Non-malignant central airway obstruction

The most common causes of non-malignant central airway obstruction are post-intubation and post-tracheostomytracheal stenosis, followed by the presence of foreign bodies, benign endobronchial tumours and tracheobronchomalacia. Other causes, such as infectious processes or systemic diseases, are less frequent. Despite the existence of numerous classification systems, a consensus has not been reached on the use of any one of them in particular. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of this entity has allowed us to improve diagnosis and treatment. For the correct diagnosis of nonspecific clinical symptoms, pulmonary function tests, radiological studies and, more importantly, bronchoscopy must be performed. Treatment must be multidisciplinary and tailored to each patient, and will require surgery or endoscopic intervention using thermoablative and mechanical techniques.

Validity and reliability of transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosing mediastinal adenopathies

Background

The aim is to assess the validity and reliability of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) of mediastinal and hilar adenopathies and to evaluate factors predictive of TBNA outcome.

Methods

We performed an analysis of prospectively collected data of patients (n = 580) who underwent TBNA (n = 685) from January 1998 to December 2007 in our center. Validity and reliability were evaluated for the overall sample and according to specific pathology. Factors predicting the successful acquisition of diagnostic samples were analyzed by multivariate analysis.

Results

Overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive (NPV) values for TBNA were 68%, 100%, 68.8%, 100%, and 10%, respectively. The most sensitive and accurate TBNAs were obtained for patients with small cell lung carcinoma and the worst results were for patients with lymphomas. NPV were similar for all pathologies. The most predictive factors of outcome were adenopathy size and the presence of indirect signs at the puncture site.

Conclusion

The sensitivity and accuracy of TBNA are high in small cell lung cancer, followed by other types of carcinoma, sarcoidosis, and tuberculosis, and low for lymphoproliferative diseases. The NPV of TBNA for all individual pathologies is low. The size of the adenopathy and the presence of indirect signs at the puncture site predict the achievement of diagnostic samples.

[Bronchoalveolar lavage findings in patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease: prospective study of a cohort of 562 patients]

OBJECTIVE

Study of the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid in some interstitial lung diseases can reveal patterns typical to each disease and that can support the diagnosis. The objective of this study was to perform a descriptive analysis of the cytologic study and of the lymphocyte subpopulations in BAL fluid from patients with interstitial lung disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective, observational study of 562 patients between January 1991 and January 2005, BAL fluid was analyzed to determine the distribution of cell populations and of lymphocyte subsets: CD3, CD4, CD8, CD3(+)CD4(-)CD8(-), and CD56.

RESULTS

The mean age was 53.4 years and 53.3% of the patients were women. The following diseases were studied: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (n=132), sarcoidosis (n=123), connective tissue diseases (n=133), cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (n=89), and extrinsic allergic alveolitis (n=85). Isolated lymphocytic alveolitis was common in sarcoidosis and extrinsic allergic alveolitis. Mixed alveolitis was the most common pattern in the other interstitial lung diseases. The CD4:CD8 ratio was the most useful parameter. It was high in sarcoidosis (median, 2.3); the ratio was low or inverted in the other interstitial lung diseases, with median values of 1.76 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, 0.45 in extrinsic allergic alveolitis, 0.35 in cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, and 0.33 in the connective tissue diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

BAL parameters, in association with clinical and radiologic data, help to discriminate between interstitial lung diseases. BAL should therefore be considered a very useful tool in clinical management, particularly when pulmonary biopsy is not conclusive or is not possible.