A Phase I Study of a New Nucleoside Analogue, OSI-7836, Using Two Administration Schedules in Patients with Advanced Solid Malignancies

Metabolism, Biochemical Actions, and Chemical Synthesis of Anticancer Nucleosides, Nucleotides, and Base Analogs

Nucleoside, nucleotide, and base analogs have been in the clinic for decades to treat both viral pathogens and neoplasms. More than 20% of patients on anticancer chemotherapy have been treated with one or more of these analogs. This review focuses on the chemical synthesis and biology of anticancer nucleoside, nucleotide, and base analogs that are FDA-approved and in clinical development since 2000. We highlight the cellular biology and clinical biology of analogs, drug resistance mechanisms, and compound specificity towards different cancer types. Furthermore, we explore analog syntheses as well as improved and scale-up syntheses. We conclude with a discussion on what might lie ahead for medicinal chemists, biologists, and physicians as they try to improve analog efficacy through prodrug strategies and drug combinations.

Advances in the development of nucleoside and nucleotide analogues for cancer and viral diseases

Nucleoside analogues have been in clinical use for almost 50 years and have become cornerstones of treatment for patients with cancer or viral infections. The approval of several additional drugs over the past decade demonstrates that this family still possesses strong potential. Here, we review new nucleoside analogues and associated compounds that are currently in preclinical or clinical development for the treatment of cancer and viral infections, and that aim to provide increased response rates and reduced side effects. We also highlight the different approaches used in the development of these drugs and the potential of personalized therapy.

Advances in the development of nucleoside and nucleotide analogues for cancer and viral diseases

Nucleoside analogues have been in clinical use for almost 50 years and have become cornerstones of treatment for patients with cancer or viral infections. The approval of several additional drugs over the past decade demonstrates that this family still possesses strong potential. Here, we review new nucleoside analogues and associated compounds that are currently in preclinical or clinical development for the treatment of cancer and viral infections, and that aim to provide increased response rates and reduced side effects. We also highlight the different approaches used in the development of these drugs and the potential of personalized therapy.

New nucleoside analogs for patients with hematological malignancies

INTRODUCTION

In the last few years, several new purine and pyrimidine nucleoside analogs have been synthesized and made available for both preclinical studies and clinical trials.

AREAS COVERED

This article summarizes recent achievements in the mechanism of action, pharmacological properties and clinical activity and toxicity as well as the emerging role of newer purine and pyrimidine nucleoside analogs potentially active in lymphoid and myeloid malignancies. A literature review was conducted from the MEDLINE database PubMed for articles in English. Publications from 2000 to October 2010 were scrutinized. The search terms used were clofarabine, nelarabine, forodesine, 8-chloroadenosine, LMP-420, azacitidine, decitabine, sapacitabine, troxacitabine, thiarabine and zebularine in conjunction with hematologic malignancies, leukemia and lymphoma. Conference proceedings from the previous 5 years of the American Society of Hematology, European Hematology Association, and American Society of Clinical Oncology were searched manually. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles.

EXPERT OPINION

Several new nucleoside analogs are currently under investigation in preclinical and clinical studies concerning hematological malignancies. Clofarabine, nelarabine, azacitidine and decitabine have been recently approved for the treatment of leukemias and/or myelodysplastic syndromes. Other agents including forodesine, 8-chloroadenosine, LMP-420, sapacitabine, troxacitabine, thiarabine and zebularine seem to be promising for the treatment of lymphoid and myeloid malignancies. However, definitive data from ongoing and future clinical trials will aid in better defining their status in the treatment of hematological disorders.

Enhancement of the in vivo antitumor activity of clofarabine by 1-beta-D-[4-thio-arabinofuranosyl]-cytosine

PURPOSE

Clofarabine increases the activation of 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl cytosine (araC) in tumor cells, and combination of these two drugs has been shown to result in good clinical activity against various hematologic malignancies. 1-beta-D-[4-thio-arabinofuranosyl] cytosine (T-araC) is a new cytosine analog that has exhibited excellent activity against a broad spectrum of human solid tumors and leukemia/lymphoma xenografts in mice and is currently being evaluated in patients as a new drug for the treatment of cancer. Since T-araC has a vastly superior preclinical efficacy profile in comparison to araC, we have initiated studies to determine the potential value of clofarabine/T-araC combination therapy.

METHODS

In vitro studies have been conducted to determine the effect of clofarabine on the metabolism of T-araC, and in vivo studies have been conducted to determine the effect of the clofarabine/T-araC combination on five human tumor xenografts in mice.

RESULTS

Initial studies with various tumor cells in culture indicated that a 2-h incubation with clofarabine enhanced the metabolism of T-araC 24 h after its removal by threefold in three tumor cell types (HCT-116 colon, K562 leukemia, and RL lymphoma) and by 1.5-fold in two other tumor cell types (MDA-MB-435 breast (melanoma), and HL-60 leukemia). Pretreatment with clofarabine resulted in a slight decrease in metabolism of T-araC in RPMI-8226 myeloma cells (65% of control) and inhibited metabolism of T-araC in CCRF-CEM leukemia cells by 90%. In vivo combination studies were conducted with various human tumor xenografts to determine whether or not the modulations observed in vitro were reflective of the in vivo situation. Clofarabine and T-araC were administered on alternate days for five treatments each (q2dx5) with the administration of T-araC 24 h after each clofarabine treatment. Combination treatment of HCT-116, K562, HL-60, or RL tumors with clofarabine and T-araC resulted in dramatically superior anti-tumor activity than treatment with either agent alone, whereas this combination resulted in antagonism in CCRF-CEM tumors. The in vivo antitumor activity of clofarabine plus T-araC against HCT-116 tumors was much better than the activity seen with clofarabine plus araC.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies provide a rationale for clinical trials using this combination in the treatment of acute leukemias as well as solid tumors and suggest that this combination would exhibit greater antitumor activity than that of clofarabine plus araC.