C-reactive Protein and Future Risk of Clinical and Molecular Subtypes of Colorectal Cancer

Biomarkers of inflammation and colorectal cancer risk

Globally, colorectal malignancy ranks among the most prevalent forms of cancer and stands as the third principal cause of cancer-associated mortality. Recent studies indicate that inflammatory processes play a significant role in the initiation and advancement of various malignancies, colorectal cancer included. It explores inflammatory biomarkers, with C-reactive protein (CRP) being a key focus. While CRP's elevation during inflammation is linked to tumorigenesis, studies on its association with CRC risk are inconsistent, showing gender and methodological differences. Interleukin-6 (IL-6), TNF - α, and their receptors also play roles in CRC development, yet research findings vary. Adiponectin and leptin, secreted by adipocytes, have complex associations with CRC, with gender disparities noted. In terms of screening, non-invasive methods like fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) are widely used, and combining biomarkers with iFOBT shows potential. Multi-omics techniques, including genomics and microbiomics, offer new avenues for CRC diagnosis. Overall, while evidence highlights the significance of inflammatory biomarkers in CRC risk prediction, larger prospective studies are urgently needed to clarify their roles due to existing inconsistencies and methodological limitations.

A predictive role of C-reactive protein in colorectal cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis from 780,985 participants and 11,289 cancer cases

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis is aimed at understanding the potential role of circulating C-reactive protein (CRP) in the prediction of colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and the potential effect of relevant variables, with specific concern to determine the incorporation of CRP into a CRC risk prediction model.

METHODS

Relevant articles on the association between circulating CRP and CRC risk were searched from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews through August 2022. Random-effects models were used to estimate the pooled relative risk (RR) for the highest versus lowest CRP categories. Linear and non-linear trend analyses were conducted to explore the dose-response associations between CRP and CRC risk.

RESULTS

Twenty-three articles including 780,985 participants and 11,289 cancer cases met the selection criteria. The overall result demonstrated a remarkable association between elevated CRP levels and CRC risk (RR, 1.259; 95% CI, 1.060-1.457), but not in dose-response analysis (RR, 1.002 (95% CI, 0.964-1.041) per natural log unit change in CRP). Subgroup analyses indicated a significant difference when grouped by study location, the length of follow-up, and gender composition. No evidence of publication bias was observed.

CONCLUSION

The predictive role of CRP in CRC incidence is limited to colon cancer and a period of 10 years after the initial discovery of CRP elevation. The result did not support the etiological role of CRP in CRC and the inclusion of CRP into the CRC risk prediction model.

Plasma Concentrations of Gut Hormones Acyl Ghrelin and Peptide YY and Subsequent Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Molecular Tumor Subtypes

Obesity and metabolic dysfunction are implicated in colorectal cancer development. Appetite-regulating gut hormones might have a role in colorectal cancer risk. We investigated whether circulating levels of the gut hormones ghrelin (analyzed as acyl ghrelin) and Peptide YY (PYY) were associated with subsequent colorectal cancer risk, including clinical and molecular tumor subtypes. We also provide descriptive data on these hormones in relation to background participant characteristics and metabolic biomarkers. This population-based study included 1,010 matched case-control pairs with a median of 12.3 years of follow-up. Acyl ghrelin and PYY were measured by multiplex immunoassay. Data on KRAS and BRAF mutations and microsatellite instability (MSI) status were available for 704 and 708 cases, respectively. Conditional logistic regression models estimated association to colorectal cancer risk. Partial correlation and linear regression were used to investigate relationships between background and metabolic variables and variation in plasma gut hormone concentrations. Acyl ghrelin was not clearly associated with colorectal cancer risk (multivariable OR per 1 SD increase: 1.11; 95% CI, 1.00-1.23). Positive associations were observed for specific subtypes, in particular BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer and right-sided colon cancer, although with nonsignificant heterogeneity. PYY was not related to colorectal cancer risk (multivariable OR per 1 SD: 1.04; 95% CI, 0.95-1.14) or any tumor subtype. In the control participants, ghrelin was inversely correlated with BMI, and PYY was positively correlated with C-peptide and insulin levels. These findings provide limited support for a possible role for ghrelin in colorectal cancer development, primarily in specific anatomical and molecular tumor subtypes.

PREVENTION RELEVANCE

The findings of this study do not support a major role for the metabolic gut hormones ghrelin and PYY in colorectal cancer development but suggest the possibility of an involvement for ghrelin in specific tumor subtypes. Elucidating subtype-specific risk factors and mechanisms of carcinogenesis may have implications for precision prevention.

Pre-diagnostic C-reactive protein concentrations, CRP genetic variation and mortality among individuals with colorectal cancer in Western European populations

BACKGROUND

The role of elevated pre-diagnostic C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations on mortality in individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear.

METHODS

We investigated the association between pre-diagnostic high-sensitivity CRP concentrations and CRP genetic variation associated with circulating CRP and CRC-specific and all-cause mortality based on data from 1,235 individuals with CRC within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 9.3 years, 455 CRC-specific deaths were recorded, out of 590 deaths from all causes. Pre-diagnostic CRP concentrations were not associated with CRC-specific (hazard ratio, HR highest versus lowest quintile 0.92, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.66, 1.28) or all-cause mortality (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.68, 1.21). Genetic predisposition to higher CRP (weighted score based on alleles of four CRP SNPs associated with higher circulating CRP) was not significantly associated with CRC-specific mortality (HR per CRP-score unit 0.95, 95% CI 0.86, 1.05) or all-cause mortality (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.90, 1.07). Among four investigated CRP genetic variants, only SNP rs1205 was significantly associated with CRC-specific (comparing the CT and CC genotypes with TT genotype, HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35, 0.83 and HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38, 0.88, respectively) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40, 0.85 and 0.64, 95% CI 0.44, 0.92, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this prospective cohort study do not support a role of pre-diagnostic CRP concentrations on mortality in individuals with CRC. The observed associations with rs1205 deserve further scientific attention.

Systemic Inflammation Status Relates to Anti-Inflammatory Drug Benefit and Survival in Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Systemic inflammation status has been recognized as a sensitive marker associated with survival in cancers and anti-inflammatory treatment outcomes in inflammation-derived diseases. This study aimed to investigate the role of systemic inflammation status as a predictive marker for survival and anti-inflammatory treatment benefit in rectal cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 475 patients with stage I-III rectal cancer receiving curative resection were prospectively enrolled. The platelet-neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (PNLR) that integrates neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios was applied to enable a comprehensive evaluation of systemic inflammation status and investigate its association with survival and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) benefit. Patients were grouped according to baseline PNLR and perioperative use of NSAIDs.

RESULTS

The high-PNLR group had worse 5-y disease-free survival (DFS) compared with the low-PNLR group (61.2% versus 70.9%, P = 0.014). Multivariate analyses confirmed that PNLR was an independent predictor for DFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.42, 95% CI: 1.03-1.97, P = 0.031). A nomogram including PNLR and other independent prognostic factors was developed and validated to predict DFS. In the high-PNLR subset, NSAIDs group had a 21.3% lower risk of recurrence than non-NSAIDs group (P = 0.009), and multivariate analysis confirmed the independently significant association of perioperative NSAIDs use with better DFS (hazard ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.16-0.78, P = 0.010). However, this association was not significant in the low-PLR subset.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline PNLR could be used to predict DFS and NSAIDs benefit in rectal cancer patients. This study highlights the potential survival benefit from the anti-inflammatory treatment in the patients with elevated systemic inflammation status in cancer patients.

Inflammation-Immunity-Nutrition Score: A Novel Prognostic Score for Patients with Resectable Colorectal Cancer

Purpose

This study was designed to investigate the prognostic value of the combination of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, lymphocyte, and albumin in patients with resectable colorectal cancer.

Patients and Methods

Seven-hundred-and-nineteen patients who underwent colorectal cancer resection in Hubei Cancer Hospital were included. Inflammation-Immunity-Nutrition score (0–6) was constructed based on preoperative high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, lymphocyte, and albumin. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve, decision curve, Kaplan-Meier survival curve, Cox regression, and C-index were conducted to detect the prognostic values of inflammation-immunity-nutrition score. The prognostic values of inflammation-immunity-nutrition score in different subgroups by sex, location of tumor, pathologic stage, and KRAS mutation were also explored. The prognostic performance of inflammation-immunity-nutrition score was further compared with that of other traditional prognostic indicators.

Results

The median follow-up time was 40 months. High inflammation-immunity-nutrition score (>2 scores) presented worse survival, with the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 3.106 (2.202–4.380) for overall survival and 2.105 (1.604–2.764) for disease-free survival. Besides, the associations of high inflammation-immunity-nutrition score with overall survival were even stronger in cases with wild type KRAS, with the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 4.018 (2.355–6.854). Considering the AUCs, C-indices, and hazard ratios estimates, inflammation-immunity-nutrition score presented better prognostic performance than high-sensitivity modified Glasgow prognostic score, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, prognostic nutrition index, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 for overall survival.

Conclusion

Inflammation-immunity-nutrition score might serve as a powerful prognostic score in patients with colorectal cancer for overall survival, particularly in patients with wild type KRAS.