Does the Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced Liver MRI Impact on the Treatment of Patients with Colorectal Cancer? Comparison Study with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT

Analysis of the best time-point for 18F-FDG PET/CT delayed imaging in patients of small colorectal cancer liver metastasis with hypothyroidism based on diagnostic efficacy and image standardized uptake values

OBJECTIVE

This study analyzes the role of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the diagnosis of small (< 10 mm) colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) lesions in patients with hypothyroidism. In particular, the impact of the best time for delayed imaging on improving diagnostic efficacy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 231 patients with small CRLM lesions with hypothyroidism who underwent dual time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging. Based on the previous studies and clinical practice experience, 120-190 min was selected as the time range for delayed imaging, divided into eight teams in 10-min groups. The delayed images of the eight time periods were first analyzed and compared for diagnostic efficacy, and second analyzed and compared for standardized uptake value (SUV) and of PET/CT images to observe the trend of SUV values over time.

RESULTS

The results of diagnostic efficacy analysis indicated that the 180-min delay group had the highest diagnostic efficacy (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy). Comparison of the SUV values with the delay time analysis showed that maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) increased with the delay time, and the normal liver tissue (SUVmean) decreased with the delay time, which resulted in the gradual increase in the ratio of the lesion to the normal liver tissue (TNR). By selecting the time-point with the highest TNR ratio and stable SUV value, and combining the results of diagnostic efficacy, this study successfully verified the best imaging time-point. After comprehensive consideration, 180 min was determined as the best imaging time-point, when the TNR reached the highest, the SUV value was stable, and the diagnostic efficacy was best.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the impact of delayed imaging on the diagnostic efficacy and SUV value of PET/CT images in patients of small CRLM with hypothyroidism was shown intuitively, and the changing pattern of SUV at different time points was also observed. The best time-point for PET/CT delayed imaging was determined to be 180 min, which provides a new scanning program for the diagnosis in patients of small CRLM with hypothyroidism.

Colon cancer: the 2023 Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Korea and the third leading cause of death from cancer. Treatment outcomes for colon cancer are steadily improving due to national health screening programs with advances in diagnostic methods, surgical techniques, and therapeutic agents.. The Korea Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary (KCCM) Committee intends to provide professionals who treat colon cancer with the most up-to-date, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve outcomes and help them make decisions that reflect their patients' values and preferences. These guidelines have been established by consensus reached by the KCCM Guideline Committee based on a systematic literature review and evidence synthesis and by considering the national health insurance system in real clinical practice settings. Each recommendation is presented with a recommendation strength and level of evidence based on the consensus of the committee.

PET/CT in assessment of colorectal liver metastases: a comprehensive review with emphasis on 18F-FDG

Approximately 25% of those who are diagnosed with colorectal cancer will develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) as their illness advances. Despite major improvements in both diagnostic and treatment methods, the prognosis for patients with CRLM is still poor, with low survival rates. Accurate employment of imaging methods is critical in identifying the most effective treatment approach for CRLM. Different imaging modalities are used to evaluate CRLM, including positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). Among the PET radiotracers, fluoro-18-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG), a glucose analog, is commonly used as the primary radiotracer in assessment of CRLM. As the importance of 18F-FDG-PET/CT continues to grow in assessment of CRLM, developing a comprehensive understanding of this subject becomes imperative for healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines. The primary aim of this article is to offer a simplified and comprehensive explanation of PET/CT in the evaluation of CRLM, with a deliberate effort to minimize the use of technical nuclear medicine terminology. This approach intends to provide various healthcare professionals and researchers with a thorough understanding of the subject matter.

Gadoxetic acid in hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastases: pearls and pitfalls

Gadoxetic disodium (Primovist) is a hepatocyte-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent with increasing popularity with its unique dual dynamic and excretory properties in focal liver lesion detection and characterisation. In-depth knowledge of its diagnostic utility and pitfalls in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver metastases is crucial in facilitating clinical management. The current article reviews the pearls and pitfalls in these aspects with highlights from the latest research evidence. Pearls for common usage of Primovist in HCC includes detection of precursor cancer lesions in cirrhotic patients. Hepatobiliary phase hypointensity precedes arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) in hepatocarcinogenesis. Hepatobiliary phase hypointense nodules without APHE can represent early or progressed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and high-grade dysplastic nodules. In addition, Primovist is useful to differentiate HCC from pseudolesions. Pitfalls in diagnosing HCC include transient tachypnoea in the arterial phase, rare hepatobiliary phase hyperintense HCC, and decompensated liver cirrhosis compromising image quality. Primovist is currently the most sensitive technique in diagnosing liver metastases before curative hepatic resection. Other patterns of enhancement of liver metastases, "disappearing" liver metastases are important pitfalls. Radiologists should be aware of the diagnostic utility, limitations, and potential pitfalls for the common usage of hepatobiliary specific contrast agent in liver MRI.

Clinical TNM staging for esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers in the era of neoadjuvant therapy: A systematic review of the literature

AIM

Clinical staging is vital for selecting appropriate candidates and designing neoadjuvant treatment strategies for advanced tumors. The aim of this review was to evaluate diagnostic abilities of clinical TNM staging for gastrointestinal, gastrointestinal cancers.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of recent publications to evaluate the accuracy of diagnostic modalities on gastrointestinal cancers. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE using the keywords "TNM staging," "T4 staging," "distant metastases," "esophageal cancer," "gastric cancer," and "colorectal cancer," and the search terms used in Cochrane Reviews between January 2005 to July 2020. Articles focusing on preoperative diagnosis of: (a) depth of invasion; (b) lymph node metastases; and (c) distant metastases were selected.

RESULTS

After a full-text search, a final set of 55 studies (17 esophageal cancer studies, 26 gastric cancer studies, and 12 colorectal cancer studies) were used to evaluate the accuracy of clinical TNM staging. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were the best modalities to assess distant metastases. Fat and fiber mode of CT may be useful for T4 staging of esophageal cancer, CT was a partially reliable modality for lymph node staging in gastric cancer, and CT combined with MRI was the most reliable modality for liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSION

The most reliable diagnostic modality differed among gastrointestinal cancers depending on the type of cancer. Therefore, we propose diagnostic algorithms for clinical staging for each type of cancer.

The diagnostic performance of a simulated "short" gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI protocol is similar to that of a conventional protocol for the detection of colorectal liver metastases

OBJECTIVES

To compare the performance of standard and simulated short gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI protocols for the detection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

From 2008 to 2017, 67 patients (44 men (66%); mean age 65 ± 11 years old) who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI during the initial work-up for colorectal cancer were included. Exams were independently reviewed by two readers blinded to clinical data in two reading sessions: (1) all acquired sequences (standard "long" protocol) and (2) only T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and hepatobiliary phase images (simulated "short" protocol). Readers characterized detected lesions using a 5-point scale (1-certainly benign to 5-certainly malignant). A lesion was considered a CRLM when the score was ≥ 3. The reference standard was histopathology or 12-month imaging follow-up. Chi-square, Student's t, and McNemar tests were used for comparisons.

RESULTS

A total of 486 lesions including 331 metastases (68%) were analyzed. The metastasis detection rate was 86.1% (95% CI 82-89.4)-86.7% (82.6-90) and 85.8% (81.6-89.2)-87% (82.9-90.2) with the short and long protocols, respectively (p > 0.99). Among detected lesions, 92.1% (89.1-94.4)-94.8% (92.2-96.6) and 84.6% (80.8-87.7)-88.8% (85.4-91.5) were correctly classified with the short and long protocols, respectively (p = 0.13 and p = 0.10). The results remained unchanged when lesions scored ≥ 4 were considered as CRLM.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of a simulated short gadoxetic enhanced-MR protocol including T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and hepatobiliary phase appears similar to that of a standard long protocol including dynamic phase images. Since this protocol shortens the duration of MR examination, it could facilitate the evaluation of patients with colorectal liver metastases.

KEY POINTS

• The detection rate of colorectal metastases with a simulated, short, MRI protocol was similar to that of a standard protocol. • The performance of both protocols for the differentiation of metastases and benign lesions appears to be similar. • A short MR imaging protocol could facilitate the evaluation of patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Kidney Disease: A Comprehensive Review and Clinical Practice Guideline Issued by the Canadian Association of Radiologists

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) in renal impairment is controversial, with physician and patient apprehension in acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and dialysis because of concerns regarding nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). The position that GBCA are absolutely contraindicated in AKI, category G4 and G5 CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2), and dialysis-dependent patients is outdated and may limit access to clinically necessary contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. This review and clinical practice guideline addresses the discrepancy between existing Canadian guidelines regarding use of GBCA in renal impairment and NSF.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Published literature (including clinical trials, retrospective cohort series, review articles, and case reports), online registries, and direct manufacturer databases were searched for reported cases of NSF by class and specific GBCA and exposed patient population.

METHODS

A comprehensive review was conducted identifying cases of NSF and their association to class of GBCA, specific GBCA used, patient, and dose (when this information was available). Based on the available literature, consensus guidelines were developed by an expert panel of radiologists and nephrologists.

KEY FINDINGS

In patients with category G2 or G3 CKD (eGFR ≥ 30 and < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), administration of standard doses of GBCA is safe and no additional precautions are necessary. In patients with AKI, with category G4 or G5 CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) or on dialysis, administration of GBCA should be considered individually and alternative imaging modalities utilized whenever possible. If GBCA are necessary, newer GBCA may be administered with patient consent obtained by a physician (or their delegate) citing an exceedingly low risk (much less than 1%) of developing NSF. Standard GBCA dosing should be used; half or quarter dosing is not recommended and repeat injections should be avoided. Dialysis-dependent patients should receive dialysis; however, initiating dialysis or switching from peritoneal to hemodialysis to reduce the risk of NSF is unproven. Use of a macrocyclic ionic instead of macrocyclic nonionic GBCA or macrocyclic instead of newer linear GBCA to further prevent NSF is unproven. Gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, and gadoversetamide remain absolutely contraindicated in patients with AKI, those with category G4 or G5 CKD, or those on dialysis. The panel agreed that screening for renal disease is important but less critical when using macrocyclic and newer linear GBCA. Monitoring for and reporting of potential cases of NSF in patients with AKI or CKD who have received GBCA is recommended.

LIMITATIONS

Limited available literature (number of injections and use in renal impairment) regarding the use of gadoxetate disodium. Limited, but growing and generally high-quality, number of clinical trials evaluating GBCA administration in renal impairment. Limited data regarding the topic of Gadolinium deposition in the brain, particularly as it related to patients with renal impairment.

IMPLICATIONS

In patients with AKI and category G4 and G5 CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and in dialysis-dependent patients who require GBCA-enhanced MRI, GBCA can be administered with exceedingly low risk of causing NSF when using macrocyclic agents and newer linear agents at routine doses.

Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Kidney Disease: Comprehensive Review and Clinical Practice Guideline Issued by the Canadian Association of Radiologists

Use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in renal impairment is controversial, with physician and patient apprehension in acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and dialysis because of concerns regarding nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). The position that GBCAs are absolutely contraindicated in AKI, CKD stage 4 or 5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min/1.73 m²) and dialysis-dependent patients is outdated, and may limit access to clinically necessary contrast-enhanced MRI examinations. Following a comprehensive review of the literature and reported NSF cases to date, a committee of radiologists and nephrologists developed clinical practice guidelines to assist physicians in making decisions regarding GBCA administrations. In patients with mild-to-moderate CKD (eGFR ≥30 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m²), administration of standard doses of GBCA is safe and no additional precautions are necessary. In patients with AKI, with severe CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m²), or on dialysis, administration of GBCAs should be considered individually and alternative imaging modalities utilized whenever possible. If GBCAs are necessary, newer GBCAs may be administered with patient consent obtained by a physician (or their delegate), citing an exceedingly low risk (much less than 1%) of developing NSF. Standard GBCA dosing should be used; half or quarter dosing is not recommended and repeat injections should be avoided. Dialysis-dependent patients should receive dialysis; however, initiating dialysis or switching from peritoneal to hemodialysis to reduce the risk of NSF is unproven. Use of a macrocyclic ionic instead of macrocyclic nonionic GBCA or macrocyclic instead of newer linear GBCA to further prevent NSF is unproven. Gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, and gadoversetamide remain absolutely contraindicated in patients with AKI, with stage 4 or 5 CKD, or on dialysis. The panel agreed that screening for renal disease is important but less critical when using macrocyclic and newer linear GBCAs. Monitoring for and reporting of potential cases of NSF in patients with AKI or CKD who have received GBCAs is recommended.