Epidural Labor Analgesia Is Associated with a Decreased Risk of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in Trial of Labor after Cesarean: A Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study

LABOUR ANALGESIA AND THE RISK OF POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION

OBJECTIVE

The aim: To find association between postpostpartum depression incidence and mode of labour analgesia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: This is a prospective observational study conducted at the Kyiv City Maternity Hospital №5 (from March 2020 to May 2021). Using google-form and face-to-face interviews, 321 women completed Childbirth Experience Questionnaire on the 2- 3-rd day in the postpartum period. After the first survey, only 35% of women agreed to screen for postpartum depression (PPD) by Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Univariate logistic regression method was used to assess the risk relation between PPD and factors.

RESULTS

Results: Women who used nitrous oxide (50:50) and non-pharmacological methods of labour analgesia were associated with the decreased risk of PPD (p = 0,044), OR = 2.83 (95% CI 1,03-7,79), compared to women with patient-control epidural analgesia. On the other hand, there are factors which do not have impact on the risk of depressive symptoms, such as age (p = 0,266); parity (p = 0,713); mode of delivery (p=0,959); pain intensity (p=0,931).

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: Our findings confirmed the association between nitrous oxide and the alternative methods of labour analgesia usage and decreased risk of development PPD.

Analgesic Effects, Birth Process, and Prognosis of Pregnant Women in Normal Labor by Epidural Analgesia Using Sufentanil in Combination with Ropivacaine: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective. The objective is to evaluate the analgesic, labor, and prognostic effects of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) versus sufentanil in conjunction with ropivacaine in normal labor. Methods. Sixty pregnant women who had a normal delivery at our hospital between February 2019 and April 2021 were included. Pregnant women were arbitrarily assigned to a control group and a research group. Pregnant women in the control group received lidocaine analgesia and PCEA with sufentanil combined with ropivacaine in the research group. Satisfaction with care, fetal umbilical artery blood flow, VAS score, labor and bleeding, neonatal Apgar score and incidence of adverse events were analyzed. Results. First, we made a comparison of satisfactory performance of nursing care. The satisfaction rate of the research group was 100.00%, compared to 83.33% for the control group. Nursing satisfaction was higher in the research group, and the difference was statistically significant ( $P<0.05$ ). Following analgesia, PI, RI, and S/D values of umbilical artery blood flow were lower in the research group than those in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant ( $P>0.05$ ). The VAS scores at 10 min, 20 min, and 30 min were found to be lower in the research group than in the control group after analgesia, and the difference was statistically significant ( $P<0.05$ ). Bleeding was significantly lower in the research group for all stages of labor, and the difference was statistically significant ( $P<0.05$ ). Apgar scores at 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 10 minutes postpartum were greater in the research group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( $P<0.05$ ). As a final note, the incidence of pruritus, hypotension, respiratory depression, nausea, and vomiting was found to be lower in the research group than in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( $P<0.05$ ). Conclusion. PCEA with sufentanil coupled with ropivacaine was used to perform labor analgesia. With significant reduction in maternal pain and assurance of labor, ropivacaine combined with sufentanil epidural labor analgesia did not reduce fetal umbilical artery blood flow without extended labor. It could not affect the labor process or the safety of the fetus, which is safe for the mother and fetus.

Relationship between delivery with anesthesia and postpartum depression: The Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS)

Background

Postpartum depression is one of the most commonly experienced psychological disorders for women after childbirth, usually occurring within one year. This study aimed to clarify whether women with delivery with anesthesia, including epidural analgesia, spinal-epidural analgesia, and paracervical block, had a decreased risk of postpartum depression after giving birth in Japan.

Methods

The Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS) was a prospective cohort study that enrolled registered fetal records (n = 104,065) in 15 regions nationwide in Japan. Binomial logistic regression analyses were performed to calculate the adjusted odd ratios (aORs) for the association between mode of delivery with or without anesthesia and postpartum depression at one-, six- and twelve-months after childbirth.

Results

At six months after childbirth, vaginal delivery with anesthesia was associated with a higher risk of postpartum depression (aOR: 1.233, 95% confidence interval: 1.079–1.409), compared with vaginal delivery without analgesia. Nevertheless, the risk dropped off one year after delivery. Among the pregnant women who requested delivery with anesthesia, 5.1% had a positive Kessler-6 scale (K6) score for depression before the first trimester (p < 0.001), which was significantly higher than the proportions in the vaginal delivery without analgesia (3.5%).

Conclusions

Our data suggested that the risk of postpartum depression at six months after childbirth tended to be increased after vaginal delivery with anesthesia, compared with vaginal delivery without analgesia. Requests for delivery with anesthesia continue to be relatively uncommon in Japan, and women who make such requests might be more likely to experience postpartum depressive symptoms because of underlying maternal environmental statuses.

Childbirth Pain and Post-Partum Depression: Does Labor Epidural Analgesia Decrease This Risk?

Post-partum depression (PPD) is a common complication of pregnancy worldwide with a prevalence as high as 15% in some countries. Pain has been identified as a risk factor for major depression; however, the relationship between labor-related pain and PPD is less understood. This article sought out to examine the relationship between pain and PPD, examining whether there is a correlation that reducing pain through epidural analgesia can lower the risk for PPD. A PubMed database search was performed using the keywords “post-partum depression” and “labor epidural”. Multiple articles including 2 meta-analyses were evaluated for the association between post-partum depression and epidural analgesia for labor. Although there is evidence supporting labor epidural analgesia reducing PPD, many studies including the meta-analyses did not uphold the hypothesis. More well-designed studies on this topic need to be investigated in order to substantiate the current evidence in the literature.

Peripartum Predictors of the Risk of Postpartum Depressive Disorder: Results of a Case-Control Study

Background: The study aimed at the identification of the risk factors present during delivery, which might be present in prophylactic programs concerning postpartum mood disorders. Material and Method: This was a retrospective comparative study. The study material included data retrieved from the medical records of patients hospitalized in the Teaching Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of Professor Orłowski Hospital in Warsaw, in the years 2010–2017. The EPDS data of 604 patients were analyzed. The study group included 75 women who obtained at least 12 points in the EPDS and the control group was made up of 75 women who obtained no more than 5 points in the EPDS. Results: The women in whom we noted an increased risk of developing mood disorders had blood loss >1000 mL and had a significantly longer stage II and III of labor than the control group. Other risk factors were cesarean section, vaginal delivery with the curettage of the uterine cavity, slightly lower APGAR scores (0.4 pts), and lower birth weight (approximately 350 g) of the child. Women at a low risk of postpartum mood disorders more commonly underwent episiotomy during delivery (76%). Conclusions: Increased supervision and support should be offered to women who experienced the above-mentioned risk factors.

Perinatal Predictors of Postpartum Depression: Results of a Retrospective Comparative Study

Postpartum mood disorders occur in a considerable number of women with the most common postpartum disorder being baby blues. The study aimed at the identification of the risk factors present before delivery, which may be comprised in prophylactic programs concerning postpartum mood disorders. The research material includes data retrieved from the medical record of patients delivering in Warsaw in the years 2010–2017 who routinely completed Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) after delivery. Data of 604 patients were analyzed. The study group included 75 women who obtained at least 12 points in EPDS, which constituted 12.4% of the whole group (mean = 14.92, SD = 3.05). The control group was made up of 75 women who obtained no more than 5 points in EPDS. A significant correlation was reported between the parity and their order vs. the risk of developing postpartum mood disorders. Women with an increased risk delivered at about 37 gestational weeks, while women in whom the risk of such disorders was low delivered at about 39 gestational weeks. No increased risk was noted in women with premature rupture of membranes. Primigravidas and women who delivered prematurely were the most predisposed to developing postpartum depression and should undergo screening tests in the perinatal period.