1
|
Alkatout I, De Wilde RL, Herrmann J, Klapdor R, Meinhold-Heerlein I, Mészáros J, Mustea A, Oppelt P, Pape JM, Schäfer SD, Wallwiener M, Krämer B. Adhesion Prevention in Gynecologic Surgery: Guidance and Clinical Experience. J Clin Med 2024; 13:7517. [PMID: 39768440 PMCID: PMC11678543 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2024] [Revised: 11/17/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2025] Open
Abstract
Postoperative adhesions represent a major medical challenge and are associated with serious health and economic consequences. 4DryField® PH (PlantTec Medical GmbH, Lueneburg, Germany) is a starch-based medical device designed both to prevent adhesions and for hemostasis. This paper explores methods to successfully apply it in gynecological surgery, leveraging the authors' extensive clinical experience. We provide detailed insights into best practices that benefit most patients with conditions such as endometriosis, along with practical tips and guidance on optimizing application and dosage. Our real-world clinical experience across various indications, supported by published data, demonstrates significant patient benefits: reduced adhesion formation, better recovery, less pain, and improved fertility. Patient acceptance and satisfaction are notably high. The device can be applied to surgical wounds as a powder for hemostasis and transformed into a gel in situ or as a premixed gel when adhesion prevention is prioritized. Specific advantages for each method are demonstrated by case studies. When used correctly, 4DryField PH is safe and effective, especially for larger wound areas with a high risk of reoperation and adhesion formation and when pregnancy is desired. It offers great versatility due to its use as either in situ gel or premixed gel with different viscosities. Despite some remaining gaps in clinical evidence and ongoing studies, our personal clinical experience suggests significant benefits with minimal risks. Therefore, we have no concerns regarding the broad use of 4DryField PH in gynecology and other surgical disciplines. Future research should focus on patient-reported outcomes and health economic benefits to support reimbursement efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim Alkatout
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany;
| | - Rudy Leon De Wilde
- Department of Gynecology, Carl-von-Ossietzky University, 26121 Oldenburg, Germany;
| | - Jörg Herrmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Weimar Hospital, 99425 Weimar, Germany;
| | - Rüdiger Klapdor
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Albertinen Hospital Hamburg, 22457 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Giessen, 35392 Gießen, Germany;
| | - József Mészáros
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, 39108 Magdeburg, Germany;
| | - Alexander Mustea
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany;
| | - Peter Oppelt
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Endocrinology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Kepler University Hospital Linz, 4020 Linz, Austria;
| | - Julian Maria Pape
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany;
| | | | - Markus Wallwiener
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Halle, 06120 Halle, Germany;
| | - Bernhard Krämer
- Department of Women’s Health, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cesnjevar R, Purbojo A, Haake C, Laas J. Significant adhesion reduction and time saving in pediatric heart surgery with 4DryField PH: A retrospective, controlled study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0277530. [PMID: 36395120 PMCID: PMC9671326 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Adhesions formation after surgery for congenital heart defects can complicate follow-up procedures due to bleeding from detached adhesion bands, injury to cardiac structures or large vessels, all of which do prolong operation times. The problem is enhanced by the fact that detached adhesions are predilection sites for new adhesions setting off a downward spiral. 4DryField® PH gel barrier has demonstrated high efficacy in reducing postoperative adhesions in general surgical and gynecological studies. This retrospective controlled study of 22 patients evaluates whether these positive results can be confirmed in pediatric cardiac surgery. Adhesions were scored from photographs of follow-up interventions by an independent cardiac surgeon blinded to group assignment. The publication provides not only score numbers but also original photographs of all sites for better traceability and transparency. In addition, timesaving due to reduced adhesions was evaluated. Results show a significantly reduced adhesion score for the 4DryField® group. Importantly, this resulted in a significantly shorter period between skin incision and start of cardiopulmonary bypass. In addition, timesaving due reduced adhesion formation was evaluated. The use of 4DryField® was safe, although higher doses per kg were used than in adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Cesnjevar
- Department for Heart Surgery, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ariawan Purbojo
- Department for Pediatric Heart Surgery, University Clinic Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Joachim Laas
- PlantTec Medical GmbH, Lüneburg, Germany
- Centre Surgery, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice. Updates Surg 2021; 73:1267-1273. [PMID: 34322783 PMCID: PMC8317684 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01136-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Bleeding is a consequence of insufficient hemostasis and excessive bleeding at a surgical site is associated with an increased risk of post-operative infection, transfusion and re-operation, in addition to increased hospital length of stay and costs. Surgeons employ a range of methods to achieve hemostasis, including topical hemostatic agents of differing composition and properties. Hemostatic powders are a sub-group of topical hemostats, which can be used in helping as adjuncts to manage troublesome bleeding in a variety of situations. As this technology is relatively new and potentially not well known by the broad surgical community, no specific guidelines or recommendations for the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgery currently exist. A steering group throughout Europe of multidisciplinary surgeons, expert in hemostasis and hemostatics, identified from literature and from personal experience, five key topics. When to use hemostatic powder, the evidence for use, benefits of use, safety remarks and considerations in various surgical specialties. Thirty-seven statements were subsequently drawn from these five key topics. An online survey was sent to 128 high-volume surgeons working in breast surgery, gynaecological and obstetric surgery, general and emergency surgery, thoracic surgery and urological surgery in Europe to assess agreement (consensus) with these statements. Consensus was defined as high if ≥ 75% and very high if ≥ 90% of respondents agreed with a statement. A total of 79 responses were received and consensus among the surgical experts was very high in 27 (73%) statements, high in 8 (22%) statements and was not achieved in 2 (5%) statements. Based on the consensus scores, the steering group produced 16 key recommendations which they considered could improve patient outcomes by reducing post-operative bleeding and its associated complications using hemostatic powder.
Collapse
|
4
|
Bründl J, Lenart S, Stojanoski G, Gilfrich C, Rosenhammer B, Stolzlechner M, Ponholzer A, Dreissig C, Weikert S, Burger M, May M. Peritoneal Flap in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2020; 117:243-250. [PMID: 32449896 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lymphocele is the most common complication arising after pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in the setting of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). The only data available until now on the utility of a peritoneal flap to prevent lymphocele were retrospectively acquired. METHODS A randomized, controlled, multi-center trial with blinded assessment of endpoints was carried out on 232 patients with prostate cancer who underwent RARP with PLND. The patients in the intervention group were given a peritoneal flap; in the control group, surgery was performed without this modification. The two joint primary endpoints were the rates of symptomatic lymphocele during the same hospitalization as the operative procedure (iT1) and within 90 days of surgery (iT2). The secondary endpoints were lymphocele volume, the need for treatment of lymphocele, complications requiring an intervention, and the degree of postoperative stress incontinence. German Clinical Trials Register number: DRKS00011115. RESULTS The data were evaluated in an intention-to-treat analysis, which, in this trial, was identical to an as-treated analysis. 108 patients (46.6%) were allotted to the intervention group. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences with respect to any clinical or histopathological criteria. A median of 16 lymph nodes were removed (interquartile range, 11-21). A symptomatic lymphocele arose in 1.3% (iT1) and 9.1% (iT2) of the patients, without any statistically significant difference between the two trial groups (p = 0.599 and p = 0.820, respectively). Nor did the groups differ significantly with respect to lymphocele volume (p = 0.670 on hospital discharge [T1], p = 0.650 90 days after surgery [T2]) or the type and frequency of need for subsequent surgical intervention (p = 0.535; iT2). 81.5% of all patients (n = 189) had no complications at all in the first three months after surgery. Nor were there any intergroup differences at 90 days with respect to the degree of stress urinary incontinence (p = 0.306) or complications (p = 0.486). CONCLUSION A peritoneal flap after RARP was not found to influence the rate of postoperative lymphocele, whether asymptomatic or requiring treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Bründl
- Department of Urology, University of Regensburg, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Urology and Andrology, Hospital of St. John of God (Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Wien), Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology and Andrology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria; Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Straubing, Straubing, Germany; Department of Urology, Vivantes Humboldt Hospital Berlin, Berlin Germany; These two authors are co-first authors
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lymphostasis and Hemostasis in Body-Contouring Surgery Using a Polysaccharide Based Hemostat (4DryField PH). PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2019; 7:e2128. [PMID: 31044110 PMCID: PMC6467625 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000002128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background: Following liposuction, abdominoplasty is the most frequent body-contouring intervention in the world. The transection of small blood vessels in large areas and subsequent bleeding is a viable risk during this procedure. The resulting microvascular bleedings should be stopped thoroughly to reduce the probability of related complications. In this prospective, monocentric, randomized study, the efficacy of the polysaccharide-based hemostat 4DryField PH (4DF) (PlanTec Medical, Lueneburg, Germany) is examined in classic abdominoplasty and lower body lift after Lockwood. Methods: For this prospective, monocentric, randomized study, 40 patients underwent surgery for both interventions. Twenty patients received an abdominoplasty, and 20 patients underwent a body lift. In each group, 10 patients have been treated with 4DF, whereas 10 have been served as the untreated control group. Results: 4DF had neither a beneficial nor a negative effect on necessity of drainages, drainage volume and duration, length of hospital stay or frequency of postoperative seromas, wound healing disturbances, and infections, independent of surgical intervention. Patients in the 4DF group, however, had more individual risk factors, and required extended surgical interventions that might mask primary outcome results. Conclusions: This is the first prospective, monocentric, randomized study on 4DF in body-contouring surgery. The use of 4DF did not lead to a better postoperative outcome regarding hemostasis and lymphostasis. Potential benefits need further evaluation in high-volume studies.
Collapse
|
6
|
Stolzenburg JU, Arthanareeswaran VKA, Dietel A, Franz T, Liatsikos E, Kyriazis I, Ganzer R, Yaney K, Do HM. Four-point Peritoneal Flap Fixation in Preventing Lymphocele Formation Following Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol Oncol 2018; 1:443-448. [PMID: 31158086 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Revised: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Symptomatic lymphocele following radical prostatectomy (RP) and concomitant bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) has a significant impact on postoperative recovery and may sometimes require surgical intervention. OBJECTIVE To report on the use of four-point peritoneal flap fixation (4PPFF) during RP to reduce lymphocele occurrence following PLND. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Between April 2010 and May 2017, 1358 patients underwent RP with concomitant bilateral ePLND. From this cohort, 193 patients who had undergone PNLD with 4PPFF were matched in a 1:1 ratio with respect to age, body mass index, initial PSA, and number of lymph nodes removed to patients who had undergone PLND without 4PPFF. INTERVENTION 4PPFF was performed by suturing the cut end of the ventral parietal peritoneum at four points (to the anterior and lateral pelvic side wall on both sides) following PLND so that the peritoneal surface was exposed to the iliac vessels and obturator fossa. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS All patients underwent ultrasound on postoperative days 6, 28, and 90 to test for the presence of lymphocele. For univariate analysis, a χ2 test and analysis of variance were applied, as appropriate. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05, and all p values reported were two-sided. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to intraoperative blood loss, positive surgical margin rate, Gleason score, clinical stage, and number of positive cores. Asymptomatic lymphocele was observed in four patients (2.07%) in the 4PPFF group compared to 16 patients (8.3%) without 4PPFF (p=0.0058). Similarly, a significant difference in the incidence of symptomatic lymphocele was observed: two patients (1.03%) in the 4PPFF group versus nine patients (4.6%) without 4PPFF (p=0.0322). There were no differences in other complication rates between the two groups. The limitations of the study are its retrospective and nonrandomised nature, with postoperative follow-up based on ultrasound imaging rather than computed tomography because of ethical considerations, which could have caused observer bias. CONCLUSIONS 4PPFF is a safe and effective procedure in preventing lymphocele occurrence in patients undergoing RP with PLND. The increase in exposure of the PLND raw area to the peritoneal surface following this procedure may aid in increased absorption of accumulating lymph fluid. Further prospective randomised multicentre studies are warranted to confirm our observations. PATIENT SUMMARY We report on the use of a surgical technique to decrease the collection of lymphatic fluid in the abdominal cavity following lymph node removal during radical removal of the prostate gland in patients with prostate cancer. Patients undergoing this procedure had significantly better outcomes when compared to patients operated on in the conventional approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anja Dietel
- Department of Urology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Toni Franz
- Department of Urology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Iason Kyriazis
- Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece
| | - Roman Ganzer
- Department of Urology, Asklepios Hospital, Bad Tölz, Germany
| | - Krassimir Yaney
- Department of Urology, Alexandrovska University Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Hoang Minh Do
- Department of Urology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kuthe A. Successful treatment of a chronic abdominal wall seroma with the polysaccharide 4DryField ® PH - A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2016; 27:48-50. [PMID: 27541060 PMCID: PMC4992008 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2016] [Accepted: 08/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Seroma formation is one of the most prevalent complications after liposuction, abdominoplasty, mastectomy or hernia repair. They can disappear without treatment, but also may persist and require complex therapy. This report describes how 4DryField® PH polysaccharide powder successfully was applied for chronic seroma therapy. PRESENTATION OF THE CASE An 80year old male patient presented with a persistent seroma (1000cm3 volume) resulting from liposuction about 15 years ago. In a first approach he was treated using en bloc excision without opening the capsule. Three month later the patient presented with a recurrent seroma of the same size. This time 1100cm3 bloody discolored fluid was aspirated. The skin was lifted using a redon tubing drawn through the whole length of the wound cavity. This allowed even distribution of 4DryField® PH powder (10g) within the former seroma cavity. Computed Tomography (CT) imaging after 4.5 month and sonographic examination after an additional year confirmed treatment success. DISCUSSION Besides conventional methods for hemos-/lymphostasis several adjunct measures like fibrin sealants, medication with corticoids and diurectics have been proposed for seroma prevention/therapy, unfortunately, with conflicting evidence. In an experimental study seroma prevention with a polysaccharide was demonstrated; however, clinical proof is missing. This case provides first clinical evidence that 4DryField® PH polysaccharide powder evenly distributed in the former seroma cavity can prevent its recurrence. CONCLUSION 4DryField® PH powder treatment of seroma is a promising new approach for prevention and treatment of chronic seroma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Kuthe
- Department of General Surgery and Traumatology, DRK-Krankenhaus, Clementinenhaus, Lützerodestr. 1, 30161 Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|