Ability of the Short Physical Performance Battery Frailty Index to Predict Mortality and Hospital Readmission in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

Predictive Value of Frailty on Outcomes of Patients With Cirrhosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Frailty is one of the most common symptoms in patients with cirrhosis. Many researchers have identified it as a prognostic factor for patients with cirrhosis. However, no quantitative meta-analysis has evaluated the prognostic value of frailty in patients with cirrhosis.

Objective

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the prognostic significance of frailty in patients with cirrhosis.

Methods

The systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) recommendations. We conducted a comprehensive search of the literature using databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science, as well as China National Knowledge Infrastructure, encompassing the period from inception to 22 December 2023. Data were extracted for frailty to predict adverse outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. RevMan (version 5.3) and R (version 4.2.2) were used to assess the extracted data.

Results

A total of 26 studies with 9597 patients with cirrhosis were included. Compared with patients having low or no frailty, the frail group had a higher mortality rate (relative ratio, RR=2.07, 95% CI 1.82-2.34, P<.001), higher readmission rate (RR=1.50, 95% CI 1.22-1.84, P<.001), and lower quality of life (RR=5.78, 95% CI 2.25-14.82, P<.001). The summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve of frailty for mortality in patients with cirrhosis showed that the false positive rate (FPR) was 0.25 (95% CI 0.17-0.34), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 4.17 (95% CI 2.93-5.93), sensitivity was 0.54 (95% CI 0.39-0.69), and specificity was 0.73 (95% CI 0.64-0.81). The SROC curve of readmission showed that the FPR, DOR, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.39 (95% CI 0.17-0.66), 1.38 (95% CI 0.64-2.93), 0.46 (95% CI 0.28-0.64), and 0.60 (95% CI 0.28-0.85), respectively.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis demonstrated that frailty is a reliable prognostic predictor of outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. To enhance the prognosis of patients with cirrhosis, more studies on frailty screening are required.

Effect of branched-chain amino acid supplementation and exercise on quadriceps muscle quantity and quality in patients with cirrhosis as assessed by ultrasonography: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND/AIM

Sarcopenia and myosteatosis are common in patients with cirrhosis. The study aimed to evaluate efficacy of ultrasound to monitor muscle status during branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) supplementation and/or muscle exercise interventional approaches.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A randomized controlled study, included 220 liver cirrhosis patients with Child- Pugh B and C, randomized into a control group (55 patients) received only the standard care, and interventional groups (165 patients) equally distributed into three subgroups, in addition to standard care, they received BCAA, programmed exercise, or BCAA and programmed exercise. At baseline and after 28 days, all participants were subjected to ultrasound-measured quadriceps muscle thickness and echo-intensity, muscle strength using handgrip, performance using short physical performance battery (SPPB), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and nutritional assessment using 7- point Subjective Global Assessment Score (SGA) and laboratory assessment.

RESULTS

All interventional groups showed a significant improvement in the ultrasound detected quadriceps muscle thickness (p = 0.001) and echo intensity, in addition to muscle strength, muscle performance, and SGA. Hematological parameters (hemoglobin and platelet count), biochemical parameters (ALT, AST, bilirubin, creatinine, urea and INR) and MELD score were also improved in the interventional groups. In Child-Pugh B patients BCAA combined with exercise showed an add-on effect.

CONCLUSION

BCAA supplements, programed muscle exercise and both are useful interventional methods in improving muscle quality and quantity in cirrhosis patients, which can be monitored by ultrasound. The best results can be achieved by combined intervention in Child-Pugh B, while in Child-Pugh C single intervention may lead to an acceptable improvement. The trial was registered retrospectively in the Clinical Trials Registry (registration number NCT06088550).

Osteosarcopenia predicts poor survival in patients with cirrhosis: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Osteosarcopenia, defined as the coexistence of sarcopenia and osteoporosis, is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The present study investigated the prognostic significance of osteosarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 126 patients with cirrhosis. Participants were classified into three groups based on the presence or absence of (1) sarcopenia and/or osteoporosis; and (2) Child-Pugh (CP) class B/C cirrhosis and/or osteosarcopenia, and the cumulative survival rates were compared between the groups. Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent factors associated with mortality. Sarcopenia and osteoporosis were diagnosed according to the Japan Society of Hepatology and the World Health Organization criteria, respectively.

RESULTS

Among the 126 patients, 24 (19.0%) had osteosarcopenia. Multivariate analysis identified osteosarcopenia as a significant and independent prognostic factor. The cumulative survival rates were significantly lower in patients with osteosarcopenia than in those without (1/3/5-year survival rates = 95.8%/73.7%/68.0% vs. 100%/93.6%/86.5%, respectively; p = 0.020). Patients with osteosarcopenia, but not sarcopenia or osteoporosis alone, had significantly lower cumulative survival rates than those without both conditions (p = 0.019). Furthermore, patients with both CP class B/C and osteosarcopenia had significantly lower cumulative survival rates than those without both (p < 0.001) and with either condition (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Osteosarcopenia was significantly associated with mortality in patients with cirrhosis. The cumulative survival rates were lower in patients with osteosarcopenia than in those without both conditions. Additionally, comorbid osteosarcopenia worsened the prognosis of patients with CP class B/C. Therefore, simultaneous evaluation of both sarcopenia and osteoporosis is crucial to better predict the prognosis.

Liver transplantation in the patient with physical frailty

Frailty is a decline in functional reserve across multiple physiological systems. A key component of frailty is sarcopenia, which denotes a loss of skeletal muscle mass and impaired contractile function that ultimately result in physical frailty. Physical frailty/sarcopenia are frequent and contribute to adverse clinical outcomes before and after liver transplantation. Frailty indices, including the liver frailty index, focus on contractile dysfunction (physical frailty), while cross-sectional image analysis of muscle area is the most accepted and reproducible measure to define sarcopenia. Thus, physical frailty and sarcopenia are interrelated. The prevalence of physical frailty/sarcopenia is high in liver transplant candidates and these conditions have been shown to adversely impact clinical outcomes including mortality, hospitalisations, infections, and cost of care both before and after transplantation. Data on the prevalence of frailty/sarcopenia and their sex- and age-dependent impact on outcomes are not consistent in patients on the liver transplant waitlist. Physical frailty and sarcopenic obesity are frequent in the obese patient with cirrhosis, and adversely affect outcomes after liver transplantation. Nutritional interventions and physical activity remain the mainstay of management before and after transplantation, despite limited data from large scale trials. In addition to physical frailty, there is recognition that a global evaluation including a multidisciplinary approach to other components of frailty (e.g., cognition, emotional, psychosocial) also need to be addressed in patients on the transplant waitlist. Recent advances in our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of sarcopenia and contractile dysfunction have helped identify novel therapeutic targets.

Systematic review: the role of frailty in advanced chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a known predictor of outcome and mortality in patients undergoing liver transplantation. However, most patients remain unsuitable transplant candidates. It is not yet known if the assessment of frailty in non-transplant candidates can aid prognostication.

AIM

To collate and interrogate the various frailty tools presently used to predict mortality in the non-transplant cirrhosis setting.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for articles published from inception to March 2022 was undertaken, excluding those where patients underwent transplantation or had hepatocellular carcinoma.

RESULTS

We identified 12 observational cohort studies, featuring 9 frailty indices. These were from various global healthcare settings and of fair or good quality. Most were objective tools utilising clinician-based assessments. All frailty scores predicted prognosis, with variability in the method of application, and utilisation in long- or short-term mortality. Three studies directly compared different indices in the same population. There was some evidence that simple tools could perform as well, if not better, than more complex, time-consuming scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Various frailty tools can reproducibly evaluate mortality in patients with cirrhosis who are ineligible for transplant. However, further prospective head-to-head comparative studies are needed. In addition to determining model utility, studies should focus on important relative considerations which may limit widespread implementation including, ease of use and limited resources, given the global disparity of liver care provision. These tools may positively identify specific patient cohorts at risk of impending deterioration, thereby stratifying those patients likely to benefit from early integration with palliative care.

Post-paracentesis Ascitic Fluid Leak in Patients with Cirrhosis of Liver and its Management: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Ascites is the most common complication of decompensated cirrhosis of liver requiring paracentesis for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. The ascitic fluid leak can develop after paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis leading to significant morbidity if persistent. We aimed to study the incidence and predictors of post-paracentesis leak in patients with ascites.

METHODS

In this prospective study, patients with cirrhosis undergoing therapeutic paracentesis were followed up, and those patients who developed persistent leak were included as cases. Controls were randomly selected in a 2:1 ratio from the group of patients who did not develop leak. Clinical and laboratory parameters were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 256 patients underwent 1126 sessions of therapeutic abdominal paracentesis over a period of 14 months. Post-paracentesis leak was seen in 55 (4.8%) patients while only 20 (1.7%) patients had persistent leak. The management of leak was in a stepwise manner initially with tincture benzoin with tight dressing followed by topical cyanoacrylate adhesive and followed by autologous blood patch in those not responding. The persistent leak group had higher proportion of patients with parietal edema, higher PT-INR and Child-Pugh score, lower mid-upper arm circumference, short physical performance battery score, and handgrip strength. On multivariate analysis, only the presence of parietal edema was an independent predictor of post-paracentesis persistent leak (odds ratio 10.35, 95% confidence interval 1.61-66.54, P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Persistent leak after paracentesis develops in a minority of patients with cirrhosis. The presence of parietal edema is a risk factor for persistent leak. The majority of these patients can be managed in a stepwise approach.

A review of literature on risk prediction tools for hospital readmissions in older adults

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to identify and analyse the readmission risk prediction tools reported in the literature and their benefits when it comes to healthcare organisations and management.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH

Readmission risk prediction is a growing topic of interest with the aim of identifying patients in particular those suffering from chronic diseases such as congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes, who are at risk of readmission. Several models have been developed with different levels of predictive ability. A structured and extensive literature search of several databases was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis strategy, and this yielded a total of 48,984 records.

FINDINGS

Forty-three articles were selected for full-text and extensive review after following the screening process and according to the eligibility criteria. About 34 unique readmission risk prediction models were identified, in which their predictive ability ranged from poor to good (c statistic 0.5-0.86). Readmission rates ranged between 3.1 and 74.1% depending on the risk category. This review shows that readmission risk prediction is a complex process and is still relatively new as a concept and poorly understood. It confirms that readmission prediction models hold significant accuracy at identifying patients at higher risk for such an event within specific context.

RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS

Since most prediction models were developed for specific populations, conditions or hospital settings, the generalisability and transferability of the predictions across wider or other contexts may be difficult to achieve. Therefore, the value of prediction models remains limited to hospital management. Future research is indicated in this regard.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE

This review is the first to cover readmission risk prediction tools that have been published in the literature since 2011, thereby providing an assessment of the relevance of this crucial KPI to health organisations and managers.

A Comparison of Different Frailty Scores and Impact of Frailty on Outcome in Patients With Cirrhosis

Background & aims

There is no "gold standard" tool for the assessment of frailty in cirrhosis. This study compares Liver Frailty Index (LFI), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Fried Frailty Criteria (FFC), and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) for frailty assessment and ascertains its impact on predicting mortality and hospitalizations in a cohort of outpatients with cirrhosis.

Methods

116 patients were enrolled in this prospective observational cohort study. Frailty assessment was done using LFI, SPPB, FFC, and CFS. All patients were followed up for 6 months. The primary outcome was the first of either all-cause unplanned hospitalization or all-cause mortality occurring within 6 months of the study period.

Results

100 (86.2%) males and 16 (13.8%) females with a mean age of 50.2 (48.4-51.9, 95% CI) years were included. The most common cause of cirrhosis was alcoholic liver disease (47.4%) followed by hepatitis C (12.9%) and Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (10.3%). There was no significant difference in prevalence of frailty based on LFI (43.1%), FFC (36.2%), CFS (44%), and SPPB (47.4%) (P > 0.05). Frail patients had worse outcomes compared to the Not frail group. At 6 months, the mortality rate in Frail patients was 42% versus 1.5% for the Not frail; hospitalization in Frail patients occurred in 92% versus 6% in the Not frail. On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of mortality were Frailty [OR 14 (1.4-54.2)], alcohol-related cirrhosis [OR 4.2 (1.1-16.3)], Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) [OR 2.1 (1.4-2.9)] and Chronic liver disease questionnaire (CLDQ) [OR 0.1 (0.1-0.4)] scores.

Conclusions

LFI, SPPB, FFC, and CFS are comparable in frailty assessment in patients with cirrhosis. Importantly, comparability of the commonly used scores for frailty assessment and prediction of hospitalization and mortality allows flexibility for clinical application.

High Prevalence of Hormonal Changes and Hepatic Osteodystrophy in Frail Patients with Cirrhosis-An Observational Study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Hormonal changes and hepatic osteodystrophy are less often studied complications of cirrhosis. This study describes the variance in hormones and osteodystrophy between Frail and Not frail patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

116 outpatients with cirrhosis were prospectively enrolled in this study. Frailty assessment was done using Liver Frailty Index (LFI). Sociodemographic assessment, anthropometry, nutritional assessment, hormone profile, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan were done in all patients.

RESULTS

116 patients, predominantly males (100 (86.2%) with mean age of 50.16 years (95% CI, 48.43-51.89) were included. Malnutrition was more common in Frail group as compared to Not frail group. Subjective global assessment (SGA) class-B patients were significantly more in Frail group (37 (74%) vs 3 (4.5%), P = 0.001). The prevalence of lower parathyroid hormone (PTH) (14 (28%) vs 2 (3%)), testosterone (33 (66%) vs 15 (22.7%)), vitamin D3 (44 (88%) vs 39 (59.1%)), and cortisol (37 (74%) vs 37 (56.1) levels was higher in Frail group (P < 0.05). The number of patients diagnosed with osteodystrophy (34 (68%) vs 21 (31.8%), P = 0.001) was significantly higher in Frail group. The marker of osteoclastic activity, β-cross laps, was significantly elevated in the Frail group both in males (736 (655-818) vs 380 (329-432), P = 0.001) and (females 619 (479-758) vs 313 (83-543), P = 0.02). Bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine (LS) and neck of femur (NF) had significant correlation with LFI (ρ = 0.60, P = 0.001 for LS and ρ = 0.59, P = 0.001 for NF), serum testosterone (ρ = 0.58, P = 0.001 for LS and ρ = 0.53, P = 0.001 for NF), β-cross laps (ρ = 0.38, P = 0.001for LS and ρ = 0.35, P = 0.000 for NF), vitamin D3 (ρ = 0.23, P = 0.04 for LS and ρ = 0.25, P = 0.01 for NF), PTH (ρ = 0.52, P = 0.001 for LS and ρ = 0.48. P = 0.001 for NF), and cortisol (ρ = 0.50, P = 0.001 for LS and ρ = 0.45, P = 0.001 for NF) levels.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study that highlights the high prevalence of hormonal changes and hepatic osteodystrophy in frail patients with cirrhosis and opens a new dimension for research and target of therapy in this field.

Clinical and biomarker assessment of frailty in liver transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver cirrhosis results in progressive decline, or frailty, which leads to poor outcomes and decreased survival. Multiple biomarkers and clinical assessment tools for quantifying frailty in liver transplant candidates exist, but a universal scoring protocol is lacking. Criteria vary between studies and correlation with patient outcome is not always clear. This review aims to summarize the pertinent biomarkers and assessment tools of frailty in cirrhosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

As cirrhosis progresses, the resultant 'frailty' is an inseparable independent predictor of pre and posttransplant mortality. Pro-inflammatory, neuroendocrine, and adipokine factors are dysregulated - leading to paradoxical anorexia and downregulation of orexigenic signals. The resulting catabolic utilization of amino and fatty acids leads to progressive malnutrition and sarcopenia. Both functional and imaging criteria define sarcopenia in cirrhotic patients, and degree of debilitation correlates with mortality. Liver-disease-specific frailty biomarkers and scoring tools are optimal to assess physical dysfunction in cirrhotics to promote early diagnosis and intervention.

SUMMARY

Liver cirrhosis and resulting frailty are progressive and portend a poor patient prognosis. A comprehensive, validated algorithm for detecting and quantifying frailty specific to liver disease would allow for standardization and facile application in the clinical setting. Early diagnosis is key for timely intervention and improved patient outcomes.

Exercise physiology in cirrhosis and the potential benefits of exercise interventions: A review

Reduction in muscle mass is a highly prevalent phenomenon in cirrhosis and is now well-documented to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Research into muscle loss in cirrhosis remains limited by an ongoing poor understanding of its relationship with muscle function, physical activity, and aerobic capacity. Alterations in exercise physiology have been documented in studies of individuals with cirrhosis that provide important information on physical function that is not captured by simple quantification of muscle mass. Despite expert consensus recommending regular exercise in end-stage liver disease to maintain muscle mass and function, there is little evidence guiding clinicians as to which form of exercise or delivery mechanism is most effective. It also remains unproven whether any specific intervention can alter clinically relevant outcomes. This review article summarizes the available literature regarding the changes in exercise physiology observed in cirrhosis, the associated impact on physical capacity, and the results of existing trials that examine the potential benefits of exercise delivery in patients with cirrhosis, particularly pertaining to their impact on exercise physiology.

APTA Cross Sections and Academies Recommendations for COVID-19 Core Outcome Measures

The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) emerged as a major health concern within the United States in early 2020. Because this is a novel virus, little guidance exists for best practice to evaluate this population within the field of physical therapy.

Sarcopenia and frailty in decompensated cirrhosis

In patients with decompensated cirrhosis, sarcopenia and frailty are prevalent. Although several definitions exist for these terms, in the field of hepatology, sarcopenia has commonly been defined as loss of muscle mass, and frailty has been broadly defined as the phenotypic manifestation of the loss of muscle function. Prompt recognition and accurate assessment of these conditions are critical as they are both strongly associated with morbidity, mortality, poor quality of life and worse post-liver transplant outcomes in patients with cirrhosis. In this review, we describe the complex pathophysiology that underlies the clinical phenotypes of sarcopenia and frailty, their association with decompensation, and provide an overview of tools to assess these conditions in patients with cirrhosis. When available, we highlight data focusing on patients with acutely decompensated cirrhosis, such as inpatients, as this is an area of unmet clinical need. Finally, we discuss management strategies to reverse and/or prevent the development of sarcopenia and frailty, which include adequate nutritional intake of calories and protein, as well as regular exercise of at least moderate intensity, with a mix of aerobic and resistance training. Key knowledge gaps in our understanding of sarcopenia and frailty in decompensated cirrhosis remain, including best methods to measure muscle mass and function in the inpatient setting, racial/ethnic variation in the development and presentation of sarcopenia and frailty, and optimal clinical metrics to assess response to therapeutic interventions that translate into a reduction in adverse outcomes associated with these conditions.

Muscle Power is Related to Physical Function in Patients Surviving Acute Respiratory Failure: A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Up to 66% of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for acute respiratory failure (ARF) develop ICU-acquired weakness, which is diagnosed by muscle strength testing. Muscle power, different from strength, is an important determinant of function that is not a common focus in patients surviving critical illness. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess muscle power in survivors of ARF.

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational study performed with survivors of ARF. Muscle power, strength and physical function were assessed 4-8 weeks post-hospital discharge. Cross sectional area and echogenicity of rectus femoris and tibialis anterior muscles were assessed using ultrasonography. Healthy community-dwelling adults were included for comparison.

RESULTS

12 survivors of ARF mean age of 55.6 ± 17.1 (66% male) and 12 healthy adults mean age of 51.6.1 ± 10.3 (66% male) participated in this study. Patients in the post-ARF group had a mean muscle power of 9.9 ± 3.5 W and 63.7 ± 31.6 W for 2-lb and 10% of body-weight loads, respectively. Compared to matched controls, power in ARF group was reduced by 43%. Muscle power in post-ARF group had moderate correlations with 5-times sit-to-stand testing (r = -0.644, P = 0.024), 4-m habitual gait speed (-0.780, P = 0.002), and 6-min walk distance (r = 0.589, P = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Muscle power is significantly reduced in survivors of critical illness and associated with deficits in physical function. These preliminary findings may support therapeutic interventions aimed at improving muscle power to potentially increase functional benefit.

Skeletal muscle loss phenotype in cirrhosis: A nationwide analysis of hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There are very limited data on the healthcare burden of muscle loss, the most frequent complication in hospitalized cirrhotics. We determined the healthcare impact of a muscle loss phenotype in hospitalized cirrhotics.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (years 2010-2014) was analyzed. Search terms included cirrhosis and its complications, and an expanded definition of a muscle loss phenotype that included all conditions associated with muscle loss. In-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), post-discharge disposition, co-morbidities and cost during admission were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify associations between a muscle loss phenotype and outcomes. Impact of muscle loss in cirrhotics was compared to that in a random sample (2%) of general medical inpatients.

RESULTS

A total of 162,694 hospitalizations for cirrhosis were reported, of which 18,261 (11.2%) included secondary diagnosis codes for a muscle loss phenotype. A diagnosis of muscle loss was associated with a significantly (p < 0.001 for all) higher mortality (19.3% vs 8.2%), LOS (14.2 ± 15.8 vs. 4.6 ± 6.9 days), and median hospital charge per admission ($21,400 vs. $8573) and a lower likelihood of discharge to home (30.1% vs. 60.2%). All evaluated outcomes were more severe in cirrhotics than general medical patients (n = 534,687). Multivariate regression analysis showed that a diagnosis of muscle loss independently increased mortality by 130%, LOS by 80% and direct cost of care by 119% (p < 0.001 for all). Alcohol use, female gender, malignancies and other organ dysfunction were independently associated with muscle loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Muscle loss contributed to higher mortality, LOS, and direct healthcare costs in hospitalized cirrhotics.

Clinical utility of the Liver Frailty Index for predicting muscle atrophy in chronic liver disease patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM

Muscle atrophy is a prognostic factor for patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The Liver Frailty Index (LFI) is a simple physical function test; however, an association between LFI and muscle mass remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the utility of LFI for predicting muscle atrophy in CLD patients with HCC.

METHODS

We enrolled 138 CLD patients with HCC (aged 77 years, female/male 34.8%/65.2%). Muscle mass was assessed by skeletal muscle index, and patients were classified into the muscle atrophy group (n = 109) or the non-muscle atrophy group (n = 29). Physical frailty was assessed by LFI. The optimal cut-off value of LFI for predicting muscle atrophy was identified by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

In the muscle atrophy group, the prevalence of pre-frail/frail was significantly higher than the non-muscle atrophy group (87.2% vs. 58.6%, P = 0.0005). In the logistic regression analysis, being female and pre-frail/frail were identified as independent factors associated with muscle atrophy (pre-frail/frail; OR 3.601, 95% CI 1.381-9.400, P = 0.0088). In patients with normal grip strength, 71.1% of patients were pre-frail/frail, in which 82.8% of patients showed muscle atrophy. Receiver operating characteristic statistics provided an area under the curve of 0.74, and an LFI cut-off value of 2.94 for predicting muscle atrophy (sensitivity 88.06%, specificity 52.17%, accuracy 77.91%).

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that pre-frail/frail was an independent factor for muscle atrophy in CLD patients with HCC. Furthermore, LFI predicted muscle atrophy with high sensitivity, even in patients with normal grip strength. Thus, LFI might be a useful screening tool for muscle atrophy in CLD patients with HCC.