1
|
Muderis MA, Tan YC, Lu W, Tetsworth K, Axelrod D, Haque R, Akhtar MA, Roberts C, Doshi K, Al-Jawazneh S, Hoellwarth JS. Transtibial osseointegration following unilateral traumatic amputation: An observational study of patients with at least two years follow-up. Injury 2024; 55:111568. [PMID: 38669890 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2024] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Most patients use a traditional socket prosthesis (TSP) to ambulate independently following transtibial amputation. However, these patients generally require prosthesis repairs more than twice annually and an entirely new prosthesis every two years. Furthermore, transtibial amputation patients have four times the skin ulceration rate of transfemoral patients, prompting more frequent prosthesis refitting and diminished use. Trans-Tibial osseointegration (TTOI) is a promising technique to address the limitations of TSP, but remains understudied with only four cohorts totaling 41 total procedures reported previously. Continued concerns regarding the risk of infection and questions as to functional capacity postoperatively have slowed adoption of TTOI worldwide. OBJECTIVE This study reports the changes in mobility, quality of life (QOL), and the safety profile of the largest described cohort of patients with unilateral TTOI following traumatic amputation. DESIGN Retrospective observational cohort study. The cohort consisted of patients with data outcomes collected before and after osseointegration intervention. SETTING A large, tertiary referral, major metropolitan center. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-one skeletally mature adults who had failed socket prosthesis rehabilitation, with at least two years of post-osseointegration follow-up. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Mobility was evaluated by K-level, Timed Up and Go (TUG), and Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT). QOL was assessed by survey: daily prosthesis wear hours, prosthesis problem experience, general contentment with prosthesis, and Short Form 36 (SF36). Adverse events included any relevant unplanned surgery such as for infection, fracture, implant loosening, or implant failure. RESULTS All patients demonstrated statistically significant improvement post osseointegration surgery with respect to K-level, TUG, 6MWT, prosthesis wear hours, prosthesis problem experience, general prosthesis contentment score, and SF36 Physical Component Score (p < 0.01 for all). Three patients had four unplanned surgeries: two soft tissue refashionings, and one soft tissue debridement followed eventually by implant removal. No deaths, postoperative systemic complications, more proximal amputations, or periprosthetic fractures occurred. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE TTOI is likely to confer mobility and QOL improvements to patients dissatisfied with TSP rehabilitation following unilateral traumatic transtibial amputation. Adverse events are relatively infrequent and not further disabling. Judicious use of TTOI seems reasonable for properly selected patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 (Therapeutic investigation, Observational study with dramatic effect).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Munjed Al Muderis
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia
| | - Yao Chang Tan
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - William Lu
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kevin Tetsworth
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland, Australia
| | - Daniel Axelrod
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Russel Haque
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia
| | - Muhammad Adeel Akhtar
- NHS Fife, UK; University of Edinburgh College of Medicine & Veterinary Medicine, UK; University of St. Andrews School of Medicine, UK
| | - Claudia Roberts
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia
| | - Karan Doshi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia
| | - Shakib Al-Jawazneh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia
| | - Jason Shih Hoellwarth
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia; Limb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rehani M, Stafinski T, Round J, Jones CA, Hebert JS. Bone-anchored prostheses for transfemoral amputation: a systematic review of outcomes, complications, patient experiences, and cost-effectiveness. FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES 2024; 5:1336042. [PMID: 38628292 PMCID: PMC11018971 DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1336042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Bone-anchored prostheses (BAP) are an advanced reconstructive surgical approach for individuals who had transfemoral amputation and are unable to use the conventional socket-suspension systems for their prostheses. Access to this technology has been limited in part due to the lag between the start of a new procedure and the availability of evidence that is required before making decisions about widespread provision. This systematic review presents as a single resource up-to-date information on aspects most relevant to decision makers, i.e., clinical efficacy, safety parameters, patient experiences, and health economic outcomes of this technology. Methods A systematic search of the literature was conducted by an information specialist in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, the Core Collection of Web of Science, CADTH's Grey Matters, and Google Scholar up until May 31, 2023. Peer-reviewed original research articles on the outcomes of clinical effectiveness (health-related quality of life, mobility, and prosthesis usage), complications and adverse events, patient experiences, and health economic outcomes were included. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence and ROBINS-I, as appropriate. Results Fifty studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 12 were excluded. Thirty-eight studies were finally included in this review, of which 21 reported on clinical outcomes and complications, 9 case series and 1 cohort study focused specifically on complications and adverse events, and 2 and 5 qualitative studies reported on patient experience and health economic assessments, respectively. The most common study design is a single-arm trial (pre-/post-intervention design) with varying lengths of follow-up. Discussion The clinical efficacy of this technology is evident in selected populations. Overall, patients reported increased health-related quality of life, mobility, and prosthesis usage post-intervention. The most common complication is a superficial or soft-tissue infection, and more serious complications are rare. Patient-reported experiences have generally been positive. Evidence indicates that bone-anchored implants for prosthesis fixation are cost-effective for those individuals who face significant challenges in using socket-suspension systems, although they may offer no additional advantage to those who are functioning well with their socket-suspended prostheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayank Rehani
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Tania Stafinski
- Health Technology and Policy Unit, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jeff Round
- Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - C. Allyson Jones
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jacqueline S. Hebert
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Evans AR, Tetsworth K, Quinnan S, Wixted JJ. Transcutaneous osseointegration for amputees. OTA Int 2024; 7:e326. [PMID: 38487401 PMCID: PMC10936159 DOI: 10.1097/oi9.0000000000000326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Transcutaneous osseointegration for amputees (TOFA) is an evolving technology that has the potential to revolutionize the interface between the amputee and their prosthesis, showing potential at many levels of amputation. While no amputation is without its challenges, TOFA requires a highly specialized prosthesis and a multidisciplinary team that includes specialized surgeons, physical therapists, wound care teams, and social workers who guide the amputee through surgery, postoperative rehabilitation, and the chronic wound care that goes into maintaining the prosthesis. The infrastructure required to facilitate care pathways that lead to reliable, successful outcomes are unique in each health care setting, including those in advanced health care systems such as the United States and Australia. This article details the emerging evidence supporting the use of this prosthetic interface design and many of the challenges that providers face when establishing programs to offer this type of care in the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew R. Evans
- Orthopedic Trauma Service, Department of Orthopedics, The Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University/Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
| | - Kevin Tetsworth
- Trauma & Limb Reconstruction Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Low J, Hoellwarth JS, Akhtar MA, Tetsworth K, Al-Muderis M. Transfemoral amputation versus knee arthrodesis for failed total knee replacement: A systematic review of outcomes. Knee 2024; 47:63-80. [PMID: 38245922 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2023.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The options available to salvage a failed total knee replacement (TKR) include transfemoral amputation (TFA) and knee arthrodesis (KA). This systematic review aims to evaluate outcomes following either TFA or KA, comparing ambulatory status, additional subsequent surgery, postoperative infection, pain, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and mortality rate. METHODS A literature search was conducted in EMBASE, Ovid Medline, and PubMed. Only primary research studies were included and data were independently extracted using a standardized form. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS Forty-four papers were included, comprising 470 TFA and 1034 KA patients. The methodological quality of the studies was moderate. No TFA versus KA randomized controlled trials could be identified. Pooled data totals via subgroup analyses were performed, owing to inconsistent reporting methods in the included studies. Prosthesis use rate by TFA patients was 157/316 = 49.7%. Significant differences included that TFA patients had lower rates of ambulatory capacity than KA patients (139/294 = 45.6% versus 248/287 = 86.4%, p < 0.001), TFA ambulators were less likely to use an ambulatory aid (55/135 = 40.7% versus 167/232 = 72.0%, p < 0.001), and TFA was associated with a greater postoperative infection rate than KA (29/118 = 24.6% versus 129/650 = 17.2%, p = 0.054). There was a similar rate of revision surgery between TFA and KA (37/183 = 20.2% versus 145/780 = 18.6%, p = 0.612). Data on HRQoL for both TFA and KA were limited, contradictory, and heterogeneous. CONCLUSION No randomized controlled trials comparing TFA versus KA exist;therefore, current data likely reflects substantial selection bias. The currently available evidence suggests that KA patients are significantly more likely to achieve independent bipedal ambulation than TFA patients. In both treatment cohorts, subsequent infection and revision surgery remain a relatively common occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juin Low
- The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
| | - Jason Shih Hoellwarth
- Limb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction Service, Osseointegration Limb Replacement Centre, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, United States
| | - Muhammad Adeel Akhtar
- The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; University of St. Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin Tetsworth
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; University of Queensland School of Medicine, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Munjed Al-Muderis
- The University of Notre Dame Australia, Auburn, New South Wales, Australia; Limb Reconstruction Centre, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie Park, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alam SH, Hoellwarth J, Tetsworth K, Oomatia A, Taylor T, Al Muderis M. Development of an evidence-based diagnostic algorithm for infection in patients with transcutaneous osseointegration following amputation. J Bone Jt Infect 2024; 9:49-57. [PMID: 38600998 PMCID: PMC11002918 DOI: 10.5194/jbji-9-49-2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Transcutaneous osseointegration following amputation (TOFA) confers better mobility and quality of life for most patients versus socket prosthesis rehabilitation. Peri-TOFA infection remains the most frequent complication and lacks an evidence-based diagnostic algorithm. This study's objective was to investigate preoperative factors associated with positive intraoperative cultures among patients suspected of having peri-TOFA infection in order to create an evidence-based diagnostic algorithm. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 83 surgeries (70 patients) performed to manage suspected lower-extremity peri-TOFA infection at a specialty orthopedic practice and tertiary referral hospital in a major urban center. The diagnosis of infection was defined as positive intraoperative cultures. Preoperative patient history (fevers, subjective pain, increased drainage), physician examination findings (local cellulitis, purulent discharge, implant looseness), and laboratory data (white blood cell count, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and external swab culture) were evaluated for association with subsequent positive intraoperative cultures using regression and area under receiver-operator curve (AUC) modeling. Results: Peri-implant limb pain (highly correlated with infection), ESR > 30 (highly correlated against infection), positive preoperative swab (moderately correlated with infection), gross implant motion (moderately correlated against infection), and erythema or cellulitis of the transcutaneous region (mildly correlated with infection) were variables included in the best AUC model, which achieved an 85 % positive predictive value. Other clinical findings and laboratory values (notably CRP and WBC) were non-predictive of infection. Conclusions: This seminal investigation to develop a preoperative diagnostic algorithm for peri-TOFA infection suggests that the clinical examination remains paramount. Further evaluation of a wider spectrum of clinical, laboratory, and imaging data, consistently and routinely collected with prospective data techniques in larger cohorts of patients, is necessary to create a robust predictive algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shafaf Hasin Alam
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Rd, Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102, Australia
| | - Jason S. Hoellwarth
- Limb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction Service, Osseointegration Limb Replacement Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Kevin Tetsworth
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland, Australia
| | - Atiya Oomatia
- Limb Reconstruction Centre, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia
| | - Tristen N. Taylor
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston TX. 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Munjed Al Muderis
- Limb Reconstruction Centre, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hoellwarth JS, Reif TJ, Mori S, Kang R, Magro CM. Horrifying Basal Cell Carcinoma Presenting as Progressive Pyoderma Gangrenosum: Case Report. Case Rep Oncol 2024; 17:298-304. [PMID: 38371171 PMCID: PMC10870126 DOI: 10.1159/000536445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Skin ulcers can be challenging to diagnose and manage, particularly with comorbid autoimmune and gastrointestinal diseases. Occam's razor encourages the simplest explanation to guide care, but reconsideration must occur when intervention proves futile. Case Presentation We report the case of a 70-year-old male, with a 17-year history of expanding pretibial skin ulcer, presumed by prior care providers to be pyoderma gangrenosum related to Crohn's disease. A surgical biopsy performed upon presentation to our institution revealed basal cell carcinoma of the skin, invasive to the proximal tibia with associated deep infection, prompting transfemoral amputation. Conclusion This report is written as a reminder to reconsider a diagnosis and consider seeking additional expertise when a patient's condition progressively worsens despite intervention. Earlier diagnosis likely would have facilitated therapeutic limb salvage care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason S. Hoellwarth
- Limb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Taylor J. Reif
- Limb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shoko Mori
- Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel Kang
- Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cynthia M. Magro
- Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Malak A, Parr WCH, Levien AS, Basa RM. Limb sparing in a cat with a humeral osteosarcoma using a customised three-dimensional printed endoprosthesis. JFMS Open Rep 2023; 9:20551169231199445. [PMID: 37810574 PMCID: PMC10559718 DOI: 10.1177/20551169231199445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Case summary A 12-year-old male neutered Bengal cat presented for a left thoracic limb lameness of several weeks' duration. Abnormal advanced imaging findings depicted the presence of an irregularly marginated osteolytic lesion in the proximal-mid diaphysis of the left humerus. A histopathological evaluation of the humerus confirmed a diagnosis of osteoblastic osteosarcoma. Limb-sparing surgery was planned with a custom-designed three-dimensional printed endoprosthesis. Mild neuropraxia was noted immediately postoperatively and deemed to have resolved by the 2-week follow-up. Stereotactic radiation was planned, though pulmonary metastasis was noted on planning CT. The cat was euthanased 90 days postoperatively owing to the development of pulmonary clinical signs. Relevance and novel information This is the first reported case of a humeral limb salvage procedure in a cat using a custom-designed three-dimensional printed endoprosthesis. Although the survival time in this case was short, the patient maintained an adequate quality of life and limb function was preserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Malak
- Veterinary Specialists of Sydney, Miranda, NSW, Australia
| | - William CH Parr
- Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Rachel M Basa
- Veterinary Specialists of Sydney, Miranda, NSW, Australia
- Sydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hoellwarth JS, Oomatia A, Tetsworth K, Vrazas E, Al Muderis M. Bone density changes after five or more years of unilateral lower extremity osseointegration: Observational cohort study. Bone Rep 2023; 18:101682. [PMID: 37205925 PMCID: PMC10189091 DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2023.101682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Rehabilitation following lower extremity amputation presents multiple challenges, many related to the traditional prosthesis (TP) socket. Without skeletal loading, bone density also rapidly decreases. Transcutaneous osseointegration for amputees (TOFA) surgically implants a metal prosthesis attachment directly into the residual bone, facilitating direct skeletal loading. Quality of life and mobility are consistently reported to be significantly superior with TOFA than TP. Objective To investigate how femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2) changes for unilateral transfemoral and transtibial amputees at least five years following single-stage press-fit osseointegration. Methods Registry review was performed of five transfemoral and four transtibial unilateral amputees who had dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) performed preoperatively and after at least five years. The average BMD was compared using Student's t-test (significance p < .05). First, all nine Amputated versus Intact limbs. Second, the five patients with local disuse osteoporosis (ipsilateral femoral neck T-score < -2.5) versus the four whose T-score was greater than -2.5. Results The average Amputated Limb BMD was significantly less than the Intact Limb, both Before Osseointegration (0.658 ± 0.150 vs 0.929 ± 0.089, p < .001) and After Osseointegration (0.720 ± 0.096 vs 0.853 ± 0.116, p = .018). The Intact Limb BMD decreased significantly during the study period (0.929 ± 0.089 to 0.853 ± 0.116, p = .020), while the Amputated Limb BMD increased a not statistically significant amount (0.658 ± 0.150 to 0.720 ± 0.096, p = .347). By coincidence, all transfemoral amputees had local disuse osteoporosis (BMD 0.545 ± 0.066), and all transtibial patients did not (BMD 0.800 ± 0.081, p = .003). The local disuse osteoporosis cohort eventually had a greater average BMD (not statistically significant) than the cohort without local disuse osteoporosis (0.739 ± 0.100 vs 0.697 ± 0.101, p = .556). Conclusions Single-stage press-fit TOFA may facilitate significant BMD improvement to unilateral lower extremity amputees with local disuse osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Shih Hoellwarth
- Limb Lengthening and Complex Reconstruction Service, Osseointegration Limb Replacement Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York 10021, NY, USA
- Corresponding author.
| | - Atiya Oomatia
- Limb Reconstruction Centre, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia
| | - Kevin Tetsworth
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland, Australia
| | - Elisabeth Vrazas
- Macquarie School of Medicine Macquarie University, Suite 305, Level 3/2 Technology Pl, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Munjed Al Muderis
- Limb Reconstruction Centre, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hoellwarth JS, Tetsworth K, Akhtar MA, Al Muderis M. Transcutaneous Osseointegration for Amputees: What Is It, How Did It Evolve, and What May Develop? CURRENT PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION REPORTS 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s40141-023-00376-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
10
|
Akhtar MA, Hoellwarth JS, Tetsworth K, Oomatia A, Al Muderis M. Osseointegration Following Transfemoral Amputation After Infected Total Knee Replacement: A Case Series of 10 Patients With a Mean Follow-up of 5 Years. Arthroplast Today 2022; 16:21-30. [PMID: 35620587 PMCID: PMC9126745 DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Adeel Akhtar
- Trauma and Orthopaedic Department, Victoria Hospital Kirkcaldy, NHS Fife, Kirkcaldy, Scotland, UK
| | - Jason Shih Hoellwarth
- Limb Salvage and Amputation Reconstruction Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Corresponding author. Limb Salvage and Amputation Reconstruction Center, 535 East 70th Street, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA. Tel.: +1 212 606 1000.
| | - Kevin Tetsworth
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Queensland, Australia
| | - Atiya Oomatia
- Limb Reconstruction Centre, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia
| | - Munjed Al Muderis
- Limb Reconstruction Centre, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Australia
| |
Collapse
|