1
|
Wang F, Jin Y, Wang M, Luo HY, Fang WJ, Wang YN, Chen YX, Huang RJ, Guan WL, Li JB, Li YH, Wang FH, Hu XH, Zhang YQ, Qiu MZ, Liu LL, Wang ZX, Ren C, Wang DS, Zhang DS, Wang ZQ, Liao WT, Tian L, Zhao Q, Xu RH. Combined anti-PD-1, HDAC inhibitor and anti-VEGF for MSS/pMMR colorectal cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial. Nat Med 2024; 30:1035-1043. [PMID: 38438735 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02813-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
Epigenetic modifications of chromatin, including histone acetylation, and tumor angiogenesis play pivotal roles in creating an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. In the randomized phase 2 CAPability-01 trial, we investigated the potential efficacy of combining the programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody sintilimab with the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) chidamide with or without the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody bevacizumab in patients with unresectable chemotherapy-refractory locally advanced or metastatic microsatellite stable/proficient mismatch repair (MSS/pMMR) colorectal cancer. Forty-eight patients were randomly assigned to either the doublet arm (sintilimab and chidamide, n = 23) or the triplet arm (sintilimab, chidamide and bevacizumab, n = 25). The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 18 weeks (18wPFS rate) was met with a rate of 43.8% (21 of 48) for the entire study population. Secondary endpoint results include a median PFS of 3.7 months, an overall response rate of 29.2% (14 of 48), a disease control rate of 56.3% (27 of 48) and a median duration of response of 12.0 months. The secondary endpoint of median overall survival time was not mature. The triplet arm exhibited significantly improved outcomes compared to the doublet arm, with a greater 18wPFS rate (64.0% versus 21.7%, P = 0.003), higher overall response rate (44.0% versus 13.0%, P = 0.027) and longer median PFS rate (7.3 months versus 1.5 months, P = 0.006). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events observed in both the triplet and doublet arms included proteinuria, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia, leukopenia and diarrhea. There were two treatment-related fatalities (hepatic failure and pneumonitis). Analysis of bulk RNA sequencing data from the patients suggested that the triplet combination enhanced CD8+ T cell infiltration, resulting in a more immunologically active tumor microenvironment. Our study suggests that the combination of a PD-1 antibody, an HDACi, and a VEGF antibody could be a promising treatment regimen for patients with MSS/pMMR advanced colorectal cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04724239 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
| | - Ying Jin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Min Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Hui-Yan Luo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Wei-Jia Fang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Ying-Nan Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Yan-Xing Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Run-Jie Huang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Wen-Long Guan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Ji-Bin Li
- Department of Clinical Research, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Yu-Hong Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Feng-Hua Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Xiao-Hua Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, P. R. China
| | - Yan-Qiao Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, P. R. China
| | - Miao-Zhen Qiu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Lu-Lu Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Zi-Xian Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Chao Ren
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - De-Shen Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Dong-Sheng Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Zhi-Qiang Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Wen-Ting Liao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Lin Tian
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Qi Zhao
- Bioinformatics Platform, Department of Experimental Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Rui-Hua Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
- Research Unit of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luke JJ, Fakih M, Schneider C, Chiorean EG, Bendell J, Kristeleit R, Kurzrock R, Blagden SP, Brana I, Goff LW, O'Hayer K, Geschwindt R, Smith M, Zhou F, Naing A. Phase I/II sequencing study of azacitidine, epacadostat, and pembrolizumab in advanced solid tumors. Br J Cancer 2023; 128:2227-2235. [PMID: 37087488 PMCID: PMC10241827 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02267-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1), an interferon-inducible enzyme, contributes to tumor immune intolerance. Immune checkpoint inhibition may increase interferon levels; combining IDO1 inhibition with immune checkpoint blockade represents an attractive strategy. Epigenetic agents trigger interferon responses and may serve as an immunotherapy priming method. We evaluated whether epigenetic therapy plus IDO1 inhibition and immune checkpoint blockade confers clinical benefit to patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS ECHO-206 was a Phase I/II study where treatment-experienced patients with advanced solid tumors (N = 70) received azacitidine plus an immunotherapy doublet (epacadostat [IDO1 inhibitor] and pembrolizumab). Sequencing of treatment was also assessed. Primary endpoints were safety/tolerability (Phase I), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or pharmacologically active dose (PAD; Phase I), and investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR; Phase II). RESULTS In Phase I, no dose-limiting toxicities were reported, the MTD was not reached; a PAD was not determined. ORR was 5.7%, with four partial responses. The most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (42.9%) and nausea (42.9%). Twelve (17.1%) patients experienced ≥1 fatal AE, one of which (asthenia) was treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS Although the azacitidine-epacadostat-pembrolizumab regimen was well tolerated, it was not associated with substantial clinical response in patients with advanced solid tumors previously exposed to immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason J Luke
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Marwan Fakih
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Charles Schneider
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - E Gabriela Chiorean
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Johanna Bendell
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Razelle Kurzrock
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Sarah P Blagden
- Early Phase Clinical Trials Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Irene Brana
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura W Goff
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | | | | | - Feng Zhou
- Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Aung Naing
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ooki A, Osumi H, Chin K, Watanabe M, Yamaguchi K. Potent molecular-targeted therapies for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359221138377. [PMID: 36872946 PMCID: PMC9978325 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221138377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Esophageal cancer (EC) remains a public health concern with a high mortality and disease burden worldwide. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a predominant histological subtype of EC that has unique etiology, molecular profiles, and clinicopathological features. Although systemic chemotherapy, including cytotoxic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors, is the main therapeutic option for recurrent or metastatic ESCC patients, the clinical benefits are limited with poor prognosis. Personalized molecular-targeted therapies have been hampered due to the lack of robust treatment efficacy in clinical trials. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop effective therapeutic strategies. In this review, we summarize the molecular profiles of ESCC based on the findings of pivotal comprehensive molecular analyses, highlighting potent therapeutic targets for establishing future precision medicine for ESCC patients, with the most recent results of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Ooki
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan
| | - Hiroki Osumi
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keisho Chin
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masayuki Watanabe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kensei Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Arance A, de la Cruz-Merino L, Petrella TM, Jamal R, Ny L, Carneiro A, Berrocal A, Márquez-Rodas I, Spreafico A, Atkinson V, Costa Svedman F, Mant A, Khattak MA, Mihalcioiu C, Jang S, Cowey CL, Smith AD, Hawk N, Chen K, Diede SJ, Krepler C, Long GV. Phase II LEAP-004 Study of Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab for Melanoma With Confirmed Progression on a Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 or Programmed Death Ligand 1 Inhibitor Given as Monotherapy or in Combination. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:75-85. [PMID: 35867951 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Effective treatments are needed for melanoma that progresses on inhibitors of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1). We conducted the phase II LEAP-004 study to evaluate the combination of the multikinase inhibitor lenvatinib and the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab in this population (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03776136). METHODS Eligible patients with unresectable stage III-IV melanoma with confirmed progressive disease (PD) within 12 weeks of the last dose of a PD-1/L1 inhibitor given alone or with other therapies, including cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, received lenvatinib 20 mg orally once daily plus ≤ 35 doses of pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks until PD or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST, version 1.1, by independent central review. RESULTS A total of 103 patients were enrolled and treated. The median study follow-up was 15.3 months. ORR in the total population was 21.4% (95% CI, 13.9 to 30.5), with three (2.9%) complete responses and 19 (18.4%) partial responses. The median duration of response was 8.3 months (range, 3.2-15.9+). ORR was 33.3% in the 30 patients with PD on prior anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 therapy. The median progression-free survival and overall survival in the total population were 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.8 to 7.1) and 14.0 months (95% CI, 10.8 to not reached), respectively. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 47 (45.6%) patients, most commonly hypertension (21.4%); one patient died from a treatment-related event (decreased platelet count). CONCLUSION Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab provides clinically meaningful, durable responses in patients with advanced melanoma with confirmed PD on prior PD-1/L1 inhibitor-based therapy, including those with PD on anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 therapy. The safety profile was as expected. These data support lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab as a potential regimen for this population of high unmet need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Arance
- Hospital Clinic Barcelona and IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Rahima Jamal
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Lars Ny
- University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ana Carneiro
- Skåne University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Ivan Márquez-Rodas
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón and CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Victoria Atkinson
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Andrew Mant
- Eastern Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Muhammad A Khattak
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch and Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | | | - C Lance Cowey
- Texas Oncology-Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Signaling pathways and targeted therapies in lung squamous cell carcinoma: mechanisms and clinical trials. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2022; 7:353. [PMID: 36198685 PMCID: PMC9535022 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-022-01200-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death across the world. Unlike lung adenocarcinoma, patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) have not benefitted from targeted therapies. Although immunotherapy has significantly improved cancer patients' outcomes, the relatively low response rate and severe adverse events hinder the clinical application of this promising treatment in LSCC. Therefore, it is of vital importance to have a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of LSCC as well as the inner connection among different signaling pathways, which will surely provide opportunities for more effective therapeutic interventions for LSCC. In this review, new insights were given about classical signaling pathways which have been proved in other cancer types but not in LSCC, including PI3K signaling pathway, VEGF/VEGFR signaling, and CDK4/6 pathway. Other signaling pathways which may have therapeutic potentials in LSCC were also discussed, including the FGFR1 pathway, EGFR pathway, and KEAP1/NRF2 pathway. Next, chromosome 3q, which harbors two key squamous differentiation markers SOX2 and TP63 is discussed as well as its related potential therapeutic targets. We also provided some progress of LSCC in epigenetic therapies and immune checkpoints blockade (ICB) therapies. Subsequently, we outlined some combination strategies of ICB therapies and other targeted therapies. Finally, prospects and challenges were given related to the exploration and application of novel therapeutic strategies for LSCC.
Collapse
|
6
|
Sah VR, Karlsson J, Jespersen H, Lindberg MF, Nilsson LM, Ny L, Nilsson JA. Epigenetic therapy to enhance therapeutic effects of PD-1 inhibition in therapy-resistant melanoma. Melanoma Res 2022; 32:241-248. [PMID: 34753889 PMCID: PMC9245557 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Targeted therapy and immunotherapy have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic skin melanoma but around half of all patients develop resistance early or late during treatment. The situation is even worse for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (UM). Here we hypothesized that the immunotherapy of therapy-resistant skin melanoma or UM can be enhanced by epigenetic inhibitors. Cultured B16F10 cells and human UM cells were treated with the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) entinostat or BETi JQ1. Entinostat-induced HLA expression and PD-L1, but JQ1 did not. A syngeneic mouse model carrying B16-F10 melanoma cells was treated with PD-1 and CTLA4 inhibitors, which was curative. Co-treatment with the bioavailable BETi iBET726 impaired the immunotherapy effect. Monotherapy of a B16-F10 mouse model with anti-PD-1 resulted in a moderate therapeutic effect that could be enhanced by entinostat. Mice carrying PD-L1 knockout B16-F10 cells were also sensitive to entinostat. This suggests HDAC inhibition and immunotherapy could work in concert. Indeed, co-cultures of UM with HLA-matched melanoma-specific tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) resulted in higher TIL-mediated melanoma killing when entinostat was added. Further exploration of combined immunotherapy and epigenetic therapy in metastatic melanoma resistant to PD-1 inhibition is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasu R. Sah
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Joakim Karlsson
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Henrik Jespersen
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Mattias F. Lindberg
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Lisa M. Nilsson
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Lars Ny
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jonas A. Nilsson
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alencar AM, Sonpavde G. Emerging Therapies in Penile Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:910335. [PMID: 35800050 PMCID: PMC9253417 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.910335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in the treatment of rare tumors like penile cancer were always hampered by the lack of deep comprehension of the molecular biology and genomic and epigenomic alterations involved in carcinogenesis and tumor progression, as well as by the difficulty in recruitment of patients for prospective clinical trials. Despite the high rates of cure in early localized penile cancers with surgery or other local procedures, locally advanced and metastatic tumors require systemic treatment, with chemotherapy being the current standard, but with high toxicity and no proven real impact on survival. Recent important findings of frequent genomic alterations and mutation signatures in penile cancer have motivated several trials in new modalities of systemic treatments, especially immunotherapy. This review aims to present the most recent advances and the prospect of new modalities of systemic therapies with ongoing studies in penile cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Machado Alencar
- Grupo de Estudos em Patologia Molecular, Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Hospital São Domingos/Dasa, São Luís, Brazil
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- *Correspondence: Guru Sonpavde,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Frisone D, Friedlaender A, Addeo A, Tsantoulis P. The Landscape of Immunotherapy Resistance in NSCLC. Front Oncol 2022; 12:817548. [PMID: 35515125 PMCID: PMC9066487 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.817548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Immunotherapy has demonstrated clinically significant benefit for non-small-cell lung cancer, but innate (primary) or acquired resistance remains a challenge. Criteria for a uniform clinical definition of acquired resistance have been recently proposed in order to harmonize the design of future clinical trials. Several mechanisms of resistance are now well-described, including the lack of tumor antigens, defective antigen presentation, modulation of critical cellular pathways, epigenetic changes, and changes in the tumor microenvironment. Host-related factors, such as the microbiome and the state of immunity, have also been examined. New compounds and treatment strategies are being developed to target these mechanisms with the goal of maximizing the benefit derived from immunotherapy. Here we review the definitions of resistance to immunotherapy, examine its underlying mechanisms and potential corresponding treatment strategies. We focus on recently published clinical trials and trials that are expected to deliver results soon. Finally, we gather insights from recent preclinical discoveries that may translate to clinical application in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Frisone
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alex Friedlaender
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Department of Oncology, Clinique Generale Beaulieu, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Alfredo Addeo
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Petros Tsantoulis
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitors: A Promising Weapon to Tackle Therapy Resistance in Melanoma. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23073660. [PMID: 35409020 PMCID: PMC8998190 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23073660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Melanoma is an aggressive malignant tumor, arising more commonly on the skin, while it can also occur on mucosal surfaces and the uveal tract of the eye. In the context of the unresectable and metastatic cases that account for the vast majority of melanoma-related deaths, the currently available therapeutic options are of limited value. The exponentially increasing knowledge in the field of molecular biology has identified epigenetic reprogramming and more specifically histone deacetylation (HDAC), as a crucial regulator of melanoma progression and as a key driver in the emergence of drug resistance. A variety of HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) have been developed and evaluated in multiple solid and hematologic malignancies, showing promising results. In melanoma, various experimental models have elucidated a critical role of histone deacetylases in disease pathogenesis. They could, therefore, represent a promising novel therapeutic approach for advanced disease. A number of clinical trials assessing the efficacy of HDACi have already been completed, while a few more are in progress. Despite some early promising signs, a lot of work is required in the field of clinical studies, and larger patient cohorts are needed in order for more valid conclusions to be extracted, regarding the potential of HDACi as mainstream treatment options for melanoma.
Collapse
|
10
|
Lecuelle J, Favier L, Fraisse C, Lagrange A, Kaderbhai C, Boidot R, Chevrier S, Joubert P, Routy B, Truntzer C, Ghiringhelli F. MER4 endogenous retrovirus correlated with better efficacy of anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy in non-small cell lung cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:jitc-2021-004241. [PMID: 35277462 PMCID: PMC8919440 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs) are highly expressed in various cancer types and are associated with increased innate immune response and better efficacy of antiprogrammed death-1/ligand-1 (anti-PD1/PD-L1)-directed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in preclinical models. However, their role in human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of patients receiving ICI for advanced NSCLC in two independent cohorts. ERV expression was determined by RNA sequencing. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) under ICI. The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from ICI initiation. We studied expression of 6205 ERVs. Multivariate Cox regression model with lasso penalty was estimated on the training set to select ERVs significantly associated with survival. The predictive power of these ERVs was compared with that of previously described transcriptomic signatures. Results We studied two independent cohorts of 89 and 70 patients, used as training and validation sets. Clinicopathological characteristics included 75% of patients with non-squamous NSCLC. We selected four ERVs significantly associated with PFS. Only high MER4 ERV was associated with better PFS and OS in both cohorts. From a biological point of view, high MER4 expression is associated with higher infiltration of eosinophils and inflammatory gene signatures, while low MER4 expression is associated with enrichment in metabolism and proliferation signatures. Adding MER4 to previously described transcriptomic signatures of response to ICI improved their predictive power. Conclusions MER4 ERV expression is useful to stratify risk and predict PFS and OS in patients treated with ICI for NSCLC. It also improves the predictive power of other known transcriptomic signatures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Lecuelle
- Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Georges-Francois Leclerc Cancer Center - UNICANCER, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
- UMR INSERM 1231, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
- Genomic and Immunotherapy Medical Institute, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
- University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
| | - Laure Favier
- Departmnt of Medical Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center - UNICANCER, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
| | - Cléa Fraisse
- Departmnt of Medical Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center - UNICANCER, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
| | - Aurélie Lagrange
- Departmnt of Medical Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center - UNICANCER, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
| | - Coureche Kaderbhai
- Departmnt of Medical Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center - UNICANCER, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
| | - Romain Boidot
- Department of Biopathology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center - UNICANCER, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
| | - Sandy Chevrier
- Department of Biopathology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center - UNICANCER, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
| | - Philippe Joubert
- Department of Pathology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bertrand Routy
- Department of Medicine Montréal, Division of Oncology, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Caroline Truntzer
- Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Georges-Francois Leclerc Cancer Center - UNICANCER, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
- UMR INSERM 1231, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
- Genomic and Immunotherapy Medical Institute, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
- University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
| | - Francois Ghiringhelli
- Platform of Transfer in Biological Oncology, Georges-Francois Leclerc Cancer Center - UNICANCER, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
- UMR INSERM 1231, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
- Genomic and Immunotherapy Medical Institute, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
- University of Burgundy-Franche Comté, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
- Departmnt of Medical Oncology, Georges François Leclerc Cancer Center - UNICANCER, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
de Guillebon E, Jimenez M, Mazzarella L, Betsou F, Stadler P, Peták I, Jeannot E, Chanas L, Servant N, Marret G, Duso BA, Legrand F, Kornerup KN, Bernhart SH, Balogh G, Dóczi R, Filotás P, Curigliano G, Bièche I, Guérin J, Dirner A, Neuzillet C, Girard N, Borcoman E, Larbi Chérif L, Tresca P, Roufai DB, Dupain C, Scholl S, André F, Fernandez X, Filleron T, Kamal M, Le Tourneau C. Combining immunotherapy with an epidrug in squamous cell carcinomas of different locations: rationale and design of the PEVO basket trial. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100106. [PMID: 33865192 PMCID: PMC8066350 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) are among the most frequent solid tumors in humans. SCCs, related or not to the human papillomavirus, share common molecular features. Immunotherapies, and specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors, have been shown to improve overall survival in multiple cancer types, including SCCs. However, only a minority of patients experience a durable response with immunotherapy. Epigenetic modulation plays a major role in escaping tumor immunosurveillance and confers resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Preclinical evidence suggests that modulating the epigenome might improve the efficacy of immunotherapy. We herein review the preclinical and the clinical rationale for combining immunotherapy with an epidrug, and detail the design of PEVOsq, a basket clinical trial combining pembrolizumab with vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with SCCs of different locations. Sequential blood and tumor sampling will be collected in order to identify predictive and pharmacodynamics biomarkers of efficacy of the combination. We also present how clinical and biological data will be managed with the aim to enable the development of a prospective integrative platform to allow secure and controlled access to the project data as well as further exploitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E de Guillebon
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France; Inserm U932 Research Unit - Immunite et cancer, Paris, France
| | | | - L Mazzarella
- Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology - IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Division of Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - F Betsou
- Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg, Dudelange, Luxembourg
| | - P Stadler
- Bioinformatics Group, Department of Computer, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - I Peták
- Oncompass Medicine Ltd, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - E Jeannot
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - L Chanas
- Data Direction, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - N Servant
- Inserm U900 Research Unit, Saint Cloud, France
| | - G Marret
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - B A Duso
- Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - K N Kornerup
- Integrated Biobank of Luxembourg, Dudelange, Luxembourg
| | - S H Bernhart
- Bioinformatics Group, Department of Computer, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - G Balogh
- Bioinformatics Group, Department of Computer, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - R Dóczi
- Oncompass Medicine Ltd, Budapest, Hungary
| | - P Filotás
- Oncompass Medicine Ltd, Budapest, Hungary
| | - G Curigliano
- Division of Innovative Therapies, European Institute of Oncology - IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - I Bièche
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - J Guérin
- Data Direction, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - A Dirner
- Oncompass Medicine Ltd, Budapest, Hungary
| | - C Neuzillet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France
| | - N Girard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France
| | - E Borcoman
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - L Larbi Chérif
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - P Tresca
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - D B Roufai
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - C Dupain
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - S Scholl
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - F André
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; INSERM, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, UMR981, Villejuif; University of Paris-Sud, Orsay, France
| | - X Fernandez
- Data Direction, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - T Filleron
- Biostatistics Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - M Kamal
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France.
| | - C Le Tourneau
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris, France; Inserm U900 Research Unit, Saint Cloud, France; Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Licht JD, Bennett RL. Leveraging epigenetics to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. Clin Epigenetics 2021; 13:115. [PMID: 34001289 PMCID: PMC8130138 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-021-01100-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Epigenetic mechanisms regulate chromatin accessibility patterns that govern interaction of transcription machinery with genes and their cis-regulatory elements. Mutations that affect epigenetic mechanisms are common in cancer. Because epigenetic modifications are reversible many anticancer strategies targeting these mechanisms are currently under development and in clinical trials. Main body Here we review evidence suggesting that epigenetic therapeutics can deactivate immunosuppressive gene expression or reprogram tumor cells to activate antigen presentation mechanisms. In addition, the dysregulation of epigenetic mechanisms commonly observed in cancer may alter the immunogenicity of tumor cells and effectiveness of immunotherapies. Conclusions Therapeutics targeting epigenetic mechanisms may be helpful to counter immune evasion and improve the effectiveness of immunotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan D Licht
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Cancer Genetics Research Complex, University of Florida, 2033 Mowry Road, Box 103633, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Richard L Bennett
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Cancer Genetics Research Complex, University of Florida, 2033 Mowry Road, Box 103633, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bukowinski A, Chang B, Reid JM, Liu X, Minard CG, Trepel JB, Lee MJ, Fox E, Weigel BJ. A phase 1 study of entinostat in children and adolescents with recurrent or refractory solid tumors, including CNS tumors: Trial ADVL1513, Pediatric Early Phase-Clinical Trial Network (PEP-CTN). Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68:e28892. [PMID: 33438318 PMCID: PMC9176707 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Entinostat is an oral small molecule inhibitor of class I histone deacetylases (HDAC), which has not previously been evaluated in pediatrics. We conducted a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase 2 dose (MTD/RP2D), toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of entinostat in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors including central nervous system (CNS) malignancies. METHODS A rolling six dose escalation design evaluated two dose levels. Entinostat oral tablet formulation was administered once per week, four doses per 28-day cycle. PK and PD studies were performed. RESULTS Twenty-one eligible patients' median (range) age was 14 years (6-20). Six subjects were treated at 3 mg/m2 dose level and 15 were treated in 4 mg/m2 dose level. The study included patients with CNS tumors (n = 12), sarcomas (n = 6), or other solid tumors (n = 3). Eight patients were not fully evaluable for toxicity due to progression of disease prior to receiving the required percentage of protocol therapy. No cycle one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed at either dose level. A three-fold higher area under the curve (AUC) was achieved in our cohort compared to adults using a similar dosing schedule. The PD studies showed increase in acetylated lysine in peripheral blood leukocytes at both doses. CONCLUSIONS Entinostat was well tolerated with no DLT observed. All patients experienced progression within the first two cycles, except one patient with ependymoma with stable disease. Based on PK and PD, the R2PD in pediatric patients with solid tumors is 4 mg/m2 orally administered once weekly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Bukowinski
- Division of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Bill Chang
- Division of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Xiaowei Liu
- Children’s Oncology Group, Operation Center, Monrovia CA, USA
| | - Charles G. Minard
- Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Jane B. Trepel
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Min-Jung Lee
- Developmental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Elizabeth Fox
- Department of Oncology, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Brenda J. Weigel
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Michielin O, Atkins MB, Koon HB, Dummer R, Ascierto PA. Evolving impact of long-term survival results on metastatic melanoma treatment. J Immunother Cancer 2020; 8:e000948. [PMID: 33037115 PMCID: PMC7549477 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Melanoma treatment has been revolutionized over the past decade. Long-term results with immuno-oncology (I-O) agents and targeted therapies are providing evidence of durable survival for a substantial number of patients. These results have prompted consideration of how best to define long-term benefit and cure. Now more than ever, oncologists should be aware of the long-term outcomes demonstrated with these newer agents and their relevance to treatment decision-making. As the first tumor type for which I-O agents were approved, melanoma has served as a model for other diseases. Accordingly, discussions regarding the value and impact of long-term survival data in patients with melanoma may be relevant in the future to other tumor types. Current findings indicate that, depending on the treatment, over 50% of patients with melanoma may gain durable survival benefit. The best survival outcomes are generally observed in patients with favorable prognostic factors, particularly normal baseline lactate dehydrogenase and/or a low volume of disease. Survival curves from melanoma clinical studies show a plateau at 3 to 4 years, suggesting that patients who are alive at the 3-year landmark (especially in cases in which treatment had been stopped) will likely experience prolonged cancer remission. Quality-of-life and mixture-cure modeling data, as well as metrics such as treatment-free survival, are helping to define the value of this long-term survival. In this review, we describe the current treatment landscape for melanoma and discuss the long-term survival data with immunotherapies and targeted therapies, discussing how to best evaluate the value of long-term survival. We propose that some patients might be considered functionally cured if they have responded to treatment and remained treatment-free for at least 2 years without disease progression. Finally, we consider that, while there have been major advances in the treatment of melanoma in the past decade, there remains a need to improve outcomes for the patients with melanoma who do not experience durable survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Michielin
- Oncology Department, Precision Oncology Center, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Oncology Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Michael B Atkins
- Medical Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and Oncology Academic Department, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Henry B Koon
- Clinical Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | | | - Paolo Antonio Ascierto
- Melanoma Cancer Immunotherapy and Innovative Therapy Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hashimoto A, Fukumoto T, Zhang R, Gabrilovich D. Selective targeting of different populations of myeloid-derived suppressor cells by histone deacetylase inhibitors. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2020; 69:1929-1936. [PMID: 32435850 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-020-02588-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are widely implicated in negative regulation of immune responses in cancer. Inhibition of class I histone deacetylases (HDAC) with entinostat has anti-MDSC activity. However, as single agent, it did not delay tumor growth in EL4 and LLC tumor models. Here, we found that entinostat reduced immune suppressive activity of only one type of MDSC-polymorphonuclear, PMN-MDSC, whereas it had no effect on monocytic M-MDSC or macrophages. M-MDSC had high amount of class II HDAC-HDAC6, which was further increased after the treatment of mice with entinostat. Inhibition of HDAC6 with ricolinostat reduced suppressive activity of M-MDSC, but did not affect PMN-MDSC or delayed tumor growth. However, combination of entinostat and ricolinostat abrogated suppressive activity of both populations of MDSC and substantially delayed tumor progression. Thus, inactivation of MDSC required targeting of both major subsets of these cells via inhibitors of class I and class II HDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayumi Hashimoto
- Immunology, Microenvironment and Metastasis Program, The Wistar Institute, Rm. 118, 3601 Spruce Str., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Takeshi Fukumoto
- Gene Expression and Regulation Program, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Rugang Zhang
- Gene Expression and Regulation Program, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Dmitry Gabrilovich
- Immunology, Microenvironment and Metastasis Program, The Wistar Institute, Rm. 118, 3601 Spruce Str., Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|