Opioid-Free Labor Analgesia: Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant Combined with Ropivacaine

Comparative efficacy and safety of local anesthesia combinations for labor pain relief: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Epidural anesthesia stands out as the most commonly employed approach for labor analgesia, frequently complemented by various local anesthetics, and the analgesic effectiveness and safety profiles of distinct local anesthetic regimens are different. To compare the efficacy and adverse reactions of different local anesthetic regimens in relieving labor pain by performing a network meta-analysis.

METHODS

We systematically searched four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) for randomized controlled trials from the inception of the databases up to March 3, 2025. Included in the study were patients aged 18 to 35 years who underwent painless delivery under epidural anesthesia.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included a total of 59 studies involving 6972 patients. The combination of Ropivacaine_Dexmedetomidine_Sufentanil (Rop_Dex_Suf) was the most effective and fast in reducing Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at 30 min after block, compared to most other anesthesia schemes. Labor pain lasted for the longest time with Ropivacaine_Dexmedetomidine(Rop_Dex). Meanwhile, Bupivacaine_Pethidine(Bpv_Pet), Bupivacaine_Dexmedetomidine(Bpv_Dex), Fentanyl(Fen), and Bupivacaine_Diamorphine(Bpv_DiaMor) had the lowest incidence of nausea, vomiting, hypotension, and pruritus. Besides, Bupivacaine_Dexmedetomidine(Bpv_Dex), Ropivacaine_Dexmedetomidine(Rop_Dex), and Ropivacaine_Dexmedetomidine_Sufentanil (Rop_Dex_Suf) have demonstrated outstanding analgesic efficacy and safety.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that the combination of ropivacaine, dexmedetomidine, and sufentanil is the most effective regimen for alleviating labor pain. Nonetheless, given the limited number of studies on certain protocols, additional high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are anticipated to substantiate our conclusion in the future.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023459538.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

Application of Dexmedetomidine in Epidural Labor Analgesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVES

To summarize and appraise the use of dexmedetomidine in epidural labor analgesia, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We conducted the literature search about the RCTs of epidural labor analgesia with or without dexmedetomidine from inception until November 1, 2022, in the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. The primary outcome was visual analog scale (VAS) within 2 hours after epidural intubation. The secondary outcomes included the duration of the first and second labor stages, Apgar score, umbilical blood pH, dosage of analgesics, and side effects.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs including 846 parturients were included. The VAS score of the dexmedetomidine group was significantly lower than that of the control group at the time of 15 minutes (mean difference [MD] -1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.23, -0.59), 30 minutes (MD -1.02, 95% CI -1.70, -0.33), 60 minutes (MD -0.90, 95% CI -1.36, -0.44), and 90 minutes (MD -0.70, 95% CI -1.16, -0.23). The incidence of pruritus in the dexmedetomidine group was lower than that of the control group （MD 0.28, 95% CI 0.11, 0.74), but the incidence of maternal bradycardia was higher (MD 6.41, 95% CI 1.64, 25.04). There were no significant difference in other outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Dexmedetomidine combined with local anesthetic for epidural labor analgesia can improve the VAS score of parturients. Except for the increased incidence of maternal bradycardia, it seems to be safe for the parturients and fetuses.

Retracted: Opioid-Free Labor Analgesia: Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant Combined with Ropivacaine

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2022/2235025.].