Changes in Emergency Department Performance during Strike of Junior Physicians in Korea

Comparison of the postoperative complications for gastric cancer surgery before and during the medical crisis in South Korea: a retrospective observational study

Purpose

In 2024, South Korea experienced a substantial shortage of medical practitioners, primarily residents and interns, owing to mass resignation from training hospitals. This study aimed to evaluate whether the quality of medical care declined because of this shortage by comparing postoperative complications before and during the period of mass resignation.

Methods

This retrospective observational study assessed patient outcomes among patients with gastric cancer before and during a period of mass resignation at a single tertiary training hospital. Outcomes analyzed included operation duration, length of hospital stays, and complication rates. The effects of the medical crisis on complication rates were analyzed using logistic regression.

Results

A total of 218 and 31 patients underwent surgery during the control and crisis periods, respectively. During the control period, approximately 73 surgeries were performed between February 20 and June 10 each year, which was reduced to 31 during the crisis period. The operation duration (minutes) was 164.5 before the medical crisis and 154.0 during it (P = 0.19). The incidence of postoperative complications before and during the medical crisis was 22.02% (48 of 218) and 9.68% (3 of 31), respectively (P = 0.15). No severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa) were observed during the crisis period. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that sex and body mass index were significant variables associated with postoperative complications, but the effects of medical crisis were not.

Conclusion

Despite the medical crisis in South Korea, patient outcomes for gastric cancer surgery were sustained in terms of the frequency of postoperative complications.

Impact of Medical Trainees on Efficiency and Productivity in the Emergency Department: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

Introduction

Effective medical education must balance clinical service demands for institutions and learning needs of trainees. The question of whether these are competing demands or can serve complementary roles has profound impacts on graduate medical education, ranging from funding decisions to the willingness of community-based hospitals and physicians to include learners at their clinical sites. Our objective in this article was to systematically review the evidence on the impact of medical trainees on productivity and efficiency in the emergency department (ED).

Methods

We queried PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from earliest available dates to March 2023. We identified all studies evaluating the impact of medical students and/or residents in the ED on commonly used productivity and efficiency metrics. Only studies in EDs in the United States were included. No additional filters were used. We assessed the risk of bias of included studies using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. Study findings were combined in a narrative synthesis and reported according to PRISMA guidelines.

Results

The literature search yielded 3,390 unique articles for abstract screening. Eighty-one abstracts were identified as relevant to our PICO question (population, intervention, control, and outcomes), 76 of which had retrievable full-text articles and the themes of which were discussed in a narrative synthesis. We selected 13 of the full-text articles for final inclusion in a systematic review. Studies were roughly split between observational (6) and quasi-experimental (7) designs. The majority of studies (11) were single-site studies. Only two studies could be graded as low risk of bias per the ROBINS-I tool.

Conclusion

Low-GRADE evidence suggests that students and residents decrease ED efficiency by a statistically small effect size of debatable clinical importance. Residents provide a moderate boost to ED productivity. Students do not produce a statistically or clinically significant impact on ED productivity. Residents increase emergency department relative value units revenue by $26.30 an hour, while students have no impact. Both types of learners decrease efficiency.

Health worker protests and the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time-series analysis

Objective

To assess the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on protests by health workers.

Methods

We conducted an interrupted time series analysis of data from 159 countries for 2 years before and after the World Health Organization classified COVID-19 as a pandemic in March 2020, thus between 2018 and 2022. We produced models examining two main outcomes: (i) the total weekly number of health worker protests globally; and (ii) the number of countries with one or more health worker protests in a given week.

Findings

In total, there were 18 322 health worker protests in 133 countries between 2018 and 2022. The number of weekly health worker protests globally increased by 47% (30.1/63.5), an increase of 30.1 protests per week (95% confidence interval, CI: 11.7-48.6) at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the number of countries experiencing such protests in a given week increased by 24% (5.7/24.1) following the declaration of the pandemic (an increase of 5.7 countries; 95% CI: 3.5-7.8).

Conclusion

The pandemic increased the overall level of health worker protests globally as well as the number of countries experiencing such protests. These protests highlight discontent in the health workforce. Given the ongoing global health workforce crisis, understanding and addressing the drivers of health worker discontent is important for global health policy and security.

Impacts of industrial actions, protests, strikes and lockouts by health and care workers during COVID-19 and other pandemic contexts: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Public health emergencies of international concern (PHEICs) as the COVID-19 pandemic and others that have occurred since the early 2000s put enormous pressure on health and care systems. This is being a context for protests by health and care workers (HCWs) because of additional workload, working conditions and effects on mental and physical health. In this paper, we intended to analyze the demands of HCWs associated with industrial actions, protests, strikes and lockouts (IAPSLs) which occurred during COVID-19 pandemic and other PHEICs; to identify the impact of these grievances; and describe the relevant interventions to address these IAPSLs.

METHODS

We included studies published between January 2000 and March 2022 in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, BVS/LILACS, WHO's COVID-19 Research Database, ILO, OECD, HSRM, and Google Scholar for grey literature. Eligibility criteria were HCWs as participants, IAPSLs as phenomenon of interest occurring in the context of COVID-19 and other PHEICs. GRADE CERQual was used to assess risk of bias and confidence of evidence.

RESULTS

1656 records were retrieved, and 91 were selected for full-text screening. We included 18 publications. A system-wide approach, rather than a limited approach to institutions on strike, makes it possible to understand the full impact of the strike on health and care services. PHEICs tend to aggravate already adverse working conditions of HCWs, acting as drivers for HCWs strikes, leading to staff shortages, and financial issues, both in the North and in the Global South, particularly evident in Asia and Africa. In addition, issues related to deficiencies in leadership and governance in heath sector and lack of medical products and technologies (e.g., lack of personal protective equipment) were the main drivers of strikes, each contributing 25% of the total drivers identified.

CONCLUSIONS

It is necessary to focus on the preparedness of health and care systems to respond adequately to PHEICs, and this includes being prepared for HCWs' IAPSLs, talked much in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence to assist policymakers in defining strategies to respond adequately to the health and care needs of the population during IAPSLs is crucial. The main impact of strikes is on the disruption of health care services' provision. Gender inequality being a major issue among HCWs, a proper understanding of the full impact of the strike on health and care services will only be possible if gender lens is combined with a systemic approach, rather than gender-undifferentiated approaches limited to the institutions on strike.

Impact of the junior doctors' industrial action on the emergency eye department in a large tertiary ophthalmic hospital: the Manchester experience

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of the junior doctors' industrial action on one of the largest emergency eye departments (EED) in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

We compared staff allocation, patient presentation, time in streaming, time in the department, the Manchester Triage System (MTS) score, number of eye emergencies and follow-up care of patients who attended the EED in the Manchester Royal Eye Hospital (MREH) during the 3-day industrial action (13-15 March 2023) compared with control periods 2 weeks before and 2 weeks after the industrial action.

RESULTS

During the industrial action, there were almost 1.5 times more staff allocated to EED with a near doubling of the senior workforce. There was no difference in patient presentation, MTS score, number of eye emergencies or patient follow-up during the industrial action. However, patients had significantly less time in streaming (p < 0.001) and in the department (p < 0.001) during the industrial action compared to control periods.

CONCLUSION

Emergency ophthalmic patient care was not compromised during the industrial action due to the reallocation of the workforce to EED. The results of this study may help in the planning of ophthalmic eye-care services in the event of future industrial actions.

The impact of strike action on healthcare delivery: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Strike action carried out by healthcare workers raises a range of ethical issues. Most fundamentally, as a strike is designed to disrupt, it has the potential to impact patient outcomes and healthcare delivery. This paper synthesises and analyses the empirical literature that details the impact of strike action on healthcare delivery.

METHODS

A systematic scoping review was utilised to examine the extent, range and nature of research activity. Embase, Medline, CINAHL, Bioethicsline, EconLit and Web of Science were searched, yielding 5644 results. Papers were included if they examined the impact that strike action had on healthcare delivery (i.e., admissions, presentations, waiting time). After screening, 43 papers met inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies explored presentations to emergency or admissions to hospital. Both dropped dramatically when comparing non-strike to strike periods. Ten studies examined length of stay in hospital and waiting times. No clear relationship was found with strike action, with some studies showing that wait times decreased. Nine studies examined the impact of strike action in facilities that were not on strike, but were impacted by nearby strike action along with the impact that strike action had on treatment seeking. Hospitals dealing with these upstream impacts often saw increase in presentations at hospitals, but results relates to treatment seeking during strike action were mixed.

CONCLUSION

Strike action can have a substantial impact on the delivery of healthcare, but this impact is not felt uniformly across services. While many services are disrupted, a number are not, with several studies reporting increased efficiency.

The impact of health care strikes on patient mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to evaluate the impact of health care strike action on patient mortality.

DATA SOURCES

EMBASE, PubMed CINAHL, BIOETHICSLINE, EconLit, WEB OF SCIENCE, and grey literature were searched up to December 2021.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis were utilized.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

Random-effects meta-analysis was used to compare mortality rate during strike versus pre- or post-strike, with meta-regression employed to identify factors that might influence the potential impact of strike action. Studies were included if they were observational studies that examined in-hospital/clinic or population mortality during a strike period compared with a control period where there was no strike action.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Seventeen studies examined mortality: 14 examined in-hospital mortality and three examined population mortality. In-hospital studies represented 768,918 admissions and 7191 deaths during strike action and 1,034,437 admissions and 12,676 deaths during control periods. The pooled relative risk (RR) of in-hospital mortality did not significantly differ during strike action versus non-strike periods (RR = 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.63, 1.31, p = 0.598). Meta-regression also showed that mortality RR was not significantly impacted by country (p = 0.98), profession on strike (p = 0.32 for multiple professions, p = 0.80 for nurses), the duration of the strike (p = 0.26), or whether multiple facilities were on strike (p = 0.55). Only three studies that examined population mortality met the inclusion criteria; therefore, further analysis was not conducted. However, it is noteworthy that none of these studies reported a significant increase in population mortality attributable to strike action.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the data available, this review did not find any evidence that strike action has any significant impact on in-hospital patient mortality.