The Pan-Tumor Landscape of Targetable Kinase Fusions in Circulating Tumor DNA

Relevance of detection of RAF fusion transcripts in pan-negative melanoma in routine practice

Pan-negative melanomas account for 30% of melanomas. In case of immunotherapy failure, therapeutic options are limited. Oncogene fusions represent a target of interest in many solid cancers. In melanoma, the frequency of oncogene fusion is not well documented and not routinely investigated. We conducted a single-center retrospective study. The objective was to determine the frequency of oncogene fusion detected by RNA sequencing, in patients with advanced or metastatic pan-negative melanoma. In parallel, an extended molecular alteration search was performed using extended targeted next-generation sequencing. We identified 59 patients with advanced pan-negative melanoma between January 2021 and January 2023. It was a cutaneous melanoma in 71.1% of the cases, a mucous melanoma in 15.2% of the cases. We identified nine patients with a RAF fusion, including seven BRAF gene fusion and two RAF1 fusion. Of the other molecular alterations, NF1 mutation was the most frequent molecular alteration identified. Among the nine patients with RAF fusions, all the patients initially received treatment with anti-PD1 ± anti-CTLA4 immunotherapy. After immunotherapy failure, five patients benefited from second-line targeted therapy (two with BRAF and MEK inhibitors combination, three MEK inhibitors alone). The response rate was 20%. In a population of pan-negative melanoma, we detected 15.2% of RAF fusion. Fusion detection allowed the introduction of a second line of targeted therapy, in the absence of a validated therapeutic option in 55.5% of cases. This study suggests the relevance of detecting RAF fusion in a selected population.

Circulating Tumor DNA Enables Sensitive Detection of Actionable Gene Fusions and Rearrangements Across Cancer Types

PURPOSE

Genomic rearrangements can generate potent oncogenic drivers or disrupt tumor suppressor genes. This study examines the landscape of fusions and rearrangements detected by liquid biopsy (LBx) of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) across different cancer types.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

LBx from 53,842 patients with 66 solid tumor types were profiled using FoundationOneLiquid CDx, a hybrid-capture sequencing platform that queries 324 cancer-related genes. Tissue biopsies (TBx) profiled using FoundationOneCDx were used as a comparator.

RESULTS

Among all LBx, 7,377 (14%) had ≥1 pathogenic rearrangement detected. A total of 3,648 (6.8%) LBx had ≥1 gain-of-function (GOF) oncogene rearrangement, and 4,428 (8.2%) LBx had ≥1 loss-of-function rearrangement detected. Cancer types with higher prevalence of GOF rearrangements included those with canonical fusion drivers: prostate cancer (19%), cholangiocarcinoma (6.4%), bladder (5.5%), and non-small cell lung cancer (4.4%). Although the prevalence of driver rearrangements was lower in LBx than TBx overall, the frequency of detection was comparable in LBx with a tumor fraction (TF) ≥1%. Rearrangements in FGFR2, BRAF, RET, and ALK, were detected across cancer types, but tended to be clonal variants in some cancer types and potential acquired resistance variants in others.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to some prior literature, this study reports detection of a wide variety of rearrangements in ctDNA. The prevalence of driver rearrangements in tissue and LBx was comparable when TF ≥1%. LBx presents a viable alternative when TBx is not available, and there may be less value in confirmatory testing when TF is sufficient.

Circulating tumour DNA testing in metastatic breast cancer: Integration with tissue testing

Breast cancer biomarker profiling predominantly relies on tissue testing (surgical and/or biopsy samples). However, the field of liquid biopsy, particularly the analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), has witnessed remarkable progress and continues to evolve rapidly. The incorporation of ctDNA-based testing into clinical practice is creating new opportunities for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). ctDNA offers advantages over conventional tissue analyses, as it reflects tumour heterogeneity and enables multiple serial biopsies in a minimally invasive manner. Thus, it serves as a valuable complement to standard tumour tissues and, in certain instances, may even present a potential alternative approach. In the context of MBC, ctDNA testing proves highly informative in the detection of disease progression, monitoring treatment response, assessing actionable biomarkers, and identifying mechanisms of resistance. Nevertheless, ctDNA does exhibit inherent limitations, including its generally low abundance, necessitating timely blood samplings and rigorous management of the pre-analytical phase. The development of highly sensitive assays and robust bioinformatic tools has paved the way for reliable ctDNA analyses. The time has now come to establish how ctDNA and tissue analyses can be effectively integrated into the diagnostic workflow of MBC to provide patients with the most comprehensive and accurate profiling. In this manuscript, we comprehensively analyse the current methodologies employed in ctDNA analysis and explore the potential benefits arising from the integration of tissue and ctDNA testing for patients diagnosed with MBC.

Fast and sensitive validation of fusion transcripts in whole-genome sequencing data

BACKGROUND

In cancer, genomic rearrangements can create fusion genes that either combine protein-coding sequences from two different partner genes or place one gene under the control of the promoter of another gene. These fusion genes can act as oncogenic drivers in tumor development and several fusions involving kinases have been successfully exploited as drug targets. Expressed fusions can be identified in RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data, but fusion prediction software often has a high fraction of false positive fusion transcript predictions. This is problematic for both research and clinical applications.

RESULTS

We describe a method for validation of fusion transcripts detected by RNA-Seq in matched whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data. Our pipeline uses discordant read pairs to identify supported fusion events and analyzes soft-clipped read alignments to determine genomic breakpoints. We have tested it on matched RNA-Seq and WGS data for both tumors and cancer cell lines and show that it can be used to validate both new predicted gene fusions and experimentally validated fusion events. It was considerably faster and more sensitive than using BreakDancer and Manta, software that is instead designed to detect many different types of structural variants on a genome-wide scale.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a fast and very sensitive pipeline for validation of gene fusions detected by RNA-Seq in matched WGS data. It can be used to identify high-quality gene fusions for further bioinformatic and experimental studies, including validation of genomic breakpoints and studies of the mechanisms that generate fusions. In a clinical setting, it could help find expressed gene fusions for personalized therapy.

Circulating and urinary tumour DNA in urothelial carcinoma - upper tract, lower tract and metastatic disease

Precision medicine has transformed the way urothelial carcinoma is managed. However, current practices are limited by the availability of tissue samples for genomic profiling and the spatial and temporal molecular heterogeneity observed in many studies. Among rapidly advancing genomic sequencing technologies, non-invasive liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising diagnostic tool to reproduce tumour genomics, and has shown potential to be integrated in several aspects of clinical care. In urothelial carcinoma, liquid biopsies such as plasma circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) and urinary tumour DNA (utDNA) have been investigated as a surrogates for tumour biopsies and might bridge many shortfalls currently faced by clinicians. Both ctDNA and utDNA seem really promising in urothelial carcinoma diagnosis, staging and prognosis, response to therapy monitoring, detection of minimal residual disease and surveillance. The use of liquid biopsies in patients with urothelial carcinoma could further advance precision medicine in this population, facilitating personalized patient monitoring through non-invasive assays.

Genomic approaches to cancer and minimal residual disease detection using circulating tumor DNA

Liquid biopsies using cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are being used frequently in both research and clinical settings. ctDNA can be used to identify actionable mutations to personalize systemic therapy, detect post-treatment minimal residual disease (MRD), and predict responses to immunotherapy. ctDNA can also be isolated from a range of different biofluids, with the possibility of detecting locoregional MRD with increased sensitivity if sampling more proximally than blood plasma. However, ctDNA detection remains challenging in early-stage and post-treatment MRD settings where ctDNA levels are minuscule giving a high risk for false negative results, which is balanced with the risk of false positive results from clonal hematopoiesis. To address these challenges, researchers have developed ever-more elegant approaches to lower the limit of detection (LOD) of ctDNA assays toward the part-per-million range and boost assay sensitivity and specificity by reducing sources of low-level technical and biological noise, and by harnessing specific genomic and epigenomic features of ctDNA. In this review, we highlight a range of modern assays for ctDNA analysis, including advancements made to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. We further highlight the challenge of detecting ultra-rare tumor-associated variants, overcoming which will improve the sensitivity of post-treatment MRD detection and open a new frontier of personalized adjuvant treatment decision-making.

Overview of the role of liquid biopsy in cancer management

With the emergence of novel targeted therapeutic options in early-stage and advanced-stage malignancies, researchers have shifted their focus on developing personalized treatment plans through molecular profiling. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a cell-free DNA (ctDNA) fragment, originating from tumor cells, and circulating in the bloodstream as well as biological fluids. Over the past decade, many techniques were developed for liquid biopsies through next-generation sequencing. This alternative non-invasive biopsy offers several advantages in various types of tumors over traditional tissue biopsy. The process of liquid biopsy is considered minimally invasive and therefore easily repeatable when needed, providing a more dynamic analysis of the tumor cells. Moreover, it has an advantage in patients with tumors that are not candidates for tissue sampling. Besides, it offers a deeper understanding of tumor burden as well as treatment response, thereby enhancing the detection of minimal residual disease and therapeutic guidance for personalized medicine. Despite its many advantages, ctDNA and liquid biopsy do have some limitations. This paper discusses the basis of ctDNA and the current data available on the subject, as well as its clinical utility. We also reflect on the limitations of using ctDNA in addition to its future perspectives in clinical oncology and precision medicine.

Evaluation of circulating tumor DNA by electropherogram analysis and methylome profiling in high-risk neuroblastomas

Background

Liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising, non-invasive diagnostic approach in oncology because the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) reflects the precise status of the disease at diagnosis, progression, and response to treatment. DNA methylation profiling is also a potential solution for sensitive and specific detection of many cancers. The combination of both approaches, DNA methylation analysis from ctDNA, provides an extremely useful and minimally invasive tool with high relevance in patients with childhood cancer. Neuroblastoma is an extracranial solid tumor most common in children and responsible for up to 15% of cancer-related deaths. This high death rate has prompted the scientific community to search for new therapeutic targets. DNA methylation also offers a new source for identifying these molecules. However, the limited blood sample size which can be obtained from children with cancer and the fact that ctDNA content may occasionally be diluted by non-tumor cell-free DNA (cfDNA) complicate optimal quantities of material for high-throughput sequencing studies.

Methods

In this article, we present an improved method for ctDNA methylome studies of blood-derived plasma from high-risk neuroblastoma patients. We assessed the electropherogram profiles of ctDNA-containing samples suitable for methylome studies, using 10 ng of plasma-derived ctDNA from 126 samples of 86 high-risk neuroblastoma patients, and evaluated several bioinformatic approaches to analyze DNA methylation sequencing data.

Results

We demonstrated that enzymatic methyl-sequencing (EM-seq) outperformed bisulfite conversion-based method, based on the lower proportion of PCR duplicates and the higher percentage of unique mapping reads, mean coverage, and genome coverage. The analysis of the electropherogram profiles revealed the presence of nucleosomal multimers, and occasionally high molecular weight DNA. We established that 10% content of the mono-nucleosomal peak is sufficient ctDNA for successful detection of copy number variations and methylation profiles. Quantification of mono-nucleosomal peak also showed that samples at diagnosis contained a higher amount of ctDNA than relapse samples.

Conclusions

Our results refine the use of electropherogram profiles to optimize sample selection for subsequent high-throughput analysis and support the use of liquid biopsy followed by enzymatic conversion of unmethylated cysteines to assess the methylomes of neuroblastoma patients.

Tumor Fraction Correlates With Detection of Actionable Variants Across > 23,000 Circulating Tumor DNA Samples

PURPOSE

Profiling of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is increasingly adopted in the management of solid tumors, concurrent with increased availability of more comprehensive ctDNA panels. However, variable ctDNA shed can result in variable assay sensitivity. We studied the relationship between ctDNA tumor fraction (TF) and detection of actionable alterations across cancer types.

METHODS

A total of 23,482 liquid biopsies (LBx) submitted between September 2020 and October 2021 were sequenced using a hybrid capture panel that reports genomic alterations (GAs) and genomic biomarkers across 324 cancer-related genes. The primary end points were the prevalence of targetable GAs by cancer type and detection in relationship to ctDNA TF. Sensitivity of detection in LBx was assessed in 1,289 patients with available tissue results.

RESULTS

94% (n = 22,130) of LBx had detectable ctDNA, with a median TF of 2.2%. LBx profiling detected GAs in National Comprehensive Cancer Network category 1 genes in 37% of lung, 30% of prostate, 36% of breast, and 51% of colon cancer cases. Potential germline GAs flagged on clinical reports were detected in genes including <i>BRCA1/2</i>, <i>PALB2</i>, <i>CHEK2</i>, and <i>ATM.</i> Polyclonal mutations in genes associated with resistance such as <i>AR</i>, <i>ESR1</i>, <i>RB1</i>, and <i>NF1</i> were detected. The sensitivity of LBx to detect driver alterations identified in tissue biopsy from the same patient ranged from 58% to 86% but was consistently at or near 100% in cases with TF ≥ 10%.

CONCLUSION

Elevated ctDNA shed is associated with both high sensitivity and negative predictive value for detection of actionable GAs. The presence of elevated TF suggests adequate tumor profiling and may reduce the value of subsequent reflex to confirmatory tissue testing in patients with negative LBx results.

Current Clinical Practice of Precision Medicine Using Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Tests in Biliary Tract Cancer in Japan

With the recent advances of next generation sequencing technologies, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests, which are designed to measure more than hundreds of cancer-related genes at a time, have now been widely introduced into daily clinical practice. For the patients whose tumor samples are not fit for tissue-based CGP tests, a blood-based CGP test (liquid biopsy) is available as an alternative option. Three CGP tests, "OncoGuide NCC™Oncopanel System (124 genes)", "FoundationOne®CDx (324 genes)", and "Founda-tionOne®CDx Liquid (324 genes)", are now reimbursed by public insurance in 233 hospitals designated for cancer genomic medicine in Japan. In biliary tract cancer, the prevalence of druggable variants is relatively higher compared to other cancer types and the European Society for Medical Oncology recommends routine use of CGP tests for advanced biliary tract cancer to guide treatment options. The latest National Cancer Center Network guideline lists eight druggable markers (NTRK fusion, MSI-H, TMB-H, BRAF V600E, FGFR2 fusions/rearrangement, IDH1 mutations, RET fusion, and HER2 overexpression) and matched therapies. In Japan, matched therapies for four markers (NTRK, MSI-H, TMB-H, and FGFR2) are reimbursed by public insurance (as of September 2022). The progress of genomic profiling technology will contribute to the improvement of the dismal clinical outcomes of this disease in the future.

Liquid Biopsy Analysis as a Tool for TKI-Based Treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has recently evolved with the introduction of targeted therapy based on the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with certain gene alterations, including EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, and MET genes. Molecular targeted therapy based on TKIs has improved clinical outcomes in a large number of NSCLC patients with advanced disease, enabling significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS). Liquid biopsy is an increasingly popular diagnostic tool for treating TKI-based NSCLC. The studies presented in this article show that detection and analysis based on liquid biopsy elements such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), exosomes, and/or tumor-educated platelets (TEPs) can contribute to the appropriate selection and monitoring of targeted therapy in NSCLC patients as complementary to invasive tissue biopsy. The detection of these elements, combined with their molecular analysis (using, e.g., digital PCR (dPCR), next generation sequencing (NGS), shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS)), enables the detection of mutations, which are required for the TKI treatment. Despite such promising results obtained by many research teams, it is still necessary to carry out prospective studies on a larger group of patients in order to validate these methods before their application in clinical practice.

Making the Rounds: Exploring the Role of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Advancements in the clinical practice of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are shifting treatment paradigms towards increasingly personalized approaches. Liquid biopsies using various circulating analytes provide minimally invasive methods of sampling the molecular content within tumor cells. Plasma-derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), the tumor-derived component of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), is the most extensively studied analyte and has a growing list of applications in the clinical management of NSCLC. As an alternative to tumor genotyping, the assessment of oncogenic driver alterations by ctDNA has become an accepted companion diagnostic via both single-gene polymerase chain reactions (PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for advanced NSCLC. ctDNA technologies have also shown the ability to detect the emerging mechanisms of acquired resistance that evolve after targeted therapy. Furthermore, the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) by ctDNA for patients with NSCLC after curative-intent treatment may serve as a prognostic and potentially predictive biomarker for recurrence and response to therapy, respectively. Finally, ctDNA analysis via mutational, methylation, and/or fragmentation multi-omic profiling offers the potential for improving early lung cancer detection. In this review, we discuss the role of ctDNA in each of these capacities, namely, for molecular profiling, treatment response monitoring, MRD detection, and early cancer detection of NSCLC.

Expert Panel Consensus Recommendations on the Use of Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Comprehensive genomic profiling is increasingly used to facilitate precision oncology based on molecular stratification. In addition to conventional tissue comprehensive genomic profiling, comprehensive genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA has become widely utilized in cancer care owing on its advantages, including less invasiveness, rapid turnaround time, and capturing heterogeneity. However, circulating tumor DNA comprehensive genomic profiling has some limitations, mainly false negatives due to low levels of plasma circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid and false positives caused by clonal hematopoiesis. Nevertheless, no guidelines and recommendations fully address these issues. Here, an expert panel committee involving representatives from 12 Designated Core Hospitals for Cancer Genomic Medicine in Japan was organized to develop expert consensus recommendations for the use of circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid‐based comprehensive genomic profiling. The aim was to generate guidelines for clinicians and allied healthcare professionals on the optimal use of the circulating tumor DNA assays in advanced solid tumors and to aid the design of future clinical trials that utilize and develop circulating tumor DNA assays to refine precision oncology. Fourteen clinical questions regarding circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid comprehensive genomic profiling including the timing of testing and considerations for interpreting results were established by searching and curating associated literatures, and corresponding recommendations were prepared based on the literature for each clinical question. Final consensus recommendations were developed by voting to determine the level of each recommendation by the Committee members.

Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Genomic Profiling Assays in Adult Solid Tumors for Precision Oncology: Recent Advancements and Future Challenges

Genomic profiling using tumor biopsies remains the standard approach for the selection of approved molecular targeted therapies. However, this is often limited by its invasiveness, feasibility, and poor sample quality. Liquid biopsies provide a less invasive approach while capturing a contemporaneous and comprehensive tumor genomic profile. Recent advancements in the detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from plasma samples at satisfactory sensitivity, specificity, and detection concordance to tumor tissues have facilitated the approval of ctDNA-based genomic profiling to be integrated into regular clinical practice. The recent approval of both single-gene and multigene assays to detect genetic biomarkers from plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as companion diagnostic tools for molecular targeted therapies has transformed the therapeutic decision-making procedure for advanced solid tumors. Despite the increasing use of cfDNA-based molecular profiling, there is an ongoing debate about a 'plasma first' or 'tissue first' approach toward genomic testing for advanced solid malignancies. Both approaches present possible advantages and disadvantages, and these factors should be carefully considered to personalize and select the most appropriate genomic assay. This review focuses on the recent advancements of cfDNA-based genomic profiling assays in advanced solid tumors while highlighting the major challenges that should be tackled to formulate evidence-based guidelines in recommending the 'right assay for the right patient at the right time'.

Validation of a DNA-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Test for Molecular Diagnostic Variant and Fusion Detection in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Specimens and Liquid Biopsy Plasma/Cell-Free DNA Samples

This study evaluated two DNA-based next-generation sequencing approaches for detection of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and fusions in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens and liquid biopsies (AVENIO Targeted and Surveillance Panels). Reference standards (n = 7 with SNVs and structural variants) and real-world FFPE tissue specimens (n = 26 lung, colorectal, pancreas, ovary, breast, prostate, melanoma, and soft tissue cancer cases with n = 27 samples), liquid biopsies [n = 29 cases with n = 40 plasma/cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples], and one pleural effusion (lung cancer) were analyzed by the AVENIO workflow for known SNVs (BRAF, BRCA1/2, CTNNB1, EGFR, KRAS, MET exon 14 skipping, NRAS, PIK3CA, and TP53), insertions and deletions (ERBB2 and KIT), and fusions (ALK and ROS1). Detection of SNVs, insertions and deletions, and fusions was reliable in 24 of 26 FFPE tissue specimen cases and at 1% allele frequency in 5 of 5 cfDNA reference standards and 37 of 40 plasma/cfDNA samples. Pitfalls were identified for the AVENIO workflow in calling and listing of clinically relevant variants, requiring additional manual inspection. Moreover, laboratory workflows are distinct for FFPE tissue specimens and liquid biopsies as well as time-consuming for sample quality control assays. In summary, the DNA-based next-generation sequencing approaches may be suitable for routine molecular pathology diagnostics on careful data interpretation and further optimization of the technical and laboratory workflows.

Next-Generation Sequencing on Circulating Tumor DNA in Advanced Solid Cancer: Swiss Army Knife for the Molecular Tumor Board? A Review of the Literature Focused on FDA Approved Test

FDA-approved next-generation sequencing assays based on cell-free DNA offers new opportunities in a molecular-tumor-board context thanks to the noninvasiveness of liquid biopsy, the diversity of analyzed parameters and the short turnaround time. It gives the opportunity to study the heterogeneity of the tumor, to elucidate complex resistance mechanisms and to adapt treatment strategies. However, lowering the limit of detection and increasing the panels' size raise new questions in terms of detection of incidental germline alterations, occult malignancies and clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential mutations. In this review, after a technological discussion and description of the common problematics encountered, we establish recommendations in properly using these FDA-approved tests in a molecular-tumor-board context.