1
|
Čerina D, Matković V, Katić K, Lovasić IB, Šeparović R, Canjko I, Bajić Ž, Vrdoljak E. Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in the Management of Ovarian Cancer—National Results from Croatia. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12071176. [PMID: 35887672 PMCID: PMC9322425 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Today, in the era of precision medicine, the determination of genomic instability or other potentially targetable mutations, along with BRCA 1 and BRCA 2, is a crucial component of the diagnosis and treatment management of advanced ovarian cancer. Advanced technologies such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) have enabled comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) analysis to become more feasible for routine use in daily clinical work. Here, we present the results for the first two years of an analysis of patients with advanced ovarian cancer on a national level. The aim was to establish the position of CGP in the daily clinical practice of treating ovarian cancer. We performed a multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional analysis on the total population of Croatian patients who were newly diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic ovarian cancer or whose initial disease had progressed from 1 January 2020 to 1 December 2021, and whose tumors underwent CGP analysis. All 86 patients (100%) analyzed with CGP had at least one genomic alteration (GA). The median LOH was 14.6 (IQR 6.8–21.7), with 35 patients (41%) having an LOH ≥ 16. We found BRCA-positive status in 22 patients (26%). Conventional testing, which detects only BRCA mutations, would have opted for therapy with PARP inhibitors in 22 (26%) of our patients. However, CGP revealed the need for PARP inhibitors in 35 patients (41%). The results identified a significantly higher number of women who would achieve a possible benefit from targeted therapy. Hence, we believe that CGP should be a backbone diagnostic tool in the management of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dora Čerina
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Center Split, School of Medicine, University of Split, 21 000 Split, Croatia;
| | - Višnja Matković
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia; (V.M.); (K.K.)
| | - Kristina Katić
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia; (V.M.); (K.K.)
| | - Ingrid Belac Lovasić
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital Center Rijeka, 51 000 Rijeka, Croatia;
| | - Robert Šeparović
- Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia;
| | - Ivana Canjko
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital Center Osijek, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia;
| | - Žarko Bajić
- Research Unit “Dr. Mirko Grmek”, University Psychiatric Hospital “Sveti Ivan”, Jankomir 11, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia;
| | - Eduard Vrdoljak
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Center Split, School of Medicine, University of Split, 21 000 Split, Croatia;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Čerina D, Matković V, Katić K, Belac Lovasić I, Šeparović R, Canjko I, Jakšić B, Petrić-Miše B, Bajić Ž, Boban M, Vrdoljak E. Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab in the First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Cervical Cancer: A Cohort Study in the Total Population of Croatian Patients. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2021; 2021:2815623. [PMID: 34394349 PMCID: PMC8363452 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2815623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although today it is almost preventable, cervical cancer still represents a significant cancer burden, especially in some developing parts of the world. Since the introduction of bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of metastatic disease, improvements of the outcomes were noted. However, results from randomized controlled trials are often hard to recreate in the real-world setting. OBJECTIVE To assess the real-world efficacy and safety of bevacizumab as a first-line treatment of advanced cervical cancer. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study on the total population of Croatian patients diagnosed with metastatic cervical cancer from 2016 to 2019 who were treated with bevacizumab in combination with cisplatin and paclitaxel (TCB) in the first line. The comparison group was the consecutive sample of patients treated with chemotherapy alone. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, incidence of adverse events, and the proportion of treatment discontinuation. RESULTS We enrolled 67 patients treated with TCB and a control group of 62 patients treated with chemotherapy alone. The TCB cohort had significantly longer unadjusted OS with a median of 27.0 (95% CI 18.5; not calculable) months, compared to 15.5 (10.7; 30.1) months in the chemotherapy-alone cohort. Adjusted OS was not significantly different. PFS was significantly longer for the TCB cohort, with a median of 10.6 (95% CI 8.5; 15.4) months, than for the chemotherapy-alone cohort, with a median of 5.4 (95% CI 3.9; 9.1) months, even after adjustment for baseline covariates (HRadjusted = 0.60; 95% CI 0.39; 0.94; p=0.027; false discovery rate <5%). CONCLUSIONS In a real-world setting, TCB as a first-line treatment of metastatic cervical cancer was associated with longer PFS, better objective disease control rate, and acceptable toxicity profile in comparison to chemotherapy alone. These results may indicate its utility and potential applicability in other parts of the developing world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dora Čerina
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Center Split, School of Medicine, University of Split, Spinčićeva 1, HR-21000 Split, Croatia
| | - Višnja Matković
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Petrova 13, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Kristina Katić
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Petrova 13, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ingrid Belac Lovasić
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital Center Rijeka, Krešimirova 42, HR-51000 Rijeka, Croatia
| | - Robert Šeparović
- Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Ilica 197, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ivana Canjko
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, University Hospital Center Osijek, Josipa Huttlera 4, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Blanka Jakšić
- Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Branka Petrić-Miše
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Center Split, School of Medicine, University of Split, Spinčićeva 1, HR-21000 Split, Croatia
| | - Žarko Bajić
- Research Unit “Dr. Mirko Grmek”, University Psychiatric Hospital “Sveti Ivan”, Jankomir 11, HR-10.090 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Marijo Boban
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Center Split, School of Medicine, University of Split, Spinčićeva 1, HR-21000 Split, Croatia
| | - Eduard Vrdoljak
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Center Split, School of Medicine, University of Split, Spinčićeva 1, HR-21000 Split, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|