A Randomized Prospective Study of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy with Low-Dose Sodium Phosphate Tablets versus Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Solution. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:879749. [PMID: 25309588 PMCID: PMC4181789 DOI: 10.1155/2014/879749]

Comparison of oral sodium phosphate tablets and polyethylene glycol lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Objective

To systematically compare the bowel cleaning ability, patient tolerance and safety of oral sodium phosphate tablets (NaPTab) and oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEGL) to inform clinical decision making.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, CBM, WanFang Data, CNKI, and VIP databases were searched for studies that used randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the roles of NaPTab and PEGL in bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in the included papers. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

A total of 13 RCTs were eligible for inclusion, including 2,773 patients (1,378 and 1,395 cases in the NaPTab and PEGL groups, respectively). Meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in the cleansing quality of the NaPTab and PEGL groups [RR 1.02, 95% CI (0.96-1.08), P = 0.46]. The incidence of nausea was lower in the NaPTab group than in the PEGL group [RR 0.67, 95% CI (0.58-0.76), p < 0.00001]. Patients rated the taste of NaPTab higher than PEGL [RR 1.33, 95% CI (1.26-1.40), P < 0.00001]. Willingness to repeat the treatment was also higher in the NaPTab group than in the PEGL group [RR 1.52, 95% CI (1.28-1.80), P < 0.00001]. Both serum potassium and serum calcium decreased in both groups after the preparation; however, meta-analysis revealed that both minerals decreased more in the NaPTab group than in the PEGL group [MD = 0.38, 95% CI (0.13-0.62), P = 0.006 for serum potassium and MD = 0.41, 95% CI (0.04-0.77), P = 0.03 for serum calcium]. Meanwhile, serum phosphorus increased in both groups after the preparation; however, levels increased more in the NaPTab group than in the PEGL group [MD 4.51, (95% CI 2.9-6.11), P < 0.00001].

Conclusions

While NaP tablets and PEGL were shown to have a similar cleaning effect before colonoscopy, NaP tablets had improved patient tolerance. However, NaP tablets had a strong effect on serum potassium, calcium, and phosphorus levels. For patients with low potassium, low calcium, and renal insufficiency, NaP tablets should be prescribed with caution. For those at high-risk for acute phosphate nephropathy, NaP tablets should be avoided. Given the low number and quality of included studies, these conclusions will require additional verification by large high-quality studies.

Systematic review registration

10.37766/inplasy2023.5.0013, identifier: NPLASY202350013.

Correlation of Cleanliness among Different Bowel Segments during Colonoscopy: A Retrospective Study

Objective

To analyze the correlation of intestinal cleanliness in each segment of the Boston Intestinal Preparation Scale.

Methods

From February 2017 to October 2019, the data of patients who underwent colonoscopy in the Department of Gastroenterology, Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, were collected. Statistical analysis was performed according to the Boston Intestinal Preparation Scale score, and the correlation of intestinal cleanliness in each region was obtained.

Results

A total of 1739 patients were included. The overall score of BBPS was 6.77 ± 1.88. The scores of each region were 2.04 ± 0.84 (right lateral colon), 2.25 ± 0.68 (transverse colon), and 2.48 ± 0.64 (left colon). The difference between the regions was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The bowel cleanliness showed a gradual deterioration trend, and there was a positive correlation between colon cleanliness in each region. The accuracy of the transverse colon in predicting the right colon (AUC = 0.809) is higher than that of the left colon (AUC = 0.735), and the accuracy of predicting the cleanliness of the right colon intestinal tract by the cleanliness of the left colon intestinal tract is relatively low.

Conclusion

Intestinal cleanliness gradually deteriorates from the direction of the insert. It is not reliable to predict the right side of poor cleanliness by using the left colon intestinal cleanliness (BBPS 0-1 score). It should continue to further endoscopy. When the cleanliness of the transverse colon is poor, then stopping further endoscopy is considered.

Efficacy and Acceptability of 1 Liter of Polyethylene Glycol with Ascorbic Acid vs. 2 Liters of Polyethylene Glycol Plus Mosapride and Sennoside for Colonoscopy Preparation

BACKGROUND [color=black]Bowel preparation is an important factor for an optimal outcome of colonoscopy. Recently, polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution has been in common use for bowel cleansing for colonoscopy, but some patients are intolerant of PEG because of taste or volume. A low-volume PEG administered with ascorbic acid solution (PEG-Asc) was designed to improve tolerability, but the administration of this method is more complex than that with PEG alone. This study aimed to compare bowel cleansing efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 1 L PEG-Asc with a 2 L PEG preparation with use of sennosides and mosapride.[/color] MATERIAL AND METHODS [color=black]This was a prospective, single-center, non-inferiority trial that included 112 patients (PEG-Asc group, 68; PEG group, 44). The primary endpoint was the efficacy of colon cleansing assessed by endoscopists using a validated 4-point scale according to the Aronchick scale and was verified by a blinded investigator. Acceptability, tolerability, and adenoma detection rate (ADR) of these 2 regimens were secondary endpoints.[/color][color=black] [/color] RESULTS [color=black]We found no statistically significant differences between the groups in colon-cleansing efficacy or in the adenoma detection rate (ADR). Moreover, overall, patients significantly favored PEG-Asc over PEG, reflecting better acceptance of PEG-Asc. Additionally, more patients favored PEG-Asc over PEG for a hypothetical future colonoscopy. [/color] CONCLUSIONS [color=black]The alternate 1 L PEG-Asc regimen and standard 2 L PEG regimen were clinically equivalent with respect to cleansing efficacy, safety, and ADR, and more patients favored PEG-Asc than PEG. This alternate regimen may improve patient compliance and acceptance of surveillance colonoscopy.[/color].

Comparing reduced-dose sodium phosphate tablets to 2 L of polyethylene glycol: A randomized study

AIM

To compare the tolerability and quality of bowel cleansing between 2 L polyethylene glycol (PEG) and reduced-dose sodium phosphate (NaP) tablets as a preparation for colonoscopy.

METHODS

Two hundred patients were randomly assigned to the PEG or NaP groups at the same ratio. The NaP group patients took 30 tablets with 2 L of clear liquid, while the PEG group patients took 2L of PEG. Tolerability was assessed by a questionnaire about taste, volume, and the overall impression. The bowel cleansing quality was evaluated by colonoscopists.

RESULTS

Although NaP showed better tolerability in terms of taste, volume and overall impression (P < 0.01, P < 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively), the overall cleansing quality was better in the PEG group (P < 0.01). A subgroup analysis, stratified by sex and age, indicated that NaP was associated with better tolerability and equivalent bowel cleansing quality in females of < 50 years of age.

CONCLUSION

Despite the better tolerability, the use of 30 NaP tablets with 2 L of clear liquid should be limited due to its lower cleansing quality; however, in certain cases the regimen may deserve consideration, particularly in cases involving young women.

Optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a guide to enhance quality of visualization

Colonoscopy is an important screening and therapeutic modality for colorectal cancer. Unlike other screening tests, colonoscopy is dependent on pre-procedure bowel preparation. If the bowel preparation is poor, significant pathology may be missed. Many factors are known to improve bowel preparation. This review will highlight those factors that may optimize the bowel preparation, including choice of bowel preparation, grading or scoring of the bowel preparation, special factors that influence preparation, and diet prior to colonoscopy that affects bowel preparation. The aim of the review is to offer suggestions and guide endoscopists on how to optimize the bowel preparation for the patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Closure with clips to accelerate healing of mucosal defects caused by colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

Most mucosal defects that occur with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be closed completely using endoscopic clips. However, benefits of such closure in wound healing are unknown. A randomized controlled study evaluated the efficacy of closure with clips compared with no closure.

METHOD

Twenty-eight patients who had undergone ESD were randomly divided into two groups: closure (n = 14) and non-closure groups (n = 14). In the closure group, the mucosal defect resulting from ESD was closed using endoscopic clips. Four weeks after ESD, defects in both groups were observed by colonoscopy. Efficacy was based on change in the area of the defect, percentage of complete healing in each group, and complications.

RESULT

Data were analyzed for 26 of the 28 patients (13, closure group; 13, non-closure group). All tumors were resected en bloc by ESD without bleeding or perforation. In the closure group, the area of the defect just after ESD was 677 ± 306 mm(2) (mean ± SD) as determined by the size of the removed lesion and had decreased to 2.17 ± 4.51 mm(2) at 4 weeks after ESD (reduction, 99.7 %), but in the non-closure group that area was 790 ± 221 mm(2) and had decreased to 27.42 ± 25.72 mm(2) at 4 weeks post-ESD (reduction, 96.2 %). The reduction rate was significantly higher in the closure than in the non-closure group (99.7 vs. 96.2 %, p = 0.010). Complete healing was 69.2 % in the closure group vs. 7.7 % in the non-closure group (p = 0.005). Multivariate analysis showed that closure of the mucosal defect (OR 24.029, 95 % CI 2.09-276.15, p = 0.011) was an independent factor associated with complete healing at 4 weeks after ESD. Delayed perforation or post-ESD bleeding was not observed in any participant.

CONCLUSION

Use of endoscopic clips for closure of defects after ESD is safe and efficacious in accelerating wound healing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN-CTR UMIN000009112.