1
|
Treskova-Schwarzbach M, Haas L, Reda S, Pilic A, Borodova A, Karimi K, Koch J, Nygren T, Scholz S, Schönfeld V, Vygen-Bonnet S, Wichmann O, Harder T. Pre-existing health conditions and severe COVID-19 outcomes: an umbrella review approach and meta-analysis of global evidence. BMC Med 2021; 19:212. [PMID: 34446016 PMCID: PMC8390115 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02058-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study applies an umbrella review approach to summarise the global evidence on the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes in patients with pre-existing health conditions. METHODS Systematic reviews (SRs) were identified in PubMed, Embase/Medline and seven pre-print servers until December 11, 2020. Due to the absence of age-adjusted risk effects stratified by geographical regions, a re-analysis of the evidence was conducted. Primary studies were extracted from SRs and evaluated for inclusion in the re-analysis. Studies were included if they reported risk estimates (odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio (HR), relative risk (RR)) for hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission, intubation or death. Estimated associations were extracted from the primary studies for reported pre-existing conditions. Meta-analyses were performed stratified for each outcome by regions of the World Health Organization. The evidence certainty was assessed using GRADE. Registration number CRD42020215846. RESULTS In total, 160 primary studies from 120 SRs contributed 464 estimates for 42 pre-existing conditions. Most studies were conducted in North America, European, and Western Pacific regions. Evidence from Africa, South/Latin America, and the Eastern Mediterranean region was scarce. No evidence was available from the South-East Asia region. Diabetes (HR range 1.2-2.0 (CI range 1.1-2.8)), obesity (OR range 1.5-1.75 (CI range 1.1-2.3)), heart failure (HR range 1.3-3.3 (CI range 0.9-8.2)), COPD (HR range 1.12-2.2 (CI range 1.1-3.2)) and dementia (HR range 1.4-7.7 (CI range 1.2-39.6)) were associated with fatal COVID-19 in different regions, although the estimates varied. Evidence from Europe and North America showed that liver cirrhosis (OR range 3.2-5.9 (CI range 0.9-27.7)) and active cancer (OR range 1.6-4.7 (CI range 0.5-14.9)) were also associated with increased risk of death. Association between HIV and undesirable COVID-19 outcomes showed regional heterogeneity, with an increased risk of death in Africa (HR 1.7 (CI 1.3-2.2)). GRADE certainty was moderate to high for most associations. CONCLUSION Risk of undesirable COVID-19 health outcomes is consistently increased in certain patient subgroups across geographical regions, showing high variability in others. The results can be used to inform COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation or other intervention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura Haas
- Immunisation Unit, The Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sarah Reda
- Immunisation Unit, The Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Antonia Pilic
- Immunisation Unit, The Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anna Borodova
- Immunisation Unit, The Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kasra Karimi
- Immunisation Unit, The Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Judith Koch
- Immunisation Unit, The Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Teresa Nygren
- Immunisation Unit, The Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Scholz
- Immunisation Unit, The Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Viktoria Schönfeld
- Immunisation Unit, The Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sabine Vygen-Bonnet
- Immunisation Unit, The Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ole Wichmann
- Immunisation Unit, The Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Harder
- Immunisation Unit, The Robert Koch Institute, Seestrasse 10, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Elsamany S, Hassanin F, Al-Abdulwahab A, Tashkandi E. Suggested modifications in oncology/hematology inpatient service in Saudi Arabia during coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Avicenna J Med 2021; 10:208-214. [PMID: 33437692 PMCID: PMC7791282 DOI: 10.4103/ajm.ajm_166_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Management of cancer patients in the current era of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic poses significant challenges on health-care systems. However, it is mandatory to keep the required level of care of cancer patients while taking the necessary precautions to maintain the safety of both patients and health-care professionals (HCPs). The present survey explores suggested modifications of inpatient oncology/hematology care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: A web-based questionnaire using SurveyMonkey was distributed to HCPs taking care of inpatient hematology/oncology service including oncologists, hematologists, and inpatient nurses in Saudi Arabia. The 25 items selected for the survey focused on five domains including characteristics of HCPs, COVID-19 infection risk among admitted patients, possible modifications related to physicians/nursing practice, and suggested infection control measures. Clinical sensibility assessment was conducted to evaluate the comprehensiveness, clarity, and face validity of our instrument on a scale of 1–5. The percentages of HCP responses to the suggested modifications in the survey were assessed in descriptive statistics to summarize data and report views of participants. Results: Of 215 HCPs, 195 responded and completed the survey. Of the respondents, 30.4% were medical oncologists, whereas hematologists and nurses constituted 6.7% and 62.9% of the participants, respectively. The majority of respondents (87.6%) work in governmental hospitals. The majority of participants (82%) have diagnosed patients with COVID-19 in their hospitals and modifications in inpatient practice during the COVID-19 pandemic were supported by 95% of respondents. The supported modifications by participants include enhanced use of oral medications (83.5%), phone calls to admitted stable patients by physicians, instead of physical interview (77%), decreasing frequency of vital signs assessment in stable patients (91%), decreasing the duration of stay in patients rooms (89%), using peripheral instead of central lines (76%), using video-based educational materials to patients through hospital TV network (91%), testing for COVID -19 before scheduled radiology imaging and procedures (74%), and performing routine nasopharyngeal swabs for HCPs (67%). Conclusion: Several modifications in inpatient oncology/hematology practice were supported by the survey participants. These suggestions need to be discussed on local basis considering local infrastructure, available resources, and level of required care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shereef Elsamany
- Oncology Center, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.,Oncology Centre, Mansoura University, Egypt
| | - Fayza Hassanin
- Nursing Administration, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Emad Tashkandi
- Oncology Center, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.,College of Medicine, Umm AlQura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|