Comparison of Kinematics in Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized for Fixed and Rotating Platform Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty with respect to Different Posterior Tibial Slope. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:5139074. [PMID: 29992149 PMCID: PMC6016153 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5139074]

Development of a Machine-Learning Model for Anterior Knee Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty With Patellar Preservation Using Radiological Variables

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain (AKP) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with patellar preservation is a common complication that significantly affects patients' quality of life. This study aimed to develop a machine-learning model to predict the likelihood of developing AKP after TKA using radiological variables.

METHODS

A cohort of 131 anterior stabilized TKA cases (105 patients) without patellar resurfacing was included. Patients underwent a follow-up evaluation with a minimum 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome was AKP, and radiological measurements were used as predictor variables. There were 2 observers who made the radiological measurement, which included lower limb dysmetria, joint space, and coronal, sagittal, and axial alignment. Machine-learning models were applied to predict AKP. The best-performing model was selected based on accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and Kappa statistics. Python 3.11 with Pandas and PyCaret libraries were used for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 35 TKA had AKP (26.7%). Patient-reported outcomes were significantly better in the patients who did not have AKP. The Gradient Boosting Classifier performed best for both observers, achieving an area under the curve of 0.9261 and 0.9164, respectively. The mechanical tibial slope was the most important variable for predicting AKP. The Shapley test indicated that high/low mechanical tibial slope, a shorter operated leg, a valgus coronal alignment, and excessive patellar tilt increased AKP risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that global alignment, including sagittal, coronal, and axial alignment, is relevant in predicting AKP after TKA. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing TKA outcomes and reducing the incidence of AKP.

Effect of Posterior Tibial Slope on Knee Kinematics After Bicruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), normal knee kinematics are rarely replicated. Retention of both cruciate ligaments (bicruciate retaining TKA) has helped this. Postoperative posterior tibial slope (PPTS) may further affect ligament tension and kinematics. The objective of this study is to determine how changes between the preoperative posterior tibial slope (PTS) and PPTS affect knee kinematics.

Methods

Twenty bicruciate retaining TKAs were performed using standard instrumentation. Fluoroscopic kinematic data were obtained during gait and a single knee bend. Differences (Δ) between radiographic measurements of preoperative and PPTS were correlated with in-vivo knee kinematics. Patients were separated into 2 groups based on their Δ values. Group I consisted of Δ values less than 0.7, indicating either a similar PPTS compared to preoperative PTS or a slightly flatter PPTS. Group II consisted of Δ values above 0.7, indicating a steepened PPTS.

Results

Preoperative PTS values ranged from -0.5° to 11.2°, with an average of 5.0° ± 3.4°. PPTS values ranged from 3.0° to 12.1°, with an average of 7.1° ± 3.1°. Weight-bearing range of motion (WBROM) measured from 94° to 139°, and femorotibial axial rotation ranged from -2.9° to 17.3°. A t-test revealed average values for WBROM in Group IT (Δ < 0.7) to be significantly greater than those for Group IIT (Δ > 0.7) (P = .01).

Conclusions

These findings indicate that either a PPTS approximating the preoperative PTS or a slightly flattened PPTS in comparison (Δ < 0.7) is associated with WBROM greater than 130°. Values for axial rotation and anterior sliding were not significantly associated with changes to the PTS.

Accurate surgical posterior tibial slope alteration can be achieved in total knee arthroplasty regardless of surgeon skill level or local soft tissue thickness-A retrospective radiograph-based study

PURPOSE

To retrospectively report on the impact of local soft tissue thickness and surgeon skill level on the accuracy of surgical posterior tibial slope (PTS) alteration achieved in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) utilising lateral knee radiographs.

METHODS

Pre- and postoperative radiographs of 82 patients undergoing primary TKA using conventional mechanical alignment technique were measured by two observers and subjected to quality criteria for accurate measurement of the PTS. All patients underwent a standardised surgical approach for PTS alteration: cruciate-retaining (CR) cases with preoperative PTS ≤ 10° were set for reconstruction of the preoperative PTS. Cases indicated for posterior-stabilised (PS) design and/or with a preoperative PTS > 10° were set for 3° of postoperative PTS. Pretibial subcutaneous fat (PSF) and surgeon skill level were analysed for their predictive quality regarding the accuracy of surgical PTS alteration achieved.

RESULTS

The overall mean postoperative PTS was significantly lower than the preoperative values (6.2°, SD 2.7 vs. 7.7°, SD 3.2; p = 0.002103). Neither local soft tissue thickness, namely PSF, nor surgeon skill level was found to be a predictor of the accuracy of surgical PTS alteration achieved. Among cases set for PTS reconstruction, 25.9% and 42.6% achieved a postoperative PTS within ±1° and ±2° of preoperative values, respectively. In patients with a PTS > 10° or those indicated for PS design, slope reduction was achieved with a mean postoperative PTS of 6.5°. Furthermore, 14.3% and 32.1% of cases were within ±1° and ±2° of 3, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that accurate surgical alteration of the PTS is possible in TKA regardless of local knee soft tissue thickness or surgeon skill level. This proves the clinical feasibility of both targeted reduction as well as reconstruction of the PTS in TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Biomechanical analysis of different levels of constraint in TKA during daily activities

BACKGROUND

Numerous total knee prosthetic implants are currently available on the orthopedic market, and this variety covers a set of different levels of constraint: among the various models available, a significant role is covered by mobile bearing cruciate-retaining design with an ultra-congruent insert, mobile bearing cruciate-retaining design, fixed-bearing posterior stabilized prosthesis and fixed-bearing constrained condylar knee. A biomechanical comparative study among them could therefore be helpful for the clinical decision-making process. This study aimed to compare the effect of these different levels of constraint in the knee biomechanics of a patient, in three different configurations representing the typical boundary conditions experienced by the knee joint during daily activities.

METHOD

The investigation was performed via finite element analysis with a knee model based on an already published and validated one. Four different types of prosthesis designs were analyzed: two mobile-bearing models and two fixed-bearing models, each one having a different level of constraint. The different designs were incorporated in to the 3D finite element model of the lower leg and analyzed in three different configurations reproducing the landing and the taking-off phases occurring during the gait cycle and chair-rising. Implant kinetics (in terms of polyethylene contact areas and contact pressure), polyethylene and tibial bone stresses were calculated under three different loading conditions for each design.

RESULTS

The tibial stress distribution in the different regions of interest of the tibia remains relatively homogeneous regardless of the type of design used. The main relevant difference was observed between the mobile and fixed-bearing models, as the contact areas were significantly different between these models in the different loading conditions. As a consequence, significant changes in the stress distribution were observed at the interface between the prosthetic components, but no significant changes were noted on the tibial bone. Moreover, the different models exhibited a symmetrical medial and lateral distribution of the contact areas, which was not always common among all the currently available prostheses (i.e. medial pivot designs).

CONCLUSION

The changes of the prosthetic implant did not induce a big variation of the stress distribution in the different regions of the tibial bone, while they significantly changed the distribution of stress at the interface between the prosthetic components.

Endurance Behavior of Cemented Tibial Tray Fixation Under Anterior Shear and Internal-External Torsional Shear Testing: A New Methodological Approach

BACKGROUND

Early total knee arthroplasty failures continue to surface in the literature. Cementation technique and implant design are two of the most important scenarios that can affect implant survivorship. Our objectives were to develop a more suitable preclinical test to evaluate the endurance of the implant-cement-bone interface under anterior shear and internal-external (I/E) torsional shear testing condition in a biomechanical sawbones.

METHODS

Implants tested included the AS VEGA System PS and the AS Columbus CR/PS (Aesculap AG, Germany), with zirconium nitride (ZrN) coating. Tibial implants were evaluated under anterior shear and I/E torsional shear conditions with 6 samples in 4 test groups. For the evaluation of the I/E torsional shear endurance behavior, a test setup was created allowing for clinically relevant I/E rotation with simultaneous high axial/tibio-femoral load. The test was performed with an I/E displacement of ±17.2°, for 1 million cycles with an axial preload of 3,000 N.

RESULTS

After the anterior shear test an implant-cement-bone fixation strength for the AS VEGA System tibial tray of 2,674 ± 754 N and for the AS Columbus CR/PS tibial tray of 2,177 ± 429 N was determined (P = .191). After I/E rotational shear testing an implant-cement-bone fixation strength for the AS VEGA System PS tray of 2,561 ± 519 N and for the AS Columbus CR/PS tray of 2,824 ± 515 N was resulted (P = .39).

CONCLUSION

Both methods had varying degrees of failure modes from debonding to failure of the sawbones foam. These two intense biomechanical loading tests are more strenuous and more representative of clinical activity.

The Role of Stability and Alignment in Improving Patient Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty

»

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment option for many patients, but a small group of patients are dissatisfied following TKA.

»

Alignment, in combination with balance, stability, and knee kinematics, is an important modifiable surgical factor that can affect patient outcomes.

»

Driven by the subset of dissatisfied patients after TKA, new techniques have evolved in the search for a more anatomic reconstruction of individual knee morphology and a more accurate approximation of the individual lower-extremity alignment.

»

There is a need to optimize 3 aspects of TKA to improve patient outcomes-mechanical tooling processes, implants that resurface the epiphysis, and techniques that respect the variable anatomy of patients.

Loading on Attune® fixed-bearing cruciate-substituting total knee implant in knee malalignment during activities of daily living: A finite element analysis

Purpose

To compare contact stresses between Attune® and PFC Sigma® total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants in the presence of knee malalignment.

Methods

Maximum contact stress after finite element analysis were compared during standing, walking, and stair climbing in 0°, 2.5° and 5°varus/valgus knee alignments.

Results

The percentage increase in contact stress was highest during walking with PFC Sigma® in 5° varus (238.5%), standing with Attune® in 5° valgus (127.2%), and standing with Attune® in 2.5° valgus (107.8%).

Conclusion

The newer Attune® design may be associated with higher maximum contact stresses and increased risk of wear and implant failure.

Effects of Posterior Tibial Slope on a Posterior Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics and Kinetics

BACKGROUND

It has been hypothesized that increasing posterior tibial slope can influence condylar rollback and play a role in increasing knee flexion. However, the effects of tibial slope on knee kinematics are not well studied. The objective of this study is to assess the effects of tibial slope on femorotibial kinematics and kinetics for a posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty design.

METHODS

A validated forward solution model of the knee was implemented to predict the femorotibial biomechanics of a posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty with varied posterior slopes of 0°-8° at 2° intervals. All analyses were conducted on a weight-bearing deep knee bend activity.

RESULTS

Increasing the tibial slope shifted the femoral component posteriorly at full extension but decreased the overall femoral rollback throughout flexion. With no tibial slope, the lateral condyle contacted the polyethylene 6 mm posterior of the midline, but as the slope increased to 8°, the femur shifted an extra 5 mm, to 11 mm posterior of the tibial midline. Similar shifts were observed for the medial condyle, ranging from 7 mm posterior to 13 mm posterior, respectively. Increasing posterior slope decreased the posterior cruciate ligament tension and femorotibial contact force.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study revealed that, although increasing the tibial slope shifted the femur posteriorly at full extension and maximum flexion, it reduced the amount of femoral rollback. Despite the lack of rollback, a more posterior location of condyles suggests lower chances of bearing impingement of the posterior femur and may explain why increasing slope may lead to higher knee flexion.

Secondary Patellar Resurfacing in TKA: A Combined Analysis of Registry Data and Biomechanical Testing

The German Arthroplasty registry (EPRD) has shown that different prosthesis systems have different rates of secondary patellar resurfacing: four years after implantation, the posterior-stabilized (PS) Vega prosthesis has a 3.2% risk of secondary patellar resurfacing compared to the cruciate-retaining (CR) Columbus prosthesis at 1.0% (both Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany). We hypothesized that PS implants have increased retropatellar pressure and a decreased retropatellar contact area compared to a CR design, which may lead to an increased likelihood of secondary patellar resurfacing. Eight fresh frozen specimens (cohort 1) were tested with an established knee rig. In addition, a possible influence of the registry-based patient collective (cohort 2) was investigated. No significant differences were found in patient data–cohort 2-(sex, age). A generally lower number of PS system cases is noteworthy. No significant increased patella pressure could be detected with the PS design, but a lower contact area was observed (cohort 1). Lower quadriceps force (100°–130° flexion), increased anterior movement of the tibia (rollback), greater external tilt of the patella, and increasing facet pressure in the Vega PS design indicate a multifactorial cause for a higher rate of secondary resurfacing which was found in the EPRD patient cohort and might be related to the PS’ principle function.

Intact, pie-crusting and repairing the posterior cruciate ligament in posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty: A 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is important for cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Whether the entire PCL should be retained during CR-TKA is controversial.

AIM

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of PCL preservation in CR-TKA and the methods used to deal with the PCL during surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with osteoarthritis undergoing primary CR-TKA (176 patients, 205 knees) in our institution between March 2012 and March 2014 was performed. A PCL protector was used to preserve the intact PCL bone block. The status of the PCL was recorded during surgery. Intact PCL preserved, pie-crusting and repairing were used to balance the tension of the PCL. Range of motion (ROM) and the Knee Society Clinical Rating system (KSS) were evaluated preoperatively and at the endpoint of follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean ROM of the knee was 103.2 ± 17.2°, KSS clinical score was 47.6 ± 9.5 and KSS functional score was 46.3 ± 11.9 before surgery. The mean ROM of the knee was 117.5 ± 9.7°, KSS clinical score was 89.2 ± 3.6 and KSS functional score was 84.6 ± 9.8 at 5 years follow-up. ROM, KSS clinical scores and KSS functional scores were significantly improved after surgery (P < 0.01). Thirty-two (23.7%) TKAs involved PCL pie-crusting and 18 (13.3%) involved PCL repair. Eighty-five (63.0%) TKAs applied standard operating procedures and preserved intact PCL. At 5 years follow-up, in the intact PCL group, the mean ROM of the knee was 118.0 ± 8.3°, KSS clinical score was 89.1 ± 3.7 and KSS functional score was 84.9 ± 9.6. In the PCL pie-crusting group, mean ROM of the knee was 114.0 ± 13.5°, KSS clinical score was 88.8 ± 3.4 and KSS functional score was 83.8 ± 10.5. In the PCL repair group, mean ROM of the knee was 120.3 ± 7.0°, KSS clinical score was 89.0 ± 3.6 and KSS functional score was 89.4 ± 4.5. There were no significant differences in ROM, KSS clinical scores and KSS functional scores among the three groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcomes of preserving the PCL in CR-TKA are encouraging. Pie-crusting and PCL repair do not affect the function. The PCL protector effectively protected the PCL bone block.

Intraoperative analysis of the kinematics of the native knee including two-dimensional translation of the femur using a navigation system : a cadaveric study

The aim of this cadaveric study was to evaluate the intraoperative kinematics of the native knee including two-dimensional translation of the femur using a navigation system. Eight native knees of 4 fresh-frozen whole-body cadavers were used for the study. The kinematics of each knee were analyzed intraoperatively using the navigation system. Although anterior-posterior translation could not be assessed directly, it could be calculated using a formula derived from the parameters in the navigation system. The native knee showed external rotation of the femur in early knee flexion, transient internal rotation in mid flexion, and gradual external rotation in late flexion. There was no marked change in the coronal rotation angle of the mechanical axis during knee flexion. The femoral center moved anteriorly in early knee flexion and posteriorly in late flexion. The distance moved in the medial-lateral direction was relatively smaller than that in the anterior-posterior direction. Two-dimensional translation of the surgical epicondylar axis showed a medial pivot-like motion. In this cadaveric study, the kinematics of the native knee, including two-dimensional translation of the femur, could be satisfactorily assessed intraoperatively using a navigation system. The intraoperative kinematics of the knee can be analyzed in more detail using this methodology. J. Med. Invest. 66 : 367-371, August, 2019.