Associations of Race and Ethnicity with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Decompensation, and Mortality in US Veterans with Cirrhosis

Disparities in liver transplantation for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis-associated hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is increasingly common, as is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the background of MASH. Liver transplantation (LT) provides superior long-term survival for patients with unresectable MASH-HCC, but not all patients have equal access to transplant. MASH-HCC disproportionately affects Hispanic patients, but minorities are less likely to undergo LT for HCC. Additionally, females also undergo LT at lower rates than males.

AIM

To investigate whether race/ethnicity and sex affect LT waitlist outcomes.

METHODS

Records of adults with MASH-HCC in the United States Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database listed for LT between 1/2015 and 12/2021 were analyzed.

RESULTS

Most of the 3810 patients waitlisted for LT for MASH-HCC were non-Hispanic (NH) white (71.2%) or Hispanic (23.4%), with only 49 (1.1%) NH Black candidates. Hispanics underwent LT at lower rates than NH whites (71.6% vs 78.4%, P < 0.001), but race/ethnicity did not affect waitlist mortality (P = 0.06). Patients with Hispanic [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.77-0.95, P = 0.002] or Asian (HR = 0.79, 95%CI: 0.63-0.98, P = 0.04) race/ethnicity were less likely to undergo LT. Women were also less likely to receive LT (male: HR = 1.16, 95%CI: 1.04-1.29, P = 0.01). Patients in regions 1 and 9 were less likely to be transplanted as well (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Hispanic patients are less likely to undergo LT for MASH-HCC, concerning given their susceptibility to MASH and HCC. There were very few NH Black candidates. Disparities were also unequal across regions, which is particularly concerning in states where at-risk populations have rising cancer incidence. Additional research is needed to identify strategies for mitigating these differences in access to LT for MASH-HCC.

Validation and expansion of Baveno VII criteria for cACLD and CSPH based on liver stiffness and platelet count: Correlation with risk of hepatic decompensation and death

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recently proposed "Rule-of-Five" criteria define compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) using liver stiffness (LS) and platelet count. We aimed to validate these criteria by determining whether they are associated with risk of adverse outcomes.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Patients without prior hepatic decompensation or HCC who underwent LS and platelet measurements (n = 17,076) were categorized as follows: no cACLD (LS: 2.5-9.9 kPa); probable cACLD (LS: 10-14.9 kPa); certain cACLD-no CSPH (LS: 15-19.9 kPa and platelets ≥110,000/µL or LS 20-24.9 kPa and platelets ≥150,000/µL); probable CSPH (LS 15-19.9 kPa and platelets <110,000/µL or LS 20-24.9 and platelets <150,000/µL); and certain CSPH (LS ≥25 kPa), which we further subdivided into 25-49.9 and 50-75 kPa.During a median follow-up of 2.82 years, each increase in the "Rule-of-Five" category was associated linearly with higher risks of death (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.18-1.25) and decompensation (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.46-1.58). Compared to patients with LS 25-49.9 kPa, those with LS 50-75 kPa ("critical" CSPH) had approximately double the risk of decompensation (11.24 vs. 4.20 per 100 patient-years) and death (9.85 vs. 6.98 per 100 patient-years).

CONCLUSIONS

The Baveno VII "Rule-of-Five" criteria provide a valid system for stratifying risks of death and hepatic decompensation and should be used routinely in patients with chronic liver disease. Among patients with CSPH (LS ≥25 kPa), the subgroup with LS 50-75 kPa ("critical" CSPH) has approximately double the risk of death and hepatic decompensation than LS 25-49.9 kPa.

Screening rates for hepatitis B and C among low-income US veterans: Data from the National Veteran Homeless and Other Poverty Experiences Study

Screening for viral hepatitis is considered a high-priority area in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Yet, few studies have examined viral hepatitis screening test use among low-income veterans who are considered high-risk with limited healthcare access. Using cross-sectional data from 933 participants in the 2021-2022 National Veteran Homeless and Other Poverty Experiences (NV-HOPE) study, we examined rates and correlates of lifetime screening for hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) infections. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated characteristics associated with HBV/HCV screening. Nearly 16% and 21% reported lifetime HBV and HCV screening, respectively. These rates are considerably lower than HBV (47.3%) and HCV (92.9%) screening rates documented among contemporaneous veterans in VHA electronic health records. In the NV-HOPE data, veterans 50-79 years were more likely than those ≥80 years of age to ever-screen for HBV/HCV. Whereas, household income was inversely related to lifetime screening behaviours, veterans reporting 'other' employment types (vs. full-time/part-time employment) were more likely to ever-screen for HBV/HCV. Ever-screening for HBV was more likely among veterans reporting non-Hispanic 'other' (vs. non-Hispanic 'white') race, housing instability, Medicaid insurance, as well as drug use and cognitive disorder histories. Living with ≥5 members (vs. alone), histories of alcohol use, cancer, and liver disorders were also correlated with ever-screening for HCV. HIV/AIDS history correlated with ever-screening for HBV/HCV. In conclusion, fewer than one-third of low-income US veterans ever-screened for HBV/HCV, with lower screening rates among those less likely to be exposed to viral hepatitis, thereby informing interventions aimed at promoting available screening, treatment and vaccinations for HBV/HCV.

Impact of DAA Treatment for HCV on Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Predominately African American Population

PURPOSE

This study tested the hypothesis that our predominately AA medical center population would demonstrate a decline in HCV-driven HCC diagnosis following the initiation of DAA treatment in 2014. Also evaluated was whether achieving an SVR prior to diagnosis of HCC improved outcomes in patients who had an HCV diagnosis after completion of treatment.

METHODS

All patients with HCC seen at the Detroit Medical Center from 2009 to 2021 were identified using ICD-10 codes, and medical records were evaluated. Outcomes were evaluated as either alive or death/hospice as of December of 2022.

RESULTS

There were 461 patients with HCC of whom 433 (94%) had racial information in the database (AA = 351; non-AA = 82). HCC incidence regardless of race peaked in 2017, with a subsequent decline through 2021. HCV as a risk factor was higher in AA as compared to non-AA (85% vs. 53% p = 0.0001). Outcome (alive vs. death/hospice) was better for SVR patients compared to untreated patients (54% vs. 19%; p = 0.0009). HCC patients who achieved SVR also had better liver function at diagnosis as defined by Child-Pugh score (74% vs. 49% Class A p = 0.04) at the time of diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial disparity in HCC etiology was confirmed with AA more likely to have HCV than non-AA. The reduction in HCC patients with HCV confirms the impact of DAA treatment and prior successful treatment of HCV yields better outcomes. Increasing HCV treatment rates especially in AA patients will have a major impact on HCC development and treatment outcomes.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• African Americans are more likely to have HCV infection as compared to non-AA. • Hepatocellular carcinoma is increasing in incidence in the US. • The role of HCV in the development of HCC remains to be further investigated.

WHAT IS NEW

• HCC diagnosis in a single urban medical center study increased from 2009 as a result of HCV as a risk factor. • HCC declined post 2018 due primarily to a reduction in HCV infection as the risk factor. • African Americans were more likely to have HCV as the risk factor as compared to non-AA patients who were more likely to have no known risk factor on record (i.e., cryptogenic).

Effect of a Hispanic outreach program on referral and liver transplantation volume at a single center

BACKGROUND

Although Hispanic patients have high rates of end-stage liver disease and liver cancer, for which liver transplantation (LT) offers the best long-term outcomes, they are less likely to receive LT. Studies of end-stage renal disease patients and kidney transplant candidates have shown that targeted, culturally relevant interventions can increase the likelihood of Hispanic patients receiving kidney transplant. However, similar interventions remain largely unstudied in potential LT candidates.

METHODS

Referrals to a single center in Texas with a large Hispanic patient population were compared before (01/2018-12/2019) and after (7/2021-6/2023) the implementation of a targeted outreach program. Patient progress toward LT, reasons for ineligibility, and differences in insurance were examined between the two eras.

RESULTS

A greater proportion of Hispanic patients were referred for LT after the implementation of the outreach program (23.2% vs 26.2%, p = 0.004). Comparing the pre-outreach era to the post-outreach era, more Hispanic patients achieved waitlisting status (61 vs 78, respectively) and received a LT (971 vs 82, respectively). However, the proportion of Hispanic patients undergoing LT dropped from 30.2% to 20.3%. In the post-outreach era, half of the Hispanic patients were unable to get LT for financial reasons (112, 50.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

A targeted outreach program for Hispanic patients with end-stage liver disease effectively increased the total number of Hispanic LT referrals and recipients. However, many of the patients who were referred were ineligible for LT, most frequently for financial reasons. These results highlight the need for additional research into the most effective ways to ameliorate financial barriers to LT in this high-need community.

Clinical Significance and Remaining Issues of Anti-HBc Antibody and HBV Core-Related Antigen

Currently, hepatitis B virus (HBV) core antibody (anti-HBc antibody) and HBV core-related antigen (HBcrAg) are widely used as serum markers for diagnosis based on the HBV core region. This review focused on anti-HBc antibodies and HBcrAg and aimed to summarize the clinical significance of currently used assay systems and the issues involved. While anti-HBc is very significant for clinical diagnosis, the clinical significance of quantitative assay of anti-HBc antibody has been reevaluated with improvements in diagnostic performance, including its association with clinical stage and prediction of carcinogenesis and reactivation. In addition, concerning the new HBcrAg, a high-sensitivity assay method has recently been established, and its diagnostic significance, including the prediction of reactivation, is being reevaluated. On the other hand, the quantitative level of anti-HBc antibody expressed in different units among assay systems complicates the interpretation of the results. However, it is difficult to standardize assay systems as they vary in advantages, and caution is needed in interpreting the assay results. In conclusion, with the development of highly sensitive HBcrAg and anti-HBc antibody, a rapid and sensitive detection assay system has been developed and used in clinical practice. In the future, it is hoped that a global standard will be created based on the many clinical findings.