1
|
Maione F, Manigrasso M, Chini A, Vertaldi S, Anoldo P, D’Amore A, Marello A, Sorrentino C, Cantore G, Maione R, Gennarelli N, D’Angelo S, D’Alesio N, De Simone G, Servillo G, Milone M, De Palma GD. The Role of Indocyanine Near-Infrared Fluorescence in Colorectal Surgery. Front Surg 2022; 9:886478. [PMID: 35669252 PMCID: PMC9163431 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.886478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purposes The aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of Indocyanine Green in control of anastomosis perfusion and on anastomotic leakage rates during laparoscopic and robotic colorectal procedures. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent elective minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2020 was performed. All patients underwent Near-Infrared Fluorescence-Indocyanine Green system in two moments: before performing the anastomosis and after completing the anastomotic procedure. Primary outcomes were the rate of intraoperative change in the surgical resection due to an inadequate vascularization and the rate of postoperative anastomotic leakage. Secondary outcomes were the postoperative complications, both medical and surgical (intra-abdominal bleeding, anastomotic leakage). Results Our analysis included 93 patients. Visible fluorescence was detected in 100% of the cases. In 7 patients (7.5%), the planned site of resection was changed due to inadequate perfusion. The mean extension of the surgical resection in these 7 patients was 2.2 ± 0.62. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 2 patients (2.1%). Other complications included 8 postoperative bleedings (8.6%) and 1 pulmonary thromboembolism. Conclusions The intraoperative use of Near-Infrared Fluorescence-Indocyanine Green in colorectal surgery is safe, feasible, and associated with a substantial reduction in postoperative anastomotic leakage rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Maione
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
- Correspondence: Francesco Maione ; Alessia Chini
| | - Michele Manigrasso
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessia Chini
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
- Correspondence: Francesco Maione ; Alessia Chini
| | - Sara Vertaldi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Pietro Anoldo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Anna D’Amore
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandra Marello
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Carmen Sorrentino
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Grazia Cantore
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Rosa Maione
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Gennarelli
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Salvatore D’Angelo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola D’Alesio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe De Simone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Servillo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Milone M, Degiuli M, Allaix ME, Ammirati CA, Anania G, Barberis A, Belli A, Bianchi PP, Bianco F, Bombardini C, Burati M, Cavaliere D, Coco C, Coratti A, De Luca R, De Manzoni G, De Nardi P, De Rosa M, Delrio P, Di Cataldo A, Di Leo A, Donini A, Elmore U, Fontana A, Gallo G, Gentilli S, Giannessi S, Giuliani G, Graziosi L, Guerrieri M, Li Destri G, Longhin R, Manigrasso M, Mineccia M, Monni M, Morino M, Ortenzi M, Pecchini F, Pedrazzani C, Piccoli M, Pollesel S, Pucciarelli S, Reddavid R, Rega D, Rigamonti M, Rizzo G, Robustelli V, Rondelli F, Rosati R, Roviello F, Santarelli M, Saraceno F, Scabini S, Sica GS, Sileri P, Simone M, Siragusa L, Sofia S, Solaini L, Tribuzi A, Trompetto M, Turri G, Urso EDL, Vertaldi S, Vignali A, Zuin M, Zuolo M, D'Ugo D, De Palma GD. Mid-transverse colon cancer and extended versus transverse colectomy: Results of the Italian society of surgical oncology colorectal cancer network (SICO CCN) multicenter collaborative study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 46:1683-1688. [PMID: 32220542 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transverse colon cancer (TCC) is poorly studied, and TCC cases are often excluded from large prospective randomized trials because of their complexity and their potentially high complication rate. The best surgical approach for TCC has yet to be established. The aim of this large retrospective multicenter Italian series is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of both hemicolectomy and transverse colectomy in order to identify the best surgical approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with mid-transverse colon cancer treated with a segmental colon resection or an extended hemicolectomy (right or left) between 2006 and 2016 in 28 high-volume (more than 70 procedures/year) Italian referral centers for colorectal surgery. RESULTS The study included 1529 patients, 388 of whom underwent a segmental resection while 1141 underwent an extended resection. A higher number of complications has been reported in the segmental group than in the extended group (30.1% versus 23.6%; p 0.010). In 42 cases the main complication was the anastomotic leak (4.4% versus 2.2%; p 0.020). Recovery outcomes also showed statistical differences: time to first flatus (p 0.014), time to first mobilization (p 0.040), and overall hospital stay (p < 0.001) were significantly shorter in the extended group. Even if overall survival were similar between the groups (95.1% versus 97%; p 0.384), 3-year disease-free survival worsened after segmental resection (78.1% versus 86.2%; p 0.001). CONCLUSIONS According to our results, an extended right colon resection for TCC seems to be surgically safer and more oncologically valid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
| | - M Degiuli
- Department of Oncology, Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery Unit, San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - M E Allaix
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - C A Ammirati
- Oncologic Surgical Unit, Hospital Policlinic San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - G Anania
- Department of Morphology, Experimental Medicine and Surgery, Section of General and Thoracic Surgery, University of Ferrara, Italy
| | - A Barberis
- Unit of General and Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy
| | - A Belli
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Abdominal Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - P P Bianchi
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - F Bianco
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Abdominal Oncology, IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - C Bombardini
- Department of Morphology, Experimental Medicine and Surgery, Section of General and Thoracic Surgery, University of Ferrara, Italy
| | - M Burati
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - D Cavaliere
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - C Coco
- Department of General Surgery, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - A Coratti
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - R De Luca
- Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Research Center, Giovanni Paolo II Tumor Institute, Bari, Italy
| | - G De Manzoni
- Department of Surgery, General and Upper GI, Surgery Division, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - P De Nardi
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institut, Milan, Italy
| | - M De Rosa
- Department of General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Italy
| | - P Delrio
- Colorectal Abdominal Surgery Division, IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - A Di Cataldo
- Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - A Di Leo
- Department of Surgery, General and Upper GI, Surgery Division, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - A Donini
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - U Elmore
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institut, Milan, Italy
| | - A Fontana
- Department of HPB and Digestive Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy
| | - G Gallo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Santa Rita Clinic, Vercelli, Italy
| | - S Gentilli
- Department of General Surgery, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - S Giannessi
- Operative Unit of General Surgery, San Jacopo Hospital, Pistoia, Italy
| | - G Giuliani
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - L Graziosi
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - M Guerrieri
- Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - G Li Destri
- Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - R Longhin
- Unit of General and Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy
| | - M Manigrasso
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - M Mineccia
- Department of HPB and Digestive Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I, Turin, Italy
| | - M Monni
- Department of General Surgery, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - M Morino
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - M Ortenzi
- Department of General Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - F Pecchini
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - C Pedrazzani
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Unit of Colorectal Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - M Piccoli
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - S Pollesel
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Italy
| | - S Pucciarelli
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - R Reddavid
- Department of Oncology, Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery Unit, San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - D Rega
- Colorectal Abdominal Surgery Division, IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - M Rigamonti
- Operative Unit of General Surgery, Valli del Noce Hospital, Cles, Trento, Italy
| | - G Rizzo
- Department of General Surgery, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - V Robustelli
- Operative Unit of General Surgery, San Jacopo Hospital, Pistoia, Italy
| | - F Rondelli
- Department of General Surgery, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Foligno, Italy
| | - R Rosati
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institut, Milan, Italy
| | - F Roviello
- Department of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Italy
| | - M Santarelli
- Division of General and Emergency Surgery, Molinette Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - F Saraceno
- Department of General Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - S Scabini
- Oncologic Surgical Unit, Hospital Policlinic San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - G S Sica
- Department of Minimally Invasive and GI Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - P Sileri
- Department of General Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - M Simone
- Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Research Center, Giovanni Paolo II Tumor Institute, Bari, Italy
| | - L Siragusa
- Department of Minimally Invasive and GI Surgery, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - S Sofia
- Department of Oncology, Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery Unit, San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - L Solaini
- General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, Italy
| | - A Tribuzi
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - M Trompetto
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Santa Rita Clinic, Vercelli, Italy
| | - G Turri
- Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Unit of Colorectal Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - E D L Urso
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - S Vertaldi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - A Vignali
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institut, Milan, Italy
| | - M Zuin
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - M Zuolo
- Operative Unit of General Surgery, Valli del Noce Hospital, Cles, Trento, Italy
| | - D D'Ugo
- Department of Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - G D De Palma
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Park J, Lee EK, Lee JH, Oh EJ, Min JJ. Effects of inspired oxygen concentration during emergence from general anaesthesia on postoperative lung impedance changes evaluated by electrical impedance tomography: a randomised controlled trial. J Clin Monit Comput 2019; 34:995-1004. [PMID: 31564020 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-019-00390-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
We evaluated the effects of three different inspired oxygen concentrations (40%, 80%, and 100%) at anaesthesia emergence on postoperative lung volumes as measured by global impedance of electrical impedance tomography (EIT). This is a randomised, controlled, and assessor-blinded study in single-centre from May 2017 to August 2017. Seventy-one patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery with healthy lung condition were randomly allocated into the three groups based on the concentration of inspired oxygen applied during anaesthesia emergence: 40%-, 80%- or 100%-oxygen. End-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) with normal tidal ventilation and total lung impedance (TLI) with full respiratory effort were measured preoperatively and before discharge in the post-anaesthesia care unit by EIT, and perioperative changes (the ratio of difference between preoperative and postoperative value to preoperative value) were compared among the three groups. Postoperative lung impedances were significantly reduced compared with preoperative values in all patients (P < 0.001); however, perioperative lung impedance reduction (%) did not differ among the three oxygen groups. The mean reduction ratio in each 40%-, 80%-, and 100%-oxygen group were 37% ± 13%, 41% ± 14%, and 46% ± 14% for EELI (P = 0.125) and 40% ± 20%, 44% ± 17% and 49% ± 20% for TLI (P = 0.276), respectively. Inspired oxygen concentrations applied during anaesthesia emergence did not show a significant difference in postoperative lung volume as measured by EIT in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery with healthy lungs.Trial registration cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0002642).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiyeon Park
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyukwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun-Kyung Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyukwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Jong-Hwan Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyukwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Eun Jung Oh
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyukwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Jin Min
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyukwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Manigrasso M, Velotti N, Calculli F, Aprea G, Di Lauro K, Araimo E, Elmore U, Vertaldi S, Anoldo P, Musella M, Milone M, Maria Sosa Fernandez L, Milone F, Domenico De Palma G. Barbed Suture and Gastrointestinal Surgery. A Retrospective Analysis. Open Med (Wars) 2019; 14:503-508. [PMID: 31428681 PMCID: PMC6698052 DOI: 10.1515/med-2019-0055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Although minimally invasive surgery is recognized as the gold standard of many surgical procedures, laparoscopic suturing is still considered as the most difficult skill in laparoscopic surgery. The introduction of barbed sutures facilitates laparoscopic suturing because it is not necessary to tie a knot. The efficacy of this method has been evaluated in different types of surgery; however, less is known about general surgery. We retrospectively analysed data from 378 patients who had undergone bariatric or surgical treatment for colic or gastric malignancy requiring a closure of gastroentero, entero-entero or enterocolotomy from January 2014 to January 2019, admitted to the General Surgery Unit and Operative Unit of Surgical Endoscopy of the University Federico II (Naples, Italy). We registered 12 anastomotic leaks (3.1%), 16 anastomotic intraluminal bleedings (4.2%) and 7 extraluminal bleedings. Other complications included 23 cases of postoperative nausea and vomit (6%), 14 cases of postoperative ileus (3.7%) and 3 cases of intra-abdominal abscess (0.8%). Overall complications rate was 19.8% (75/378). No postoperative death was registered. Thus, by pooling together 378 patients, we can assess that barbed suture could be considered safe and effective for closure of holes used for the introduction of a branch of mechanical stapler to perform intracorporeal anastomosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Manigrasso
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery. University "Federico II" of Naples, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Nunzio Velotti
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery. University "Federico II" of Naples, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Federica Calculli
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Aprea
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery. University "Federico II" of Naples, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Katia Di Lauro
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery. University "Federico II" of Naples, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Enrico Araimo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery. University "Federico II" of Naples, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Ugo Elmore
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Vertaldi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery. University "Federico II" of Naples, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Pietro Anoldo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery. University "Federico II" of Naples, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Musella
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery. University "Federico II" of Naples, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery. University "Federico II" of Naples, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Loredana Maria Sosa Fernandez
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery. University "Federico II" of Naples, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery. University "Federico II" of Naples, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Domenico De Palma
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery. University "Federico II" of Naples, Via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|