Adjunctive Pessary Therapy after Emergency Cervical Cerclage for Cervical Insufficiency with Protruding Fetal Membranes in the Second Trimester of Pregnancy: A Novel Modification of Treatment

The efficacy of emergency cervical cerclage in singleton and twin pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

An emergency (rescue) cervical cerclage can be offered to pregnant women presenting with dilatation and prolapsed membranes in the second trimester of pregnancy because of cervical insufficiency. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of an emergency cerclage in both singleton and twin pregnancies in the prevention of extreme premature birth.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed and Embase from inception to June 2022 for transvaginal cervical emergency cerclages.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All studies on transvaginal cervical emergency cerclages with at least 5 patients and reporting survival were included.

METHODS

Included studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias with an adjusted Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were performed for the primary outcome: survival.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 96 studies, incorporating 3239 women, including 14 studies with an expectant management control group, incorporating 746 women. Overall survival after cervical emergency cerclage was 74%, with a fetal survival of 88% and neonatal survival of 90%. Singleton and twin pregnancies showed similar survival, with a pregnancy prolongation of 52 and 37 days and a gestational age at delivery of 30 and 28 weeks, respectively. Meta-regression analyses indicated a significant inverse association between mean gestational age at diagnosis and pregnancy prolongation and no association between dilatation or gestational age at diagnosis and gestational age at delivery. Compared with expectant management, emergency cerclage significantly increased overall survival by 43%, fetal survival by 17% and neonatal survival by 22%, along with a significant pregnancy prolongation of 37 days and reduction in delivery at <28 weeks of gestation of 55%. These effects were more profound in singleton pregnancies than in twin pregnancies.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review indicates that, in pregnancies threatened by extreme premature birth because of cervical insufficiency, emergency cerclage leads to significantly higher survival, accompanied by significant pregnancy prolongation and reduction in delivery at <28 weeks of gestation, compared with expectant management. The mean gestational age at delivery was 30 weeks, independent of dilatation or gestational age at diagnosis. Survival was similar for singleton and twin pregnancies, implying that emergency cerclage should be considered in both.

Correlation Between Clinical Factors and Pregnancy Outcome Following Repeat Cerclage: A Retrospective Analysis of a Chinese Population

Background

The role of repeat cerclage (RC) among patients with prolapsed membranes remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of RC and assess the correlation between clinical factors and pregnancy outcome following RC.

Methods

The clinical data of patients who underwent RC for prolapsed membranes after prior cerclage were retrospectively investigated. The clinical characteristics of patients were compared between singleton and twin pregnancies. The clinical characteristics of singleton pregnancies were compared between the gestational age (GA) at delivery <28 weeks' and ≥28 weeks' groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine predictive factors. Singleton patients were divided into two groups according to GA at RC as follows: GA <22.3 weeks and GA ≥22.3 weeks. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between groups.

Results

The mean GA at delivery of singleton pregnancies was significantly higher than that of twin pregnancies. The mean latency between RC and delivery of singleton pregnancies was significantly longer than their twin counterparts. There were significant differences in the pregnancy outcomes between the GA <22.3 weeks group and GA ≥22.3 weeks group. Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed a lower incidence of neonatal death in the GA ≥22.3 weeks group compared with that in the GA <22.3 weeks group.

Conclusions

RC may be an effective method to prolong the duration of pregnancy among patients with singleton pregnancy. However, the selection of RC for patients with twin pregnancies remains controversial. GA at RC appears to be fair for predicting pregnancy outcomes following RC.

Severe ischaemic gangrene of scalp in an extreme preterm: a fatal case of combined aetiology

A 24+5-week preterm neonate with a severe scalp lesion was admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) after caesarean section due to maternal chorioamnionitis (MC). An Arabin pessary had been inserted in addition to a previous cervical cerclage due to cervix insufficiency at 21+5 weeks of pregnancy (wp). At 23+5 wp, preterm rupture of membranes was evidenced. Both devices were kept to provide fetal viability. On 24+4 wp, she developed MC. Urgent caesarean section was performed. Transvaginal manual manipulation was required during the procedure. On NICU, she presented severe shock which required high-dose vasopressors and blood products. Following surgical repair, a bilateral grade IV intracranial haemorrhage was evidenced. Subsequently, it was agreed to withdraw life support. We hypothesise that MC and local infection could have acted as predisposing factors, with the presence of a pessary in the setting causing uterine contractions and its manipulation acting as a precipitating factor.

Comparison of cerclage and pessary in prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancies

Background: The preterm labor has increased in multiple pregnancies over the past 2 decades. Preterm labor has led to increase in neonatal mortality rates, long-term morbidity, respiratory distress, and neonatal infections. Thus, this study aimed at investigating the effect of cerclage versus pessary on the prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancies.

Methods: This prospective randomized clinical trial was performed on 50 women pregnant with twins who visited Taleghani hospital in 2016-2018. Their cervical length, which was measured by transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS), was less than 30 millimeters at week 14 of pregnancy. The participants were randomly divided into 2 groups (n=25). They separately underwent cervical pessary and cerclage. McDonald's procedure was performed in cerclage group from 14 to 27 weeks. The suture material was Mersilene Ethicon 5-0 double-armed s14 needle. Ring hodge pessary was also inserted in the vagina of the participants in the pessary group. All the patients were injected 250 mg intramuscular 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate weekly from week 16 to week 36. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 18 software.

Results: The results of this study showed that the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for pregnancy length of the cerclage and pessary groups were 238.6±32.4 and 223.6±16.6, respectively. Also, significant differences were found between the 2 groups (p=0.048). No significant difference was found in pregnancy (p=0.565), length of pessary/cerclage use (p=0.491), and BMI before and after delivery between the cerclage and pessary groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion: The use of cerclage in twin pregnancies is recommended to increase the length of pregnancy.

A Novel Cerclage Insertion: Modified Laparoscopic Transabdominal Cervical Cerclage with Transvaginal Removing (MLTCC-TR)

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To report on our center's experience of a novel modified approach for laparoscopic cervical cerclage and to evaluate its safety and efficacy preliminarily.

DESIGN

Retrospective descriptive study.

SETTING

Single academic institution.

PATIENTS

Pregnant and nonpregnant women who underwent the modified laparoscopic transabdominal cervical cerclage with transvaginal removing (MLTCC-TR) from June 2016 to April 2019. Eligible participants had multiple adverse obstetric histories or the short cervix and were not suitable for a second transvaginal cerclage.

INTERVENTIONS

Preconceptional or postconceptional MLTCC-TR.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 24 participants (including 3 first-trimester singleton pregnant women) underwent the MLTCC-TR, giving birth to 27 infants. Among 21 women who underwent preconceptional cerclage, 26 cases of postoperational pregnancies were noted, and the incidence of term labor was 73.07%, which was significantly higher than that in the precerclage group (p <.001). Their mean gestational age at delivery was 37.21 ± 5.05 weeks. Among 3 cases of postconceptional cerclage, the mean gestational age at cerclage was 10.90 ± 2.61 weeks, and all of them had term delivery. The overall neonatal survival rate was 100% (27/27), of which 81.48% (22/27) were term infants. There were no severe perioperative complications directly related to the insertion of cerclage.

CONCLUSION

Our new approach of MLTCC-TR may be a relatively effective, feasible, and safe treatment for cervical insufficiency. It may be considered as an acceptable alternative to the traditional laparoscopic cervical cerclage with its superiority of transvaginal removing.