Modified Method of Contrast Transthoracic Echocardiography for the Diagnosis of Patent Foramen Ovale

Contrast-enhanced transcranial doppler versus contrast transthoracic echocardiography for right-to-left shunt diagnosis

RLS can be diagnosed using US, CT angiography, and right heart catheterization. However, most reliable diagnostic modality remains undetermined. c-TCD was more sensitive than c-TTE in the diagnosis of RLS. This was true especially for the detection of provoked shunts or mild shunts. c-TCD can be used as the preferred screening method for RLS.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Transthoracic Echocardiography With Contrast for Detection of Right-to-Left Shunt: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The clinical utility of transthoracic echocardiography with contrast (TTE-C) for detection of right-to-left shunt (RLS) remains unknown. In this meta-analysis we evaluated the accuracy of TTE-C for RLS diagnosis compared with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as the reference standard.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane library databases. Studies that were included provided data to assess sensitivity and specificity of TTE-C compared with TEE for RLS detection.

RESULTS

A total of 35 studies, involving 4209 patients, were analyzed. The average patient age was 49.1 ± 11.2 years and 53.9% were male. For RLS detection in the entire cohort, TTE-C sensitivity was 73% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66%-80%) and specificity was 94% (95% CI, 92%-96%). The sensitivity of TTE-C was 80% (95% CI, 74%-86%) in studies published in 2000 or later compared with 51% (95% CI, 36%-65%) in those published before 2000. In studies that used harmonic imaging, TTE-C sensitivity was 82% (95% CI, 77%-87%) and specificity was 95% (95% CI, 93%-97%). Among those with patent foramen ovale closure indications, TTE-C sensitivity was 74% (95% CI, 59%-89%) and specificity was 98% (95% CI, 95%-100%). In patients in whom RLS was diagnosed using a guideline-suggested 3 cardiac cycle cutoff, TTE-C sensitivity was 75% (95% CI, 66%-83%) and specificity was 94% (95% CI, 92%-97%). Provocative manoeuvres increased sensitivity by approximately 40%.

CONCLUSIONS

TTE-C offers excellent specificity and moderate sensitivity for RLS diagnosis compared with TEE, and it might therefore serve as an initial screening modality for selected patients with a high likelihood of having RLS and for indications for treatment.

The Chinese Experience of Imaging in Cardiac Intervention: A Bird's Eye Review

Recent scientific and technological advances have greatly contributed to the development of medical imaging that could enable specific functions. It has become the primary focus of cardiac intervention in preoperative assessment, intraoperative guidance, and postoperative follow-up. This review provides a contemporary overview of the Chinese experience of imaging in cardiac intervention in recent years.

Pitfalls of Using Imaging Technique in the Presence of Eustachian Valve or Chiari Network: Effects on Right-to-Left Shunt and Related Influencing Factors

When patent foramen ovale (PFO) combines with the prominent Eustachian valve or Chiari network (EV/CN), contrast transthoracic echocardiography (cTTE) may miss the diagnosis of PFO. We sought to determine the characteristics of right-to-left shunt (RLS) in PFO patients with prominent EV/CN on cTTE and identify the causal factors of missed diagnosis. We consecutively enrolled 98 patients who suffered from PFO-related stroke and with prominent EV/CN. All patients were divided into the delayed and non-delayed groups according to the characteristics of RLS on cTTE. The characteristics of RLS were compared with those of 42 intrapulmonary shunt patients. The anatomical characteristics of PFO and EV/CN were analyzed in the 98 PFO patients. Upon cTTE, significantly delayed occurrence and longer duration of the RLS in the delayed group were found both at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver, similar to the intrapulmonary shunt. Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that the length of EV/CN (>19 mm) and the diameter of PFO at the left atrium aspect (<1.2 mm) were high-risk factors for missed diagnosis. In conclusion, RLS showed delayed emergence and disappearance in some of the PFO patients with prominent EV/CN. The length of EV/CN and the diameter of PFO may have been related to the missed diagnosis of PFO.

Application of Transesophageal Echocardiography in Amplatzer Atrial Septal Defect Occluder for Percutaneous Closure of Large Patent Foramen Ovale

Objective. The Amplatzer patent foramen ovale (PFO) occluder is the most commonly used device for percutaneous closure of a large PFO. However, its use may predispose the patient to postoperative residual shunting. To reduce the incidence of residual shunting, we investigated the safety and effectiveness of the Amplatzer atrial septal defect (ASD) occluder for percutaneous closure of a large PFO measured by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and evaluated the value of TEE in this procedure. Methods. Overall, 118 patients who were diagnosed with a large PFO (all with $a\ge 2$  mm left atrial side height after the Valsalva maneuver (VM) excluding those with a small ASD) using contrast transthoracic echocardiography (c-TTE) and TEE underwent closure under TEE guidance at The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University. An ASD device was used in 48 patients (group I) and a PFO device in 70 (group II). After the procedure, we verified the safety and efficacy of different devices using c-TTE, TTE, and TEE. Results. In both groups, the preoperative TEE results showed a significantly increased left height of the PFO after VM compared with that at rest (all $P<0.01$ ). Compared with the left height of the PFO measured using TEE after VM, the PFO-stretch diameter (SD) measured by TEE after the delivery sheath passed the PFO was higher (all $P<0.01$ ). We selected the ASD occluder size according to this PFO-SD. In group II, most patients underwent the implantation of the larger PFO devices. Interventional treatment was successfully performed on all patients. The effective occlusion rate in group I at 12 months after the procedure was significantly higher than that in group II (93.7% vs. 78.6%, $P<0.05$ ). The TEE results showed that 18 patients with a medium and large residual shunt at 12 months after the procedure exhibited an intradisc tunnel-like shunt. Conclusion. The Amplatzer ASD device and Amplatzer PFO device are safe for large PFO closure, but the Amplatzer ASD device has a higher effective occlusion rate. TEE plays a crucial role in the use of the Amplatzer ASD occluder for percutaneous closure of a large PFO.

A Prospective, Single-Center, Phase I Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Value of Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale With a Novel Biodegradable Occluder

Objective

Traditional metal alloy occluders for the closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO) may be associated with some potential complications, and may restrict the trans-septal access to the left atrium for future treatment of left-sided heart disease. Increasing attention has been paid to novel biodegradable occluders (NBOs) to achieve PFO closure. We aimed to evaluate the role of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the diagnostic and anatomical evaluation of PFO, as well as in the Post-procedural assessment after transcatheter closure with a NBO.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, single-center clinical study of 44 patients who were diagnosed with PFO by contrast transthoracic echocardiography (c-TTE) and TEE from June 2019 to June 2020. All patients underwent PFO occlusion with NBO under TTE guidance. Follow-up was performed at 2 days and 3 months after the procedure with TTE, and at 6 months and 1 year after the procedure with c-TTE, TTE, and TEE.

Results

Interventional treatment was successfully performed in all patients. The left and right sides of the occluder device disc were significantly reduced at 3, 6, and 12 months compared to 2 days after the procedure (all P &lt; 0.01), and decreased gradually. The thickness was significantly reduced at 12 months compared to the first three time points (all P &lt; 0.01). Thrombus was found on the surface of the occluder device in three patients (6.4%) at 3 and 6 months after occlusion. At 6 months after procedure, there were 3 (6.8%) cases of extensive residual right-to-left shunt (RLS), 2 (4.5%) cases of moderate shunt, and 7 (15.9%) cases of small shunts. One year after procedure, 2 (4.5%) cases had a extensive residual shunt, 6 (13.6%) cases of small shunts were confirmed to originate from pulmonary veins by TEE, and the PFO-RLS occlusion rate reached 95.5%.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of NBO for the closure of PFO in humans, with a high rate of complete shunt closure. Accurate TEE assessment of the PFO anatomy before closure with NBO is important to ensure that the procedure remains safe and effective. Furthermore, TEE plays a crucial role in the Post-procedure follow-up.

Aortic Root Downward Movement as a Novel Method for Identification of an Adequately Performed Valsalva Maneuver to Detect Patent Foramen Ovale during Transesophageal Echocardiograph

The Valsalva maneuver (VM) is the most sensitive auxiliary method for the detection of patent foramen ovale (PFO), but it is difficult to assess whether the maneuver is adequately performed during transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). In this study, we tried to use aortic root downward movement as a novel method for judging whether VM was adequate or not, and to evaluate whether this novel method can increase the sensitivity of detecting PFO. A total of 224 patients with clinically suspected PFO were enrolled in this study. These patients were injected with activated normal saline to detect the right-to-left shunt (RLS), in the following three conditions: contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography under adequate VM (AVM cTTE), contrast-enhanced TEE under non-adequate VM (non-AVM cTEE), and cTEE under adequate VM (AVM cTEE). A novel method in which the aorta root moves downward (movement range ≥16 mm) in the cTEE judged whether AVM was performed. The PFO detection rate and sensitivity of AVM cTEE were better than that of non-AVM cTEE (detection rate: 108 PFOs [48.2%] vs. 86 PFOs [38.4%], p = 0.036; sensitivity: 100% vs. 79.6%). Among AVM cTTE, non-AVM cTEE, and AVM cTEE, the RLS grade evaluation results were inconsistent, with significant differences (p < 0.05). Non-AVM cTEE had RLS underestimation or false negatives. Compared with non-AVM cTEE, AVM cTEE and AVM cTTE had better consistency in evaluating PFO RLS (kappa value = 0.675). Aortic root downward movement could be used as a novel method for judging the effectiveness of VM, which is critical for the detection of PFO in cTEE. Concerning effectiveness and convenience, this method should be promoted during the clinical detection of PFO.

Prevalence and grade of RLS in migraine: A prospective study of 251 migraineurs by synchronous test of c-TTE and c-TCD

BACKGROUND

Right-to left shunt (RLS) is regarded as a risk factor resulting in migraine, but the relevance between the RLS and migraine remains controversial. This paper aims at investigating the prevalence and RLS grade of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in cases of migraine (including migraine with and without aura) and evaluate the relationship between PFO and migraine.

METHODS

Synchronous test of contrast transthoracic echocardiography and contrast transcranial Doppler ultrasonography was performed in 251 cases of migraine, which contains 62 cases of migraine with aura (MA) and 189 cases without aura (MO) and 275 healthy adults. Among these cases, 25 cases with migraine and 14 healthy adults were evaluated through transesophageal echocardiography.

RESULTS

(1). The prevalence of permanent RLS, total RLS, and large RLS in migraine was 11.16%, 39.04%, and 17.13%, respectively, which was significantly higher than that of the controls (P = .042, <.001, and.001, respectively). (2). Permanent RLS was detected as 7.93% of the cases in MO, 20.96% in MA, and 6.18% in controls. Total RLS was detected as 35.98% of the cases in MO, 48.38% in MA, and 23.64% in controls. Large RLS was detected as 13.76% of the cases in MO, 27.41% in MA, and 7.27% in controls. Compared with controls, the positive rate of total RLS and large RLS in MO increased (P = .004 and.022, respectively), the that of permanent RLS, total RLS, and large RLS in MA also increased (P < .001 for each of the comparisons). The positive rate of permanent RLS and large RLS in MA was remarkably higher than that in MO (P = .005 and.013, respectively). (3) The presence of large-size PFO (≥2.0 mm) of migraine showed higher than that of the controls (P = .048).

CONCLUSIONS

PFO is associated with the migraine (especially with aura), when it is permanent RLS, large RLS, and large-size PFO (≥2.0 mm).

A Nomogram for the Prediction of Cessation of Migraine Among Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale After Percutaneous Closure

Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram to predict cessation of patent foramen ovale (PFO) patients with migraine headache after percutaneous closure.

Methods: A total of 247 eligible patients with PFO and migraine after percutaneous closure between May, 2016 and May, 2018 were divided into a development cohort (n = 149) and a validation cohort (n = 98). The primary end point was cessation of migraine at follow-up of 1 year after the procedure measured by the Migraine Disability Assessment Score (MIDAS). In the development cohort, the LASSO regression was used data dimension reduction. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop the predicting nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was assessed by concordance index (C-index), calibration and clinical usefulness. The results were validated in the validation cohort.

Results: Migraine with aura, history of antiplatelet, and the right-to-left shunt (RLS) at rest were identified as significant predictors based on the analysis of multivariate logistic regression. The nomogram incorporating these variables showed good calibration and discrimination in the development cohort with C-index of 0.906 (95% CI: 0.847–0.965), which was confirmed using the validation cohort with C-index of 0.827 (95% CI: 0.751–0.903). The nomogram showed good agreement between prediction by nomogram and actual observation. Furthermore, the decision curve indicated that the novel nomogram was clinically useful.

Conclusion: The novel nomogram showed favorable predictive accuracy for cessation of migraine among patients with PFO after percutaneous closure and might provide constructive guidance in clinical decision making.

Diagnosis of Patent Foramen Ovale: The Combination of Contrast Transcranial Doppler, Contrast Transthoracic Echocardiography, and Contrast Transesophageal Echocardiography

Objectives

To access the distinct values of contrast transcranial Doppler (cTCD), contrast transthoracic echocardiography (cTTE), and contrast transesophageal echocardiography (cTEE) in the diagnosis of right-to-left shunt (RLS) due to patent foramen ovale (PFO) and to define the most practical strategy for the diagnosis of PFO.

Methods

102 patients with a high clinical suspicion for PFO had simultaneous cTCD, cTTE, and cTEE performed. The agitated saline mixed with blood was used to detect right-to-left shunt (RLS).

Results

In all 102 patients, the shunt was detected at rest by cTCD in 60.78% of cases, by cTTE in 42.16%, and by cTEE in 47.06%. The positive results of all 3 techniques with Valsalva maneuver (VM) were significantly improved. cTCD showed higher pick-up rate than cTTE (98.04% vs. 89.22%; χ² = 12.452, p < 0.05) and the cTEE (98.04% vs. 96.08%; nonsignificant difference) in the diagnosis of PFO. Nevertheless, cTEE, compared with cTTE, underestimated shunting in 44% of patients. The diameter of both PFO entrance and exit was significantly greater in patients with a severe shunt compared with a mild shunt (2.8 ± 1.0 mm vs. 2.0 ± 0.7 mm, t = 3.135, p < 0.05) and the cTEE (98.04% vs. 96.08%; nonsignificant difference) in the diagnosis of PFO. Nevertheless, cTEE, compared with cTTE, underestimated shunting in 44% of patients. The diameter of both PFO entrance and exit was significantly greater in patients with a severe shunt compared with a mild shunt (2.8 ± 1.0 mm vs. 2.0 ± 0.7 mm, t = 3.135, p < 0.05) and the cTEE (98.04% vs. 96.08%; nonsignificant difference) in the diagnosis of PFO. Nevertheless, cTEE, compared with cTTE, underestimated shunting in 44% of patients. The diameter of both PFO entrance and exit was significantly greater in patients with a severe shunt compared with a mild shunt (2.8 ± 1.0 mm vs. 2.0 ± 0.7 mm, t = 3.135, p < 0.05) and the cTEE (98.04% vs. 96.08%; nonsignificant difference) in the diagnosis of PFO. Nevertheless, cTEE, compared with cTTE, underestimated shunting in 44% of patients. The diameter of both PFO entrance and exit was significantly greater in patients with a severe shunt compared with a mild shunt (2.8 ± 1.0 mm vs. 2.0 ± 0.7 mm,

Conclusions

The best method to diagnose PFO should be the combination of cTCD, cTTE, and cTEE. And cTCD should be applied as the first choice for screening RLS. Then, cTTE should be performed to quantify the severity of the shunt. Last but not least, cTEE should be performed to assess the morphologies of PFO when the closure is planned. The study provides for clinicians the most practical strategy for diagnosing PFO in the future. However, further trials with a large sample size are required to confirm this finding.