1
|
Lobig F, Subramanian D, Blankenburg M, Sharma A, Variyar A, Butler O. To pay or not to pay for artificial intelligence applications in radiology. NPJ Digit Med 2023; 6:117. [PMID: 37353531 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00861-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023] Open
|
2
|
Gomez Montero M, El Alili H, Hashim M, Wigfield P, Dimova M, Riley R, Pascoe K. How are Companion Diagnostics Considered in Economic Evaluations of Oncology Treatments? A Review of Health Technology Assessments. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2022; 6:637-646. [PMID: 35790681 PMCID: PMC9440183 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-022-00350-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Companion diagnostic (CDx) testing is increasingly used to identify eligible patients for targeted treatments. Guidance on how CDx testing should be incorporated into cost-effectiveness models (CEM) is limited. This review evaluated how health technology assessment bodies and research organizations considered CDx in CEMs of targeted therapies in oncology and whether this ultimately impacted their decisions or time from regulatory approval to recommendations. METHODS An exhaustive list of approved CDx tests in oncology was compiled. For corresponding indications and treatments, NICE appraisals published between 2016 and 2019 were identified. Then, assessments for the same treatments issued from 11 other agencies were reviewed. Data extracted included background and CDx information, CDx's role in the CEM, and recommendations. RESULTS Twenty-seven NICE appraisals were identified; 15 considered CDx testing in the CEM, while 12 did not, mainly because testing had already been established for the comparators within the same class or in clinical practice from a prior treatment line. Both testing costs and mutation prevalence drove CDx testing costs per patient. The cross-comparison of assessments showed that CDx test characteristics were inconsistently reported. Time from regulatory approval to recommendations was not impacted by CDx cost inclusion in CEMs. CONCLUSION CDx testing was included in cost-effectiveness models whenever mutation testing was required solely for patients receiving targeted treatment; cost per patient was based on test costs and mutation prevalence. It is unclear if expanded reliance on CDx testing will impact future assessments of targeted therapies. A future update is warranted to track trends over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mahmoud Hashim
- Ingress-Health, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Janssen Global Services Inc, 2340, Beerse, Belgium
| | | | - Mariya Dimova
- Janssen Global Services Inc, 92787, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France
| | - Ralph Riley
- Janssen Global Services Inc, Raritan, NJ, USA
| | - Katie Pascoe
- Janssen Oncology, Global Commercial Strategy Organization, 50-100 Holmers Farm Way, High Wycombe, HP12 4EG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kamal-Bahl S, Puckett J, Singh A, Willke R. Valuing treatment in oncology: embracing a broader notion of value. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2022; 28:362-368. [PMID: 35100007 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.21153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Over the past decade, we have witnessed unprecedented, groundbreaking innovation in pharmaceuticals. This has been particularly true in oncology, where new therapies have increased survival and at times offered clinical cure. However, the impact of these promising treatments has been attenuated by persistent access and cost challenges that may limit their effect. A narrative has emerged that many of these so-called breakthroughs are not priced according to the value they provide. Traditional cost-effectiveness analyses would appear to support these doubts, often suggesting that innovative therapies do not represent value for money. However, there is a case to be made that innovative therapies require equally innovative value assessments. To explore this emerging viewpoint, this article provides a brief introduction to the current value debate and oncology-specific considerations when assessing elements of value. We offer a brief background on the nature and development of quality-adjusted life-years as a part of cost-effectiveness analyses and some of their key limitations; a primer on "novel" elements of value, which capture specific aspects of patient and societal preferences not included in quality-adjusted life-years; and their applicability to oncology including discussion on areas where further thought and research might be needed. We conclude with a potential checklist of novel elements of value that should be considered. DISCLOSURES: This Viewpoints article was funded by Novartis, Inc., which also provided funding to COVIA Health Solutions for manuscript development. The sponsor was involved in developing the manuscript. Kamal-Bahl and Puckett are employees of COVIA Health Solutions, a consulting firm that provides services to biopharmaceutical clients, trade organizations, and foundations. Kamal-Bahl holds stock in Merck and Pfizer. Singh is an employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Willke received personal fees from COVIA Health Solutions for work on the manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Richard Willke
- International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Lawrenceville, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Govaerts L, Waeytens A, Van Dyck W, Simoens S, Huys I. Evaluation of precision medicine assessment reports of the Belgian healthcare payer to inform reimbursement decisions. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2020; 36:1-8. [PMID: 32892765 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462320000604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Precision medicines rely on companion diagnostics to identify patient subgroups eligible for receiving the pharmaceutical product. Until recently, the Belgian public health payer, RIZIV-INAMI, assessed precision medicines and companion diagnostics separately for reimbursement decisions. As both components are considered co-dependent technologies, their assessment should be conducted jointly from a health technology assessment (HTA) perspective. As of July 2019, a novel procedure was implemented accommodating for this joint assessment practice. The aim of this research was to formulate recommendations to improve the assessment in the novel procedure. METHODS This study evaluated the precision medicine assessment reports of RIZIV-INAMI of the last 5 years under the former assessment procedure. The HTA framework for co-dependent technologies developed by Merlin et al. for the Australian healthcare system was used as a reference standard in this evaluation. Criteria were scored as either present or not present. RESULTS Thirteen assessment reports were evaluated. Varying scores between reports were obtained for the domain establishing the co-dependent relationship between diagnostic and pharmaceutical. Domains evaluating the clinical utility of the biomarker and the cost-effectiveness performed poorly, whereas the budget impact and the transfer of trial data to the local setting performed well. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on these results we recommend three amendments for the novel procedure. (i) The implementation of the linked evidence approach when direct evidence of clinical utility is not present, (ii) incorporation of a bias assessment tool, and (iii) further specify guidelines for submission and assessment to decrease the variability of reported evidence between assessment reports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurenz Govaerts
- Healthcare Management Centre, Vlerick Business School, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, Box 521, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anouk Waeytens
- National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (RIZIV-INAMI), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Walter Van Dyck
- Healthcare Management Centre, Vlerick Business School, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, Box 521, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, Box 521, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, Box 521, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hogarth S, Löblová O. Regulatory niches: Diagnostic reform as a process of fragmented expansion. Evidence from the UK 1990–2018. Soc Sci Med 2020; 304:113363. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
6
|
Govaerts L, Simoens S, Van Dyck W, Huys I. Shedding Light on Reimbursement Policies of Companion Diagnostics in European Countries. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:606-615. [PMID: 32389226 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Revised: 01/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Ensuring access to precision medicine has been an issue because in some European countries, desynchronized reimbursement decision-making occurs between the medicine and the companion diagnostic (CDx). This has resulted in cases in which precision medicine is reimbursed but not the CDx. In overcoming this issue, an alignment of the decision-making process for reimbursement between the 2 entities should be considered. As pharmaceutical reimbursement procedures are meticulously covered in the literature, we set out to systematically map in vitro diagnostic (IVD) reimbursement procedures and identify policies for aligning these procedures with the pharmaceutical reimbursement procedures. METHODS We selected 8 European countries for this analysis. For each country, we characterized the national benefit basket entailing the IVD medical acts in outpatient care, evaluated the procedure for inclusion, and identified alternative reimbursement practices for CDx. Targeted searches, using publicly accessible sources, were conducted to identify relevant reimbursement policies and laws. RESULTS We systematically describe the reimbursement process in 8 European countries. Alternative procedures for CDx reimbursement were identified in Belgium and Germany. Alternative policies attributed to the practice of precision medicine were identified in England and Italy. In France, some CDx are included in the "coverage with evidence" development program. Specifically, the health technology assessment agencies of France and England commented on the assessment of companion diagnostics and their clinical utility. CONCLUSION CDx reimbursement procedures have recently been implemented in some countries. This was seemingly done primarily to ensure access to the precision medicine and only secondary to the value they would provide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurenz Govaerts
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Healthcare Management Centre, Vlerick Business School, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Walter Van Dyck
- Healthcare Management Centre, Vlerick Business School, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Love-Koh J, Peel A, Rejon-Parrilla JC, Ennis K, Lovett R, Manca A, Chalkidou A, Wood H, Taylor M. The Future of Precision Medicine: Potential Impacts for Health Technology Assessment. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2018; 36:1439-1451. [PMID: 30003435 PMCID: PMC6244622 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0686-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Precision medicine allows healthcare interventions to be tailored to groups of patients based on their disease susceptibility, diagnostic or prognostic information, or treatment response. We analysed what developments are expected in precision medicine over the next decade and considered the implications for health technology assessment (HTA) agencies. METHODS We performed a pragmatic literature search to account for the large size and wide scope of the precision medicine literature. We refined and enriched these results with a series of expert interviews up to 1 h in length, including representatives from HTA agencies, research councils and researchers designed to cover a wide spectrum of precision medicine applications and research. RESULTS We identified 31 relevant papers and interviewed 13 experts. We found that three types of precision medicine are expected to emerge in clinical practice: complex algorithms, digital health applications and 'omics'-based tests. These are expected to impact upon each stage of the HTA process, from scoping and modelling through to decision-making and review. The complex and uncertain treatment pathways associated with patient stratification and fast-paced technological innovation are central to these effects. DISCUSSION Innovation in precision medicine promises substantial benefits but will change the way in which some health services are delivered and evaluated. The shelf life of guidance may decrease, structural uncertainty may increase and new equity considerations will emerge. As biomarker discovery accelerates and artificial intelligence-based technologies emerge, refinements to the methods and processes of evidence assessments will help to adapt and maintain the objective of investing in healthcare that is value for money.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Love-Koh
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK.
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
| | - Alison Peel
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Kate Ennis
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK
- Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rosemary Lovett
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrea Manca
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
- Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
| | | | - Hannah Wood
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK
| | - Matthew Taylor
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
DECISION-COMPONENTS OF NICE'S TECHNOLOGY APPRAISALS ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2018; 34:163-171. [DOI: 10.1017/s0266462318000090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: Value assessment frameworks have gained prominence recently in the context of U.S. healthcare. Such frameworks set out a series of factors that are considered in funding decisions. The UK's National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) is an established health technology assessment (HTA) agency. We present a novel application of text analysis that characterizes NICE's Technology Appraisals in the context of the newer assessment frameworks and present the results in a visual way.Methods: A total of 243 documents of NICE's medicines guidance from 2007 to 2016 were analyzed. Text analysis was used to identify a hierarchical set of decision factors considered in the assessments. The frequency of decision factors stated in the documents was determined and their association with terms related to uncertainty. The results were incorporated into visual representations of hierarchical factors.Results: We identified 125 decision factors, and hierarchically grouped these into eight domains: Clinical Effectiveness, Cost Effectiveness, Condition, Current Practice, Clinical Need, New Treatment, Studies, and Other Factors. Textual analysis showed all domains appeared consistently in the guidance documents. Many factors were commonly associated with terms relating to uncertainty. A series of visual representations was created.Conclusions: This study reveals the complexity and consistency of NICE's decision-making processes and demonstrates that cost effectiveness is not the only decision-criteria. The study highlights the importance of processes and methodology that can take both quantitative and qualitative information into account. Visualizations can help effectively communicate this complex information during the decision-making process and subsequently to stakeholders.
Collapse
|
9
|
Gavan SP, Thompson AJ, Payne K. The economic case for precision medicine. EXPERT REVIEW OF PRECISION MEDICINE AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT 2018; 3:1-9. [PMID: 29682615 PMCID: PMC5890303 DOI: 10.1080/23808993.2018.1421858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 12/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: The advancement of precision medicine into routine clinical practice has been highlighted as an agenda for national and international health care policy. A principle barrier to this advancement is in meeting requirements of the payer or reimbursement agency for health care. This special report aims to explain the economic case for precision medicine, by accounting for the explicit objectives defined by decision-makers responsible for the allocation of limited health care resources. Areas covered: The framework of cost-effectiveness analysis, a method of economic evaluation, is used to describe how precision medicine can, in theory, exploit identifiable patient-level heterogeneity to improve population health outcomes and the relative cost-effectiveness of health care. Four case studies are used to illustrate potential challenges when demonstrating the economic case for a precision medicine in practice. Expert commentary: The economic case for a precision medicine should be considered at an early stage during its research and development phase. Clinical and economic evidence can be generated iteratively and should be in alignment with the objectives and requirements of decision-makers. Programmes of further research, to demonstrate the economic case of a precision medicine, can be prioritized by the extent that they reduce the uncertainty expressed by decision-makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean P. Gavan
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Alexander J. Thompson
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
|
11
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Companion diagnostic tests (CDx) are used to measure an individual's protein or gene expression (biomarkers) to inform choice of therapy. The increasing number of drugs requiring CDx poses challenges for regulatory and reimbursement policies. To better understand this issue, an environmental scan was conducted by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH). METHODS The environmental scan was based on a focused literature search and feedback solicited from targeted stakeholders. RESULTS The global market for CDx is expected to grow considerably until the end of this decade, with compound annual growth rate around 20 percent. Several factors may impact the adoption of CDx, including the potential cost-savings associated with reduced treatment failures and adverse reactions. Anticipating an expansion in drugs with CDx, some countries have updated their regulatory frameworks, including the United States where the FDA released new guidance in 2014. With respect to reimbursement, both the United Kingdom and Australia updated their evaluation frameworks to inform reimbursement decisions; however, several countries, including Canada, have not published policies for co-dependent technology. CONCLUSION The market size for CDx is expected to considerably expand in the future. The drive in uptake may be influenced by many factors including an increased knowledge of biomarkers and molecular drivers of disease and the potential cost-savings associated with fewer treatment failures and adverse reactions. Assessing whether such benefits materialize is important. Health technology assessment will play an important role in informing policies regarding the clinical use and funding of pharmaceuticals with CDx.
Collapse
|
12
|
Shimazawa R, Ikeda M. Overcoming regulatory challenges in the development of companion diagnostics for monitoring and safety. Per Med 2016; 13:155-167. [DOI: 10.2217/pme.15.51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Concurrent development and co-approval of a companion diagnostic (CDx) with a corresponding drug is ideal, but often unfeasible. Because of limited exposure to a drug in clinical trials, crucial information on safety is sometimes revealed only after approval. Therefore, a CDx for monitoring/safety is often developed after approval of a corresponding drug. However, regulatory guidance is insufficient if contemporaneous development is not possible, thereby leaving plenty of opportunities for improvement with respect to pharmacovigilance and retrospective validation of the CDx. Furthermore, global harmonization of guidance on how to incorporate new scientific information from retrospective analyses of biomarkers should lead to the establishment of more evidence for the development of CDx for approved drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rumiko Shimazawa
- Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
- Tokai University School of Medicine, 143 Shimokasuya, Isehara, Kanagawa 259-1193, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ikeda
- Department of Medical Informatics, Kagawa University Hospital, Miki-cho Ikenobe, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Huckle D. The impact of new trends in POCTs for companion diagnostics, non-invasive testing and molecular diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2016; 15:815-27. [PMID: 25990929 DOI: 10.1586/14737159.2015.1033405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Point-of-care diagnostics have been slowly developing over several decades and have taken on a new importance in current healthcare delivery for both diagnostics and development of new drugs. Molecular diagnostics have become a key driver of technology change and opened up new areas in companion diagnostics for use alongside pharmaceuticals and in new clinical approaches such as non-invasive testing. Future areas involving smartphone and other information technology advances, together with new developments in molecular biology, microfluidics and surface chemistry are adding to advances in the market. The focus for point-of-care tests with molecular diagnostic technologies is focused on advancing effective applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Huckle
- Adams Business Associates, 2 Buckingham Place, Bellfield Road, High Wycombe HP13 5HW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Economic Evaluations of Personalized Health Technologies: An Overview of Emerging Issues. Per Med 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39349-0_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
15
|
Shabaruddin FH, Fleeman ND, Payne K. Economic evaluations of personalized medicine: existing challenges and current developments. Pharmgenomics Pers Med 2015; 8:115-26. [PMID: 26309416 PMCID: PMC4538689 DOI: 10.2147/pgpm.s35063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Personalized medicine, with the aim of safely, effectively, and cost-effectively targeting treatment to a prespecified patient population, has always been a long-time goal within health care. It is often argued that personalizing treatment will inevitably improve clinical outcomes for patients and help achieve more effective use of health care resources. Demand is increasing for demonstrable evidence of clinical and cost-effectiveness to support the use of personalized medicine in health care. This paper begins with an overview of the existing challenges in conducting economic evaluations of genetics- and genomics-targeted technologies, as an example of personalized medicine. Our paper illustrates the complexity of the challenges faced by these technologies by highlighting the variations in the issues faced by diagnostic tests for somatic variations, generally referring to genetic variation in a tumor, and germline variations, generally referring to inherited genetic variation in enzymes involved in drug metabolic pathways. These tests are typically aimed at stratifying patient populations into subgroups on the basis of clinical effectiveness (response) or safety (avoidance of adverse events). The paper summarizes the data requirements for economic evaluations of genetics and genomics-based technologies while outlining that the main challenges relating to data requirements revolve around the availability and quality of existing data. We conclude by discussing current developments aimed to address the challenges of assessing the cost-effectiveness of genetics and genomics-based technologies, which revolve around two central issues that are interlinked: the need to adapt available evaluation methods and identifying who is responsible for generating evidence for these technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nigel D Fleeman
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group (LRiG), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Institute of Population Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rubin EH, Allen JD, Nowak JA, Bates SE. Developing precision medicine in a global world. Clin Cancer Res 2014; 20:1419-27. [PMID: 24634465 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Advances in understanding the biology of cancer, as well as advances in diagnostic technologies, such as the advent of affordable high-resolution DNA sequencing, have had a major impact on the approach to identification of specific alterations in a given patient's cancer that could be used as a basis for treatment selection, and hence the development of companion diagnostics. Although there are now several examples of successful development of companion diagnostics that allow identification of patients who will achieve the greatest benefit from a new therapeutic, the path to coapproval of a diagnostic test along with a new therapeutic is complex and often inefficient. This review and the accompanying articles examine the current state of companion diagnostic development in the United States and Europe from academic, industry, regulatory, and economic perspectives. See all articles in this CCR Focus section, "The Precision Medicine Conundrum: Approaches to Companion Diagnostic Co-development."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric H Rubin
- Authors' Affiliations: Merck Research Laboratories, North Wales, Pennsylvania; Friends of Cancer Research, Arlington, Virginia; NorthShore University Health System Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Evanston, Illinois; and Developmental Therapeutics Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Parkinson DR, McCormack RT, Keating SM, Gutman SI, Hamilton SR, Mansfield EA, Piper MA, Deverka P, Frueh FW, Jessup JM, McShane LM, Tunis SR, Sigman CC, Kelloff GJ. Evidence of clinical utility: an unmet need in molecular diagnostics for patients with cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2014; 20:1428-44. [PMID: 24634466 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-2961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This article defines and describes best practices for the academic and business community to generate evidence of clinical utility for cancer molecular diagnostic assays. Beyond analytical and clinical validation, successful demonstration of clinical utility involves developing sufficient evidence to demonstrate that a diagnostic test results in an improvement in patient outcomes. This discussion is complementary to theoretical frameworks described in previously published guidance and literature reports by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Institute of Medicine, and Center for Medical Technology Policy, among others. These reports are comprehensive and specifically clarify appropriate clinical use, adoption, and payer reimbursement for assay manufacturers, as well as Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified laboratories, including those that develop assays (laboratory developed tests). Practical criteria and steps for establishing clinical utility are crucial to subsequent decisions for reimbursement without which high-performing molecular diagnostics will have limited availability to patients with cancer and fail to translate scientific advances into high-quality and cost-effective cancer care. See all articles in this CCR Focus section, "The Precision Medicine Conundrum: Approaches to Companion Diagnostic Co-development."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Parkinson
- Authors' Affiliations: New Enterprise Associates, Inc., Menlo Park; CCS Associates, Mountain View; Myraqa, Redwood Shores, California; Johnson & Johnson/Veridex, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey; University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Center for Diagnostics and Radiologic Health, Office of In Vitro Diagnostics, Personalized Medicine Program, Silver Spring; Center for Medical Technology Policy, Baltimore; Opus Three LLC; National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Rockville, Maryland; and Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-Based Practice Center, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pignatti F, Ehmann F, Hemmings R, Jonsson B, Nuebling M, Papaluca-Amati M, Posch M, Rasi G. Cancer Drug Development and the Evolving Regulatory Framework for Companion Diagnostics in the European Union. Clin Cancer Res 2014; 20:1458-68. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-1571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
19
|
|