Treatment of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy for Moderate or Severe Proteinuria: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Cyclophosphamide induced early remission and was superior to rituximab in idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients with high anti-PLA2R antibody levels

Rituximab (RTX) and cyclophosphamide (CYC) based treatments are both recommended as first-line therapies in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) by KDIGO 2021 guideline. However, the efficacy of RTX vs. CYC-based treatments in IMN is still controversial. We performed this systemic review and meta-analysis registered in PROSPERO (CRD 42,022,355,717) by pooling data from randomized controlled trials or cohort studies in IMN patients using the EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane libraries (till Orc 1, 2022). The primary outcomes were the complete remission (CR) rate + partial remission (PR) rate. CR rate, immunologic response rate, relapse rate, and the risk of serious adverse events (SAE) were secondary outcomes. Eight studies involving 600 adult patients with IMN were included with a median follow-up duration of 12 to 60 months. RTX induced a similar overall remission rate compared with CYC (RR 0.88, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.09, P = 0.23). At the follow-up time of 6 months, RTX was associated with a lower CR + PR rate compared with CYC (RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52, 0.88, P = 0.003). Moreover, RTX might be less effective in inducing CR + PR than CYC treatment in IMN patients with high antiPLA2R antibody levels (RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.94, P = 0.02). The occurrences of CRs, relapse rates, immunologic response rates, and SAE were not significantly different between RTX and CYC, respectively. In conclusion, although the long-term efficacy and safety of CYC compared to RTX were comparable, CYC might respond faster and be more advantageous in IMN patients with high antiPLA2R antibody titers.

Phospholipase A2 Receptor Antibodies and Clinical Prognosis in Patients with Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is the most common form of primary nephrotic syndrome in adults. Antibodies against the M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R-ab) are considered as diagnostic biomarkers of IMN.

OBJECTIVE

Here, we performed an updated meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic value of PLA2R-ab for clinical remission in IMN patients.

METHOD

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies published before September 2022. Odds ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were determined using a fixed or random effects model. The heterogeneity among studies was explored by subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies involving 1,761 IMN participants were included. There were significant differences between PLA2R-ab (+) and PLA2R-ab (-) patients in terms of complete remission (CR) and spontaneous remission. The rates of partial remission (PR) and relapse were similar between the two groups. Patients with PLA2R-ab (-) were at a higher CR rate when treated with a calcineurin inhibitor or a treatment course for 3 months and 6 months, while the spontaneous remission rate was higher in PLA2R-ab seronegative patients from Asia. However, the CR and spontaneous remission rate only significantly declined in IMN patients with the highest titer, but not a middle titer, when compared to those with the lowest titer.

CONCLUSION

In contrast with previous meta-analyses, our results verified that PLA2R-ab can likely predict CR and spontaneous remission in IMN patients, instead of PR and relapse. Race, immunosuppressive agents, and duration of treatment may affect the prognostic value of PLA2R-ab. Considering that the remission rate of IMN patients with a middle level of PLA2R-ab was not different from that of patients with the lowest level, a proper cut-off value of PLA2R-ab for prognosis should be clarified.

Implications of rituximab pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations in various immune-mediated glomerulopathies and potential anti-CD20 therapy alternatives

The specific B-cell depleting anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (RTX) is effective in terms of the treatment of various immune-mediated glomerulopathies. The administration of RTX has been shown to be reliable and highly effective particularly in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis, which is manifested predominantly with non-nephrotic proteinuria. Stable long-term B-cell depletion is usually readily attained in such patients using standard dosing regimens. However, in patients with nephrotic syndrome and non-selective proteinuria, the RTX pharmacokinetics is altered profoundly and RTX does not maintain high enough levels for a sufficiently long period, which may render RTX treatment ineffective. Since complement-derived cytotoxicity is one of the important modes of action of RTX, hypocomplementemia, frequently associated with systemic lupus erythematodes, may act to hamper the efficacy of RTX in the treatment of patients with lupus nephritis. This review provides a description of RTX pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in several selected glomerulopathies, as well as the impact of proteinuria, anti-drug antibodies and other clinical variables on the clearance and volume of distribution of RTX. The impact of plasmapheresis and peritoneal dialysis on the clearance of RTX is also discussed in the paper. A review is provided of the potential association between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations in various kidney-affecting glomerular diseases, the sustainability of B-cell depletion and the clinical efficacy of RTX, with proposals for potential dosing implications. The role of therapeutic drug monitoring in treatment tailoring is also discussed, and various previously tested RTX dosing schedules are compared in terms of their clinical and laboratory treatment responses. Since alternative anti-CD20 molecules may prove effective in RTX unresponsive patients, their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and current role in the treatment of glomerulopathies are also mentioned.