Free Intraperitoneal Gallstone: An Unusual Case of Small Bowel Obstruction from Extrinsic Compression

Spilled gallstones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review

<b> Aim: </b> The study was conducted to analyse the recent peer-reviewed literature related to symptomatic spilled gallstones after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC). </br></br> <b>Materials and methods:</b> Articles published in the peer-reviewed journals of repute from 20122022 were evaluated for nine variables including: [I] age of the patient, [II] gender, [III] interval since index LC, [IV] index LC if emergent/difficult or elective/straightforward, [V] clinical presentation, [VI] spilled gallstones if detected by imaging, [VII] management, [VIII] approach to management, [IX] number of spilled gallstones. </br></br> <b>Results:</b> There were a total of 71 cases (37 males and 34 females) with a mean age of 63.7 years. The time of onset of symptoms from spilled gallstones, after index LC, ranged from 2 days to 15 years and 57 patients (80.3%) presented within 6 years. Forty (56.3%) patients were unaware of the fact that gallstone spillage had occurred during index LC. The retained gallstones were detected by imaging in 47 (66.1%) cases and they were multiple in 51 (71.8%). In 52 patients (73.2%), the stones manifested as abdominal abscess/foreign body granuloma; the other presentations being pelvic pain/fistula, intestinal obstruction, abdominal lump simulating malignancy, incidental finding of metastatic lesions and generalized peritonitis. The major approaches adopted to retrieve the retained stones included open surgery, laparoscopy and percutaneous drainage. There were two deaths (2.9%) due to spilled gallstones. </br></br> <b>Conclusion:</b> Retained gallstones represent a complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) that has a potential to create morbidity and diagnostic difficulties, even after a substantial delay. There is a need to spread awareness about the adverse effects of spilled stones so that they are actively looked for and retrieved if gallbladder perforates during cholecystectomy. Whenever such a complication occurs, the patient should be properly informed and the details should be very clearly mentioned in the operation notes.

Iatrogenic gallbladder perforation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

We aimed to compare the outcomes of iatrogenic gallbladder perforation (IGP) versus no gallbladder perforation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in compliance with PRISMA statement standards. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Scopus, and CENTRAL to identify eligible studies. The last search was run on 17 October 2021. The outcome of interest included surgical site infection (SSI), postoperative collection, operative time, and length of hospital stay. Random effects modelling was applied to calculate pooled outcome data. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE system.

RESULTS

Analysis of 5366 patients from 11 observational studies suggested that IGP during laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not increase the risk of SSI (OR: 1.48, 95% CI 0.57-3.86, P = 0.42) and postoperative collection (RD: 0.00, 95% CI - 0.00-0.01, P = 0.41) but may result in longer operative time (MD 10.28 min, 95% CI 7.40-13.16, P < 0.00001) and length of hospital stay (MD 0.51 days, 95% CI 0.15-0.87, P = 0.005). The results remained consistent through sensitivity analyses. The quality of available evidence was judged to be moderate, and the GRADE certainty of the evidence was judged to be high.

CONCLUSIONS

The best available evidence suggests that IGP during laparoscopic cholecystectomy may not increase the risk of SSI and postoperative collection but may result in longer operative time and length of hospital stay. Whether prompt retrieval of spilled stones, adequate peritoneal irrigation, and intraoperative use of prophylactic antibiotic contribute to the above findings remains unknown.