Unpredictable nature of tolvaptan in treatment of hypervolemic hyponatremia: case review on role of vaptans

Tolvaptan versus fluid restriction in acutely hospitalised patients with moderate-profound hyponatraemia (TVFR-HypoNa): design and implementation of an open-label randomised trial

Background

Current hyponatraemia guidelines are divided on the use of tolvaptan in hospitalised patients with moderate to severe hyponatraemia, due to an uncertain risk-benefit ratio. We will conduct a randomised trial to test the hypothesis that early use of tolvaptan improves the rate of serum sodium correction and clinical outcomes compared with current standard first-line therapy, restriction of fluid intake, without increasing the risk of serum sodium overcorrection.

Methods

We will enrol hospitalised patients with euvolaemic or hypervolaemic hyponatraemia and serum sodium of 115–130 mmol/L at Austin Health, a tertiary care centre in Melbourne, Australia. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive either tolvaptan (initial dose 7.5 mg) or fluid restriction (initial limit 1000 ml per 24 h), with titration of therapy based on serum sodium response according to a pre-determined protocol over a 72-h intervention period.

The primary endpoint will be the between-group change in serum sodium over time, from study day 1 to day 4. Secondary endpoints include serum sodium increment in the first 24 and 48 h, proportion of participants with normalised serum sodium, length of hospital stay, requirement for serum sodium re-lowering with intravenous dextrose or desmopressin, cognitive and functional measures (Confusion Assessment Method Short form, Timed Up and Go test, hyponatraemia symptom questionnaire), 30-day readmission rate, treatment satisfaction score and serum sodium 30 days after discharge. The trial will be overseen by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board. Serum sodium will be monitored every 6–12 h throughout the study period, with pre-specified thresholds for commencing intravenous 5% dextrose if serum sodium rise targets are exceeded.

Discussion

We seek to inform future international guidelines with high-quality data regarding the utility and safety of tolvaptan compared to standard therapy fluid restriction in patients with moderate-severe hyponatraemia in hospital. If tolvaptan use in this patient group is endorsed by our findings, we will have established an evidence-based framework for tolvaptan initiation and monitoring to guide its use.

Trial registration

Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619001683123. Registered on December 2 2019

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06237-5.

[Retrospective Observational Study on Predictors of Body Weight and BNP Teduction in Cases of Tolvaptan Induction for Heart Failure]

Tolvaptan (TLV) carries the risk of serious side effects, and its introduction requires hospitalization. Therefore, it is important from the viewpoints of safety and medical economics to predict in advance, the patients for whom it will be effective and introduce it. The purpose of this study was to investigate the noninvasive and simple predictors for identifying TLV responders. We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients with heart failure who had TLV introduced at our hospital from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2018. By using the body weight and BNP reduction as the effect indices, predictors of body weight and BNP reduction were extracted by logistic analysis. The sensitivity and specificity at the cutoff value obtained by ROC analysis were also examined. Among 85 subjects, urine sodium concentration >63 mEq/L [odds ratio (OR): 6.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36-27.4] was detected as a predictor of body weight reduction. The sensitivity at this cutoff value was 81%, and the specificity was 70%. Serum osmolarity>291 mOsm/L (OR: 3.76, 95% CI: 1.00-14.2), urine potassium concentration<21 mEq/L (OR: 4.45, 95% CI: 1.09-18.2), and urine sodium concentration>71 mEq/L (OR: 7.38, 95% CI: 2.05-26.6) were detected as predictors of BNP reduction. The sensitivities were 62%, 53%, and 73%, and the specificities were 58%, 68%, and 68%, respectively. Therefore, it was suggested that urine sodium concentration may be useful as a predictor of body weight and BNP decrease after TLV induction.

Risk factors for sodium overcorrection in non-hypovolemic hyponatremia patients treated with tolvaptan

PURPOSE

In this study, the risk factors associated with sodium overcorrection were investigated with an optimal cutoff for baseline serum sodium for use in daily clinical practice.

METHODS

Electronic medical records of patients who received tolvaptan for non-hypovolemic hyponatremia were reviewed. Demographic and clinical data including age, sex, weight, height, comorbidity, cause of hyponatremia, hypertonic saline use, and comedication were collected. Baseline laboratory parameters measured included serum sodium, serum potassium, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, serum tonicity, ALT, AST, and urine osmolality. The primary outcome was the overcorrection of serum sodium, which was defined as an increase in serum sodium by more than 10 mmol/L in 24 h.

RESULTS

From a total of 77 patients included in the analysis, 24 (31.2%) showed sodium overcorrection (> 10 mmol/L/24 h); 2 (2.6%) in heart failure cohort, 17 (22.1%) in SIADH cohort, and 5 (6.5%) in unknown cause cohort. More than half of patients (51.9%) were administered hypertonic saline prior to tolvaptan. Hypertension, cancer, diuretics, baseline serum sodium, and SIADH were associated with the risk of overcorrection in the univariable analysis. Significant factors for the overcorrection from multivariable analysis were lower body mass index, presence of cancer (adjusted odds ratio, 10.87; 95% CI, 1.23-96.44), and lower serum sodium at baseline (adjusted odds ratio, 0.76 for every 1 mEq/L increase; 95% CI, 0.61-0.94).

CONCLUSION

The overcorrection of hyponatremia in non-hypovolemic patients treated with tolvaptan was significantly associated with lower body mass index, presence of cancer, and lower serum sodium at baseline. In subgroup analysis using SIADH patients, baseline sodium and cancer were found to be significant factors of overcorrection.

Equivalent Efficacy and Decreased Rate of Overcorrection in Patients With Syndrome of Inappropriate Secretion of Antidiuretic Hormone Given Very Low-Dose Tolvaptan

Rationale & Objective

Euvolemic hyponatremia often occurs due to the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH). Vasopressin 2 receptor antagonists may be used to treat SIADH. Several of the major trials used 15 mg of tolvaptan as the lowest effective dose in euvolemic and hypervolemic hyponatremia. However, a recent observational study suggested an elevated risk for serum sodium level overcorrection with 15 mg of tolvaptan in patients with SIADH.

Study Design

A retrospective chart review study comparing outcomes in patients with SIADH treated with 15 versus 7.5 mg of tolvaptan.

Settings & Participants

Patients with SIADH who were treated with a very low dose of tolvaptan (7.5 mg) at a single center compared with patients using a 15-mg dose from patient-level data from the observational study described previously.

Predictors

Tolvaptan dose of 7.5 versus 15 mg daily.

Outcomes

Appropriate response to tolvaptan, defined as an initial increase in serum sodium level > 3 mEq/L, and overcorrection of serum sodium level (>8 mEq/L per day, and >10 mEq/L per day in sensitivity analyses).

Analytical Approach

Descriptive study with additional outcomes compared using t tests and F-tests (Fischer's Exact χ2 Test).

Results

Among 18 patients receiving 7.5 mg of tolvaptan, the mean rate of correction was 5.6 ± 3.1 mEq/L per day and 2 (11.1%) patients corrected their serum sodium levels by >8 mEq/L per day, with 1 of these increasing by >12 mEq/L per day. Of those receiving tolvaptan 7.5 mg, 14 had efficacy, with increases ≥ 3 mEq/L; similar results were seen with the 15-mg dose (21 of 28). There was a statistically significant higher chance of overcorrection with the use of 15 versus 7.5 mg of tolvaptan (11 of 28 vs 2 of 18; P = 0.05; and 10 of 28 vs 1 of 18; P = 0.03, for >8 mEq/L per day and >10 mEq/L per day, respectively).

Limitations

Small sample size, retrospective, and nonrandomized.

Conclusions

Tolvaptan, 7.5 mg, daily corrects hyponatremia with similar efficacy and less risk for overcorrection in patients with SIADH versus 15 mg of tolvaptan.

Rapidity of Correction of Hyponatremia Due to Syndrome of Inappropriate Secretion of Antidiuretic Hormone Following Tolvaptan

BACKGROUND

Tolvaptan effectively corrects hyponatremia due to the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH), but undesired overcorrection can occur. We hypothesized that pretherapy parameters can predict the rapidity of response to tolvaptan in SIADH.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter historical cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Adults with SIADH or congestive heart failure (CHF) treated with tolvaptan for a serum sodium concentration ≤ 130 mEq/L at 5 US hospitals.

PREDICTORS

Demographic and laboratory parameters.

OUTCOMES

Rate of change in serum sodium concentration.

MEASUREMENTS

Spearman correlations, analysis of variance, and multivariable linear mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

28 patients with SIADH and 39 patients with CHF treated with tolvaptan (mean baseline serum sodium, 120.6 and 122.4 mEq/L, respectively) were studied. Correction of serum sodium concentration > 12 mEq/L/d occurred in 25% of patients with SIADH compared to 3% of those with CHF (P<0.001). Among patients with SIADH, the increase in serum sodium over 24 hours was correlated with baseline serum sodium concentration (r=-0.78; P<0.001), serum urea nitrogen concentration (SUN; r=-0.76; P<0.001), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (r=0.58; P=0.01). Baseline serum sodium and SUN concentrations were identified as independent predictors of change in serum sodium concentration in multivariable analyses. When patients were grouped into 4 categories according to baseline serum sodium and SUN median values, those with both low baseline serum sodium (≤121 mEq/L) and low baseline SUN concentrations (≤10mg/dL) exhibited a significantly greater rate of increase in serum sodium concentration (mean 24-hour increase of 15.4 mEq/L) than the other 3 categories (P<0.05). Among patients with CHF, only baseline SUN concentration was identified as an independent predictor of change in serum sodium concentration over time.

LIMITATIONS

Lack of uniformity in serial serum sodium concentration determinations and documentation of water intake.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline serum sodium and SUN values are predictive of the rapidity of hyponatremia correction following tolvaptan use in SIADH. We advise caution when dosing tolvaptan in patients with both low serum sodium and SUN concentrations.

Long-term low-dose tolvaptan treatment in hospitalized male patients aged >90 years with hyponatremia: Report on safety and effectiveness

The retrospective study aimed at investigating the safety and clinical efficacy of long-term application of tolvaptan in patients >90 years old with hyponatremia. Although tolvaptan has been used to treat hyponatremia, the effect of its long-term use in elderly patients was unknown.Seven patients over 90 with isovolumic or hypervolemic hyponatremia admitted to the PLA Navy General Hospital between October 2011 and October 2013 were enrolled. The patients' serum sodium levels <135 mmol/L persisted for more than 3 months, and oral treatment with tolvaptan lasted for more than 12 months. Tolvaptan dose started from 7.5 mg once daily, with maximum dose no more than 30 mg daily. Clinical and laboratory data of the patients before and after treatment were compared.Serum sodium and chlorine levels increased significantly in the 1st 3 days after treatment (P < .05). All patients' serum sodium levels were above 135 mmol/L 1 month after treatment, and sustained through 1 year after treatment, without extra sodium supplementation. No serious complications were observed.The result indicated a significant improvement in the serum sodium levels and no serious adverse effects after long-term use in very elderly patients.

In-patient Tolvaptan use in SIADH: care audit, therapy observation and outcome analysis

BACKGROUND

Indications for use of tolvaptan in SIADH-associated hyponatraemia remain controversial. We audited our local guidelines for Tolvaptan use in this situation to review treatment implications including drug safety, hospital admission episode analysis (episodes of liver toxicity, CNS myelinolysis, sodium-related re-admission rates), morbidity; mortality and underlying aetiologies.

METHODS

We report a retrospective case series analysis of on-going treatment outcomes (case-note review) for 31 patients (age 73.3 ± 10.5 years, 55% females) consecutively treated with Tolvaptan as in-patient for confirmed SIADH with persistent S/Na⁺ < 125 mmol/L despite removal of reversible causes and 24-48 h fluid restriction, and include longer-term outcome data (re-treatment/readmissions/mortality) for up to 4 years of follow-up. A minimum of 6 months follow-up data were reviewed unless the patient died before that period.

RESULTS

Short-term outcomes were favourable; 94%-achieved treatment targets after a mean of 3.48 ± 2.46 days. There was statistically significant rise in S/Na⁺ level after Tolvaptan treatment (before treatment: mean sodium 117.8 ± 3.73, 108-121 mmol/L and after treatment: mean sodium 128.7 ± 3.67, 125-135.2 mmol/L, P < .001). Although the target S/Na⁺ level was >125 mmol/L in fact one third (35%) of the patients achieved a S/Na⁺ level of >130 mmol/L by the time of hospital discharge. No patient experienced S/Na⁺ rise >12 mmol/L/24 h, drug-associated liver injury or CNS-myelinolysis. The average length of hospital stay following start of Tolvaptan treatment was 3.2 days. Relapse of hyponatraemia occurred in 26% of the patients, requiring retreatment with Tolvaptan. In all patients where either relapse of hyponatraemia occurred or readmission was necessary, SIADH was associated with malignancy, which was present overall in 60% of the group studied.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the safety and efficacy of Tolvaptan in the treatment of SIADH-related significant, symptomatic hyponatraemia when used under specialist guidance and strict monitoring. A sodium level relapsing below the treatment threshold by 1 week after discontinuation is a good indicator of a patient group with re-treatment/longer-term therapy needs, all of whom had underlying malignancy. The criteria set locally in our trust to initiate Tolvaptan use also identifies a group where further investigation for underlying malignancy should be considered.

Hyponatremia and the Brain

Hyponatremia is defined by low serum sodium concentration and is the most common electrolyte disorder encountered in clinical practice. Serum sodium is the main determinant of plasma osmolality, which, in turn, affects cell volume. In the presence of low extracellular osmolality, cells will swell if the adaptation mechanisms involved in the cell volume maintenance are inadequate. The most dramatic effects of hyponatremia on the brain are seen when serum sodium concentration decreases in a short period, allowing little or no adaptation. The brain is constrained inside a nonextensible envelope; thus, brain swelling carries a significant morbidity because of the compression of brain parenchyma over the rigid skull. Serum sodium concentration is an important determinant of several biological pathways in the nervous system, and recent studies have suggested that hyponatremia carries a significant risk of neurological impairment even in the absence of brain edema. The brain can also be affected by the treatment of hyponatremia, which, if not undertaken cautiously, could lead to osmotic demyelination syndrome, a rare demyelinating brain disorder that occurs after rapid correction of severe hyponatremia. This review summarizes the pathophysiology of brain complications of hyponatremia and its treatment.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Hyponatremia: Compilation of the Guidelines

Hyponatremia is a common water balance disorder that often poses a diagnostic or therapeutic challenge. Therefore, guidelines were developed by professional organizations, one from within the United States (2013) and one from within Europe (2014). This review discusses the diagnosis and treatment of hyponatremia, comparing the two guidelines and highlighting recent developments. Diagnostically, the initial step is to differentiate hypotonic from nonhypotonic hyponatremia. Hypotonic hyponatremia is further differentiated on the basis of urine osmolality, urine sodium level, and volume status. Recently identified parameters, including fractional uric acid excretion and plasma copeptin concentration, may further improve the diagnostic approach. The treatment for hyponatremia is chosen on the basis of duration and symptoms. For acute or severely symptomatic hyponatremia, both guidelines adopted the approach of giving a bolus of hypertonic saline. Although fluid restriction remains the first-line treatment for most forms of chronic hyponatremia, therapy to increase renal free water excretion is often necessary. Vasopressin receptor antagonists, urea, and loop diuretics serve this purpose, but received different recommendations in the two guidelines. Such discrepancies may relate to different interpretations of the limited evidence or differences in guideline methodology. Nevertheless, the development of guidelines has been important in advancing this evolving field.

Real-life experience of tolvaptan use in the treatment of severe hyponatraemia due to syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion

OBJECTIVE

European guidelines do not recommend tolvaptan for treatment of syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH), principally owing to concerns about risk of overly rapid correction of hyponatraemia. This study evaluated the real-life effectiveness and safety of tolvaptan.

DESIGN

Consecutive case series.

PATIENTS

Inpatients treated with tolvaptan for SIADH in 2 UK hospitals over a 3-year period.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome measures were serum sodium (sNa) correction at 24 and 48 h after tolvaptan therapy.

RESULTS

This case series included 61 patients aged 74·4 ± 15·3 years with (mean ± SD) sNa 119·9 ± 5·5 mmol/l. The mean sNa increase 24 h after tolvaptan initiation was 9 ± 3·9 mmol/l. Excessive correction of hyponatraemia was observed in 23% of patients with all these patients having baseline sNa <125 mmol/l, but no cases of osmotic demyelination syndrome were recorded. At the end of tolvaptan therapy, sNa increase was 13·5 ± 5·9 mmol/l with 96·7% of patients having sNa increase ≥5 mmol/l in 48 h. There was a negative significant correlation (P = 0·012) between baseline sNa and 24-h change; for every 1 mmol/l reduction in baseline value, sNa increased by an additional 0·23 mmol/l (95% CI 0·05-0·41).

CONCLUSIONS

Tolvaptan is effective in correcting hyponatraemia. Without rigorous electrolyte monitoring, tolvaptan carries a significant risk of overly rapid sodium correction, especially in patients with starting sNa <125 mmol/l. Tolvaptan should be used with great caution under close electrolyte monitoring.

Mild Chronic Hyponatremia in the Ambulatory Setting: Significance and Management

Mild chronic hyponatremia, as defined by a persistent (>72 hours) plasma sodium concentration between 125 and 135 mEq/L without apparent symptoms, is common in ambulatory patients and generally perceived as being inconsequential. The association between increased mortality and hyponatremia in hospitalized patients in various settings and etiologies is widely recognized. This review analyzes the significance of mild chronic hyponatremia in ambulatory subjects and its effects on mortality and morbidity. It addresses whether this disorder should even be treated and if so, which patients are likely to benefit from treatment. The available approaches to correct hyponatremia in such patients in the context of recently published panel-generated recommendations and guidelines are described.

[Hyponatremia and tolvaptan : what is the situation 5 years after approval?]

The diuretic tolvaptan has been approved for more than 5 years for the indications of euvolemic hyponatremia due to syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) secretion. In recent years many patients have been treated with tolvaptan and many physicians could gather practical experience. Other countries, such as the USA had already gained greater experience, also in the indications for hypervolemic hyponatremia. After approval was granted more than 5000 patients worldwide were included in the so-called hyponatremia register and 22 active centers in Germany with 317 patients participated. Although some details from this now concluded register have been published, the final publication of the multinational post-authorization safety study on tolvaptan in the treatment of SIADH has not yet been published. In the years 2012 and 2013 two warning letters were issued on tolvaptan. The first letter warned of the risk of a faster increase in serum sodium using tolvaptan and provided detailed information on how the risk of osmotic demeyelination can be minimized. So far only one proven case of osmotic demelination syndrome (ODS) is known; however, this occurred following incorrect use of tolvaptan in a monotherapy. The second warning letter provided information on the potential risk (reversible) of liver damage by tolvaptan, which resulted from the TEMPO 3:4 study. In this study tolvaptan was used in a higher dosage for therapy of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Although the European renal best practice (ERBP) guidelines from 2014 did not recommend tolvaptan for the indications of SIADH, other guidelines came to different conclusions. In summary, 5 years after the approval of tolvaptan there is still no consensus. At the current time many questions still remain unanswered. Initiation of therapy with tolvaptan remains reserved for experienced physicians in hospitals. Treatment must be adapted on the basis of a clinical estimation of the individual situation of each patient.

Current treatment practice and outcomes. Report of the hyponatremia registry

Current management practices for hyponatremia (HN) are incompletely understood. The HN Registry has recorded diagnostic measures, utilization, efficacy, and outcomes of therapy for eu- or hypervolemic HN. To better understand current practices, we analyzed data from 3087 adjudicated adult patients in the registry with serum sodium concentration of 130 mEq/l or less from 225 sites in the United States and European Union. Common initial monotherapy treatments were fluid restriction (35%), administration of isotonic (15%) or hypertonic saline (2%), and tolvaptan (5%); 17% received no active agent. Median (interquartile range) mEq/l serum sodium increases during the first day were as follows: no treatment, 1.0 (0.0–4.0); fluid restriction, 2.0 (0.0–4.0); isotonic saline, 3.0 (0.0–5.0); hypertonic saline, 5.0 (1.0–9.0); and tolvaptan, 4.0 (2.0–9.0). Adjusting for initial serum sodium concentration with logistic regression, the relative likelihoods for correction by 5 mEq/l or more (referent, fluid restriction) were 1.60 for hypertonic saline and 2.55 for tolvaptan. At discharge, serum sodium concentration was under 135 mEq/l in 78% of patients and 130 mEq/l or less in 49%. Overly rapid correction occurred in 7.9%. Thus, initial HN treatment often uses maneuvers of limited efficacy. Despite an association with poor outcomes and availability of effective therapy, most patients with HN are discharged from hospital still hyponatremic. Studies to assess short- and long-term benefits of correction of HN with effective therapies are needed.

Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion and cerebral/renal salt wasting syndrome: similarities and differences

Hyponatremia (sodium levels of <135 mEq/L) is one of the most common electrolyte imbalances in clinical practice, especially in patients with neurologic diseases. Hyponatremia can cause cerebral edema and brain herniation; therefore, prompt diagnosis and proper treatment is important in preventing morbidity and mortality. Among various causes of hyponatremia, diagnosing syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) and cerebral/renal salt wasting syndrome (C/RSW) is difficult due to many similarities. SIADH is caused by excess of renal water reabsorption through inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, and fluid restriction is the treatment of choice. On the other hand, C/RSW is caused by natriuresis, which is followed by volume depletion and negative sodium balance and replacement of water and sodium is the mainstay of treatment. Determinating volume status in hyponatremic patients is the key point in differential between SIADH and C/RSW. However, in most situations, differential diagnosis of these two diseases is difficult because they overlap in many clinical and laboratory aspects, especially to assess differences in volume status of these patients. Although distinction between the SIADH and C/RSW is difficult, improvement of hypouricemia and an increased fractional excretion of uric acid after the correction of hyponatremia in SIADH, not in C/RSW, may be one of the helpful points in discriminating the two diseases. In this review, we compare these two diseases regarding the pathophysiologic mechanisms, diagnosis, and therapeutic point of view.

Management of hyponatremia in various clinical situations

OPINION STATEMENT

Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte abnormality in both inpatient and outpatient settings. The condition primarily results from the combination of impaired free water excretion due to elevated vasopressin levels in conjunction with a source of free water intake. Recent studies have revealed that even mild and asymptomatic hyponatremia is associated with deleterious consequences. It is an independent risk factor for mortality and is also associated with increased length of hospitalization and hospital costs. Even mild chronic hyponatremia can result in subtle neurologic impairment and bone demineralization, leading to falls and associated bone fractures in the elderly. Hyponatremia can be a difficult condition to treat, with varying therapeutic strategies based on the etiology, severity, duration, and extent of neurologic symptoms. The ideal magnitude of correction is also controversial, as both inadequate therapy and overly aggressive therapy can result in neurologic injury. Formulas that have been devised to aid in the treatment of hyponatremia can be inaccurate in that they fail to adequately account for the renal response to therapy. Hyponatremic encephalopathy is the most serious complication of hyponatremia, and can result in permanent neurologic impairment or death if left untreated. Individuals most at risk for developing hyponatremic encephalopathy are postmenarchal women, children under 16 years of age, patients with central nervous system disease or hypoxemia, and patients in the postoperative setting. The preferred therapy for hyponatremic encephalopathy is a 100-ml bolus of 3 % sodium chloride (513 mEq/L) administered in repeated doses until symptoms reverse, with the goal of increasing the serum sodium 5-6 mEq/L. Vasopressin (V2) antagonists (vaptans) are not appropriate for the management of acute hyponatremic encephalopathy, as the onset of action is not sufficiently rapid and the increase in sodium is not predictable. Vaptans are primarily indicated for the treatment of asymptomatic hyponatremia due to SIAD that is refractory to conventional measures.