1
|
Sammons RM, Cho EJ, Dalby KN. Identification and biochemical characterization of small molecule inhibitors of ERK2 that target the D-recruitment site. Methods Enzymol 2023; 690:445-499. [PMID: 37858538 PMCID: PMC10950554 DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2023.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) is the culmination of a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade that regulates cellular processes like proliferation, migration, and survival. Consequently, abnormal ERK signaling often plays a role in the tumorigenesis and metastasis of numerous cancers. ERK inhibition is a sought-after treatment for cancers, especially since clinically approved drugs that target signaling upstream of ERK often induce acquired resistance. Furthermore, the ERK2 isoform may have a differential role in various cancers from the other canonical isoform, ERK1. We demonstrate that small molecules can inhibit ERK2 catalytic and noncatalytic functions by binding to the D-recruitment site (DRS), a protein-protein interaction site distal to the enzyme active site. Using a fluorescence anisotropy-based high-throughput screening, we identify compounds that bind to the DRS and exhibit dose-dependent inhibition of ERK2 activity and ERK2 phosphorylation. We characterize the dose-dependent potency of ERK2 inhibitors using fluorescence anisotropy-based binding assays, fluorescence-based ERK2 substrate phosphorylation assays, and in vitro ERK2 activation assays. In our example, the binding of a DRS inhibitor can be prevented by mutating the DRS residue Cys-159 to serine, indicating that this residue is essential for the interaction. Resulting inhibitors from this process can be assessed in cellular and in vivo experiments for inhibition of ERK signaling and can be evaluated as potential cancer drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R M Sammons
- Targeted Therapeutic Drug Discovery and Development Program, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - E J Cho
- Targeted Therapeutic Drug Discovery and Development Program, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
| | - K N Dalby
- Targeted Therapeutic Drug Discovery and Development Program, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States; Division of Chemical Biology & Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lebedev TD, Khabusheva ER, Mareeva SR, Ivanenko KA, Morozov AV, Spirin PV, Rubtsov PM, Snezhkina AV, Kudryavtseva AV, Sorokin MI, Buzdin AA, Prassolov VS. Identification of cell type-specific correlations between ERK activity and cell viability upon treatment with ERK1/2 inhibitors. J Biol Chem 2022; 298:102226. [PMID: 35787369 PMCID: PMC9358475 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Increased MAPK signaling is a hallmark of various cancers and is a central regulator of cell survival. Direct ERK1/2 inhibition is considered a promising approach to avoid ERK1/2 reactivation caused by upstream kinases BRAF, MEK1/2, and KRAS, as well as by receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, but the dynamics and selectivity of ERK1/2 inhibitors are much less studied compared with BRAF or MEK inhibitors. Using ERK1/2 and downstream kinase ELK1 reporter cell lines of lung cancer (H1299; NRASQ61K), colon cancer (HCT-116; KRASG13D), neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y), and leukemia (U937), we examined the relationship between ERK inhibition and drug-induced toxicity for five ERK inhibitors: SCH772984, ravoxertinib, LY3214996, ulixertinib, and VX-11e, as well as one MEK inhibitor, PD0325901. Comparing cell viability and ERK inhibition revealed different ERK dependencies for these cell lines. We identify several drugs, such as SCH772984 and VX-11e, which induce excessive toxicity not directly related to ERK1/2 inhibition in specific cell lines. We also show that PD0325901, LY3214996, and ulixertinib are prone to ERK1/2 reactivation over time. We distinguished two types of ERK1/2 reactivation: the first could be reversed by adding a fresh dose of inhibitors, while the second persists even after additional treatments. We also showed that cells that became resistant to the MEK1/2 inhibitor PD0325901 due to ERK1/2 reactivation remained sensitive to ERK1/2 inhibitor ulixertinib. Our data indicate that correlation of ERK inhibition with drug-induced toxicity in multiple cell lines may help to find more selective and effective ERK1/2 inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timofey D Lebedev
- Department of Cancer Cell Biology, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
| | - Elmira R Khabusheva
- Department of Cancer Cell Biology, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sofia R Mareeva
- Department of Cancer Cell Biology, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University), Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - Karina A Ivanenko
- Department of Cancer Cell Biology, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexey V Morozov
- Department of Cancer Cell Biology, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pavel V Spirin
- Department of Cancer Cell Biology, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Petr M Rubtsov
- Department of Cancer Cell Biology, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anastasiya V Snezhkina
- Department of Cancer Cell Biology, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anna V Kudryavtseva
- Department of Cancer Cell Biology, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Maxim I Sorokin
- Institute of Personalized Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Group for Genomic Regulation of Cell Signaling Systems, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia; Department of Bioinformatics and Molecular Networks, OmicsWay Corp, Walnut, California, USA
| | - Anton A Buzdin
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University), Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia; Institute of Personalized Oncology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Group for Genomic Regulation of Cell Signaling Systems, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia; Department of Bioinformatics and Molecular Networks, OmicsWay Corp, Walnut, California, USA
| | - Vladimir S Prassolov
- Department of Cancer Cell Biology, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; Center for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maik-Rachline G, Wortzel I, Seger R. Alternative Splicing of MAPKs in the Regulation of Signaling Specificity. Cells 2021; 10:cells10123466. [PMID: 34943973 PMCID: PMC8699841 DOI: 10.3390/cells10123466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades transmit signals from extracellular stimuli to a variety of distinct cellular processes. The MAPKKs in each cascade specifically phosphorylate and activate their cognate MAPKs, indicating that this step funnels various signals into a seemingly linear pathway. Still, the effects of these cascades vary significantly, depending on the identity of the extracellular signals, which gives rise to proper outcomes. Therefore, it is clear that the specificity of the signals transmitted through the cascades is tightly regulated in order to secure the desired cell fate. Indeed, many regulatory components or processes that extend the specificity of the cascades have been identified. Here, we focus on a less discussed mechanism, that is, the role of distinct components in each tier of the cascade in extending the signaling specificity. We cover the role of distinct genes, and the alternatively spliced isoforms of MAPKKs and MAPKs, in the signaling specificity. The alternatively spliced MEK1b and ERK1c, which form an independent signaling route, are used as the main example. Unlike MEK1/2 and ERK1/2, this route’s functions are limited, including mainly the regulation of mitotic Golgi fragmentation. The unique roles of the alternatively spliced isoforms indicate that these components play an essential role in determining the proper cell fate in response to distinct stimulations.
Collapse
|