Abstract CT025: Dabrafenib plus trametinib in BRAF V600E-mutant high-grade (HGG) and low-grade glioma (LGG)

Management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: current state of the art and emerging therapeutic approaches

Glioblastoma multiforme represent > 50% of primary gliomas and have five year survival rates of ~ 5%. Maximal safe surgical resection followed by radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide remains the standard treatment since published by Stupp et al. (in N Engl J Med 352:987-996, 2005), with additional benefit for patients with MGMT-methylated tumors. We review the current treatment landscape and ongoing efforts to improve these outcomes. An extensive literature search of Pubmed and Google Scholar involving the search terms "glioblastoma," "glioblastoma multiforme," or "GBM" for papers published to July 2021 was conducted and papers evaluated for relevance. As well as current data that informs clinical practice, we review ongoing clinical research in both newly diagnosed and recurrent settings that provides hope for a breakthrough. The Stupp protocol remains standard of care in 2021. Addition of tumor treating fields improved mOS modestly, with benefit seen in MGMT-methylated and unmethylated cohorts and also improved time to cognitive decline but has not been widely adopted. The addition of lomustine to temozolomide, in MGMT-methylated patients, also showed a mOS benefit but further investigation is required. Other promising therapeutic strategies including anti-angiogenic therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy have yet to show a survival advantage. Improvements in the multidisciplinary management, surgical techniques and equipment, early palliative care, carrier support, and psychological support may be responsible for improving survival over time. Despite promising preclinical rationale, immunotherapy and targeted therapy are struggling to impact survival. A number of ongoing clinical trials provide hope for a breakthrough.

Tissue-Agnostic Activity of BRAF plus MEK Inhibitor in BRAF V600-Mutant Tumors

BRAF plus MEK inhibitor combinations are currently FDA-approved for melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and anaplastic thyroid cancer. The lack of clinical benefit with BRAF inhibition in BRAF V600-mutated colorectal cancer has prevented its tissue-agnostic drug development. We reviewed the AACR GENIE database for the prevalence of BRAF V600 mutations across tumor types. We reviewed the literature for case reports of clinical responses, outcomes in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive nonmelanoma malignancies who received BRAF inhibitor therapy, and data from published adult and pediatric trials. BRAF V600 mutations are prevalent across multiple nonmelanoma malignancies (>40 different tumor types), lead to oncogene addiction, and are clinically actionable in a broad range of adult and pediatric nonmelanoma rare malignancies. Continued tissue-agnostic drug development is warranted beyond the current BRAF plus MEK approved cancers.

Predicting BRAF V600E mutation in glioblastoma: utility of radiographic features

Detection of BRAF V600E mutation in glioblastomas (GBMs) is important because of potential therapeutic implications. Still, the relative paucity of these mutations makes molecular detection in all GBMs controversial. In the present study, we analyzed clinical, radiographic and pathologic features of 12 BRAF V600E-mutant GBMs and 12 matched controls from 2 institutions. We found that a majority of BRAF V600E-mutant GBMs displayed a combination of well-circumscribed lesions, large cystic components with thin walls and solid cortical component on MRI, but with some overlap with matched BRAF wildtype controls (p = 0.069). BRAF V600E-mutant GBMs were also apt to gross total resection (83% vs 17%, p = 0.016) and morphologically displayed epithelioid features (83% vs 0%, p < 0.0001). Identification of these clinical, radiographic, and pathologic characteristics should prompt testing for BRAF V600E in IDH-wildtype GBM.