Abstract 4843: TP53-stabilization with APR-246 enhances antitumor effects of immune checkpoint blockade in preclinical models

Mutant p53 gain of function mediates cancer immune escape that is counteracted by APR-246

BACKGROUND

p53 mutants contribute to the chronic inflammatory tumour microenvironment (TME). In this study, we address the mechanism of how p53 mutants lead to chronic inflammation in tumours and how to transform it to restore cancer immune surveillance.

METHODS

Our analysis of RNA-seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA-BRCA) project revealed that mutant p53 (mtp53) cancers correlated with chronic inflammation. We used cell-based assays and a mouse model to discover a novel gain of function of mtp53 and the effect of the mtp53 reactivating compound APR-246 on the anti-tumour immune response.

RESULTS

We found that tumour samples from patients with breast carcinoma carrying mtp53 showed elevated Interferon (IFN) signalling, Tumour Inflammation Signature (TIS) score and infiltration of CD8+ T cells compared to wild type p53 (wtp53) tumours. We showed that the expression of IFN and immune checkpoints were elevated in tumour cells in a mtp53-dependent manner, suggesting a novel gain of function. Restoration of wt function to mtp53 by APR-246 induced the expression of endogenous retroviruses, IFN signalling and repressed immune checkpoints. Moreover, APR-246 promoted CD4+ T cells infiltration and IFN signalling and prevented CD8+ T cells exhaustion within the TME in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast carcinomas with mtp53 displayed enhanced inflammation. APR-246 boosted the interferon response or represses immune checkpoints in p53 mutant tumour cells, and restores cancer immune surveillance in vivo.

Phase Ib study of eprenetapopt (APR-246) in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors

Background

We conducted a phase I, multicenter, open-label, dose-finding, and expansion study to determine the safety and preliminary efficacy of eprenetapopt (APR-246) combined with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04383938).

Patients and methods

For dose-finding, requirements were non-central nervous system primary solid tumor, intolerant to/progressed after ≥1 line of treatment, and eligible for pembrolizumab; for expansion: (i) gastric/gastroesophageal junction tumor, intolerant to/progressed after first-line treatment, and no prior anti-programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy; (ii) bladder/urothelial tumor, intolerant to/progressed after first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and no prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy; (iii) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with previous anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Patients received eprenetapopt 4.5 g/day intravenously (IV) on days 1-4 with pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on day 3 in each 21-day cycle. Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), adverse events (AEs), and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of eprenetapopt.

Results

Forty patients were enrolled (median age 66 years; range 27-85) and 37 received eprenetapopt plus pembrolizumab. No DLTs were reported and the RP2D for eprenetapopt in combination was 4.5 g/day IV on days 1-4. The most common eprenetapopt-related AEs were dizziness (35.1%), nausea (32.4%), and vomiting (29.7%). AEs leading to eprenetapopt discontinuation occurred in 2/37 patients (5.4%). In efficacy-assessable patients (n = 29), one achieved complete response (urothelial cancer), two achieved partial responses (NSCLC, urothelial cancer), and six patients had stable disease.

Conclusions

The eprenetapopt plus pembrolizumab combination was well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile and showed clinical activity in patients with solid tumors.

•

Eprenetapopt in combination with pembrolizumab was well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile.

•

Eprenetapopt plus pembrolizumab demonstrated clinical activity in heavily pre-treated patients with solid tumors.

•

This is the first clinical trial evaluating the combination of a p53 reactivator with immuno-oncology therapy.

•

This work informs the development of treatment combining immunotherapy with agents targeting specific pathways such as p53.