Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography in pancreatic diseases. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2012;2012:786239. [PMID: 23197932 PMCID: PMC3503265 DOI: 10.1155/2012/786239]

Can the location of the mural nodule indicate benign or malignant in branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas?

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are classified into main duct (MD)-type IPMNs, branch duct (BD)-type IPMNs, and mixed type IPMNs. While MD-type IPMN has a high risk of malignancy and should therefore be considered for resection if the patient is fit, BD-type IPMN needs to be carefully judged for surgical indication. The decision to resect BD-type IPMN is often based on international consensus Fukuoka guidelines 2017, but further investigation is required. In this study, we focused on whether the location of the mural nodule (MN) could be an indicator of malignancy.

METHODS

We enrolled 17 cases who had been diagnosed BD-type IPMNs which were surgically resected from January 2016 to December 2019. These cases were classified into benign and malignant group. Subsequently, a clinicopathological study was conducted based on the localization of MN (MN-central type or MN-peripheral type).

RESULTS

Although MN was found in 57% (4/11) in the benign group, 88% (7/8) was noted in the malignant group, indicating the presence of MN to be more common in the malignant group. Those with MN consisted of 6 cases of MN-central type and 5 cases of MN-peripheral type. All cases of central type were malignant compared to only one case of the peripheral group being confirmed on histology as cancer.

CONCLUSION

BD-IPMN with central mural nodule should be considered high risk for malignancy.

Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: an updated meta-analysis

Aim

We aim to assess the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CE-EUS) for pancreatic cancer and inflammatory lesions by pooling current evidence.

Materials and Methods

A systematical search of PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library was performed from inception to January 2016. Two authors independently screened and extracted detailed data from included studies. A random effect model was adopted to estimate the pooled sensitivity, specificity in order to determine the diagnostic ablitity of CE-EUS. Furthermore, we conducted the meta-regression and subgroup analyses to explore possible heterogeneity.

Results

Eighteen eligible studies enrolling 1668 patients were finally included in the study. The pooled sensitivity of CE-EUS for distinguishing pancreatic cancers from solid inflammatory masses was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91–0.94), and the specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84–0.90). The area under summary receiver operating characteristic curve yielded 0.97. No publication bias was observed by Deeks’ funnel plot in current meta-analysis.

Conclusions

We provided evidence that CE-EUS is a promising modality for differential diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Further multicenter prospective studies should be carried out to certify its utility.

Current Status and Future Directions for Screening Patients at High Risk for Pancreatic Cancer

It is well known that pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has a high mortality rate. Despite progress in understanding the biology and genetic basis of this disease, life expectancy has changed minimally in the last 50 years. This article highlights the importance of screening patients at high risk for developing pancreatic cancer and reviews current methods as well as methods in development for pancreatic cancer early detection and surveillance.

Effectiveness of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for detecting mural nodules in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas and for making therapeutic decisions

Background and Objectives:

There have been few studies to date evaluating the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CE-EUS) for detecting mural nodules in patients with branch duct-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (BD-IPMN) of the pancreas. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of CE-EUS for detecting mural nodules in BD-IPMN.

Patients and Methods:

Of the 427 BD-IPMN patients, 21 patients (4.9%) in whom the presence of mural nodules was suggested by CE computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or in whom the presence of nodule-like lesions as shown by fundamental EUS, were examined by CE-EUS.

Results:

The mean diameter of cystic lesions was 29.8 ± 12.8 mm. The mean diameter of mural nodules was 9.5 ± 5.7 mm. BD-IPMN was detected in the pancreatic head in 16 cases, pancreatic body in 2 cases, and pancreatic tail in 3 cases. The mean follow-up period was 17.2 ± 11.9 months. The detection rates of mural nodule-like lesions in BD-IPMN patients on CT, MRI, and fundamental EUS were 36.8%, 63.2%, and 100%, respectively. The detection rates of true mural nodules in BD-IPMN patients on CT, MRI, and fundamental EUS were 85.7%, 71.4%, and 100%, respectively. The echo levels of mural nodule-like lesions on fundamental EUS were hyperechoic in 6 patients, isoechoic in 9 patients, and hypoechoic in 6 patients. The final diagnosis was mucus lumps in 14 patients and mural nodules in 7 patients. The contrast patterns observed were avascular, isovascular, and hypervascular in 14, 3, and 4 patients, respectively. No patients showed a hypovascular pattern. Fourteen patients showing an avascular pattern were diagnosed as having mucus lumps, and they were able to avoid surgical resection. Of the 7 patients who were diagnosed as having mural nodules, 5 underwent surgical resection. The pathological findings were adenocarcinoma in 2 patients and adenoma in 3 patients. Of the 3 adenoma patients, fundamental EUS demonstrated a hypoechoic area in 1 patient and an isoechoic area in 2 patients. Of the 2 adenocarcinoma patients, 1 each showed a hypoechoic area and a hyperechoic area. It was difficult to distinguish between patients with adenoma and patients with adenocarcinoma using the echo levels obtained from fundamental EUS.

Conclusions:

CE-EUS may be useful for avoiding the overdiagnosis of BD-IPMN with mural nodule-like lesions. However, it has difficulty in distinguishing between clearly benign and malignant lesions in BD-IPMN.

Endoscopic ultrasonography elastography for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid pancreatic masses: A systemic review and Meta-analysis

AIM: To evaluate the value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) elastography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid pancreatic masses.

METHODS: The databases including Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE, Science Direct, Springer link, CBM, Wan fang ,VIP and CNKI were searched before May 1, 2015 to collect the articles reporting the use of EUS-elastography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid pancreatic masses. The retrieved articles were screened and selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality assessment was conducted using the QUADAS scale. Stata 12.0 software was used to evaluate the publication bias, and Meta-Disc1.4 software was used to analyze the heterogeneity of the included articles, calculate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood and negative likelihood, and plot the SROC curve to evaluate the diagnosis value.

RESULTS: A total of 15 English articles were included. The summary sensitivity of qualitative EUS elastography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid pancreatic masses was 97% (95%CI: 95%-98%), the summary specificity was 63% (95%CI: 55%-70%), the positive likelihood ratio was 2.48 (95%CI: 1.49-4.12), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.06 (95%CI: 0.02-0.15), and the area under the SROC curve was 0.9013. The summary sensitivity of quantative EUS elastography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid pancreatic masses was 96% (95%CI: 94%-97%), the summary specificity was 71% (95%CI: 63%-78%), the positive likelihood ratio was 3.00 (95%CI: 1.91-4.70), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.09 (95%CI: 0.05-0.15), and the area under the SROC curve was 0.9193.

CONCLUSION: Quantative EUS elastography has a higher specificity than qualitative EUS elastography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant solid pancreatic masses, and both of them have higher diagnostic value.

Echoendoscopes

Advances in echoendoscopes and their processors have significantly expanded the role of EUS and its clinical applications.The diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities of EUS continue to evolve and improve. EUS has made a large impact on patient care but comes with significant startup and maintenance costs. As improved technology continues to enhance image resolution while decreasing the size of EUS processors, use of endosonography will become more widespread. EUS will continue to be a vital part of patient care and complement currently available cross-sectional imaging.

Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The negative predictive value of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions remains low, and the biopsy specimens are sometimes inadequate for appropriate pathological diagnosis.

AIMS

To evaluate the usefulness of a novel method of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for the differential diagnosis and adequate sampling of solid pancreatic lesions.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions who underwent fine-needle aspiration guided by contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography or by endoscopic ultrasonography from October 2010 to July 2013 were retrospectively identified and classified into the CH-EUS or EUS group, respectively. Surgical pathology and/or follow-up results were defined as the final diagnosis. Operating characteristics and adequacy of biopsy specimens by fine-needle aspiration were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Operating characteristics for contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions were as follows: area under the curve = 0.908, sensitivity = 81.6%, specificity = 100%, positive predictive value = 100%, negative predictive value = 74.1%, and accuracy = 87.9%. The percentage of adequate biopsy specimens in the CH-EUS group (96.6%) was greater than that in the EUS group (86.7%).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography during fine-needle aspiration is useful for improving the diagnostic yield and adequate sampling of solid pancreatic lesions.

Ultrasonographic evaluation of abdominal organs after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Disturbances of the hepatosplanchnic region may occur after cardiac operations. Experimental studies have implicated impairment of splanchnic blood supply in major abdominal organ dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We investigated the impact of the cardiac operation and CPB on liver, kidney, and renal perfusion and function by means of ultrasonography and biochemical indices in a selected group of cardiac surgery patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy five patients scheduled for a major cardiac operation were prospectively included in the study. Criteria for selection were moderate or good left ventricular ejection fraction and absence of previous hepatic or renal impairment. Ultrasound examination of the hepatic and renal vasculature and examination of biochemical parameters were performed on the day preceding the operation (T0), on the first postoperative day (T1), and on the seventh postoperative day (T2).

RESULTS

Portal vein velocity and flow volume increased significantly, whereas hepatic artery velocity and flow volume decreased at T1 in comparison with T0. Hepatic vein indices remained unaffected throughout the observation period. Renal artery velocity and flow decreased, whereas renal pulsatility index and renal resistive index increased at T1 as compared with T0. Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase values were increased as compared with baseline values 24 h postoperatively. All parameters displayed a trend to approach preoperative levels at T2. Strong negative correlations between alanine aminotransferase values at T1 and hepatic artery velocity and flow volume at the same time point were also demonstrated (R = 0.638, P < 0.001 and r = 0.662, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in portal vein flow and velocity and the decrease in hepatic artery flow and velocity in the period after CPB might be attributed to the hypothermic bypass technique and the hepatic arterial buffer response, respectively. The decrease in renal blood flow and velocity and the parallel increase in Doppler renal pulsatility index and renal resistive index could be considered as markers of kidney hypoperfusion and intrarenal vasoconstriction. Maintaining a high index of suspicion for the early diagnosis of noncardiac complications in the period after CPB and institution of supportive care in case of compromised splanchnic perfusion are warranted.

Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography: advance and current status

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) technology has undergone a great deal of progress along with the color and power Doppler imaging, three-dimensional imaging, electronic scanning, tissue harmonic imaging, and elastography, and one of the most important developments is the ability to acquire contrast-enhanced images. The blood flow in small vessels and the parenchymal microvasculature of the target lesion can be observed non-invasively by contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS). Through a hemodynamic analysis, CE-EUS permits the diagnosis of various gastrointestinal diseases and differential diagnoses between benign and malignant tumors. Recently, mechanical innovations and the development of contrast agents have increased the use of CE-EUS in the diagnostic field, as well as for the assessment of the efficacy of therapeutic agents. The advances in and the current status of CE-EUS are discussed in this review.

Diagnostic evaluation of solid pancreatic masses

Determining the etiology of a solid pancreatic lesion is a critical first step toward developing an appropriate treatment plan for patients with a benign or malignant pancreatic mass. Technological advances in cross-sectional and endoscopic imaging modalities offer pancreatic imaging options with degrees of resolution that were not available even 15-20 years ago. In most cases, the nature of a solid pancreatic mass can be determined using computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration. Knowledge about the basics of these modalities, as well as their strengths and limitations, plays an important role in understanding how patients with solid pancreatic masses should be evaluated.

Effectiveness of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for the evaluation of solid pancreatic masses

AIM

To evaluate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) in differentiating between pancreatic adenocarcinomas and other pancreatic disease.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated 90 patients who were seen between November 2010 and May 2013. All these patients had solid pancreatic masses that had a hypoechoic appearance on EUS. All patients underwent CH-EUS to evaluate this diagnostic method's usefulness. The mass lesions observed on CH-EUS were classified into three categories based on their echo intensity: hypoenhanced, isoenhanced, and hyperenhanced lesions. We adjusted the sensitivity and the specificity of each category for detecting malignancies. We also estimated the accuracy of CH-EUS by comparing it to a pathological diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of the 90 patients, 62 had a pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Fifty-seven out of 62 pancreatic adenocarcinomas showed a hypoenhanced pattern on CH-EUS. The sensitivity was 92%, the specificity 68% and the accuracy approximately 82%. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic analysis for CH-EUS was 0.799. There is a significant association between the hypoenhanced pattern on CH-EUS and pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma (χ(2) = 35.264, P < 0.001). In pathological examinations, the number of specimens for EUS-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) was considered insufficient for diagnosis in three patients, and in two patients, the results were reported to be negative for malignancy. Pancreatic masses in all five patients revealed a hypoenhanced pattern with CH-EUS. Three patients were diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma based on the pathology results of a biopsy, and the remaining two patients were clinically diagnosed with malignancy.

CONCLUSION

CH-EUS is useful for distinguishing between pancreatic adenocarcinoma and other pancreatic disease. When a pancreatic mass shows a hypoenhanced pattern on CH-EUS but involves either insufficient samples or negative results with EUS-FNA, clinicians might consider performing another pathologic diagnosis on the basis of an EUS-FNA sample or a biopsy.