Efficacy of further attempts to mobilize CD34+ peripheral stem cells with alternative procedures after primary failure

Finding the needle in the hay stack: hematopoietic stem cells in Fanconi anemia

Fanconi anemia is a rare bone marrow failure and cancer predisposition syndrome. Childhood onset of aplastic anemia is one of the hallmarks of this condition. Supportive therapy in the form of blood products, androgens, and hematopoietic growth factors may boost blood counts temporarily. However, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) currently remains the only curative treatment option for the hematologic manifestations of Fanconi anemia (FA). Here we review current clinical and pre-clinical strategies for treating hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) failure, including the experience with mobilizing and collecting CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells as target cells for somatic gene therapy, the current state of FA gene therapy trials, and future prospects for cell and gene therapy.

The role of diagnosis in patients failing peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization

BACKGROUND

Failure to mobilize PBPCs for auto-logous transplantation has mostly been attributed to previous therapy and poses therapeutic problems.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The role of underlying disease was analyzed in 17 of 73 (23%) patients with PBPC mobilization failure, and secondary mobilization with high-dose filgrastim was attempted.

RESULTS

Of 16 patients with acute leukemia, 13 (81%) mobilized poorly. In contrast, of 57 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and solid tumor, 53 (93%, p < 0.001) showed good PBPC mobilization. Relapsed disease did not predispose to poor mobilization. As secondary mobilization attempt, 7 patients received 25 micro g per kg per day filgrastim without chemotherapy leading to a 3.7 +/- 2.8-fold (SD) increase in the maximum number of circulating CD34+ cells (p = 0.104). PBPC apheresis yielded 3.3 (+/-0.5) x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight in 5 patients. Four poor mobilizers received 50 micro g per kg per day filgrastim as second or third mobilization attempt. Circulating CD34+ cells in these patients increased by 1.5 (+/-0.7) compared with the primary G-CSF application.

CONCLUSION

Selective PBPC mobilization failure was seen in patients with acute leukemia whereas remarkably good mobilization was seen in other malignancies. Increasing the filgrastim dose to 25 micro g per kg per day may allow PBPC collection in patients failing PBPC mobilization.

Analysis of remobilization success in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplants who fail an initial mobilization: risk factors, cytokine use and cost

Inadequate stem cell mobilization is seen in approximately 25% of patients undergoing autotransplantation for hematologic malignancies. Remobilization strategies include chemotherapy/cytokine combinations or high-dose cytokines alone or in combination. From 1/1997 to 7/2002, we remobilized 86 patients who failed an initial mobilization (median total CD34=0.72 x 10(6)/kg) in sequential cohorts using high-dose G-CSF (32 microg/kg/day) or G-CSF(10 microg/kg/day)+GM-CSF (5 microg/kg/day). No difference in CD34/kg yields were seen (G-CSF alone: 2.2 x 10(6) and G-CSF+GM-CSF 1.6 x 10(6)) in the median 3 aphereses performed (P=0.333). Of the 86, 23 (27%) failed the second mobilization; 14 were remobilized again (yield=1.5 x 10(6) CD34/kg; three aphereses). Of the 86, 93% went to transplant: three progressed, and three had inadequate stem cells. Significant risk factors for a failed remobilization were: number of stem-cell-damaging regimens (P=0.015), time between last chemotherapy and first mobilization (P=0.028), and higher WBC at initiation of first mobilization (P=0.04). High-dose G-CSF (32 microg/kg/day) was more costly @ USD $9,016, vs $5,907 for the G-CSF+GM-CSF combination (P<0.001). Most patients failing an initial mobilization benefit from a cytokine only remobilization. Lower cost G-CSF+GM-CSF is as effective as high-dose G-CSF.

Second mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with poor first mobilization

The aim of this study was to analyse the efficacy of 2 second mobilization (MB) protocols in 2 groups of patients who failed to obtain enough peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in the first MB. In 1 group (8 patients), 10 microg/kg of G-CSF was administered, and in the other group (8 patients), a double dosage (10 microg/kg twice a day) was administered. Both groups of patients received Cyclophosphamide (1.5 g/kg) 10 days before the apheresis. No difference was found among both groups of patients in diagnosis, previous chemotherapy, and time elapsed after the first MB. Administration of higher doses of G-CSF decreased the number of apheresis needed in the second MB to complete 2 x 10(6)/kg of CD34+ cells. It also increased the number of patients who achieved sufficient CD34+, namely, 75% versus 50%.

High-dose ara-C with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell support induces a marked progenitor cell mobilization: an indication for patients at risk for low mobilization

A high-dose (HD) chemotherapy scheme was designed for the collection of large numbers of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in lymphoma patients who were candidates for myeloablative therapy with autograft. The scheme included the sequential administration of HD cyclophosphamide (CY) (7 g/m(2)) and HD ara-C (2 g/m(2) twice a day for 6 consecutive days), followed by final consolidation with PBPC autograft. PBPC harvests were scheduled following both HD CY and HD ara-C. To minimize hematologic toxicity, small aliquots of PBPC (<or=3 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg) collected following HD CY were reinfused following HD ara-C. The treatment was delivered to 112 patients (median age: 43 years) with lymphoid malignancies (107 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, four Hodgkin's lymphoma, one amyloidosis); 75 patients were at disease onset, whereas 37 had relapsed or were refractory after first-line conventional therapy. PBPC mobilization was assessed in terms of peak values of circulating CD34(+) cells/microl, as well as total CD34(+) cells/kg collected. In a few patients CFU-GM/kg were also evaluated. At the time of maximal mobilization following HD CY, 93 'high-mobilizer' patients had >20 circulating CD34(+) cells/microl, whereas the remaining 19 'low-mobilizer' patients did not reach this cut-off value. In spite of poor mobilization after HD CY, 16 out of 19 low mobilizers provided good harvests following HD ara-C; overall, median collected CD34(+) cells x 10(6)/kg were 1.4 (0-3.1) and 10.2 (0-37) after HD CY and HD ara-C, respectively (P = 0.00007). Similar patterns were observed when PBPC were evaluated by CFU-GM/kg. Complete and durable hemopoietic reconstitution followed autograft with post HD ara-C PBPC. Within the high-mobilizer group, 88 patients received HD ara-C and 79 (90%) still showed high mobilization; overall, median collected CD34(+)cells x 10(6)/kg were 17.8 (range 3-94) and 19 (range 0-107) after HD CY and HD ara-C respectively (P = NS). Thus, the scheme allowed sufficient PBPC collections for autografting in low mobilizer patients; in addition, the scheme could be considered whenever extensive chemotherapy debulking is needed prior to PBPC collection.