Diagnosis of Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions with Transbronchial Lung Cryobiopsy by Guide Sheath and Radial Endobronchial Ultrasonography: A Prospective Control Study

Diagnosis of Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions Using Forceps and 1.1- or 1.7-mm Cryoprobes: A Randomised Trial

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer screening has increased the detection of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). Accurate diagnosis for therapy and prognosis is crucial but challenging. Our study compares the safety and efficacy of transbronchial cryobiopsy with two probe diameters and forceps biopsy.

METHODS

This single-centre, investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised trial included patients with PPLs who required flexible bronchoscopy with radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided biopsy for histopathological diagnosis. Patients received a forceps biopsy and were randomly assigned to a cryobiopsy with a 1.1-mm (freezing time 7-10 s) or a 1.7-mm cryoprobe (freezing time 4-6 s), respectively. The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield; secondary outcomes included total biopsy size, the proportion of malignant tissue, artefact-free alveolar space percentage, molecular pathology of the specimen, and safety.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients (66.52 ± 9.81 years; 48.1% male) with a median nodule size of 24 mm (interquartile range 19-30) were included. The overall diagnostic yield was similar in the 1.1-mm and 1.7-mm groups (75.9% vs. 88.0%, p = 0.261), and the specimens obtained with the two different cryoprobes were equal in size, quality, and information about molecular pathology. There was no difference in procedural-related bleeding between the groups (p = 0.847). Compared to forceps biopsies, cryobiopsies had a superior overall diagnostic yield (75.9% vs. 48.1%, p = 0.001) and were better suited for further molecular analysis (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The 1.1-mm and 1.7-mm cryoprobes displayed comparable diagnostic yield, ability to provide molecular pathology information, and safety. Forceps biopsy was inferior to cryobiopsy in all aspects except safety.

Diagnostic accuracy of imaging-guided biopsy of peripheral pulmonary lesions: a systematic review

The histologic definition of peripheral pulmonary lesion (PPL) is critical for a correct diagnosis and appropriate therapy. Non-invasive techniques for PPL biopsy are imaging-guided, using endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), computed tomography (CT), and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB). To assess the diagnostic accuracy of PPL biopsy and provide a framework for reporting data for accuracy studies of PPL biopsy. A systematic review was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify all the articles assessing the accuracy of EBUS, CT, and ENB between January 2000 and June 2023 basing search queries on keywords emerging from PICO question. Only studies investigating biopsy of PPL and reporting accuracy or necessary data to calculate it independently were included. Risk of bias was based on QUADAS-2 tool. In total, 81 studies were included. Median accuracy was 0.78 (range=0.51-0.94) in the EBUS group, 0.91 (range=0.73-0.97) in the CT group, 0.72 (range=0.59-0.97) in the ENB group, and 0.77 (range=0.61-0.92) in the combined group. Sensitivity and NPV ranges were 0.35-0.94 and 0.26-0.88 in the EBUS group, 0.71-0.97 and 0.46-1.00 in the CT group, 0.55-0.96 and 0.32-0.90 in the ENB group, and 0.70-0.90 and 0.28-0.79 in the combined group. Specificity and PPV were 1.00 in almost all studies. Overall complication rate was 3%, 30%, 8%, and 5% in the EBUS, CT, ENB, and combined groups. CT-guided biopsy was the most accurate technique, although with the highest complication rate. When calculating accuracy, indeterminate results must be considered false negatives according to the "intention-to-diagnose" principle.

Bronchial branch tracing navigation in ultrathin bronchoscopy-guided radial endobronchial ultrasound for peripheral pulmonary nodule

BACKGROUND

Most malignant peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) are situated in the peripheral region of the lung. Although the ultrathin bronchoscope (UTB) can access these areas, a robust navigation system is essential for precise localisation of these small peripheral PPLs. Since many UTB procedures rely on automated virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN), this study aims to determine the accuracy and diagnostic yield of the manual bronchial branch tracing (BBT) navigation in UTB-guided radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS) procedures.

METHODS

Single-centre retrospective study of UTB-rEBUS patients with PPLs smaller than 3 cm over a two year period.

RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 47 patients with a mean age of 61.6 (SD 9.53) years and a mean target size of 1.91 (SD 0.53) cm. Among these lesions, 46.8% were located in the 6th airway generation, and 78.7% exhibited a direct bronchus sign. Navigation success using BBT was 91.5% based on positive rEBUS identification. The index diagnostic yield was 82.9%, increasing to 91.5% at 12 months of follow-up. Malignant lesions accounted for 65.1% of cases, while 34.9% were non-malignant. The presence of a direct bronchus sign was the sole factor associated with higher navigation success and diagnostic yield. Cryobiopsy outperformed forceps biopsy in non-concentric rEBUS lesions (90.9% vs. 50.0%, p < 0.05), but not in concentric orientated lesions. One pneumothorax occurred in our cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

BBT as an exclusive navigation method for small PPLs in UTB-rEBUS procedures has proved to be safe and feasible. Combination of UTB with cryobiopsy remains efficient for eccentric and adjacently oriented rEBUS lesions.

Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions. A narrative review

An increasing number of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) requiring tissue verification to establish a definite diagnosis for further individualized management are detected due to the growing adoption of lung cancer screening by chest computed tomography (CT), especially low-dose CT. However, the morphological diagnosis of PPLs remains challenging. Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) that can retrieve larger specimens with more preserved cellular architecture and fewer crush artifacts in comparison with conventional transbronchial forceps biopsy (TBFB), as an emerging technology for diagnosing PPLs, has been demonstrated to have the potential to resolve the clinical dilemma pertaining to currently available sampling devices (e.g., forceps, needle and brush) and become a diagnostic cornerstone for PPLs. Of note, with the introduction of the 1.1 mm cryoprobe that will be more compatible with advanced bronchoscopic navigation techniques, such as radial endobronchial ultrasound (r-EBUS), virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB), the use of TBLC is expected to gain more popularity in the diagnosis of PPLs. While much remains for exploration using the TBLC technique for diagnosing PPLs, it can be envisaged that the emergence of additional studies with larger data accrual will hopefully add to the body of evidence in this field.

Radial endobronchial ultrasound - guided bronchoscopy for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials

Background

The diagnostic yield of radial endobronchial ultrasound (r-EBUS) for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) varies between studies and is affected by multiple factors. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of r-EBUS, and to explore the factors influencing the diagnostic yield of r-EBUS in patients with PPLs.

Methods

The PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched to identify relevant studies that used r-EBUS for diagnosing PPLs from the date of inception to Dec 2022. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 15.1.

Results

An analysis of 46 studies with a total of 7252 PPLs was performed. The pooled diagnostic yield of r-EBUS was 73.4 % (95 % CI: 69.9%-76.7 %), with significant heterogeneity detected among studies (I2 = 90 %, P < 0.001). Further analysis demonstrated PPLs located in the middle or lower lobe, >2 cm in size, malignant in type, solid in appearance on computerized tomography (CT), present in bronchus sign, the within probe location, and the addition of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) were associated with increased diagnostic yield, whereas use of a guide sheath (GS), bronchoscopy type, and a multimodality approach failed to influence the outcome. The pooled incidence rates of overall complications, pneumothorax and moderate and severe bleeding were 3.1 % (95 % CI: 2.1%-4.3 %), 0.4 % (95 % CI: 0.1%-0.7 %) and 1.1 % (95 % CI: 0.5%-2.0 %), respectively.

Conclusions

r-EBUS has an appreciable diagnostic yield and an excellent safety manifestation when used to deal with PPLs.

Development of the Korean Association for Lung Cancer Clinical Practice Guidelines: Recommendations on Radial Probe Endobronchial Ultrasound for Diagnosing Lung Cancer - An Updated Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (RP-EBUS) accurately locates peripheral lung lesions (PLLs) during transbronchial biopsy (TBB). We performed an updated meta-analysis of the diagnostic yield of TBB for PLLs using RP-EBUS to generate recommendations for the development of the Korean Association of Lung Cancer guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (from January 2013 to December 2022), and performed a meta-analysis using R software. The diagnostic yield was evaluated by dividing the number of successful diagnoses by the total lesion number. Subgroup analysis was performed to identify related factors.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies with a total of 13,133 PLLs were included. The pooled diagnostic yield of RP-EBUS was 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 0.75). Significant heterogeneity was observed among studies (χ2=292.38, p < 0.01, I2=86.4%). In a subgroup analysis, there was a significant difference in diagnostic yield based on RP-EBUS findings (within, adjacent to, invisible), with a risk ratio of 1.45 (95% CI, 1.23 to 1.72) between within and adjacent to, 4.20 (95% CI, 1.89 to 9.32) between within and invisible, and 2.59 (95% CI, 1.32 to 5.01) between adjacent to and invisible. There was a significant difference in diagnostic yield based on lesion size, histologic diagnosis, computed tomography (CT) bronchus sign, lesion character, and location from the hilum. The overall complication rate of TBB with RP-EBUS was 6.8% (bleeding, 4.5%; pneumothorax, 1.4%).

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that TBB with RP-EBUS is an accurate diagnostic tool for PLLs with good safety profiles, especially for PLLs with within orientation on RP-EBUS or positive CT bronchus sign.

Endoscopic Technologies for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: From Diagnosis to Therapy

Peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) are frequent incidental findings in subjects when performing chest radiographs or chest computed tomography (CT) scans. When a PPL is identified, it is necessary to proceed with a risk stratification based on the patient profile and the characteristics found on chest CT. In order to proceed with a diagnostic procedure, the first-line examination is often a bronchoscopy with tissue sampling. Many guidance technologies have recently been developed to facilitate PPLs sampling. Through bronchoscopy, it is currently possible to ascertain the PPL's benign or malignant nature, delaying the therapy's second phase with radical, supportive, or palliative intent. In this review, we describe all the new tools available: from the innovation of bronchoscopic instrumentation (e.g., ultrathin bronchoscopy and robotic bronchoscopy) to the advances in navigation technology (e.g., radial-probe endobronchial ultrasound, virtual navigation, electromagnetic navigation, shape-sensing navigation, cone-beam computed tomography). In addition, we summarize all the PPLs ablation techniques currently under experimentation. Interventional pulmonology may be a discipline aiming at adopting increasingly innovative and disruptive technologies.

Factors related to the diagnosis of lung cancer by transbronchial biopsy with endobronchial ultrasonography and a guide sheath

BACKGROUND

Transbronchial biopsy (TBB) with endobronchial ultrasonography and a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) is an effective examination tool for the diagnosis of lung cancer. Factors related to making the diagnosis are still not fully understood.

METHODS

A total of 367 patients who underwent EBUS-GS and were diagnosed with lung cancer in Saga University Hospital were investigated retrospectively. Clinical characteristics were compared between 244 patients who were diagnosed with lung cancer and 123 patients who were not diagnosed by TBB with EBUS-GS but were diagnosed by other examinations.

RESULTS

Size of target lesion, rate of patients with target lesion size ≥20 mm, presence of the bronchus sign, and detection by EBUS imaging were significantly associated with making the diagnosis (all p < 0.01). In patients whose lesion was detected by EBUS imaging, patients with positive findings within the lesion were significantly more often diagnosed by TBB with EBUS-GS than those with positive findings adjacent to the lesion (p < 0.01). The odds ratio (OR) of patients whose lesion was detected by EBUS imaging (OR [95% confidence interval] 14.5 [8.0-26.4]) tended to be higher compared to the ORs of size of lesion ≥20 mm (3.9 [2.2-6.8]) and the bronchus sign (7.5 [4.6-12.2]).

CONCLUSION

Targeted lesion diameter ≥20 mm, bronchus sign, and detection by EBUS imaging, especially within the lesion, are important factors for the diagnosis of lung cancer by TBB with EBUS-GS.

Applications of cryobiopsy in airway, pleural, and parenchymal disease

INTRODUCTION

:Cryobiopsy is a novel diagnostic technique for thoracic diseases which has been extensively investigated over the past 20 years. It was originally proposed for the diagnosis of endobronchial lesions and diffuse parenchymal lung disease due to limitations of conventional sampling techniques including small size and presence of artifacts.

AREAS COVERED

:We will review recent evidence related to the expanding use of cryobiopsy in thoracic diseases. To identify references, the MEDLINE database was searched from database inception until May 2022 for case series, cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to cryobiopsy.

EXPERT OPINION

Cryobiopsy has expanding applications in the field of thoracic diseases. Evidence to support transbronchial cryobiopsy as an alternative to surgical lung biopsy is increasing and was recently endorsed as a conditional recommendation by the latest American Thoracic Society guideline update for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Developments in technology and technique, in particular the availability of a 1.1 mm flexible cryoprobe, have extended applications to pulmonary diseases, including diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases, peripheral pulmonary lesions, and lung transplant rejection.

Radial-EBUS: CryoBiopsy Versus Conventional Biopsy: Time-Sample and C-Arm

Introduction: Diagnosis of lung nodules is still under investigation. We use computed tomography scans and positron emission tomography in order to identify their origin. Patients and Methods: In our retrospective study, we included 248 patients with a single lung nodule or multiple lung nodules of size ≥1 cm. We used a radial-endobronchial ultrasound and a C-Arm. We used a 1.1 mm cryoprobe versus a 22G needle vs. forceps/brush. We compared the sample size of each biopsy method with the number of cell-block slices. Results: Central lesions indifferent to the method provided the same mean number of cell-block slices (0.04933–0.02410). Cryobiopsies provide less sample size for peripheral lesions due to the higher incidence of pneumothorax (0.04700–0.02296). Conclusion: The larger the lesion ≥2 cm, and central, more cell-blocks are produced indifferent to the biopsy method (0.13386–0.02939). The time of the procedure was observed to be less when the C-Arm was used as an additional navigation tool (0.14854–0.00089).

Efficacy and Safety of Cryobiopsy vs. Forceps Biopsy for Interstitial Lung Diseases, Lung Tumors, and Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Cryobiopsy has emerged as a novel alternative to conventional forceps biopsy for the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), lung tumors, and peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). This study aims to compare cryobiopsy and forceps biopsy for the diagnosis of these lung pathologies with respect to efficacy and safety by performing a meta-analysis of updated evidence.

Methods

A number of databases, such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, OVID, CNKI, and Wanfang database, were searched for eligible studies. Randomized and non-randomized comparative studies investigating the efficacy and safety of cryobiopsy vs. forceps biopsy for lung pathologies were included. Pooled results were calculated as an odds ratio (OR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI.

Results

A total of 39 studies, such as 9 RCTs with 3,586 biopsies (1,759 cryobiopsies and 1,827 flexible forceps biopsies) were analyzed. Cryobiopsy was associated with a significant increase in the diagnostic rates of ILDs (OR, 4.29; 95% CI, 1.85–9.93; p < 0.01), lung tumors (OR, 3.58; 95% CI, 2.60–4.93; p < 0.01), and PPLs (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.23–2.34; p < 0.01). Cryobiopsy yielded significantly larger specimens compared with flexible forceps biopsy (SMD, 3.06; 95% CI, 2.37–3.74; p < 0.01). The cryobiopsy group had a significantly higher (moderate to severe) bleeding risk than the forceps group (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.48–3.19; p < 0.01). No significant difference was observed in the incidence of pneumothorax between the groups (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.44–1.85; p = 0.78).

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that cryobiopsy is a safe and efficacious alternative to conventional forceps biopsy.