Dexmedetomidine use in the setting of cocaine-induced hypertensive emergency and aortic dissection: a novel indication

Dexmedetomidine in the treatment of toxicologic conditions: a systematic review and review of the toxicology investigators consortium database

INTRODUCTION

Dexmedetomidine is an alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist which is widely used for sedation. Dexmedetomidine does not suppress the respiratory drive and produces a state of cooperative sedation; it may be associated with beneficial outcomes in the general critical care population. The role of dexmedetomidine in the treatment of toxicologic conditions (excluding alcohol withdrawal) is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To critically assess and summarize the literature regarding the use of dexmedetomidine in toxicologic conditions other than alcohol withdrawal.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the medical literature to identify all existing evidence regarding the use of dexmedetomidine for toxicologic conditions. We excluded reviews and commentary, studies reporting exclusively on alcohol withdrawal, and studies reporting the use of dexmedetomidine to treat iatrogenic sedative withdrawal in the intensive care unit. We also performed a review of the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) database for patients treated with dexmedetomidine.

RESULTS

We identified 98 studies meeting inclusion criteria; 87 of these were case reports or case series, representing 99 unique cases. Eleven articles with other designs were identified, which included 138 patients treated with dexmedetomidine for toxicologic conditions. Ninety-three cases from the ToxIC registry met inclusion criteria. Common indications for dexmedetomidine included stimulant intoxication, sedative withdrawal, serotonin syndrome, antimuscarinic toxidrome, opioid withdrawal, and cannabinoid intoxication. Dexmedetomidine was usually administered by continuous infusion; bolus administration was reported in a minority of cases. Adverse effects were uncommon. The quality of evidence was generally low, given the preponderance of case reports, the rate of missing or poorly reported data, and the near-universal co-administration of other sedatives.

TREATMENT OF STIMULANT POISONING

Fifty-nine patients with stimulant poisoning were treated with dexmedetomidine. There was reasonably good evidence that dexmedetomidine was helpful in the treatment of stimulant poisoning.

TREATMENT OF SEDATIVE WITHDRAWAL

Twenty-two patients with sedative withdrawal were treated with dexmedetomidine. Several case reports of very high-quality suggested efficacy of dexmedetomidine for this indication, particularly for baclofen withdrawal.

TREATMENT OF SEROTONIN SYNDROME

Twenty-six patients with serotonin syndrome were treated with dexmedetomidine. This evidence was of lower quality due to missing clinical details, potential overdiagnosis of serotonin syndrome, and near-universal concomitant treatment with other sedatives.

TREATMENT OF ANTIMUSCARINIC POISONING

Forty-two patients with antimuscarinic poisoning were treated with dexmedetomidine. This evidence was of low quality and was limited by infrequent use of the preferred antidote, physostigmine.

TREATMENT OF OPIOID WITHDRAWAL

Forty-four patients with opioid withdrawal were treated with dexmedetomidine. This evidence was of low quality due to missing clinical details and near-universal concomitant treatment with other agents. The one high-quality trial reported the use of dexmedetomidine in ultra-rapid opioid detoxification, which is not indicated in modern practice.

TREATMENT OF CANNABINOID INTOXICATION

Five patients with cannabinoid intoxication were treated with dexmedetomidine. No definite conclusion can be drawn from the limited available evidence.

DISCUSSION

It is important to distinguish between the use of dexmedetomidine as a general sedative, which is likely to increase as the overall utilization of dexmedetomidine in critical care settings increases, and the use of dexmedetomidine as a specific pharmacologic treatment for a toxicologic condition. Well-established pharmacologic data from animal and human studies suggest dexmedetomidine counteracts stimulant-induced norepinephrine release. The mechanism by which dexmedetomidine treats sedative withdrawal is unclear. Some animal data show that dexmedetomidine may indirectly suppress serotonin release, which may suggest a role for dexmedetomidine in this condition.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a small and generally low-quality body of evidence which suggests that dexmedetomidine may be helpful in the treatment of certain toxicologic conditions, particularly stimulant intoxication and sedative withdrawal. Further high-quality research is needed to clarify the role of dexmedetomidine in patients with toxicologic conditions.

Aortic Dissection

Acute aortic dissection is a highly morbid condition with high mortality that requires emergent surgical evaluation and repair. The intraoperative management of acute aortic dissection requires the anesthesiologist to do far more than administer anesthesia and begins before the patient arrives at the operative theater. High-fidelity communication with the surgeon, knowledge of the surgical plan, knowledge of the anatomy of the dissection, and a nuanced understanding of aortic dissection pathophysiology are all critical aspects of anesthetic management.

Is It Time for an Expanded Role of Dexmedetomidine in Contemporary Anesthesia Practice? - A Clinician's Perspective

Since its approval by US Food and Drug Administration in 1999 the clinical use of dexmedetomidine has been gaining in popularity. The indications and clinical applications of this drug have been expanded significantly. In this paper we reviewed its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, mechanisms of action and mainly focused on its clinical uses and outcomes. Common clinical uses of dexmedetomidine include pre-operative anxiolysis, heart rate control during intubation, treatment of bronchospasm, prevention of laryngospasm and avoiding opioid-induced post-operative respiratory depression and nausea and vomiting. Avoiding opioid induced respiratory depression has been especially beneficial in patients with sleep apnea syndrome. Other problems that can be prevented with dexmedetomidine are tachydysrhythmias, myocardial ischemia, delirium and acute kidney injury. Dexmedetomidine is an excellent sedative drug for intubated patients and it greatly facilitates neurological evaluation. It has been used successfully as a patient-controlled anesthesia drug and to prevent shivering. It is also used as an adjuvant to local anesthetics. It has been suggested that dexmedetomidine is a drug that has many beneficial effects and should be used more frequently by anesthesia care providers to prevent common problems in the peri-operative period. With judicious titration to effect during the intravenous administration of this drug the occurrence of side effects can be minimized. It is very likely that this drug will ascend to take a much more prominent role in future anesthesia practice.

β-Blockers, Cocaine, and the Unopposed α-Stimulation Phenomenon

Cocaine abuse remains a significant worldwide health problem. Patients with cardiovascular toxicity from cocaine abuse frequently present to the emergency department for treatment. These patients may be tachycardic, hypertensive, agitated, and have chest pain. Several pharmacological options exist for treatment of cocaine-induced cardiovascular toxicity. For the past 3 decades, the phenomenon of unopposed α-stimulation after β-blocker use in cocaine-positive patients has been cited as an absolute contraindication, despite limited and inconsistent clinical evidence. In this review, the authors of the original studies, case reports, and systematic review in which unopposed α-stimulation was believed to be a factor investigate the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and published evidence behind the unopposed α-stimulation phenomenon. We also investigate other potential explanations for unopposed α-stimulation, including the unique and deleterious pharmacologic properties of cocaine in the absence of β-blockers. The safety and efficacy of the mixed β-/α-blockers labetalol and carvedilol are also discussed in relation to unopposed α-stimulation.

Treatment of cocaine cardiovascular toxicity: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Cocaine abuse is a major worldwide health problem. Patients with acute cocaine toxicity presenting to the emergency department may require urgent treatment for tachycardia, dysrhythmia, hypertension, and coronary vasospasm, leading to pathological sequelae such as acute coronary syndrome, stroke, and death.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to review the current evidence for pharmacological treatment of cardiovascular toxicity resulting from cocaine abuse.

METHODS

MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), OpenGrey, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to November 2015. Articles on pharmacological treatment involving human subjects and cocaine were selected and reviewed. Evidence was graded using Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines. Treatment recommendations were compared to current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. Special attention was given to adverse drug events or treatment failure. The search resulted in 2376 articles with 120 eligible involving 2358 human subjects. Benzodiazepines and other GABA-active agents: There were five high-quality (CEBM Level I/II) studies, three retrospective (Level III), and 25 case series/reports (Level IV/V) supporting the use of benzodiazepines and other GABA-active agents in 234 subjects with eight treatment failures. Benzodiazepines may not always effectively mitigate tachycardia, hypertension, and vasospasm from cocaine toxicity. Calcium channel blockers: There were seven Level I/II, one Level III, and seven Level IV/V studies involving 107 subjects and one treatment failure. Calcium channel blockers may decrease hypertension and coronary vasospasm, but not necessarily tachycardia. Nitric oxide-mediated vasodilators: There were six Level I/II, one Level III, and 25 Level IV/V studies conducted in 246 subjects with 11 treatment failures and two adverse drug events. Nitroglycerin may lead to severe hypotension and reflex tachycardia. Alpha-adrenoceptor blocking drugs: There were two Level I studies and three case reports. Alpha-1 blockers may improve hypertension and vasospasm, but not tachycardia, although evidence is limited. Alpha-2-adrenoceptor agonists: There were two high-quality studies and one case report detailing the successful use of dexmedetomidine. Beta-blockers and β/α-blockers: There were nine Level I/II, seven Level III, and 34 Level IV/V studies of β-blockers, with 1744 subjects, seven adverse drug events, and three treatment failures. No adverse events were reported for use of combined β/α-blockers such as labetalol and carvedilol, which were effective in attenuating both hypertension and tachycardia. Antipsychotics: Seven Level I/II studies, three Level III studies, and seven Level IV/V case series and reports involving 168 subjects have been published. Antipsychotics may improve agitation and psychosis, but with inconsistent reduction in tachycardia and hypertension and risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects. Other agents: There was only one high level study of morphine, which reversed cocaine-induced coronary vasoconstriction but increased heart rate. Other agents reviewed included lidocaine, sodium bicarbonate, amiodarone, procainamide, propofol, intravenous lipid emulsion, propofol, and ketamine.

CONCLUSIONS

High-quality evidence for pharmacological treatment of cocaine cardiovascular toxicity is limited but can guide acute management of associated tachycardia, dysrhythmia, hypertension, and coronary vasospasm. Future randomized prospective trials are needed to evaluate new agents and further define optimal treatment of cocaine-toxic patients.

Poisoning with illicit substances: toxicology for the anaesthetist

The consumption of illicit substances represents a considerable threat to the health and wellbeing of particular sectors of our communities. Hospitalisation is sometimes required for the treatment of the direct toxic effects of the drugs as well as for injuries sustained while under their influence. Although poisoning with 'traditional' substances of abuse such as opioids, cocaine and cannabis still predominate in terms of numbers, the availability and use of new psychoactive substances are on the rise. These latter agents, some of which began life as failed pharmaceutical products, have enjoyed renewed status as recreational stimulants, entactogens or hallucinogens, properties that originally precluded them from legitimate use. These drugs may act by enhancing endogenous release of neurotransmitters, inhibiting their reuptake back into neurons or having direct effects on receptors, and may involve adrenergic, dopaminergic or serotonergic systems. The use of intravenous lipid emulsion for the symptomatic treatment of drug overdose has become a fertile ground for research and may hold promise as a non-specific treatment for poisoning with illicit substances. Dexmedetomidine, an α(2)-receptor agonist with a central sympatholytic effect, may be able to counteract the cardiovascular and central nervous system overstimulation that may accompany stimulant toxicity.