The Involvement of β-Catenin/COX-2/VEGF Axis in NMDA-Caused Retinopathy

A comparative study on the effect of dopamine vs phenylephrine in improving the cutaneous analgesic effect of mexiletine in rats

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to compare the effects of the combined administration of two adjuvants, dopamine and phenylephrine, on the cutaneous analgesic effect and duration of mexiletine in rats.

METHODS

Nociceptive blockage was evaluated by the inhibition of response to skin pinpricks in rats via the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex (CTMR). After subcutaneous injection, the analgesic activities of mexiletine in the absence and presence of either dopamine or phenylephrine were assessed. Each injection was standardized into 0.6 ml with a mixture of drugs and saline.

RESULTS

Subcutaneous injections of mexiletine successfully induced dose-dependent cutaneous analgesia in rats. The results revealed that rats injected with 1.8 μmol mexiletine exhibited 43.75% blockage (%MPE), while rats injected with 6.0 μmol mexiletine showed 100% blockage. Co-application of mexiletine (1.8 or 6.0 μmol) with dopamine (0.06, 0.60, or 6.00 μmol) elicited full sensory block (%MPE). Sensory blockage ranged from 81.25% to 95.83% in rats injected with mexiletine (1.8 μmol) and phenylephrine (0.0059 or 0.0295 μmol), and complete subcutaneous analgesia was observed in rats injected with mexiletine (1.8 μmol) and a higher concentration of phenylephrine (0.1473 μmol). Furthermore, mexiletine at 6.0 μmol completely blocked nociception when combined with any concentration of phenylephrine, while 0.1473 μmol phenylephrine alone exhibited 35.417% subcutaneous analgesia. The combined application of dopamine (0.06/0.6/6 μmol) and mexiletine (1.8/6 μmol) resulted in increased %MPE, complete block time, full recovery time, and AUCs compared to the combined application of phenylephrine (0.0059 and 0.1473 μmol) and mexiletine (1.8/6 μmol) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Dopamine is superior to phenylephrine in improving sensory blockage and enhancing the duration of nociceptive blockage by mexiletine.

Extract of the Blood Circulation-Promoting Recipe-84 Can Protect Rat Retinas by Inhibiting the β-Catenin Signaling Pathway

Extract of the Blood Circulation-Promoting Recipe (EBR-84) from the Chinese Herbal medicine “Blood Circulation Promoting Recipe” could retard retinopathy development. This study investigated whether EBR-84 protects retinas by inhibiting the β-catenin pathway using a rat model of retinopathy and a retinal ganglion cell 5 (RGC-5) cell death model. RGC death was induced by either N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) or TWS119 (an activator of the β-catenin pathway). After the corresponding treatment with EBR-84, RGC death and the protein expression levels of β-catenin, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in rat retinas were examined. β-Catenin accumulated in the retinal ganglion cell layer (GCL) of NMDA-treated rats. EBR-84 (3.9, 7.8, and 15.6 g/kg) significantly attenuated the NMDA-induced RGC loss accompanying the reduction of β-catenin expression. Moreover, the expression levels of COX-2 and VEGF were decreased by EBR-84 in a dose-dependent manner. For the TWS119-treated rats, EBR-84 also ameliorated RGC loss and lowered the expression levels of β-catenin, COX-2, and VEGF. In vitro, EBR-84 increased the viability of NMDA-treated RGC-5 while decreased β-catenin expression. In conclusion, EBR-84 retarded ratretinopathy, and the β-catenin signaling pathway played an important role during this protective process.