Reducing Blood Loss in Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Tranexamic Acid Is Effective in Aseptic Revisions and in Second-Stage Reimplantations for Periprosthetic Infection

Orthopaedic Surgery in the Jehovah's Witness Patient: Clinical, Ethical, and Legal Considerations

➢ Jehovah's Witnesses refuse allogeneic blood products based on religious beliefs that create clinical, ethical, and legal challenges in orthopaedic surgery, requiring detailed perioperative planning and specific graft selection.➢ Detailed perioperative planning is particularly important for procedures with high intraoperative blood loss.➢ Graft selection must align with Jehovah's Witnesses patients' religious beliefs, with options including autografts, allografts, and synthetic materials; this requires shared decision-making between the patient and surgeon.➢ A multidisciplinary approach, integrating medical, ethical, and religious considerations, ensures optimal care, with innovative techniques and open dialogue being key to successful outcomes.

Drainage in primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty

Drainage after total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) used to be systematic to prevent complications and notably hematoma and infection. However, improvement in practices, the introduction of blood-sparing protocols and above all the conclusions reported in many studies have cast doubt on this dogma. There is abundant literature on the pros and cons of drainage after primary THA and TKA. The main endpoints were transfusion rates and volumes, total blood loss and variations in hemoglobin levels. Clinical endpoints comprised pain, edema, postoperative hematoma and, more rarely, short-to-medium-term function. Except for a few studies reporting greater pain and edema without drainage, there is agreement that drainage not only provides no benefit but actually aggravates postoperative bleeding. There are fewer studies of drainage in revision procedures for the hip and very few for the knee. The interest of drainage has not been demonstrated and again postoperative bleeding is aggravated. Whether in primary or revision arthroplasty, tranexamic acid is recommended when not contraindicated, whatever the administration protocol. However, it should not be seen as the sole and determining reason for abandoning drainage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, expert opinion.

The Association between Bleeding Disorders and Postoperative Complications Following Operative Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture

Background  While previous studies have investigated the association between bleeding disorders and outcomes with hip or knee surgeries, no studies have investigated the association between bleeding disorders and outcomes in upper extremity surgery. Questions/Purposes  The purpose of this study was to investigate if a past history of bleeding disorders is associated with which, if any postoperative complications for patients receiving distal radius fracture open reduction internal fixation. Patients and Methods  Patients undergoing operative treatment for distal radius fracture from 2007 to 2018 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: patients with a bleeding disorder and patients without a bleeding disorder. In this analysis, 30-day postoperative complications were assessed, as well as mortality, extended length of stay, reoperation, and readmission. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results  Of the 16,489 total patients undergoing operative treatment for distal radius fracture, 16,047 patients (97.3%) did not have a bleeding disorder, whereas 442 (2.7%) had a bleeding disorder. Following adjustment on multivariate analyses, an increased risk of postoperative transfusion requirement (odds ratio [OR] 17.437; p  = 0.001), extended length of hospital stay more than 3 days (OR 1.564; p  = 0.038), and readmission (OR 2.515; p  < 0.001) were seen in patients with a bleeding disorder compared to those without a bleeding disorder. Conclusion  History of bleeding disorders is an independent risk factor for transfusions, extended length of stay, and readmission. We recommend a multidisciplinary team approach to addressing bleeding disorders before patients receive distal radius fracture open reduction internal fixation. Level of Evidence  Level III, retrospective study.

Transfusion Rates in the Operative Treatment of Prosthetic Hip and Knee Infection

Surgery for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) can often lead to significant blood loss, necessitating allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT). The use of ABT is associated with higher rates of morbidity and death in revision total joint arthroplasty, particularly in the treatment of PJI. We compared ABT rates by procedure type among patients treated for PJI. We retrospectively reviewed 143 operative cases of hip and knee PJI performed at our institution between 2016 and 2018. Procedures were categorized as irrigation and debridement (I&D) with modular component exchange (modular component exchange), explantation with I&D and placement of an antibiotic spacer (explantation), I&D with antibiotic spacer exchange (spacer exchange), or antibiotic spacer removal and prosthetic reimplantation (reimplantation). Rates of ABT and the number of units transfused were assessed. Factors associated with ABT were assessed with a multilevel mixed-effects regression model. Of the cases, 77 (54%) required ABT. The highest rates of ABT occurred during explantation (74%) and spacer exchange (72%), followed by reimplantation (36%) and modular component exchange (33%). A lower preoperative hemoglobin level was associated with higher odds of ABT. Explantation, reimplantation, and spacer exchange were associated with greater odds of ABT. Antibiotic spacer exchange and explantation were associated with greater odds of multiple-unit transfusion. Rates of ABT remain high in the surgical treatment of PJI. Antibiotic spacer exchange and explantation procedures had high rates of multiple-unit transfusions, and additional units of blood should be made available. Preoperative anemia should be treated when possible, and further refinement of blood management protocols for prosthetic joint infection is necessary. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(6):353-359.].

Different Doses of Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

 This article assessed the efficacy and safety of different doses of intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

 We retrospectively identified 122 patients in our institution who underwent revision TKA with a history of perioperative intravenous TXA utilization. According to the sum of intravenous TXA documented, all patients were divided into three groups: 1 g intravenous TXA, 2 g intravenous TXA, and equal or greater than 3 g intravenous TXA. The primary outcomes included total blood loss (TBL), hidden blood loss (HBL), transfusion rate, and the incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism among the three groups. A correlation analysis was conducted to analyze the correlation between the dose of TXA and the blood loss.

RESULTS

 In total, there was no significance difference in TBL and revised HBL (rHBL) between the first two groups (1 g/dL for intravenous TXA, 2 g/dL for intravenous TXA; p = 0.486; p = 0.525). Equal or greater than 3 g intravenous TXA (≥3 g/dL for intravenous TXA) reached a significant reduction in TBL, rHBL, and length of stay compared with the first two groups (p = 0.01; p = 0.01; p = 0.01). The rate of transfusion between the three groups did not differ significantly (p = 0.21). Due to the limitations in sample size, only one symptomatic venous thromboembolism was reported in the 1 g intravenous TXA group.

CONCLUSION

 Applying the dose of intravenous TXA equal or greater than 3 g in revision TKA might further reduce the blood loss and shorten the length of stay.

Efficacy of intravenous tranexamic acid administration in revision hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of constant dose intravenous administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) in reducing postoperative blood loss, hemoglobin (Hb) concentration, and the number of transfusions in revision hip arthroplasty (RHA).

METHODS

The study included 145 consecutive patients who had undergone RHA: a TXA group (75 patients) who received two doses of TXA (1.0 g 15 min before skin incision and 1.0 g during wound closure) and a no-TXA group (70 patients). Percentage blood loss and quantitative blood loss were calculated.

RESULTS

The percentage blood loss (23.82 ± 10.6% vs. 39.17 ± 15.1%; P < 0.001), Hb drop (2.9 ± 1.14 g/dL vs. 4.22 ± 1.4 g/dL; P < 0.001), and total blood loss (1030 ± 477 mL vs. 1736 ± 761 mL; P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the TXA group than in the no-TXA group on postoperative day 1. Percentage blood loss (37.5 ± 10.4% vs. 43.1 ± 12.5%; P < 0.01), Hb drop (4.64 ± 1.5 g/dL vs. 5.22 ± 1.6 g/dL; P < 0.01) and total blood loss (1639 ± 543 mL vs. 1908 ± 681 mL; P = 0.02) were significantly lower in the TXA group than in the no-TXA group on the 5th postoperative day. The blood transfusion requirements were lower in the TXA group than those in the no-TXA group (30.7% vs. 71.4% of patients; P < 0.001), with a lower transfusion per patient ratio of 0.55 in the TXA group and 1.4 in the no-TXA group. No postoperative complications were associated with TXA administration, including deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSION

Administration of TXA is an effective method to reduce perioperative blood loss, Hb drop and the number of transfusions in RHA.

Factors Associated With Perioperative Transfusion in Lower Extremity Revision Arthroplasty Under a Restrictive Blood Management Protocol

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 37% of patients undergoing lower extremity revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA) receive allogeneic blood transfusions (ABTs), which are associated with increased risk of morbidity and death. It is important to identify patient factors associated with needing ABT because the health of higher-risk patients can be optimized preoperatively and their need for ABT can be minimized. Our goal was to identify the patient and surgical factors independently associated with perioperative ABT in revision TJA.

METHODS

We included all 251 lower extremity revision TJA cases performed at our academic tertiary care center from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018. We assessed the following factors for associations with perioperative ABT: patient age, sex, race, body mass index, preoperative hemoglobin level, and infection status (ie, infection as indication for revision TJA); use of vasopressors, tranexamic acid (TXA), surgical drains, tourniquets, and intraoperative cell salvage; and procedure type (hip versus knee), procedure complexity (according to the number of components revised), and surgical time. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors independently associated with perioperative ABT.

RESULTS

The following characteristics were independently associated with greater odds of perioperative ABT: preoperative hemoglobin level (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 to 2.2), infectious indication for revision (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 9.7), and procedure complexity. TXA use was a negative predictor of ABT (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.98). Compared with polyethylene liner exchanges, single-component revisions (OR, 14; 95% CI, 3.6 to 56) and dual-component revisions (OR, 7.8; 95% CI, 2.3 to 26) were associated with greater odds of ABT.

DISCUSSION

Patients with preoperative anemia, those undergoing revision TJA because of infection, those who did not receive TXA, and those undergoing more complex TJA procedures may have greater odds of requiring ABT. We recommend preoperative optimization of the health of these patients to reduce the need for ABT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study.

Do Low Hemoglobin Levels Affect the Healing Process of Periprosthetic Joint Infection?

Background

Revision knee arthroplasty (RKA) is associated with low hemoglobin (Hb) levels after surgery, which results mostly from perioperative blood loss. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the common reasons for RKA. This study aimed to determine whether low Hb levels affect the healing process of PJI.

Methodology

This retrospective study included 69 patients who underwent two-stage revision for PJI between 2013 and 2016. Patients were divided into two groups according to the latest Hb levels (Hb < 10 and Hb > 10 g/dL) during hospitalization for the first-stage revision surgery. Laboratory parameters of infection were measured during the cement spacer retention period: C-reactive protein (CRP), sedimentation rate (SEDIM), and white blood cell (WBC) count. Treatment was evaluated in two periods: cement spacer retention period (between the first surgery and second surgery) and the first normal CRP period (between the first surgery with the first normal CRP level during the cement spacer retention period). Infection parameters in the two time periods and reoperation with cement spacer were compared between the groups.

Results

The mean patient age was 67.3 ± 7.94 (50-87) years, and the female-to-male ratio was 4:1. No difference was found in the postoperative first control CRP, SEDIM, and WBC between the groups (p = 0.953, p = 0.3341, and p = 0.444, respectively). CRP-SEDIM control curves were observed in parallel, and no significant difference was found. The cement spacer retention period was 60.3 ± 24.8 (17-123) days, and the first normal CRP period was 87.3 ± 28.4 (14-161) days; no statistical difference was found between the groups (p = 0.727, p = 0.754).

Conclusions

In RKA, as low Hb level was not a negative factor of infection, blood transfusion should be avoided as it has many complications.

The Topical Tranexamic Acid Have Potential Hazard of Promoting Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus in Microenvironment of the Prosthetic Joint

Background. Perioperative topical tranexamic acid as antifibrinolytic agent is often used for total joint replacement to reduce bleeding currently. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common isolates from perioperative infection of prosthetic joint. The influence of topical application with tranexamic acid on the incidence of acute prosthetic joint infection of Staphylococcus aureus has not been clarified. Methods. Mouse model of Staphylococcus aureus knee prosthesis infection was constructed. Tranexamic acid was intra-articular injected during the perioperative period. CFU counting from tissue and implant sample was evaluated 3 days and 7 days after inoculating of Staphylococcus aureus. Bacterial growth curve, biofilm formation, aggregation, and plasmin inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus were tested with tranexamic acid added to the synovial culture medium. Results. There were no significant differences of CFU counting from tissue and implant samples in knee prosthesis infection after a single local injection of tranexamic acid at the postoperative 3 or 7 days. The amount of bacterial colonization on the surface of implant increased after 3 days’ continuous local injection of tranexamic acid. Tranexamic acid has no effect on bacterial growth at the concentration (10 mg/ml) of clinical application, but it can inhibit bacterial aggregation and mildly inhibit biofilm formation. Plasmin can significantly inhibit biofilm formation which can be revised by adding tranexamic acid. Conclusion. Although continuous local injection of tranexamic acid can promote the biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus on the surface of articular implant, it has clinical safety for using one single local injection of tranexamic acid during the perioperative period.

Intravenous tranexamic acid is associated with safe reduced blood loss and transfusion rate in one-stage exchange for infected hip arthroplasty

Objectives

This study aims to investigate if the use of intravenous (IV) tranexamic acid (TXA) during one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip that necessitates an extensive debridement is associated with decreased blood loss, if the rate of blood transfusion that may lead to side effects can be lowered with IV TXA, and if there is any difference regarding the occurrence of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Patients and methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent one-stage exchange for PJI of the hip with perioperative IV administration of TXA (n=163; 90 males, 73 females; mean age 68±10.3; range, 25 to 90 years) between January 2015 and December 2016 and compared them to another group (n=190; 106 males, 84 females; mean age 71±10.1; range, 39 to 92 years) who underwent one-stage exchange for PJI of the hip without perioperative IV administration of TXA between January 2006 and December 2012. Blood loss, transfusion rates, amount of transfused blood, and occurrence of VTE complications were observed.

Results

Mean blood loss of the TXA group was significantly lower than that of the non-TXA group (2.4 L and 4.5 L, respectively; p<0.001). Patients in non-TXA group experienced significantly higher rate of blood transfusion (71.1% and 58.3%, respectively; p=0.014) and higher quantity of transfused packed red blood cells (3.2 and 1.9 units, respectively; p<0.001). There was one patient with VTE complication in each group.

Conclusion

Even in the presence of infection, usage of IV TXA during one-stage exchange for PJI of the hip is associated with significantly lower blood loss and transfusion rates showing no higher risk of VTE events.

Intravenous Tranexamic Acid Safely and Effectively Reduces Transfusion Rates in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been well established. However, there have been limited data for revision TKAs. The primary aim was to assess the impact of intravenous TXA on transfusion rates and symptomatic venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) in a large revision TKA cohort with or without intravenous TXA utilization.

METHODS

A retrospective review of revision TKAs performed from 2005 to 2014 was performed, identifying 2,951 procedures (2,219 patients), in which TXA was utilized in 1,144 procedures (39%). The mean age was 65 years with 52% female patients in the TXA revision group and 67 years with 52% female patients in the non-TXA revision group. Transfusion rates and symptomatic VTEs were the primary outcomes assessed. Comparisons were performed between cohorts, utilizing a unique propensity model to mitigate bias, on the basis of TXA use and subsequently for aseptic or septic revision etiology.

RESULTS

Significant reductions in transfusion rates with use of TXA were identified in revision TKAs overall (13% compared with 39%; p < 0.001 [adjusted relative risk, 1.7]), including revisions for both aseptic etiology (6% with TXA compared with 28% without TXA; p < 0.001) and septic etiology (31% with TXA compared with 54% without TXA; p < 0.001). The risk of a postoperative symptomatic VTE was not significantly different (adjusted p = 0.63) with use of TXA at 11 events (1.0%) compared with 24 events (1.3%) in the non-TXA group).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous TXA significantly reduced transfusion rates in revision TKAs by approximately twofold, including cohorts revised for aseptic and septic etiologies. There was a very low rate of VTEs (1.2%) with no significant difference in the number of VTEs between groups after adjusting risk utilizing propensity modeling.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Intravenous tranexamic acid reduces blood transfusions in revision total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Aim: We performed a meta-analysis to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous tranexamic acid in revision total hip arthroplasty. Method: Potential academic articles were identified from Cochrane Library, Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, ScienceDirect and other databases. The time range we retrieved from was that from the inception of electronic databases to February 2019. Gray studies were identified from the references of included literature reports. STATA version 11.0 was used to analyze the pooled data. Results: A total of eight articles were involved in our study. The overall participants of tranexamic acid (TXA) group were 3533, whereas it was 11,007 in the control group. Our meta-analysis showed that TXA is preferable for revision total hip arthroplasty because of its lower value of hemoglobin reduction (weighted mean difference = -1.277-1.405; 95% CI: -1.996 to -0.559; p < 0.001), the rate of blood transfusion (odds ratio: 0.233; 95% CI: 0.129-0.422; p < 0.001) and the number of red blood cell units transfused (weighted mean difference = -0.978; 95% CI = -1.631 to -0.324; p = 0.003). However, there was no difference in calculated blood loss (p = 0.075), operation duration (p = 0.569) and venous thromboembolism complications (p = 0.338). Conclusion: Based on available evidence, use of intravenous TXA for patients undergoing revision arthroplasty may reduce hemoglobin reduction, number of red blood cell units transfused and blood transfusion rate without increasing the risk of venous thromboembolism and length of operation duration. Given the relevant possible biases in our study, adequately powered and better-designed studies with long-term follow-up are required to reach a firmer conclusion.