Accuracy and Precision of Three-Dimensional Low Dose CT Compared to Standard RSA in Acetabular Cups: An Experimental Study

The accuracy and precision of CT-RSA in arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

 Computed tomography-based radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) is an alternative to conventional radiostereometric analysis (RSA) in measuring implant migration, circumventing the need for operative insertion of tantalum markers. The accuracy and precision of different CT-RSA techniques in various joints are still unclear, and the effective radiation dose (ED) of CT-RSA is usually higher than RSA. In this systematic literature review, we aimed to provide an overview of the accuracy, precision, clinical precision, and ED of CT-RSA techniques.

METHODS

 We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Main search items were "arthroplasty" AND "migration" AND "computed tomography." We included full-text English papers, using CT for migration analysis (CT-RSA) in human, animal, or synthetic models with arthroplasties, reporting accuracy and/or precision. Eligible studies were screened and reviewed by 2 authors independently. Main outcomes were accuracy, precision, and clinical precision of CT-RSA in 6 degrees of freedom. Secondary outcome was the mean ED. A meta-analysis on (clinical) precision of CT-RSA was performed.

RESULTS

 23 studies were included involving 163 patients, 20 human cadaveric, 3 porcine cadaveric, and 7 synthetic models. 6 different CT-RSA techniques were used to study 6 different joint components in cervical disc replacement and shoulder, hip, and knee arthroplasty. CT-RSA accuracy ranged between 0.02 and 0.71 mm and 0.03° and 1.00°. CT-RSA precision ranged between 0.00 and 0.47 mm and 0.00° and 1.09°. Mean precision was 0.15 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.25) in the acetabulum, 0.13 mm (CI 0.00-0.28) and 0.24° (CI 0.00-0.51) in the proximal femur, and 0.04 mm (CI 0.00-0.08) and 0.07° (CI 0.00-0.15) in the proximal tibia. CT-RSA clinical precision ranged between 0.03 and 1.36 mm and 0.06° and 2.25°. Mean clinical precision was 0.13 mm (CI 0.11-0.16) and 0.26° (CI 0.20-0.32) in the acetabulum. The mean ED of CT-RSA ranged between 0.02 and 5.80 mSv.

CONCLUSION

 CT-RSA shows comparable accuracy and precision to standard RSA. CT-RSA seems to be a promising alternative to RSA.

Precision of computer tomography based RSA on femoral implants in total knee arthroplasty: A porcine cadaver study

BACKGROUND

Radiostereometric analysis is the gold standard for assessing migration of orthopaedic implants. The novel CT-based radiostereometric analysis yields high precision of evaluation of tibial implants. We analyzed the precision of CT-based radiostereometric analysis on femoral implants in knee arthroplasty at different dose levels, and compared it to previously published results on tibial implants and the available literature on precision of radiostereometric analysis.

METHODS

We performed a total knee arthroplasty on a porcine cadaver knee. In the subsequent 7 CT scans, we analyzed the precision of the CT-based radiostereometric analysis method in 21 samples at two different effective doses (standard and low dose), and compared this to literature on radiostereometric analysis.

FINDINGS

CT-based radiostereometric analysis of maximum total point motion of femoral and tibial components showed a precision difference of (mean, 95 % confidence interval) 0.18 mm (0.13 to 0.22), P < 0.001. For femoral implants (mean, 95 % confidence interval, standard deviation) we found precisions of 0.25 mm (0.21-0.29, 0.1) and 0.29 (0.25-0.32, 0.08) mm for the standard and low dose protocols respectively. Variability ratios of tibia versus femur and standard versus low dose femur (95 % confidence interval) were 18.3 (7.4-45.1) and 0.7 (0.3-1.7) with respective P-values of <0.001 and 0.40.

INTERPRETATION

CT-based radiostereometric analysis on femoral implants in total knee arthroplasty is feasible and has a lower, yet still acceptable, precision compared to CT-based radiostereometric analysis on tibial implants in a porcine cadaver. However, confirmation in clinical studies is warranted.

Comparison of Marker-Based RSA and CT-RSA for Analyzing Micromotions After Distal Radius Osteotomy: A 1-Year Retrospective Study of 24 Patients

Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) is the most accurate method for determining early micromotions of orthopedic implants. Computed Tomography Radiostereometric Analysis (CT-RSA) is a method that can be used to determine implant and bone micromovements using low-dose CT scans. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the CT-RSA method in measuring the interfragmental mobility in patients who have undergone a correction osteotomy due to a malunited distal radius fracture. Twenty-four patients were included and operated with a radiolucent volar plate. Markers were embedded in the plate and bone. RSA and CT examinations were obtained postoperatively up to 1-year postoperative. Micromovements of the distal radius segment relative to the proximal were compared between the methods with paired analysis and Bland-Altman plots. The limits of clinical significance were: dorsal/volar tilt < 10°, radial shortening < 5 mm, radial inclination ≥ 15°, and radial shift < 5 mm. For the dorsal/volar tilt, the paired analysis between the two methods, showed a mean difference (95% CI) of -0.06° (-0.67 to 0.55), for radial compression-0.04 mm (-0.09 to 0.01), for radial inclination 0.21° (-0.06 to 0.48), and for radial shift -0.07 mm (-0.21 to 0.07). The paired analysis for micromotions showed that the thresholds of clinical significance are excluded from the difference's 95% CI. The Bland-Altman plots showed comparable results up to 1 year, considering clinically relevant thresholds. In conclusion, the CT-RSA method is comparable to that of marker-based RSA in measuring micromotions after wrist osteotomy, as the differences between the methods are not clinically significant.

Accuracy and precision of Volumetric Matching Micromotion Analysis (V3MA) is similar to RSA for tibial component migration in TKA

Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the current gold standard to determine implant migration, but it requires bone markers and special equipment. Therefore, we developed VoluMetric Matching Micromotion Analysis (V3MA), a software program for Computed Tomography-based radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA). This study aimed to determine the accuracy and precision of V3MA in vitro compared to RSA and provide a clinical proof of concept. The accuracy (RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error)) and precision (SD (standard deviation)) of V3MA were compared to RSA. A tibial component was placed in 21 different positions within a cadaveric bone to assess accuracy. For precision, a total of 20 repeated zero-migration examinations from 4 cadaveric bones with cemented tibial components were performed. In 6 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients 1 to 5 year migration was measured with V3MA and RSA. V3MA accuracy ranged between 0.02 and 0.09 mm for translations and was 0.01° for internal-external rotations. For RSA, the accuracy ranged between 0.03 and 0.09 mm for translations and was 0.09° for internal-external rotations. V3MA precision ranged between 0.01 and 0.06 mm for translations and 0.02 to 0.07° for rotations. RSA precision ranged between 0.00 and 0.06 mm for translations and 0.04 to 0.25° for rotations. V3MA was successful in 6 clinical cases and no systematic bias was present. In conclusion, the accuracy and precision of V3MA were similar to RSA. Therefore, V3MA is a promising alternative to RSA in migration measurements of tibial components in TKA.

Comparison of the CT-based micromotion analysis method versus marker-based RSA in measuring femoral head translation and evaluation of its intra- and interobserver reliability: a prospective agreement diagnostic study on 27 patients up to 1 year

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

 Computed tomography radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) assesses implant micromovements using low-dose CT scans. We aimed to investigate whether CT-RSA is comparable to marker-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) measuring early femoral head migration in cemented stems. We hypothesized that CT-RSA is comparable to marker-based RSA in evaluating femoral head subsidence.

METHODS

 We prospectively included 31 patients undergoing cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA), of which 27 were eligible for the analysis. Femoral head migration at 1 year was measured with marker-based RSA and CT-RSA. Comparison was performed using paired analysis and Bland-Altman plots, and the intra- and interobserver reliability of CT-RSA was assessed Results: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) translation on the Y-axis measured with marker-based RSA was -0.86 mm (-1.10 to -0.37) and -0.83 mm (-1.11 to -0.48) for CT-RSA (i.e. subsidence), with a median difference of -0.03 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.08 to 0.18). The minimal important difference in translation was set to 0.2 mm. This value was excluded from the CI of the differences. No statistical difference was found between marker-based RSA and CT-RSA regarding assessment of subsidence of the femoral head. The Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between the 2 methods in measuring subsidence of the femoral head. The intra- and interobserver reliability of the CT-RSA method was excellent with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 1 (0.99-1) and ICC = 0.99 (0.99-1), respectively.

CONCLUSION

 We showed that CT-RSA was comparable to marker-based RSA in measuring femoral head subsidence. Moreover, the intra- and interobserver reliability of the CT-RSA method was excellent, suggesting that the method is assessor independent.

The role of bone remodeling in measuring migration of custom implants for large acetabular defects

In revision total hip arthroplasty, achieving robust fixation is difficult and implant movement may occur over time. Bone may also rearrange around the implant as a result of mechanical loading, making the measurement of migration challenging. The study aimed to quantify changes in bone shape and implant position 1 year following acetabular reconstruction using custom three-dimensional-printed cups. This observational retrospective cohort study involved 23 patients with Paprosky type IIIB defects. Postop computed tomography scans taken within 1 week of surgery and at 1-year postsurgery were co-registered and analyzed. Three co-registration strategies were implemented including bone-to-bone and implant-to-implant. (1) Co-registration of the ipsilateral innominate bone (diseased anatomy) was used to measure changes in implant position. (2) Co-registration of the implant was carried out to quantify changes in the ipsilateral innominate bone shape. (3) Co-registration of the contralateral innominate bone (nondiseased anatomy) was performed to measure changes in the ipsilateral innominate bone shape and implant position. The median centroid distances (interquartile range [IQR]) were 2.3 mm (IQR: 3.7-1.7 mm) for changes in implant position, 2.4 mm (IQR: 3.6-1.6 mm) for changes in ipsilateral innominate bone shape, and 3.7 mm (IQR: 4.6-3.5 mm) for changes in ipsilateral innominate bone shape and implant position. Following acetabular reconstruction, implant movements and periprosthetic bone remodeling are physiological and of a similar extent. Surgeons and engineers should consider this when performing implant monitoring in these patients.

Guideline for RSA and CT-RSA implant migration measurements: an update of standardizations and recommendations

Opening remarks: These guidelines are the result of discussions within a diverse group of RSA researchers. They were approved in December 2023 by the board and selected members of the International Radiostereometry Society to update the guidelines by Valstar et al. [1]. By adhering to these guidelines, RSA studies will become more transparent and consistent in execution, presentation, reporting, and interpretation. Both authors and reviewers of scientific papers using RSA may use these guidelines, summarized in the Checklist, as a reference. Deviations from these guidelines should have the underlying rationale stated.

Comparison between model-based RSA and an AI-based CT-RSA: an accuracy study of 30 patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiostereometry (RSA) is the current gold standard for evaluating early implant migration. CT-based migration analysis is a promising method, with fewer handling requirements compared with RSA and no need for implanted bone-markers. We aimed to evaluate agreement between a new artificial intelligence (AI)-based CT-RSA and model-based RSA (MBRSA) in measuring migration of cup and stem in total hip arthroplasty (THA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

30 patients with THA for primary osteoarthritis (OA) were included. RSA examinations were performed on the first postoperative day, and at 2 weeks, 3 months, 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery. A low-dose CT scan was done at 2 weeks and 5 years. The agreement between the migration results obtained from MBRSA and AI-based CT-RSA was assessed using Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

Stem migration (y-translation) between 2 weeks and 5 years, for the primary outcome measure, was -0.18 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.31 to -0.05) mm with MBRSA and -0.36 (CI -0.53 to -0.19) mm with AI-based CT-RSA. Corresponding proximal migration of the cup (y-translation) was 0.06 (CI 0.02-0.09) mm and 0.02 (CI -0.01 to 0.05) mm, respectively. The mean difference for all stem and cup comparisons was within the range of MBRSA precision. The AI-based CT-RSA showed no intra- or interobserver variability.

CONCLUSION

We found good agreement between the AI-based CT-RSA and MBRSA in measuring postoperative implant migration. AI-based CT-RSA ensures user independence and delivers consistent results.

Load-induced deformation of the tibia and its effect on implant loosening detection

CT imaging under external valgus and varus loading conditions and consecutive image analysis can be used to detect tibial implant loosening after total knee arthroplasty. However, the applied load causes the tibia to deform, which could result in an overestimation of implant displacement. This research evaluates the extent of tibia deformation and its effect on measuring implant displacement. Ten cadaver specimen with TKA were CT-scanned under valgus/varus loading (20 Nm), first implanted without bone cement fixation (mimicking a loose implant) and subsequently with bone cement fixation (mimicking a fixed implant). By means of image analysis, three relative displacements were assessed: (1) between the proximal and distal tibia (measure of deformation), (2) between the implant and the whole tibia (including potential deformation effect) and (3) between the implant and the proximal tibia (reduced deformation effect). Relative displacements were quantified in terms of translations along, and rotations about the axes of a local coordinate system. As a measure of deformation, the proximal tibia moved relative to the distal tibia by, on average 1.27 mm (± 0.50 mm) and 0.64° (± 0.25°). Deformation caused an overestimation of implant displacement in the cemented implant. The implant displaced with respect to the whole tibia by 0.45 mm (± 0.22 mm) and 0.79° (± 0.38°). Relative to the proximal tibia, the implant moved by 0.23 mm (± 0.10 mm) and 0.62° (± 0.34°). The differentiation between loose and fixed implants improved when tibia deformation was compensated for by using the proximal tibia rather than the whole tibia.

Dose reduction does not impact the precision of CT-based RSA in tibial implants: a diagnostic accuracy study on precision in a porcine cadaver

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the gold standard for evaluation of migration of implants. CT-RSA has been shown to have precision at the level of RSA in hip, shoulder, and knee joint replacements. We aimed to assess the impact of dose reduction on precision of CT-RSA on tibial implants, comparing it with previously published data on precision of standard dose CT-RSA on tibial implants.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a total knee arthroplasty on a porcine knee cadaver, and subsequent CT-RSA with low effective doses (0.02 mSv). We compared the results with previously published CT-RSA data with standard (0.08 mSv) dose. The primary outcome variable was the difference in precision of the maximum total translation (MTT). Secondary variables included ratios of variances and standard deviations, and precision of peripheral point translations, center-of-mass translations, and rotations. A difference of more than 0.1 mm in precision was defined as clinically relevant. Our hypothesis was that precisions of low and standard CT-RSA doses were equal.

RESULTS

Low dose (mean 0.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06-0.08) and standard dose CT-RSA (0.08, CI 0.07-0.09) achieve similar precision, with difference in precision of MTT of 0.01, CI 0.00-0.02 mm. The F-statistic (0.99, CI 0.63-1.55) and sdtest (1.05, CI 0.43-2.58) also supported this.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the precision of low dose CT-RSA for tibial implants on a porcine cadaver is equal to standard dose CT-RSA. However, these findings should be confirmed in clinical trials.

CT-based migration analysis is more precise than radiostereometric analysis for tibial implants: a phantom study on a porcine cadaver

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the gold standard for migration analysis, but computed tomography analysis methods (CTRSA) have shown comparable results in other joints. We attempted to validate precision for CT compared with RSA for a tibial implant.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

RSA and CT were performed on a porcine knee with a tibial implant. Marker-based RSA, model-based RSA (MBRSA), and CT scans from 2 different manufacturers were compared. CT analysis was performed by 2 raters for reliability evaluation.

RESULTS

21 double examinations for precision measurements for RSA and CT-based Micromotion Analysis (CTMA) were analysed. Mean (95% confidence interval) precision data for maximum total point motion (MTPM) using marker-based RSA was 0.45 (0.19-0.70) and 0.58 (0.20-0.96) using MBRSA (F-statistic 0.44 [95% CI 0.18-1.1], p = 0.07). Precision data for total translation (TT) for CTMA was 0.08 (0.03-0.12) for the GE scanner and 0.11 (0.04-0.19) for the Siemens scanner (F-statistic 0.37 [0.15-0.91], p = 0.03). When comparing the aforementioned precision for both RSA methods with both CTMA analyses, CTMA was more precise (p < 0.001). The same pattern was seen for other translations and migrations. Mean effective radiation doses were 0.005 mSv (RSA) (0.0048-0.0050) and 0.08 mSv (CT) (0.078-0.080) (p < 0.001). Intra- and interrater reliability were 0.79 (0.75-0.82) and 0.77 (0.72-0.82), respectively.

CONCLUSION

CTMA is more precise than RSA for migration analysis of a tibial implant, has overall good intra- and interrater reliability but higher effective radiation doses in a porcine cadaver.

Low dose CT-based spatial analysis (CTSA) to measure implant migration after ceramic hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA): A phantom study

Implant migration is a predictor of arthroplasty survivorship. It is crucial to monitor the migration of novel hip prostheses within premarket clinical investigations. RSA is the gold standard method, but requires calibrated radiographs using specialised equipment. A commercial computed tomography micromotion analysis solution is a promising alternative but is not yet available for use with monobloc ceramic implants. This study aimed to develop and validate a CT-based spatial analysis (CTSA) method for use with ceramic implants. A phantom study was undertaken to assess accuracy and precision. A ceramic hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and 20 tantalum beads were implanted into a synthetic hip model and mounted onto a 6-degree of freedom motion stage. The hip was repeatedly scanned with a low dose CT protocol, with imposed micromovements. Data were interrogated using a semiautomated technique. The effective radiation dose for each scan was estimated to be 0.25 mSv. For the head implant, precision ranged between 0.11 and 0.28 mm for translations and 0.34°-0.42° for rotations. For the cup implant, precision ranged between 0.08 and 0.11 mm and 0.19° and 0.42°. For the head, accuracy ranged between 0.04 and 0.18 mm for translations and 0.28°-0.46° for rotations. For the cup, accuracy ranged between 0.04 and 0.08 mm and 0.17° and 0.43°. This in vitro study demonstrates that low dose CTSA of a ceramic HRA is similar in accuracy to RSA. CT is ubiquitous, and this method may be an alternative to RSA to measure prosthesis migration.

Precision of low-dose CT-based micromotion analysis technique for the assessment of early acetabular cup migration compared with gold standard RSA: a prospective study of 30 patients up to 1 year

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Computed tomography micromotion analysis (CTMA) can be used to determine implant micro-movements using low-dose CT scans. By using CTMA, a non-invasive measurement of joint implant movement is enabled. We evaluated the precision of CTMA in measuring early cup migration. Standard marker-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) was used as reference. We hypothesised that CTMA can be used as an alternative to RSA in assessing implant micromotions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 30 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Acetabular cup migration at 1 year was measured with RSA and CTMA. To determine the precision of both methods, 20 double examinations (postoperatively) with repositioning of the patients were performed. The precision was calculated from zero by assuming that there was no motion of the prosthesis between the 2 examinations.

RESULTS

The precision of RSA ranged from 0.06 to 0.15 mm for translations and 0.21° to 0.63° for rotations. Corresponding values for CTMA were 0.06 to 0.13 mm and 0.23° to 0.35°. A good level of agreement was found between the methods regarding cup migration and rotation at 1 year.

INTERPRETATION

The precision of CTMA in measuring acetabular cup migration and rotation is comparable to marker-based RSA. CTMA could possibly thus be used as an alternative method to detect early implant migration.

A novel technique to assess rotational deformities in lower extremities using CT-based motion analysis

Rotational deformities following intramedullary (IM) nailing of tibia has a reported incidence of as high as 20%. Common techniques to measure deformities following IM nailing of tibia are either based on clinical assessment, plain X-rays or Computed Tomography (CT) comparing the treated leg with the uninjured contralateral side. All these techniques are based on examiners manual calculation inherently subject to bias. Following our previous rigorous motion analysis and symmetry studies on hemi pelvises, femurs and orthopaedic implants, we aimed to introduce a novel fully digital technique to measure rotational deformities in the lower legs. Following formal institutional approval from the Imperial College, CT images of 10 pairs of human lower legs were retrieved. Images were anonymized and uploaded to a research server. Three dimensional CT images of the lower legs were bilaterally reconstructed. CT-based motion analysis (CTMA) was used and the mirrored images of the left side were merged with the right side proximally as stationary and distally as moving objects. Discrepancies in translation and rotation were automatically calculated. Our study population had a mean age of 54 ± 20 years. There were six males and four females. We observed a greater variation in translation (mm) of Centre of Mass (COM) in sagittal plane (95% CI − 2.959–.292) which was also presented as rotational difference alongside the antero-posterior direction or Y axis (95% CI .370–1.035). In other word the right lower legs in our study were more likely to be in varus compared to the left side. However, there were no statistically significant differences in coronal or axial planes. Using our proposed fully digital technique we found that lower legs of the human adults were symmetrical in axial and coronal plane. We found sagittal plane differences which need further addressing in future using bigger sample size. Our novel recommended technique is fully digital and commercially available. This new technique can be useful in clinical practice addressing rotational deformities following orthopaedic surgical intervention. This new technique can substitute the previously introduced techniques.

Precision of CT-based micromotion analysis is comparable to radiostereometry for early migration measurements in cemented acetabular cups

Background and purpose - CT (computed tomography) based methods have lately been considered an alternative to radiostereometry (RSA) for assessing early implant migration. However, no study has directly compared the 2 methods in a clinical setting. We estimated the precision and effective radiation dose of a CT-based method and compared it with marker-based RSA in 10 patients with hip arthroplasty.Patients and methods - We included 10 patients who underwent total hip replacement with a cemented cup. CT and RSA double examinations were performed postoperatively, and precision and effective dose data were compared. The CT data was analyzed with CT micromotion analysis (CTMA) software both with and without the use of bone markers. The RSA images were analyzed with RSA software with the use of bone markers.Results - The precision of CTMA with bone markers was 0.10-0.16 mm in translation and 0.31°-0.37° in rotation. Without bone markers, the precision of CTMA was 0.10-0.16 mm in translation and 0.21°-0.31° in rotation. In comparison, the precision of RSA was 0.09-0.26 mm and 0.43°-1.69°. The mean CTMA and RSA effective dose was estimated at 0.2 mSv and 0.04 mSv, respectively.Interpretation - CTMA, with and without the use of bone markers, had a comparable precision to RSA. CT radiation doses were slightly higher than RSA doses but still at a considerably low effective dose.

Adverse Events due to Lack of Precision in Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Potential of Provocation-Based CT for Diagnosis of Implant Loosening

Adverse events in total hip replacement (THR) may have several origins, one being lack of precision in diagnosis and/or during surgery. This study describes the pattern and frequency of avoidable injuries in THR and the potential value of a new tool for early diagnosis of implant loosening. This retrospective study was based on all (n = 1 456) settled claims regarding THR in the Swedish National Patient Insurance database from 2010 to 2017. The claims and medical records were analyzed for root causes, with special focus on adverse events where lack of precision could be the cause. In a second stage, we assessed in 10 patients (20 implants) the diagnostic precision of a new software tool based on provocation-CT. These were all patients where the implant loosening diagnosis was deemed as inconclusive after a first plain X-ray. The findings from the provocation-CT and plain X-ray were compared to the surgical findings at revision. While 3 of 20 implants were correctly diagnosed with plain X-ray, for dynamic CT, this number was 14 of 20 implants. The retrospective study showed that the most common types of injuries were infections (34%), nerve injury (29%), mechanical problems (14.5%), dislocation (6%), and miscellaneous complications (16.5%). Of the patients with mechanical complications, one-third had aseptic implant loosening. Statement of clinical significance: we estimated that almost 200 patients in our registry study had mechanical complications after THR, mainly implant loosening. A third of these could potentially have been diagnosed and treated if CT examination with a dedicated image analysis tool to assess implant loosening after THR had been available.

The anatomical SP-CL stem demonstrates a non-progressing migration pattern in the first year: a low dose CT-based migration study in 20 patients

Background and purpose - RSA is the gold standard for evaluation of early implant migration. We report the results of a new CT-based method Sectra CT micromotion analysis (CTMA) applied to assess the migration pattern in 20 patients in the 1st year after surgery, both with and without the use of tantalum beads in the bone. The patients had an SP-CL anatomical stem that uses an S-shape, designed to better fit the curvature of the femur. Patients and methods - 20 THA patients (mean age 61 years, 10 female) received SP-CL stems, tantalum markers in the femur, and low-dose CT scans at 1 day, 3 months and 12 months postoperatively. In addition, precision as well as inter- and intra-observer variability of the 12-month migration was measured. Results - The 3-month subsidence was median 0.5 mm (95% CI 0.3-1.0) and the internal rotation 1.8° (CI 0.9-2.6). At 12 months the corresponding values were 0.6 (CI 0.3-1.6) mm and 1.9° (CI 0.8-2.4). Precision was 0.1 to 0.3 mm and 0.1° to 0.4° at 3 and 12 months. Intra- and inter- observer variability yielded R-values averaging 0.96 and 0.98. Interpretation - The migration mainly took place during the 1st 3 months, in line with other uncemented stems. The number of patients with subsidence over 2 mm in the first year (5) might be due to the design of the prosthesis with an anatomical shape. Alternatively, our results might indicate a challenge when choosing the correct size for these new anatomical stems. CTMA provided precise and highly repeatable measurements of migration without the need for tantalum markers.

Effective radiation dose in radiostereometric analysis of the hip

Background and purpose - Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the gold standard to study micromotion of joint replacements. RSA requires the acquisition of additional radiographs increasing the radiation dose of patients included in RSA studies. It is important to keep this dose as low as possible. Effective radiation dose (ED) measurements of RSA radiographs for different joints were done by Teeuwisse et al. some years ago using conventional radiology (CR); for total hip arthroplasty (THA), Teeuwisse et al. reported an ED of 0.150 milliSievert (mSv). With the modern digital radiography (DR) roentgen technique the ED is expected to be less.Material and methods - In this phantom study, simulating a standard patient, the ED for hip RSA radiographs is determined using DR under a variety of different roentgen techniques. The quality of the RSA radiographs was assessed for feasibility in migration analysis using a (semi-)automatic RSA analysis technique in RSA software.Results - A roentgen technique of 90 kV and 12.5 mAs with additional 0.2 copper (Cu) + 1 mm aluminum (Al) external tube filters results in an ED of 0.043 mSv and radiographs suitable for analysis in RSA software.Interpretation - The accumulated ED for a standard patient in a 2-year clinical hip RSA study with 5 follow-up moments and a double acquisition is below the acceptable threshold of 1.0 mSv provided by the EU radiation guideline for studies increasing knowledge for general health.

Low-dose CT-based implant motion analysis is a precise tool for early migration measurements of hip cups: a clinical study of 24 patients

Background and purpose - Early implant migration is known to be a predictive factor of clinical loosening in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the gold standard used to measure early migration in patients. However, RSA requires costly, specialized imaging equipment and the image process is complex. We determined the precision of an alternative, commercially available, CT method in 3 ongoing clinical THA studies, comprising 3 different cups.Materials and methods - 24 CT double examinations of 24 hip cups were selected consecutively from 3 ongoing prospective studies: 2 primary THA (1 cemented and 1 uncemented) and 1 THA (cemented) revision study. Precision of the CT-based implant motion analysis (CTMA) system was calculated separately for each study, using both the surface anatomy of the pelvis and metal beads placed in the pelvis.Results - For the CTMA analysis using the surface anatomy of the pelvis, the precision ranged between 0.07 and 0.31 mm in translation and 0.20° and 0.39° for rotation, respectively. For the CTMA analysis using beads the precision ranged between 0.08 and 0.20 mm in translation and between 0.20° and 0.43° for rotations. The radiation dose ranged between 0.2 and 2.3 mSv.Interpretation - CTMA achieved a clinically relevant and consistent precision between the 3 different hip cups studied. The use of different hip cup types, different CT scanners, or registration method (beads or surface anatomy) had no discernible effect on precision. Therefore, CTMA without the use of bone markers could potentially be an alternative to RSA to measure early migration.

Accuracy and precision of a CT method for assessing migration in shoulder arthroplasty: an experimental study

BACKGROUND

Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the gold standard to measure early implant migration which is a predictive factor for implant survival.

PURPOSE

To validate an alternative computed tomography (CT) technique to measure implant migration in shoulder arthroplasty.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cadaver proximal humerus and a scapula, which had tantalum beads incorporated within them, were prepared to accept a short-stemmed humeral component and a two-pegged glenoid component of a commercial total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) system. A five degree of freedom micrometer and goniometer equipped rig was used to translate and rotate the implant components relative to the respective bone to predetermined positions. Double CT examinations were performed for each position and CT motion analysis software (CTMA) was used to assess these movements. The accuracy and precision of the software was estimated using the rig's micrometers and goniometers as the gold standard. The technique's effective dose was also assessed.

RESULTS

The accuracy was in the range of 0.07-0.23 mm in translation and 0.22-0.71° in rotation. The precision was in the range of 0.08-0.15 mm in translation and 0.23-0.54° in rotation. The mean effective dose for the CT scans was calculated to be 0.27 mSv.

CONCLUSION

In this experimental setting, accuracy, precision, and effective dose of the CTMA technique were found to be comparable to that of RSA. Therefore, we believe clinical studies are warranted to determine if CTMA is a suitable alternative to traditional RSA for migration measurements in TSA.

Model-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis using elementary geometrical shape models: 10 years results of an uncemented acetabular cup component

Background

Non-cemented acetabular cup components demonstrated different clinical performance depending on their surface texture or bearing couple. However, clinical osseointegration needs to be proved for each total joint arthroplasty (TJA) design. Aim of this study was to detect the in vivo migration pattern of a non-cemented cup design, using model-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis with elementary geometrical shape models (EGS-RSA) to calculate early cup migration.

Methods

Interchangeable applicability of the model-based EGS-RSA method next to gold standard marker-based RSA method was assessed by clinical radiographs. Afterwards, in vivo acetabular cup migration for 39 patients in a maximum follow up of 120 months (10 years) was calculated using model-based EGS-RSA.

Results

For the axes with the best predictive capability for acetabular cup loosening, mean (±SD) values were calculated for migration and rotation of the cup. The cup migrated 0.16 (±0.22) mm along the cranio-caudal axis after 24 months and 0.36 (±0.72) mm after 120 months, respectively. It rotated − 0.61 (±0.57) deg. about the medio-lateral axis after 24 months and − 0.53 (±0.67) deg. after 120 months, respectively.

Conclusions

Interchangeable applicability of model-based EGS-RSA next to gold standard marker-based RSA method could be shown. Model-based EGS-RSA enables an in vivo migration measurement without the necessity of TJA specific surface models. Migration of the investigated acetabular cup component indicates significant migration values along all the three axes. However, migration values after the second postoperative year were within the thresholds reported in literature, indicating no risk for later aseptic component loosening of this TJA design.

No implant migration and good subjective outcome of a novel customized femoral resurfacing metal implant for focal chondral lesions

PURPOSE

Managing focal cartilage injuries in the middle-aged patient poses a challenge. Focal prosthetic inlay resurfacing has been proposed to be a bridge between biologics and conventional joint arthroplasty. Patient selection and accurate implant positioning is crucial to avoid increased contact pressure to the opposite cartilage surface. A customized femoral condyle implant for focal cartilage injuries was designed to precisely fit each patient's individual size and location of damage. The primary objective was to assess implant safety profile, surgical usability of the implant and instruments, and implant migration with radiostereometric analysis (RSA).

METHODS

Ten patients 36-56 years with focal chondral defects, ICRS 3-4 of the femoral cartilage and failed earlier conservative or surgical interventions with VAS pain > 40. The patients were followed for 2 years with subjective outcome measures (VAS, EQ5D, KOOS) and RSA. The customized implant and guide instruments were manufactured by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) techniques using MRI data.

RESULTS

VAS, EQ5D and KOOS showed improvements that reached significance for VAS (p ≤ 0.001), Tegner (p = 0.034) and the KOOS subscores ADL (p = 0.0048), sport and recreation (p = 0.034) and quality of life (p = 0.037). VAS and KOOS scores improved gradually at 3, 6 and 12 months. The improvements in EQ5D, KOOS pain and KOOS symptoms did not reach statistical significance. No infections, deep venous thrombosis or other complications occured in the postoperative period. No radiographic signs of damage to the opposing tibial cartilage was noted. The surgical usability of implants and instruments were good. RSA did not show any implant migration.

CONCLUSION

This is the first clinical report of a new customized, focal knee resurfacing system. The short-term implant safety and patient-related outcome measures showed good-to-excellent results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective case series, Level 4.