Diazepam treatment to increase the cerebral GABAergic activity in acute stroke: a feasibility study in 104 patients

Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonists for acute stroke

BACKGROUND

Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonists have been shown to have a neuroprotectant effect in reducing infarct size and improving functional outcome in animal models of cerebrovascular disease. However, the sedative effects of GABA receptor agonists have limited their wider application in people with acute stroke, due to the potential risk of stupor. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2013, and previously updated in 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of GABA receptor agonists in the treatment of acute stroke.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (accessed March 2016), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) 2016, Issue 3, part of the Cochrane Library (accessed March 2016), MEDLINE (from 1949 to March 2016), Embase (from 1980 to March 2016), CINAHL (from 1982 to March 2016), AMED (from 1985 to March 2016), and 11 Chinese databases (accessed March 2016). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished, and ongoing trials we searched ongoing trials registers, reference lists, and relevant conference proceedings, and contacted authors and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating GABA receptor agonists versus placebo for people with acute stroke (within 12 hours after stroke onset), with the primary outcomes of efficacy and safety.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted eligible data, cross-checked the data for accuracy, and assessed the risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five trials with 3838 participants (3758 analyzed). The methodological quality of the included trials was generally good, with an unclear risk for selection bias only. Four trials (N = 2909) measured death and dependency at three months for chlormethiazole versus placebo; pooled results did not find a significant difference (risk ratio (RR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96 to 1.11). One trial (N = 849) measured this outcome for diazepam versus placebo (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.07). The most frequent adverse events related to chlormethiazole were somnolence (RR 4.56, 95% CI 3.50 to 5.95; two trials; N = 2527) and rhinitis (RR 4.75, 95% CI 2.67 to 8.46; two trials; N = 2527).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review provides moderate-quality evidence that fails to support the use of GABA receptor agonists (chlormethiazole or diazepam) for the treatment of people with acute stroke. More well-designed RCTs with large samples of participants with total anterior circulation syndrome are required to determine if there are benefits for this subgroup. Somnolence and rhinitis are frequent adverse events related to chlormethiazole.

Developing drug strategies for the neuroprotective treatment of acute ischemic stroke

Developing new treatment strategies for acute ischemic stroke in the last twenty years has offered some important successes, but also several failures. Most trials of neuroprotective therapies have been uniformly negative to date. Recent research has reported how excitatory amino acids act as the major excitatory neurotransmitters in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. Furthermore, other therapeutic targets such as free radical scavenger strategies and the anti-inflammatory neuroprotective strategy have been evaluated with conflicting data in animal models and human subjects with acute ischemic stroke. Whereas promising combinations of neuroprotection and neurorecovery, such as citicoline, albumin and cerebrolysin have been tested with findings worthy of further evaluation in larger randomized clinical trials. Understanding the complexities of the ischemic cascade is essential to developing pharmacological targets for acute ischemic stroke in neuroprotective or flow restoration therapeutic strategies.

Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonists for acute stroke

BACKGROUND

Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonists have been shown to have a neuroprotectant effect in reducing infarct size and improving functional outcome in animal models of cerebral ischemia. However, the sedation effects of GABA receptor agonists have limited their wider application in acute stroke patients due to the potential risk of stupor.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of GABA receptor agonists in the treatment of acute stroke.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (February 2014), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 5), MEDLINE (1949 to June 2014), EMBASE (1980 to June 2014), CINAHL (1982 to June 2014), AMED (1985 to June 2014) and 11 Chinese databases (June 2014). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished and ongoing trials we searched ongoing trials registers, reference lists and relevant conference proceedings, and contacted authors and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating GABA receptor agonists versus placebo for acute stroke patients (within 12 hours after stroke onset), with the outcomes of death or dependency, functional independence and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted eligible data, cross-checked the data for accuracy and assessed the methodological quality.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five trials with 3838 patients. The methodological quality of the included trials was generally good, with low risk of bias. Four trials measured death and dependency at three months in chlormethiazole versus placebo without significant difference (risk ratio (RR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 1.11). One trial measured this outcome between diazepam and placebo (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.07). In the subgroup analysis of total anterior circulation syndrome (TACS), a higher percentage of functional independence was found in the chlormethiazole group (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.64). The frequent adverse events related to chlormethiazole were somnolence (RR 4.56, 95% CI 3.50 to 5.95) and rhinitis (RR 4.75, 95% CI 2.67 to 8.46).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review does not provide the evidence to support the use of GABA receptor agonists (chlormethiazole or diazepam) for the treatment of patients with acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Chlormethiazole appeared to be beneficial in improving functional independence in patients with TACS according to the subgroup analysis, but this result must be interpreted with great caution. More well-designed RCTs with large samples of TACS would be required for further confirmation. However, somnolence and rhinitis are frequent adverse events related to chlormethiazole.

Impact of benzodiazepines on functional outcome and occurrence of pneumonia in stroke: evidence from VISTA

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepines have been proposed both as a neuroprotectant and risk factor for pneumonia in acute stroke.

AIMS

We assessed the impact of benzodiazepine exposure on the modified Rankin scale score distribution at 90 days as well as pneumonia rates among patients registered in a trials archive.

METHOD

We used an age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Score, and thrombolysis-rate adjusted Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test to test significance (P) followed by proportional odds logistic regression analysis to estimate the odds ratios for improved modified Rankin scale score, and binary logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio for developing pneumonia.

RESULTS

Data were available for 5938 patients, of whom 1800 received benzodiazepines. No association of benzodiazepine use and overall stroke outcome could be found (odds ratio 0·90, 95% confidence interval 0·82-1·00, P=0·121). Pneumonia occurred in 12·8% of patients treated with benzodiazepines and in 13·6% of the controls (odds ratio 0·99, 95% confidence interval 0·83-1·18, P=0·904).

CONCLUSION

In this nonrandomized comparison, treatment with benzodiazepines as a concomitant medication had no independent impact on stroke outcome.

Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonists for acute stroke

BACKGROUND

Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonists have been shown to have a neuroprotectant effect in reducing infarct size and improving functional outcome in animal models of cerebral ischemia. However, the sedation effects of GABA receptor agonists have limited their wider application in acute stroke patients due to the potential risk of stupor.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of GABA receptor agonists in the treatment of acute stroke.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (January 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1949 to March 2012), EMBASE (1980 to March 2012), CINAHL (1982 to March 2012), AMED (1985 to March 2012) and 11 Chinese databases (March 2012). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished and ongoing trials we searched ongoing trials registers, reference lists and relevant conference proceedings, and contacted authors and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating GABA receptor agonists versus placebo for acute stroke patients (within 12 hours after stroke onset), with the outcomes of death or dependency, functional independence and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of identified records, selected studies for inclusion, extracted eligible data, cross-checked the data for accuracy and assessed the methodological quality.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five trials with 3838 patients. The methodological quality of the included trials was generally good, with low risk of bias. Four trials measured death and dependency at three months in chlormethiazole versus placebo without significant difference (risk ratio (RR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.95 to 1.11). One trial measured this outcome between diazepam and placebo (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.07). In the subgroup analysis of total anterior circulation syndrome (TACS), a higher percentage of functional independence was found in the chlormethiazole group (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.64). The frequent adverse events related to chlormethiazole were somnolence (RR 4.56, 95% CI 3.50 to 5.95) and rhinitis (RR 4.75, 95% CI 2.67 to 8.46).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review does not provide the evidence to support the use of GABA receptor agonists (chlormethiazole or diazepam) for the treatment of patients with acute ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Chlormethiazole appeared to be beneficial in improving functional independence in patients with TACS according to the subgroup analysis, but this result must be interpreted with great caution. More well-designed RCTs with large samples of TACS would be required for further confirmation. However, somnolence and rhinitis are frequent adverse events related to chlormethiazole.

Diazepam to Improve Acute Stroke Outcome: Results of the Early GABA-Ergic Activation Study In Stroke Trial

BACKGROUND

We tested whether diazepam, a GABA-ergic drug that also inhibits brain nitric monoxide formation, improves acute stroke prognosis.

METHODS

880 patients, randomized within 12 h of acute stroke, received diazepam 10 mg or placebo by rectiole, as soon as possible, followed by 10-mg tablets twice daily for 3 days. Primary outcome was independence (Rankin score <3) at 3 months; secondary outcome was complete recovery (Barthel index >or=95 or Rankin score <or=1).

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat analyses on all 849 patients with full follow-up (50.4% on diazepam): odds ratio (OR) 1.14, 95% CI 0.87-1.49 for primary endpoint, and an OR of 1.26 (0.90-1.76) for complete recovery, both favoring diazepam. Adjusted analyses for all stroke patients (843): OR 1.20 (0.87-1.65), and 1.25 (0.89-1.74), respectively, and for all infarct patients (748): OR 1.31 (0.93-1.85), and 1.46 (1.02-2.09; p=0.037), respectively. Analyses restricted to cardioembolic infarct patients (200) showed treatment benefit for the primary outcome: OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.07-4.76, p=0.032, and complete recovery: OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.06-6.59, p=0.037. About one third of ischemic stroke patients had 'any adverse event', without any difference between treatment groups. In 95 intracerebral hemorrhage patients, frequency of pneumonia and death were higher in the diazepam group than in the placebo group: 35 and 10%, 22 and 12%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although point estimates favored diazepam treatment in various analyses, our data did not confirm our primary hypothesis. Diazepam treatment seems beneficial in cardioembolic infarct patients, is safe in acute ischemic stroke, but may better be avoided in intracerebral hemorrhage.

Critical period plasticity in local cortical circuits

Neuronal circuits in the brain are shaped by experience during 'critical periods' in early postnatal life. In the primary visual cortex, this activity-dependent development is triggered by the functional maturation of local inhibitory connections and driven by a specific, late-developing subset of interneurons. Ultimately, the structural consolidation of competing sensory inputs is mediated by a proteolytic reorganization of the extracellular matrix that occurs only during the critical period. The reactivation of this process, and subsequent recovery of function in conditions such as amblyopia, can now be studied with realistic circuit models that might generalize across systems.

Critical Period Mechanisms in Developing Visual Cortex

Binocular vision is shaped by experience during a critical period of early postnatal life. Loss of visual acuity following monocular deprivation is mediated by a shift of spiking output from the primary visual cortex. Both synaptic and network explanations have been offered for this heightened brain plasticity. Direct experimental control over its timing, duration, and closure has now been achieved through a consideration of balanced local circuit excitation-inhibition. Notably, canonical models of homosynaptic plasticity at excitatory synapses alone (LTP/LTD) fail to produce predictable manipulations of the critical period in vivo. Instead, a late functional maturation of intracortical inhibition is the driving force, with one subtype in particular standing out. Parvalbumin-positive large basket cells that innervate target cell bodies with synapses containing the alpha1-subunit of GABA(A) receptors appear to be critical. With age, these cells are preferentially enwrapped in peri-neuronal nets of extracellular matrix molecules, whose disruption by chondroitinase treatment reactivates ocular dominance plasticity in adulthood. In fact, critical period plasticity is best viewed as a continuum of local circuit computations ending in structural consolidation of inputs. Monocular deprivation induces an increase of endogenous proteolytic (tPA-plasmin) activity and consequently motility of spines followed by their pruning, then re-growth. These early morphological events faithfully reflect competition only during the critical period and lie downstream of excitatory-inhibitory balance on a timescale (of days) consistent with the physiological loss of deprived-eye responses in vivo. Ultimately, thalamic afferents retract or expand accordingly to hardwire the rapid functional changes in connectivity. Competition detected by local inhibitory circuits then implemented at an extracellular locus by proteases represents a novel, cellular understanding of the critical period mechanism. It is hoped that this paradigm shift will lead to novel therapies and training strategies for rehabilitation, recovery from injury, and lifelong learning in adulthood.

Molecular mechanisms of cerebral ischemia-induced neuronal death

The mode of neuronal death caused by cerebral ischemia and reperfusion appears on the continuum between the poles of catastrophic necrosis and apoptosis: ischemic neurons exhibit many biochemical hallmarks of apoptosis but remain cytologically necrotic. The position on this continuum may be modulated by the severity of the ischemic insult. The ischemia-induced neuronal death is an active process (energy dependent) and is the result of activation of cascades of detrimental biochemical events that include perturbion of calcium homeostasis leading to increased excitotoxicity, malfunction of endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria, elevation of oxidative stress causing DNA damage, alteration in proapoptotic gene expression, and activation of the effector cysteine proteases (caspases) and endonucleases leading to the final degradation of the genome. In spite of strong evidence showing that brain infarction can be reduced by inhibiting any one of the above biochemical events, such as targeting excitotoxicity, up-regulation of an antiapoptotic gene, or inhibition of a down-stream effector caspase, it is becoming clear that targeting a single gene or factor is not sufficient for stroke therapeutics. An effective neuroprotective therapy is likely to be a cocktail aimed at all of the above detrimental events evoked by cerebral ischemia and the success of such therapeutic intervention relies upon the complete elucidation of pathways and mechanisms of the cerebral ischemia-induced active neuronal death.

Neuroprotective agents for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke

Neuroprotective treatments are therapies designed to interrupt the cellular, biochemical, and metabolic elaboration of injury during or following exposure to ischemia; they encompass a rapidly expanding array of pharmacologic interventions. Various classes of neuroprotective agents have reached phase III efficacy trials in focal ischemic stroke, but none has proven effective, despite successful preceding animal studies. This notwithstanding, recent favorable results of hypothermia in human cardiac arrest trials have validated the general concept of neuroprotection. In addition, the promise of neuroprotective therapy for focal acute ischemic stroke has been renewed by innovations in strategies of preclinical drug development and clinical trial design that rectify past defects, including trial testing of combination therapies rather than single agents and novel approaches to accelerating time to initiation of experimental treatment.

Diazepam does not reduce infarct size in rats subjected to transient occlusion of the middle cerebral artery when normothermia is maintained

Activation of the gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA)-ergic system might protect against the damage that occurs after cerebral ischaemia. We examined this hypothesis by administering diazepam to rats subjected to transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) using the intraluminal thread method. Diffusion MRI (DWI) and perfusion imaging (PI) were acquired during MCAO to assess brain tissue status and haemodynamics, respectively. Rats were intraperitoneally injected with either 10 mg kg(-1) diazepam (n = 5) or vehicle (n = 5) both 30 min and 90 min after the onset of MCAO. To exclude the possibility that neuroprotection was due to the hypothermic action of the drug, body temperature was maintained at 37-38 degrees C for up to 7 h postischaemia with a feed-back controlled thermoregulatory unit. Infarct volumes quantified 2 days after MCAO from T(2)-weighted images were similar in ischaemic control rats and in ischaemic rats treated with diazepam. We conclude that diazepam-induced enhancement of GABA(A) activity does not effectively protect against neuronal damage that occurs after transient MCAO in normothermic rats.

Implementing the EGASIS trial, an international multicenter acute intervention trial in stroke

This paper describes some of the problems that were encountered during implementation of the Early GABA-ergic Activation Study In Stroke (EGASIS), a large international multicenter clinical trial evaluating the neuroprotective effect of diazepam in acute stroke. The focus is on obtaining funding for such a large international nonprofit trial, getting approval from all national and local ethics committees, shipping trial medication, and trial insurance. For each topic the specific problems and ways in which they were solved are described. Several recommendations for facilitating the running of a large international multicenter clinical trial such as EGASIS are made.