Trends in Racial/Ethnic Disparity of Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults with and without Cancer (1998–2012)

Racial/Ethnic Disparities: Discrimination's Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life-An All of Us Cancer Survivors' Cross-sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Discrimination is associated with worse mental and physical health outcomes. However, the associations among cancer survivors are limited.

OBJECTIVE

We examined whether discrimination is associated with HRQoL and whether adjusting for it reduces racial/ethnic disparities in HRQoL among cancer survivors.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data from adult cancer survivors who completed surveys on discrimination in the medical settings (DMS), everyday perceived discrimination (PD), and HRQoL in the "All of Us" Program from 2018 to 2022 were assessed. We created a binary indicator for fair-to-poor vs. good-to-excellent physical health and mental health. PD and DMS scores were a continuous measure with higher scores reflecting more discrimination. Multivariable logistic regression models tested whether DMS and PD are associated with HRQoL and whether they differently affect the association between race/ethnicity and HRQoL.

RESULTS

The sample (N = 16,664) of cancer survivors was predominantly White (86%) and female (59%), with a median age of 69. Every 5-unit increase in DMS and PD scores was associated with greater odds of fair-to-poor physical health (DMS: OR [95%CI] = 1.66 [1.55, 1.77], PD: 1.33 [1.27, 1.40]) and mental health (DMS: 1.57 [1.47, 1.69], PD: 1.33 [1.27, 1.39]). After adjusting for DMS or PD, Black and Hispanic survivors had a decreased likelihood of fair-to-poor physical health and mental health (decrease estimate range: - 6 to - 30%) compared to White survivors. This effect was greater for Black survivors when adjusting for PD, as the odds of fair-to-poor mental health compared to White survivors were no longer statistically significant (1.78 [1.32, 2.34] vs 1.22 [0.90, 1.64]).

CONCLUSION

Experiences of discrimination are associated with lower HRQoL and reducing it may mitigate racial/ethnic disparities in HRQoL.

A randomized controlled trial of gamification to increase physical activity among black and Hispanic breast and prostate cancer survivors: Rationale and design of the ALLSTAR clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Survivors of breast and prostate cancer, especially those that are Black and/or Hispanic, are at high risk for cardiovascular events. Physical activity can reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in cancer survivors, but Black and Hispanic people are less likely to engage in routine physical activity. Concepts from behavioral economics have been used to design scalable, low-touch gamification interventions that increase physical activity in individuals at high risk for cardiovascular events, but the effectiveness of these strategies in Black and Hispanic survivors of breast and prostate cancer is uncertain.

STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES

ALLSTAR (NCT05176756) is a pragmatic, virtual randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a gamification intervention informed by behavioral economic concepts to increase daily physical activity in Black and Hispanic breast and prostate cancer survivors who received cardiotoxic therapies and have additional risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Patients are either referred by their cancer care team or identified by electronic health record searches; contacted by letter, email, text message and/or phone; and complete enrollment and informed consent on the Penn Way to Health online platform. Patients are then provided with a wearable fitness tracker, establish a baseline daily step count, set a goal to increase daily step count by 1,500-3,000 steps from baseline, and are randomized 1:1 to control or gamification. Interventions continue for 6 months, with follow-up for an additional 3 months to evaluate the durability of behavior change. The trial has met its enrollment goal of 150 participants, with a primary endpoint of change from baseline in daily steps over the 6-month intervention period. Key secondary endpoints include change from baseline in daily steps over the 3-month post-intervention follow-up period, change in moderate to vigorous physical activity over the intervention and follow-up periods, and change in patient-reported measures of physical function, fatigue, and overall quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

ALLSTAR is a virtual, pragmatic randomized clinical trial powered to demonstrate whether gamification is superior to control in increasing physical activity in Black and Hispanic breast and prostate cancer survivors. Its results will have important implications for strategies to promote physical activity in survivors of breast and prostate cancer, specifically among minority populations.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05176756.

Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Meeting Physical Activity Guidelines among Female Breast Cancer Survivors in the United States

BACKGROUND

Cancer survivors show low physical activity participation rates in the United States. However, there are limited national-level data on disparities in the prevalence of meeting physical activity guidelines among women with and without breast cancer. We aimed to evaluate national-level trends in meeting physical activity guidelines across demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of breast cancer survivors and women without cancer.

METHODS

Data for women ≥35 years of age with and without breast cancer were obtained from the 2004 to 2018 National Health Interview Survey. We used National Health Interview Survey sample weights to generate national-level prevalence estimates and calculate absolute and relative indices of disparity for breast cancer survivors and women without cancer meeting aerobic (150 minutes/week) and muscle-strengthening guidelines (2 sessions/week) stratified by demographic (e.g., race/ethnicity) and socioeconomic (e.g., homeownership) characteristics.

RESULTS

We included 5,845 breast cancer survivors and 160,162 women without cancer. The weighted percentage of breast cancer survivors meeting aerobic guidelines was 37.7% compared with 40.9% of women without cancer. Fewer women met muscle-strengthening guidelines. There were lower proportions of women who were younger (<50-years), were non-Hispanic Black, were Hispanic, worked 35+ hours/week, or rented their home among breast cancer survivors meeting aerobic guidelines compared with women without cancer meeting aerobic guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer survivors were less likely to meet physical activity guidelines compared with women without cancer. Demographic and socioeconomic disparities may exist among breast cancer survivors and women without cancer meeting physical activity guidelines.

IMPACT

Targeted interventions may be necessary to address low physical activity participation among breast cancer survivors.

Trends in racial and ethnic disparities in health-related quality of life in older adults with lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to quantitatively examine differences in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) by race/ethnicity among older adults with lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (SEER-MHOS) data set, we identified two cohorts of patients ≥65 years old with lung cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 who completed the health outcomes survey within 36 months pre- and post-diagnosis. The Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) were used to measure HRQOL. Racial/ethnic groups were White, Black, Asian, and Hispanic. Univariate (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) linear regression analyses with pairwise contrasts assessed disparities among the racial/ethnic groups. MVA models were adjusted for sex, age, marital status, education, income, year diagnosed, comorbidity count, limitations in activities of daily living, national region, histology, and treatment type (post-diagnosis cohort only).

RESULTS

We identified 4025 patients in the pre-diagnosis cohort (White = 75.9 %, Asian = 6.3 %, Black = 8.7 %, and Hispanic = 6.1 %; stages I = 28.8 %, II = 8.9 %, III = 21.7 %, IV = 27.8 %, unknown = 12.7 %) and 2465 patients in the post-diagnosis cohort (White = 74.4 %, Asian = 7.8 %, Black = 8.8 %, and Hispanic = 5.8 %; stages I = 40.2 %, II = 14.1 %, III = 17.5 %, IV = 10.7 %, unknown = 17.5 %; treatment type radiation alone = 46.5 %, radiation and surgery = 26.8 %, surgery alone = N < 11, neither surgery nor radiation = N 〈300). Upon pre-diagnosis cohort UVA, White and Asian patients had higher mean MCS scores than Black and Hispanic patients (51.3 and 52.7 vs 47.4 and 47.4, respectively; p < .001 and p < .001), White patients had higher mean PCS scores than Black patients (38.6 vs 36.0; p < .001), and Asian patients had higher mean PCS scores than White, Black, and Hispanic patients (40.7 vs 38.6, 36.0 and 37.5, respectively; p = .008, p < .001, and p = .005). On pre-diagnosis MVA, White and Asian patients had higher mean MCS scores than Hispanic patients (51.2 and 52.0, respectively, vs 47.2; p < .001). On pre-diagnosis MVA, Asian patients had higher mean PCS scores than White patients (52.0 and 51.2; p = .002).On post-diagnosis UVA, White and Asian patients had higher mean MCS scores than Black patients (48.9 and 48.9, respectively, vs 46.3; p = .006 and p = .042), White patients had higher mean MCS scores than Hispanic patients (48.9 vs 46.1; p = .015), White patients had higher mean PCS scores than Black patients (33.8 vs 31.9; p = .018), and Hispanic patients had higher mean PCS scores than Black patients (34.9 vs. 31.9; p = .019). On post-diagnosis MVA, race/ethnicity was no longer associated with differing MCS or PCS.

DISCUSSION

Among older patients with lung cancer, those identifying as White or Asian had higher pre-diagnosis mental HRQOL than Hispanic patients. However, HRQOL differences before diagnosis among all racial/ethnic groups were no longer significant after cancer diagnosis and treatment. Understanding these patterns of HRQOL can be used for more pointed initiatives to improve therapeutic strategy, compliance, goals of care, and treatment-related morbidity.

Factors associated with self-reports of limitations in activities of daily living among Medicare Fee-for-Service recipients

BACKGROUND

Physical function is an important indicator of physical health and predicts mortality. This study identified characteristics associated with limitations in Medicare recipients' activities of daily living.

METHODS

2019 Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Fee-for-Service Medicare Survey data: 79,725 respondents (34% response rate) who were 65 and older and 53% female; 7% Black, 5% Hispanic, 4% Asian American, Native Hawaiian, or other Pacific Islander, 2% Multiracial, 1% American Indian/Alaskan Native; 35% with high school education or less. Walking, getting in and out of chairs, bathing, dressing, toileting, and eating (scored as having no difficulty versus being able to do with difficulty or unable to do) and a scale of these items were regressed on patient characteristics.

RESULTS

After adjustment for all characteristics, function limitations were found for those who smoked (effect sizes of significant associations range .04-.13), had chronic health conditions (.02-.33), were 85 years or older (.09-.46), needed assistance completing the survey (.32-1.29), were female (.05-.07), and had low income and assets (.15-.47).

CONCLUSIONS

These nationally representative U.S. estimates of physical function characteristics are useful for interventions for vulnerable population subgroups.

A scoping review of racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities in the outcomes of older adults with cancer

INTRODUCTION

Cancer health disparities are widespread. Nevertheless, the disparities in outcomes among diverse survivors of cancer ages 65 years and older ("older") have not been systematically evaluated.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of original research articles published between January 2016 and September 2023 and indexed in Medline (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL databases. We included studies evaluating racial, ethnic, socioeconomic disadvantaged, geographic, sexual and gender, and/or persons with disabilities disparities in treatment, survivorship, and mortality among older survivors of cancer. We excluded studies with no a priori aims related to a health disparity, review articles, conference proceedings, meeting abstracts, studies with unclear methodologies, and articles in which the disparity group was examined only as an analytic covariate. Two reviewers independently extracted data following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis reporting guidelines.

RESULTS

After searching and removing duplicates, 2573 unique citations remained and after screening 59 articles met the inclusion criteria. Many investigated more than one health disparity, and most focused on racial and ethnic (n = 44) or socioeconomic (n = 25) disparities; only 10 studies described geographic disparities, and none evaluated disparities in persons with disabilities or due to sexual and gender identity. Research investigating disparities in outcomes among diverse older survivors of cancer is increasing gradually-68% of eligible articles were published between 2020 and 2023. Most studies focused on the treatment phase of care (n = 28) and mortality (n = 26), with 16 examined disparities in survivorship, symptoms, or quality of life. Most research was descriptive and lacked analyses of potential underlying mechanisms contributing to the reported disparities.

CONCLUSION

Little research has evaluated the effect of strategies to reduce health disparities among older patients with cancer. This lack of evidence perpetuates cancer inequities and leaves the cancer care system ill equipped to address the unique needs of the rapidly growing and increasingly diverse older adult cancer population.

Do Contemporary Cancer Survivors Experience Better Quality of Life? Evaluating a Decade of SEER Medicare Health Outcomes Survey Data

BACKGROUND

A cancer diagnosis may have deleterious effects on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as adults age. This study examined differences in HRQOL between cancer and matched noncancer Medicare beneficiaries over 65, within and across two time periods.

METHODS

We used novel matching methods on data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (MHOS) data resource. We matched SEER-MHOS respondents with cancer from a recent period (2015-2019) to respondents with cancer from an earlier period (2008-2012). We then matched these two cohorts, without replacement, to contemporary cohorts without cancer diagnoses. We estimated Veteran's RAND 12-Item Short Form Survey Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores for all cohorts.

RESULTS

Our analysis found significantly higher mean MCS scores in the recent period for those with cancer relative to the recent noncancer control group. Breast and lung cancer presented positive and statistically significant trends. We found statistically insignificant differences in PCS scores between the two time periods. No cancer sites had different PCS scores over time compared with the comparison group.

CONCLUSIONS

Mental health for those with cancer improved more between 2008 and 2019 than a matched noncancer comparison group. Physical health remained stable across time. These findings highlight the importance of including a matched noncancer group when evaluating HRQOL outcomes.

IMPACT

SEER-MHOS respondents with cancer report stable PCS scores across 15 years of data and higher MCS scores relative to noncancer controls.

Change in quality of life of stage IA non-small cell lung cancer after surgery or radiation therapy

Background

Few studies have examined the differential impact of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on quality of life (QoL) during the first post-treatment year.

Methods

A prospective cohort of stage IA NSCLC patients undergoing surgery or SBRT at Mount Sinai Health System had QoL measured before treatment, and 2, 6, and 12 months post-treatment using: 12-item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2) [physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)], Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung Cancer Subscale (FACT-LCS), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) measuring depression and anxiety. Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) was fitted to identify the best interval knot for the change in the QoL trends post-treatment, adjusted piecewise linear mixed effects model was developed to estimate differences in baseline, 2- and 12-month scores, and rates of change.

Results

In total, 503 (88.6%) patients received surgery and 65 (11.4%) SBRT. LOWESS plots suggested QoL changed at 2 months post-surgery. Worsening in PCS was observed for both surgery and SBRT within 2 months after treatment but was only significant for surgical patients (-2.11, P<0.001). Two months later, improvements were observed for surgical but not SBRT patients (0.63 vs. -0.30, P<0.001). Surgical patients had significantly better PCS (P<0.001) and FACT-LCS (P<0.001) scores 1-year post-treatment compared to baseline, but not SBRT patients. Both surgical and SBRT patients reported significantly less anxiety 1-year post-treatment compared to baseline (P<0.001 and P=0.03). Decrease in depression from baseline to 1-year post-treatment was only significant for surgical patients (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Post-treatment, surgical patients exhibited improvements in physical health and reductions in lung cancer symptoms following initial deterioration within the first two months; in contrast, SBRT patients showed persistent decline in these areas throughout the year. Nonetheless, improved mental health was noted across both patient categories post-treatment. Targeted interventions and continuous monitoring are recommended during the initial 2 months post-surgery and throughout the year post-SBRT to alleviate physical and mental distress in patients.

Access to cancer clinical trials for racialised older adults: an equity-focused rapid scoping review protocol

BACKGROUND

The intersection of race and older age compounds existing health disparities experienced by historically marginalised communities. Therefore, racialised older adults with cancer are more disadvantaged in their access to cancer clinical trials compared with age-matched counterparts. To determine what has already been published in this area, the rapid scoping review question are: what are the barriers, facilitators and potential solutions for enhancing access to cancer clinical trials among racialised older adults?

METHODS

We will use a rapid scoping review methodology in which we follow the six-step framework of Arksey and O'Malley, including a systematic search of the literature with abstract and full-text screening to be conducted by two independent reviewers, data abstraction by one reviewer and verification by a second reviewer using an Excel data abstraction sheet. Articles focusing on persons aged 18 and over who identify as a racialised person with cancer, that describe therapies/therapeutic interventions/prevention/outcomes related to barriers, facilitators and solutions to enhancing access to and equity in cancer clinical trials will be eligible for inclusion in this rapid scoping review.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

All data will be extracted from published literature. Hence, ethical approval and patient informed consent are not required. The findings of the scoping review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at international conferences.

Mediational roles of stress-coping factors in the relationship between patient-perceived communication quality and physical functioning: racial difference between Chinese and Non-Hispanic White American breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE

The assumption that patient-provider communication may mediate patients' sense of control over cancer to affect health outcomes has limited evidence. This study examines whether patient-perceived cancer care communication quality (PPCQ) mediates stress appraisal and coping behavior, affecting physical functioning across different racial groups.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty Chinese American and 216 non-Hispanic White (NHW) women (ages 28-80) with stage 0-III breast cancer, 1-5 years post-diagnosis, and without recurrence, enrolled and completed a cross-sectional telephone survey. Physical functioning was measured by the NIH-PROMIS short form. Validated measures of PPCQ, patients' evaluation of their socioeconomic well-being, stress appraisal (perceived severity and control), use of coping strategies, treatment-related symptoms, and comorbidities were also assessed. Path analyses were used to examine the mediation for each racial group.

RESULTS

Regardless of race, treatment-related symptoms, comorbidities, and socioeconomic well-being were all directly related to physical functioning (p < 0.05). The impact of PPCQ on physical functioning was mediated by perceived control in the Chinese American group (p < 0.05), but not in the NHW group. Perceived severity and coping were not mediators of physical functioning in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The mediational pathway from PPCQ to perceived control to physical functioning in Chinese American survivors may be partially explained by their lower socioeconomic well-being and culturally valued conformity to physicians as a medical authority. These sociocultural dynamics reinforce the importance of cancer care communication. For NHW survivors, the impact of treatment-related symptoms and socioeconomic well-being on physical functioning outweighed their PPCQ and perceived control.

Investigating the Relationship Between Physical Activity Disparities and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Black People With Knee Osteoarthritis

INTRODUCTION

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis, which is a leading cause of disability. Although no cure exists for knee OA, physical activity has been shown to improve functionality, which can improve an individual's health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). However, racial disparities exist in participating in physical activity, which can result in Black people with knee OA experiencing lower HR-QOL compared with their White counterparts. The purpose of this study was to investigate disparities of physical activity and related determinants, specifically pain and depression, and how these constructs explain why Black people with knee OA experience low HR-QOL.

METHODS

Data were from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, a multicenter longitudinal study that collected data from people with knee OA. The study used a serial mediation model to test whether a change in scores for pain, depression, and physical activity over 96 months mediated the effects between race and HR-QOL.

RESULTS

Analysis of variance models found Black race to be associated with high pain, depression, and lower physical activity and HR-QOL at baseline and month 96. The findings supported the prospective multi-mediation model, which found pain, depression, and physical activity to mediate between race and HR-QOL (β = -0.11, SE = 0.047; 95% CI, -0.203 to -0.016).

CONCLUSION

Disparities in pain, depression, and physical activity could explain why Black people with knee OA experience lower HR-QOL compared with their White counterparts. Future interventions should address sources of pain and depression disparities by improving health care delivery. Additionally, designing race- and culture-appropriate community physical activity programs would help to achieve physical activity equity.

Understanding men's beliefs and concerns about linking health data in the context of precision medicine

Background/Objective

Linking data is a critical feature of precision medicine initiatives that involves integrating information from multiple sources to improve researchers' and clinicians' ability to deliver care. We have limited understanding of how individuals perceive linking data as it relates to precision medicine. The aim of this study was to identify how sociodemographics, comorbidities, and beliefs about precision medicine influence two outcomes related to linking data: beliefs about linking data and concerns about linking data among men.

Methods

We recruited 124 adult men from primary care practices at a large clinical research university to complete a cross-sectional survey that included questions about sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, beliefs, benefits, and limitations of precision medicine, and two outcomes of interest: beliefs about the value of linking data and concerns about linking data. Descriptive statistics, bivariate associations, and multivariable regression were conducted.

Results

Participants had positive beliefs about linking data for precision medicine (M = 4.05/5) and average concern about linking data (M = 2.1/5). Final multivariable models revealed that higher levels of loneliness are associated with more positive beliefs about linking data (β = 0.41, p = 0.027). Races other than African American (β = -0.64, p = 0.009) and those with lower perceived limitations of precision medicine were less likely to be concerned about linking data (β = -0.75, p = 0.0006).

Conclusion

Our results advance the literature about perceptions of linking data for use in clinical and research studies among men. Better understanding of factors associated with more positive perceptions of data linkages could help improve how researchers recruit and engage participants.

The History and Applications of the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12)

There has been an increasing emphasis on placing patients at the center of clinical care and health care research and, in particular, assessing outcomes and experiences from the patient's perspective. One of the most widely used patient-reported outcome instruments is the Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey (VR-12). This article reviews the VR-12 development and its applications over the last 2 decades, including research and potential uses in clinical care.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Thyroidectomy for Graves' Disease

Background: Graves' disease accounts for ∼80% of all cases of hyperthyroidism and is associated with significant morbidity and decreased quality of life. Understanding the association of total thyroidectomy with patient-reported quality-of-life and thyroid-specific symptoms is critical to shared decision-making and high-quality care. We estimate the change in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) before and after surgery for patients with Graves' disease to inform the expectations of patients and their physicians. Methods: PROs using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) validated questionnaire were collected prospectively from adult patients with Graves' disease from January 1, 2015, to November 20, 2020, on a longitudinal basis. Survey responses were categorized as before surgery (≤120 days), short term after surgery (<30 days; ST), and long term after surgery (≥30 days; LT). Negative binomial regression was used to estimate the association of select covariates with PROs. Results: Eighty-five patients with Graves' disease were included. The majority were female (83.5%); 47.1% were non-Hispanic white and 35.3% were non-Hispanic black. The median thyrotropin (TSH) value before surgery was 0.05, which increased to 0.82 in ST and 1.57 in LT. In bivariate analysis, the Total Symptom Burden Score, a composite of all patient-reported burden, significantly reduced shortly after surgery (before surgery mean of 56.88 vs. ST 39.60, p < 0.001), demonstrating improvement in PROs. Furthermore, both the Thyroid Symptoms Score, including patient-reported thermoregulation, palpitations, and dysphagia, and the Quality-of-Life Symptom Score improved in ST and LT (thyroid symptoms, before surgery 13.88 vs. ST 8.62 and LT 7.29; quality of life, before surgery 16.16 vs. ST 9.14 and LT 10.04, all p < 0.05). After multivariate adjustment, the patient-reported burden in the Thyroid Symptom Score and the Quality-of-Life Symptom Score exhibited reduction in ST (thyroid symptoms, rate ratio [RR] 0.55, confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-0.72; quality of life, RR 0.57, CI: 0.40-0.81) and LT (thyroid symptoms, RR 0.59, CI: 0.44-0.79; quality of Life, RR 0.43, CI: 0.28-0.65). Conclusions: Quality of life and thyroid-specific symptoms of Graves' patients improved significantly from their baseline before surgery to both shortly after and longer after surgery. This work can be used to guide clinicians and patients with Graves' disease on the expected outcomes following total thyroidectomy.

The impact of hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis on patients' health-related quality of life

Background

Patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC) are known to have worse health‐related quality of life (HRQL) than the general population. However, the change in HRQL from before the diagnosis to after diagnosis remains unknown and is difficult to estimate. We aimed to compare HCC cases with matched controls to evaluate the differences in change in HRQL from before to after HCC diagnosis.

Methods

We performed propensity score‐matched analysis using the self‐reported HRQL data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries (SEER) data linked with Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (MHOS) data (1998–2014). Cases were selected as Medicare beneficiaries (aged ≥65 years) who were diagnosed with HCC between their baseline assessment and follow‐up assessment. Matched controls were selected from the same data resource and the same time period to include subjects without cancer diagnosis by propensity scores. HRQL was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form‐36 (SF‐36).

Results

The study included 62 subjects who developed HCC and 365 matched controls. Compared to their baseline HRQL scores, after diagnosis of HCC, subjects were more likely to report declines in scores related to the mental component of HRQL. When stratified by time since diagnosis, mental component remained significantly lower as the disease advanced. In contrast, only general health aspects of physical health worsened after HCC diagnosis.

Conclusions

Diagnosis of HCC has a profound negative impact on patients’ HRQL. Mental health component deteriorated significantly over time. The need of including mental health services within a multidisciplinary HCC care model is clearly evident.

Patient-reported symptom burden in routine oncology care: Examining racial and ethnic disparities

Background

Racial and ethnic disparities are well‐documented in cancer outcomes such as disease progression and survival, but less is known regarding potential disparities in symptom burden.

Aims

The goal of this retrospective study was to examine differences in symptom burden by race and ethnicity in a large sample of cancer patients. We hypothesized that racial and ethnic minority patients would report greater symptom burden than non‐Hispanic and White patients.

Methods and results

A total of 5798 cancer patients completed the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale—revised (ESAS‐r‐CSS) at least once as part of clinical care. Two indicators of symptom burden were evaluated: (1) total ESAS‐r‐CSS score (i.e., overall symptom burden) and (2) number of severe symptoms (i.e., severe symptomatology). For patients completing the ESAS‐r‐CSS on multiple occasions, the highest score for each indicator was used. Zero‐inflated negative binomial regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for other sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Symptomology varied across race. Patients who self‐identified as Black reported higher symptom burden (p = .016) and were more likely to report severe symptoms (p < .001) than self‐identified White patients. Patients with “other” race were also more likely to report severe symptoms than White patients (p = .032), but reported similar total symptom burden (p = .315). Asian and Hispanic patients did not differ from White or non‐Hispanic patients on symptom burden (ps > .05).

Conclusion

This study describes racial disparities in patient‐reported symptom burden during routine oncology care, primarily observed in Black patients. Clinic‐based electronic symptom monitoring may be useful to detect high symptom burden, particularly in patients who self‐identify their race as Black or other. Future research is needed to reduce symptom burden in racially diverse cancer populations.