Lv ZW, Li YC, Jia L, Chi BR. Infusion of ulinastatin via the pancreatic duct for prophylaxis of pancreatic injury after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in dogs.
Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2012;
20:467-472. [DOI:
10.11569/wcjd.v20.i6.467]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the prophylactic effect of infusion of ulinastatin via the pancreatic duct on pancreatic injury after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in a canine model.
METHODS: Twenty-four dogs were randomized into three groups: ulinastatin group (group A), iobitridol group (group B) and normal group (group C). A duodenoscope was routinely inserted to the duodenal papilla under general anesthesia in dogs of each group. A guide wire was introduced into the bile duct in groups A and B to inject 10.0 mL of iobitridol, and the guide wire was then introduced into the pancreatic duct to slowly administer 100 000 units of ulinastatin and 8.0 mL of sodium chloride in group A and 10.0 mL of sodium chloride in group B. Five minutes later, 10.0 mL of iobitrdol was transfused into the pancreatic ducts in both groups within less than 1 min. A guide wire was introduced into the bile duct in group C to administer 10.0 mL of iobitridol. The contents of serum IL-6, IL-8, amylase and plasma TAP were determined by ELISA. Pancreatic tissues were pathologically examined 6 days after ERCP.
RESULTS: The contents of serum IL-6, IL-8, amylase and plasma TAP were significantly lower in group A than in group B (391.0 U/L ± 67.2 U/L vs 1 077.0 U/L ± 246.1 U/L, 51.91 ng/L ± 4.87 ng/L vs 78.11 ng/L ± 11.25 ng/L,
4.070 μg/L ± 0.089 μg/L vs 4.520 μg/L ± 0.195 μg/L, 3.234 nmol/L ± 0.185 nmol/L vs
4.001 nmol/L ± 0.237 nmol/L (all P < 0.05), and significantly higher in groups A and B than in group C. Under light microscopy, the pathological changes in pancreatic tissues in the ulinastatin group were less significant than those in other groups.
CONCLUSION: Pancreatic injury induced by ERCP could be ameliorated effectively and safety by infusion of ulinastatin via the pancreatic duct in dogs.
Collapse