Furthermore, ARFI correlated to histological grading of liver fibrosis (p<0.001) and to inflammatory activity (p<0.05). Liver steatosis had no statistical influence on ARFI results (p=0.2) in contrast to Fibroscan(®) (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The new ultrasonographic method of ARFI elastography allows valid, accurate and flexible evaluation of liver stiffness. It seems more feasible in patients with liver cirrhosis than Fibroscan(®). ARFI elastography of the left liver lobe is also possible. Liver steatosis does not seem to influence ARFI elastography.