1
|
Coschi CH, Dodbiba L, Guerry D. Oncology: What You May Have Missed in 2023. Ann Intern Med 2024; 177:S57-S70. [PMID: 38621244 DOI: 10.7326/m24-0520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Advances in oncology treatment methods have improved outcomes and quality of life for patients with cancer. However, care of these patients can be complex, and the contribution of physicians from different specialties is crucial. This article highlights important publications from 2023 on topics across a wide spectrum relating to the management of oncology patients. The literature was screened for significant new evidence that is relevant to internal medicine specialists and subspecialists whose focus is not oncology. Two articles address the importance of social interventions targeting end-of-life care for low-income and minority patients and the well-being of caregivers. Two additional articles address screening considerations in patients at risk for colorectal and lung cancer. Two more articles address safe use of hormone-related therapies to treat symptoms of menopause and prevent disease recurrence or progression in patients diagnosed with noninvasive breast neoplasia. Finally, several articles were included on topics related to COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cancer, use of cannabinoids for cancer pain control, chronic autoimmune adverse effects related to use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and the incidence of second primary neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney H Coschi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.H.C., L.D.)
| | - Lorin Dodbiba
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (C.H.C., L.D.)
| | - DuPont Guerry
- Associate Editor, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Emeritus Professor of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (D.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bessa X, Vidal J, Balboa JC, Márquez C, Duenwald S, He Y, Raymond V, Faull I, Burón A, Álvarez-Urturi C, Castells X, Bellosillo B, Montagut C. High accuracy of a blood ctDNA-based multimodal test to detect colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:1187-1193. [PMID: 37805131 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.09.3113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a minimally invasive and convenient blood-based screening strategy that may increase effectiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS A novel multimodal ctDNA-based blood assay that integrates genomics, epigenomics and fragmentomics, as well as proteomics in a refined version, was tested in blood samples from two cohorts: (i) consecutive fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive individuals from the CRC Barcelona stool-based screening program; (ii) patients diagnosed with CRC. Primary endpoint was the performance of the test to detect CRC at different tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stages. Secondary endpoint was the ability of the test to detect advanced precancerous lesions (advanced adenoma or advanced serrated lesion). RESULTS A total of 623 blood samples were analyzed in the primary analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of the assay to detect CRC was 93% and 90%, respectively. The sensitivity of CRC detection according to TNM stages was 84% for stage I, 94% for stage II and 96% for stage III (70/73) (P< 0.024). Sensitivity to detect advanced precancerous lesions was 23% with a refined version of the test (including protein and updating bioinformatic thresholding). CONCLUSION A blood-based multimodal ctDNA assay detected CRC with high accuracy. This minimally invasive, accessible and convenient assay may help to increase the effectiveness of CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Bessa
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona.
| | - J Vidal
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J C Balboa
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona
| | - C Márquez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona
| | | | - Y He
- Guardant Health Inc., Redwood City, USA
| | - V Raymond
- Guardant Health Inc., Redwood City, USA
| | - I Faull
- Guardant Health Inc., Redwood City, USA
| | - A Burón
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; RICAPPS (Research Network on Chronicity, Primary Care and Prevention and Health Promotion), Madrid, Spain
| | - C Álvarez-Urturi
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona
| | - X Castells
- Epidemiology and Evaluation Department, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; RICAPPS (Research Network on Chronicity, Primary Care and Prevention and Health Promotion), Madrid, Spain
| | - B Bellosillo
- Pathology Department, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Montagut
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Star J, Bandi P, Siegel RL, Han X, Minihan A, Smith RA, Jemal A. Cancer Screening in the United States During the Second Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4352-4359. [PMID: 36821800 PMCID: PMC10911528 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine whether cancer screening prevalence in the United States during 2021 has returned to prepandemic levels using nationally representative data. METHODS Information on receipt of age-eligible screening for breast (women age 50-74 years), cervical (women without a hysterectomy age 21-65 years), prostate (men age 55-69 years), and colorectal cancer (men and women age 50-75 years) according to the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations was obtained from the 2019 and 2021 National Health Interview Survey. Past-year screening prevalence in 2019 and 2021 and adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs), 2021 versus 2019, with their 95% CIs were calculated using complex survey logistic regression models. RESULTS Between 2019 and 2021, past-year screening in the United States decreased from 59.9% to 57.1% (aPR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.91 to 0.97) for breast cancer, from 45.3% to 39.0% (aPR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.89) for cervical cancer, and from 39.5% to 36.3% (aPR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.97) for prostate cancer. Declines were most notable for non-Hispanic Asian persons. Colorectal cancer screening prevalence remained unchanged because an increase in past-year stool testing (from 7.0% to 10.3%; aPR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.58) offset a decline in colonoscopy (from 15.5% to 13.8%; aPR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.95). The increase in stool testing was most pronounced in non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations and in persons with low socioeconomic status. CONCLUSION Past-year screening prevalence for breast, cervical, and prostate cancer among age-eligible adults in the United States continued to be lower than prepandemic levels in the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic, reinforcing the importance of return to screening health system outreach and media campaigns. The large increase in stool testing emphasizes the role of home-based screening during health care system disruptions. [Media: see text].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Star
- Surveillance & Health Equity Science Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Priti Bandi
- Surveillance & Health Equity Science Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Rebecca L. Siegel
- Surveillance & Health Equity Science Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Xuesong Han
- Surveillance & Health Equity Science Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Adair Minihan
- Surveillance & Health Equity Science Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Robert A. Smith
- Early Cancer Detection Science Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ahmedin Jemal
- Surveillance & Health Equity Science Research Program, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang X, Yang L, Liu S, Li H, Li Q, Li H, Wang N, Ji J. Performance of different colorectal cancer screening strategies: a long-term passive follow-up population-based screening program in Beijing, China. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1640. [PMID: 37641033 PMCID: PMC10463986 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16564-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to assess the performance of the risk assessment questionnaire and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in a population-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program to provide timely evidence for tailored screening strategies in China. METHODS This analysis was conducted using data from Beijing Cancer Screening Prospective Cohort Study (BCSPCS). A risk assessment questionnaire and FIT were selected as the primary screening methods, and participants with any positive results were referred to undergo a diagnostic colonoscopy. RESULTS From 2015 to 2020, 148,636 Beijing residents aged 40-69 years were invited from designated communities, with 147,807 finishing the risk assessment questionnaire and 115,606 (78.2%) completing the FIT. Among the 42,969 (29.1%) high-risk CRC participants, 23,824 (55.4%) underwent colonoscopy. One year after enrollment, all subjects were linked to the Beijing Cancer Registry (BCR) database and 241 cases of CRC were confirmed. The CRC incidence rate was 58.2/100,000 for the low-risk arm and 418.9/100,000 for the high-risk arm. For participants who underwent colonoscopy, 91 CRC cases were detected, with a detection rate of 91.9% and 63.7% of them were early-stage cases. Furthermore, the sensitivities of utilizing the risk assessment questionnaire alone, FIT alone, combined risk assessment questionnaire and FIT were 75.7%, 50.1%, and 95.1%, and the specificities were 75.3%, 87.3%, and 70.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION The Beijing CRC screening program can effectively detect early-onset CRC; however, the compliance with colonoscopy still needs to be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xi Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing Office for Cancer Prevention and Control, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Yang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing Office for Cancer Prevention and Control, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuo Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing Office for Cancer Prevention and Control, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Huichao Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing Office for Cancer Prevention and Control, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Qingyu Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing Office for Cancer Prevention and Control, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Haoxin Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing Office for Cancer Prevention and Control, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Ning Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing Office for Cancer Prevention and Control, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiafu Ji
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lazar NJ, Khreisat A, AlKloub R, Al-Hillan A, Duffy M. Inappropriate Multi-Target Stool DNA Use for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Risks, Compliance, and Outcomes. Cureus 2023; 15:e40506. [PMID: 37397671 PMCID: PMC10313417 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Inappropriate or "off-label" use of multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) tests refers to their use in patients for whom colonoscopy or no testing at all is warranted. Examples include a positive family history of colorectal cancer, a history of inflammatory bowel disease, or medical issues necessitating diagnostic colonoscopy, among others. Current understanding of off-label mt-sDNA use for colorectal cancer screening, its associated risks, and outcomes is lacking. We examined off-label mt-sDNA prescription and compliance with testing in an outpatient setting in southeast Michigan. Aims The primary aims of the study were determining the extent of off-label mt-sDNA testing and compliance, and results of all testing, as well as demographic factors associated with off-label prescriptions. The secondary aims were to examine explanations for incomplete testing and factors contributing to successful completion. Methods Using a retrospective design, we identified mt-sDNA orders from outpatient internal medicine clinics between January 1, 2018, to July 31, 2019, to evaluate the proportion of off-label mt-sDNA, results of testing, and follow-up colonoscopies up to one year after order placement. Patients were categorized as "off-label" if any inappropriate criteria were met. Statistical analysis was performed for primary and secondary outcomes. Results From 679 mt-sDNA orders within the study period, 81 (12.1%) had at least one off-label criterion for testing. In total, 404/679 (59.5%) patients completed testing. Lack of follow-up comprised the majority of incompletions (216/275; 78.6%). Only 52 (70.3%) out of 74 positive results were followed by diagnostic colonoscopy. Retired employment status (OR = 1.87; 95%CI, 1.17-2.98; P = 0.008) and age of 76 years or older (OR = 2.28; 95%CI, 0.99-5.21; P = 0.044) were significantly associated with increased risk of off-label mt-sDNA prescription. Increasing age range was associated with higher test completion (χ2 (5) = 12.085, p = 0.034). Multinomial logistic regression revealed an increasing age range (OR = 1.29; 95% CI, 1.09-1.54; P = 0.004), predictive of a positive mt-sDNA result for both groups. There was no significant difference between off-label or on-label groups in the mean number of resected polyps or pathology scores on follow-up colonoscopy. Conclusions Off-label mt-sDNA use remains a concern in the outpatient setting. Compliance for test completion and follow-up colonoscopy for positive results require further improvement. Our findings shed new light on the factors associated with off-label testing while reiterating its burden. We also describe common reasons for incomplete tests in an attempt to augment future colorectal cancer (CRC) screening initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ali Khreisat
- Internal Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, USA
| | - Roa'a AlKloub
- Internal Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, USA
| | | | - Michael Duffy
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mark Fendrick A, Borah BJ, Burak Ozbay A, Saoud L, Limburg PJ. Life-years gained resulting from screening colonoscopy compared with follow-up colonoscopy after a positive stool-based colorectal screening test. Prev Med Rep 2022; 26:101701. [PMID: 35106276 PMCID: PMC8789575 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Screening colonoscopies for colorectal cancer (CRC) are typically covered without patient cost-sharing, whereas follow-up colonoscopies for positive stool-based screening tests often incur patient costs. The objective of this analysis was to estimate and compare the life-years gained (LYG) per average-risk screening colonoscopy and follow-up colonoscopy after a positive stool-based test to better inform CRC coverage policy and reimbursement decisions. CRC outcomes from screening and follow-up colonoscopies versus no screening were estimated using CRC-AIM in a simulated population of average-risk individuals screened between ages 45-75 years. The LYG/colonoscopy per 1000 individuals was 0.09 for screening colonoscopy and 0.29 for follow-up colonoscopy. 0.01 and 0.04 CRC cases and 0.01 and 0.02 CRC deaths were averted per screening and follow-up colonoscopies, respectively. Coverage policies should be revised to encourage individuals to complete recommended screening processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Mark Fendrick
- Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Bijan J. Borah
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Paul J. Limburg
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kisiel JB, Itzkowitz SH, Ozbay AB, Saoud L, Parton M, Lieberman D, Limburg PJ. Impact of the Sessile Serrated Polyp Pathway on Predicted Colorectal Cancer Outcomes. GASTRO HEP ADVANCES 2022; 1:55-62. [PMID: 39129937 PMCID: PMC11307850 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastha.2021.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Background and Aims Approximately 20%-30% of colorectal cancers (CRCs) arise from the serrated polyp pathway. CRC screening options have differential sensitivity to detect sessile serrated polyps (SSPs). We used the Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma Incidence and Mortality Microsimulation Model (CRC-AIM) to assess how the detection of SSPs impacts predicted life years gained (LYG), CRC incidence, and CRC mortality with multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening. Methods A simulated cohort of average-risk US individuals underwent triennial mt-sDNA or annual FIT screening between ages 45-75 years. SSP-attributed CRCs were modeled at 0% (base case), 14.3%, 20%, and 30%, in combination with 4 adherence & attendance scenarios: S1: 100% stool-screening adherence/100% follow-up colonoscopy attendance after a positive stool test; S2: reported stool-screening adherence (mt-sDNA = 71%; FIT = 43%)/100% follow-up colonoscopy attendance; S3: reported stool-screening adherence/reported follow-up colonoscopy attendance (mt-sDNA = 72%; FIT = 47%); and S4: reported stool-screening adherence/72% follow-up colonoscopy attendance. Outcomes were per 1000 individuals. Sensitivity analyses used ranges of stool-screening adherence or follow-up attendance. Results At S1, S2, S3, and S4, LYG with FIT at the base case (0% SSP-attributed CRC) was 346.7, 279.3, 126.6, and 196.1, respectively, and with mt-sDNA was 324.6, 311.8, 215.8, and 215.8, respectively. Among the 4 adherence/attendance scenarios, modeling SSP-attributed CRCs decreased LYG by 4.9-20.9 with FIT and 2.0-5.1 with mt-sDNA. At S3 and 30% SSP-attributable CRCs, mt-sDNA had 95.1 more LYG, 21.5% greater CRC incidence reduction, and 22.2% greater CRC mortality reduction than FIT. Conclusion Incorporating SSPs and real-world adherence into the CRC-AIM modeling analyses yielded more practice-relevant estimates of CRC screening outcomes and should be applied in future studies to afford more appropriate assessment of comparative effectiveness estimates between guideline-endorsed screening options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John B. Kisiel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Steven H. Itzkowitz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | | | - Leila Saoud
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | - David Lieberman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Paul J. Limburg
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|