[Clinical practice guideline on asthma (part II)]

[Recurrent wheezing in three year-olds: facts and opportunities]

The 3 year-old group of children has an increased incidence and prevalence of recurrent wheezing episodes. There are different subgroups, who give different inflammatory responses to different triggering agents, and subgroups that differ in aetiopathology and immunopathology. Current diagnostic methods (exhaled nitric oxide in multiple breaths, nitric oxide in exhaled air condensate, induced sputum, broncho-alveolar lavage and endo-bronchial biopsy), enable the inflammatory pattern to be identified and to give the most effective and safe treatment. The various therapeutic options for treatment are reviewed, such as inhaled glucocorticoids when the inflammatory phenotype is eosinophilic, and leukotriene receptor antagonists, when the inflammatory phenotype is predominantly neutrophilic. In accordance with the current recommendations, for the diagnosis as well as for the therapy initiated in children of this age, they must be regularly reviewed, so that if the benefit is not clear, the treatment must be stopped and an alternative diagnosis and treatment considered. The start of treatment should be determined depending on the intensity and frequency of the symptoms, with the aim of decreasing morbidity and increasing the quality of life of the patient.

[Variability in peak expiratory flow does not classify asthma according to severity]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether variability in peak expiratory flow (PEF) could be used to classify the level of severity of asthma in children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 387 boys and girls diagnosed with asthma and classified severity according to clinical criteria (Spanish Society of Pediatric Pneumology). PEF variability was determined using a portable mini-Wright peak flow meter (Clement Clarke International, London, UK; range, 50 L/min-800 L/min) over a 14-day period, with no changes in normal treatment. The following indices were used to calculate PEF variability: 1) difference between morning PEF and nighttime PEF, expressed as a percentage of the mean value of the PEF measurements taken on that day; 2) minimum PEF rate during a week, expressed as a percentage of the highest value recorded during that week; 3) difference between the highest and the lowest PEF values, expressed as a percentage of the highest value; and 4) the 10th percentile of PEF values recorded during a week, expressed as a percentage of the highest value recorded during that week. We assessed agreement between clinical classification and PEF variability using the weighted kappa coefficient. We also analyzed the sensitivity and specificity of PEF variability indices for episodic and persistent asthma.

RESULTS

The analysis of levels of agreement between clinical classification of asthma and formulas 1, 2, 3, and 4 gave quadratic weighted kappa coefficients of 0.494, 0, 0.488, and 0.346, respectively. The results were similar when patients were grouped and analyzed by type of asthma (episodic or persistent asthma).

CONCLUSIONS

The monitoring of PEF variability, a recommendation common in national and international guidelines on the management of asthma in children, is not valid for classifying severity of asthma in children.