Effects of Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-myelodysplastic Syndrome on Long-term Outcomes Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Outcome of donor lymphocyte infusion after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed myelodysplastic syndrome

BACKGROUND AIMS

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) improves outcomes for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients, but relapse rates remain high, and postrelapse treatment options are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the factors contributing to the response to donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in relapsed MDS patients post-HSCT.

METHODS

This study included 107 patients with relapsed and DLI-treated MDS who underwent their first HSCT between 2002 and 2022 and were registered in the Transplant Registry Unified Program. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were conducted using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models. Overall survival (OS) and response rates to DLI were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The 1-year OS was 30.0% and univariate analysis identified poor prognostic factors: age ≥58 years (P = 0.003), complex karyotype (P = 0.026), hematologic relapse (P = 0.026) and early relapse (P = 0.004). Azacitidine plus DLI also improved prognosis (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed age ≥58 years, hematologic relapse, and early relapse as poor prognostic factors. The adjusted OS for patients aged ≥58 years who relapsed <110 days post-transplant showed that the 1-year OS in patients with cytogenetic/molecular relapse was 43.6%, compared to 9.4% for those with hematologic relapse. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred in 62.3% of patients, and chronic GVHD in 30.8%, with manageable outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

DLI may improve OS in younger patients, those with cytogenetic/molecular relapse, and those with late relapse. Despite the risk of GVHD, its impact on prognosis is minimal. Given the limited treatment options, DLI should be considered for relapsed MDS patients post-HSCT.

Cellular and immunotherapies for myelodysplastic syndromes

In this review article, we outline the current landscape of immune and cell therapy-based approaches for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Given the well characterized graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect observed with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, and the known immune escape mechanisms observed in MDS cells, significant interest exists in developing immune-based approaches to treat MDS. These attempts have included antibody-based drugs that block immune escape molecules, such as inhibitors of the PD-1/PD-L1 and TIM-3/galectin-9 axes that mediate interactions between MDS cells and T-lymphocytes, as well as antibodies that block the CD47/SIRPα interaction, which mediates macrophage phagocytosis. Unfortunately, these approaches have been largely unsuccessful. There is significant potential for T-cell engaging therapies and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells, but there are also several limitations to these approaches that are unique to MDS. However, many of these limitations may be overcome by the next generation of cellular therapies, including those with engineered T-cell receptors or natural killer (NK)-cell based platforms. Regardless of the approach, all these immune cells are subject to the complex bone marrow microenvironment in MDS, which harbours a variable and heterogeneous mix of pro-inflammatory cytokines and immunosuppressive elements. Understanding this interaction will be paramount to ensuring the success of immune and cellular therapies in MDS.

Mild Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Improves Outcomes After HLA-Haploidentical-Related Donor Transplantation Using Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide and Cord Blood Transplantation

Haploidentical-related donor transplantation using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy-haplo) and cord blood transplantation (CBT) are valid alternatives for patients with hematological malignancies when HLA-matched donor transplantation (MDT) is unavailable. However, the effects of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) on outcomes after these transplants have not been fully elucidated. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of acute and chronic GVHD on transplant outcomes after PTCy-haplo transplants and compared them with CBT and MDT. We included a total of 914 adult patients with hematological malignancies in the Kyoto Stem Cell Transplantation Group registry who received PTCy-haplo (N = 120), CBT (N = 402), and MDT (N = 392), and achieved neutrophil engraftment. A multivariate analysis revealed that grade I-II acute GVHD improved of overall survival (OS) after PTCy-haplo [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.39, P = 0.018] and CBT (HR = 0.48, P < 0.001), but not after MDT (HR = 0.80, P = 0.267) compared with patients without acute GVHD. Grade I-II acute GVHD had a trend toward reducing the risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after PTCy-haplo (HR = 0.13, P = 0.060) and this positive effect was significant after CBT (HR = 0.39, P = 0.003). A negative impact of grade III-IV acute GVHD on NRM was observed after CBT and MDT, but not after PTCy-haplo. Limited chronic GVHD had a positive impact on OS after CBT and MDT, but not after PTCy-haplo. In conclusion, mild acute GVHD improved outcomes after PTCy-haplo and CBT, and limited chronic GVHD improved outcomes after CBT and MDT. These data indicated that the effects of GVHD on transplant outcomes depended on transplant platforms.

Blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 increases effector T cells and aggravates murine chronic graft-versus-host disease

T-cells mediated immunopathology is crucial for pathogenesis of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), a common complication following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Programmed death-1 (PD-1) regulates long-term survival and functional exhaustion of T-cell which might play a role in regulating cGVHD. We examined PD-1 expression on T cells of cGVHD mice and tested the impact of a PD-1 antibody on severity of cGVHD in murine allotransplant models. We also used a murine graft-versus-tumor (GVT) model to explore how tumor cell-derived PD-L1 affect the GVT effect and occurrence of cGVHD. PD-1 fluorescence intensity on CD4⁺ T-cells increased in mice developing cGVHD. PD-1^High T cells expressed higher levels of IFNγ and IL-17, comparing with PD-1^Low T cells. Giving the PD-1 antibody increased proportions of Th1, Th17 and Tc1 cells, but decreased proportion of Treg cells in allotransplant mice. The PD-1 antibody decreased survival of recipients and induced severe lung cGVHD. In the GVT model, knockdown of PD-L1 in A20 tumor cells enhanced GVT effect but increased cGVHD. In vitro study showed knockdown of PD-L1 in tumor cells increased cytotoxicity of T cells and reduced apoptosis of T cells. Knockdown of PD-L1 in tumor cells increased protein levels of phosphorylated AKT, Bcl-2 and Mcl-1, but decreased protein levels of Bak and Bax in co-cultured allogeneic T cells. In conclusion, expression of PD-1 on T cells increased in mice undergoing cGVHD. Intervention of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway showed a significant impact on occurrence of cGVHD and GVT effect.

Emerging immuno-oncology targets in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

Approaches to immunologic therapies in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have generally fallen into 2 categories: therapies that target immune effector cells and enhance or direct an antileukemic effect, and therapies which target immunological markers on MDS progenitors themselves. Examples of the former include immune checkpoint inhibitors, immunomodulatory therapies, and vaccines, among others, while examples of the latter include antibody-drug conjugate therapies and naked antibodies; while bispecific antibodies and modified T-cells (such as CAR-T therapies) bridge both therapeutic modalities. In this review, we will discuss the rationale for the above therapies, clinical results to date, and potential future directions for investigation.

Differential Effect of Graft-versus-Host Disease on Survival in Acute Leukemia according to Donor Type

PURPOSE

The anti-leukemic activity of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) depends on both the intensity of conditioning regimen and the strength of the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. However, it is unclear whether the sensitivity of the GVL effects differs between donor type and graft source.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We retrospectively evaluated the effect of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) on transplant outcomes for adults with acute leukemia (n = 6,548) between 2007 and 2017 using a Japanese database. In all analyses, we separately evaluated three distinct cohorts based on donor type [(8/8 allele-matched sibling donor, 8/8 allele-matched unrelated donor, and unrelated single-cord blood (UCB)].

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis, in which the development of GVHD was treated as a time-dependent covariate, showed a reductive effect of grade I-II acute GVHD on treatment failure (defined as 1-leukemia-free survival; P < 0.001), overall mortality (OM; P < 0.001), relapse (P < 0.001), and non-relapse mortality (NRM; P < 0.001) in patients receiving from UCB. A reductive effect of limited chronic GVHD on treatment failure (P < 0.001), OM (P < 0.001), and NRM (P < 0.001) was also shown in patients receiving from UCB. However, these effects were not always shown in patients receiving from other donors. The beneficial effects of mild acute and chronic GVHD after UCB transplantation on treatment failure were noted relatively in subgroups of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia and a non-remission status.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggested that the development of mild GVHD could improve survival after UCB transplantation for acute leukemia.

Silver Lining: Reduced Relapse with Chronic GVHD after Transplant for MDS

Chronic GVHD following hematopoietic cell transplantation is associated with reduced relapse incidence in patients with leukemias. This impact has been investigated in myelodysplastic syndrome, showing a beneficial impact of limited chronic GVHD on transplant outcomes in a cohort of more than 3,000 patients.See related article by Konuma et al., p. 6483.